Has Bell Begun to Toll for the GOP?

Pat Buchanan, Tampa Bay Online, May 22, 2012

Among the more controversial chapters in “Suicide of a Superpower,” my book published last fall, was the one titled, “The End of White America.”

It dealt with the demographic decline of the white majority and what it portends for education, the U.S. economy, politics and national unity.

That book and chapter proved the proximate cause of my departure from MSNBC, where the network president declared that subjects such as these are inappropriate for “the national dialogue.”

Apparently, the mainstream media are reassessing that.

For, in rare unanimity, The New York Times, The Washington Post and USA Today all led with the same story one day last week.

“Whites Account for Under Half of Births in U.S.,” blared the Times headline. “Minority Babies Majority in U.S.,” echoed the Post. “Minorities Are Now a Majority of Births,” proclaimed USA Today.

The USA Today story continued, “The nation’s growing diversity has huge implications for education, economics and politics.”

{snip}

Not only are whites declining as a share of the population, they are declining in real terms. Between 2010 and 2011, the number of births to white women fell 10 percent. The median age of white Americans, now 43 and rising, means that half of all white women have moved past the age that they are ever likely to bear more children.

White America is a dying tribe.

What do these statistics mean politically? Almost surely the end of the Republican Party as a national governing institution.

Republicans now depend on the vanishing majority for fully 90 percent of their votes in presidential elections, while the Democratic Party wins 60 to 70 percent of the Asian and Hispanic vote and 90 to 95 percent of the black vote.

{snip}

When Texas—where whites are a minority and a declining share of the population—tips, how does the GOP put together an electoral majority?

{snip}

Fifty-three percent of all Hispanic children are born out of wedlock, with no father in the home and many of the moms themselves high school dropouts. Most Hispanic kids thus start school far behind.

In tests of fourth-, eighth- and 12th-graders, their scores are closer to those of African-American kids than whites and Asians. Their dropout rate matches that of black kids. Absent affirmative action, not only America’s colleges but her professions are going to look far more Asian and white than the national population.

{snip}

Not only do we seem not to know how to close it [the racial gap in test scores] after four decades of plunging trillions into public schools, the country is tapped out. And why should Hispanics vote Republican?

The majority of Hispanics are among that half of the population that pays no income tax. Why should they vote for a party whose major plank is that it will cut income taxes?

Hispanics benefit disproportionately from government programs.

Government puts their kids in Head Start before public school and provides them with Pell grants and student loans after public school.

From kindergarten through 12th grade, government educates their kids for free. Government provides them with free or subsidized health care through Medicaid and clinics. Government provides their families with public housing and rent supplements. Government provides the food stamps that feed the family. Government provides them with an annual earned-income tax credit, a check just for working.

Government provides all these things, and what are Republicans going to do? They promise to cut government.

{snip}

Establishment Republicans say the party should support amnesty for illegal aliens. Yet this would make millions more eligible for federal programs in a country sinking in debt and mean millions more Hispanics going to the polls, and millions more coming to America in anticipation of the next amnesty.

How would that help the GOP?

By endlessly expanding Great Society programs, by lopping taxpayers off tax rolls, by supporting open borders and endless immigration from the Third World, the Republican Party, out of sheer nobility of character, has probably ensured its impending departure from history.

Topics: ,

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

    Yes, the demographic tidal wave will eventually result in the end of the Republican Party.  However, it won’t happen as soon as PJB would seem to suggest, because there will be a period of time between now and then when American politics become Mississippiized.

    • Pandemonium

      Ok, what does “Mississippiized” mean?

      • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

         Whites voting for one party, non-whites for the other.  Elections being racial headcounts in essence.

  • Whiteman

    “not only America’s colleges but her professions are going to look far more Asian and white than the national population”.
    This ‘disparate impact’ will always be true. There will never be enough ‘teachers of color’ to properly teach students of color in the US as we are told is necessary (but only for students of color – for white students it works the opposite way. They must be exposed to diversity). Whites on average are an older population than people of color in the US.  Older people, on average earn more money than do younger people. At least that’s how it works in other countries around the world. 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RXNNXOJ4TFQHXNF2DEW6GGWTLE Cyb

    most hispanics ARE in marriages, they just arent DUMB enough to declare them to the federal government. The husbands mow lawns, do construction, get paid CASH or go to check cashing places using matricula consular cards on assumed identities…. poof no federal taxes PLUS uncle sam kicks in free housing, free food, and free medical. Not a bad deal for the uneducated huh? see “the white mans burden” on the giavellireport for more info on this and other hispanic scams

    • The__Bobster

      most hispanics ARE in marriages
      ________

      Which is why their illegitimacy rate is 53%?

      http://www.vdare.com/posts/illegitimacy-rate-fell-in-2010

      The federal government’s National Vital Statistics Report on Births: Preliminary Data for 2010 shows the first decline in the percentage of children born illegitimately in many years. In 2010, 40.8 % of all births in America were to unmarried mothers, down marginally from 41.0% in 2009. 

      This is in part due to the sharp fall in total births to Hispanics. The Latino illegitimacy rate still grew from 53.2% to 53.3%, but the Hispanic share of total births declined from 24.2% to 23.6%. The non-Hispanic white illegitimacy rate was stable at 29.0%, while the black rate fell from 72.8% to 72.5% and the Asian rate from 17.2% to 17.0%.

      • Xanthippe2

        She is right.  They have weddings, stay together, have children together — everything – but they do not declare this to the government for financial reasons.  Sure they break up and have affairs too, but no more than those who don’t  game the system and are officially married.   Those who don’t often just can’t believe it is this easy and are afraid they will get deported or have their kids taken away.   I have heard this from several Mexican females.

  • libertarian1234

    Pat knows,  and could have added,  that this present, continuing trend involves more and  more numbers of blacks who are turning to crime.  It’s going to involve more and more black on white attacks.  It’s going to involve a far greater increase in gang membership as well.  And, to a lesser extent, all this is true of Hispanics also, with the possible exception of black on white attacks.

    In other words this society is set to explode into a tumultuous country with out of control crimes that will have police forces that likely will rival the military for budget expenditures, right along with court costs, incarceration costs and probationary expenses.  But, worst of all,  it will mean that the streets in every urban area will be worse than what Chicago, St. Louis and New Orleans are right now in their worse sectors. 

    And this situation will probably be an even greater problem than Pat’s examples of  not enough qualified people to fill slots requiring an education.

    And, regarding that scenario, there will be a tremendous number of non-whites, mostly blacks, who will be pushed into occupations they aren’t qualified for, and in the case of pharmacists and the medical field it will surely result in numerous avoidable deaths.

    There is no question the American empire is degenerating to third world levels without question and if secession, civil war or out-of-control civil strife don’t occur, then we will eventually be a kind of Brazil society times ten, with cardboard shacks in a cities where the rabble rule the streets at night and others are forced to stay home until daylight, driving to work in their bullet proof cars, with anti-carjacking devices.

    This too will be the eventual result of the “strength of diversity” the do-gooders and multicults have plagued us with.

    • JohnEngelman

      Pat knows,  and could have added,  that this present, continuing trend involves more and  more numbers of blacks who are turning to crime.  It’s going to involve more and more black on white attacks.                                                  
      - libertarian1234                 
                          
                                           
      From 1981 to 2010 the rate of violent crime per 100,000 in the United States declined from 758.1 to 403.6.
      http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm 

      • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

         Like a snake in the grass, I’ve been waiting for you to say something like this.  Because I thought about you when I read this article about a black NYPD cop going full “Muh Organ” mode:

        http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/the_troop_cop_5fbOC70hE3glgdEfjdma2N

        Pay attention to these paragraphs:

        Sgt. Lesly Charles even indicated that some criminal activity is
        apparently OK on his beat — as long as he’s paid proper respect.  “You
        guys are hustling or whatever, I ain’t got no problem with that. Listen
        . . . do your thing,” Charles barked during the April 28 diatribe,
        which is now being investigated by the city’s Civilian Complaint Review
        Board. “But when I come around and I speak, you f–king listen. Tell
        your boys.”

        And you wonder why some of us take “official” crime stats with a grain of sodium chloride.

        • JohnEngelman

          I love facts that can be documented by credible organizations. In the case of crime the FBI is about the best authority one can hope for. Those who reject facts that violate what they want to believe are impossible to reason with. 

          • bluegrass91

            “Credible” organizations my ass.  Its soft tyranny and low level war, plain and simple.

            http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/Texas10MostWanted/fugitives.aspx

            Would you consider many of these men White?  Do you think this is the Federal government trying to give Hispanics a feeling of inclusion in this awful white dominated society? 

            No, they’re trying to the truth. Hiding Hispanic crime under Whites is just one tactic of many. 

            The U.S. government is the enemy.  The quicker we all accept this, the quicker we can all move on to the inevitable necessities.

          • JohnEngelman

            Those of your persuasion claim that criticism of the United States from the left is tantamount to treason, and that those who issue that criticism hate America. Then you turn around and express your hatred for the Government.  
             
            The government of the United States is the representative of the people of the government, elected by the American People.  
             
            When the government does things you dislike that is because most Americans disagree with you. One cannot hate the government of the United States without hating the people of the United States. 

          • libertarian1234

            JE…”You did not post a link to the Wikipedia article you mentioned…”
             
            How disingenuous, John.  You know perfectly well my excerpt came from Wikipedia.  My, my, my, I do believe you’re taking any kind of opposing view of your incorrect data as a personal attack on yourself.  But here’s the link and the excerpt….AGAIN!
             
            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime_in_the_United_States
             
            There are fundamental limitations of the UCR system, including:[10]
            Inaccuracy: UCR statistics do not represent the actual amount of criminal activity occurring in the United States. As it relies upon local law enforcement agency crime reports, the UCR program can only measure crime known to police and cannot provide an accurate representation of actual crime rates.[11]
            Misrepresentation: The UCR program is focused upon street crime, and does not record information on many other types of crime, such as organized crime, corporate crime or federal crime. Further, law enforcement agencies can provide inadvertently misleading data as a result of local policing practices. These factors can lead to misrepresentations regarding the nature and extent of criminal activity in the United States.[12]
            Manipulation: UCR data is capable of being manipulated by local law enforcement agencies. Information is supplied voluntarily to the UCR program, and manipulation of data can occur at the local level.[13]

            Is that clear enough for you????????

            Too, I asked you to refute my original contention….above…in three different posts that black crime is trending to get worse.  You FAILED to do that time after time.

          • JohnEngelman

            libertarian1234,    
                       
            The article you presented does not indicate that
            the gathering of crime statistics is less accurate now than it used to be. The article does not indicate that black on white crime is increasing. 

            I looked on the internet for evidence that black
            on white crime is increasing. I could not find any. You have not provided any. When I make a factual assertion I document it. When you make a factual assertion it is your responsibility to document it. 

            I have documented a significant decline in
            violent crime since 1992. 

            Here is another website with data presented by
            the Bureau of Justice Statistics, of the United States Department of Justice. The source is the FBI, Supplementary Homicide Reports, 1976-2005.

            http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/homicide/race.cfm  

            Charts in this website demonstrate both a significant decline in black murder rates, and a decline in
            white victimization. Consequently, it is reasonable to assume that black on white crime is declining.

          • libertarian1234

            ” The article you presented does not indicate thatthe gathering of crime statistics is less accurate now than it used to be.”

            That’s not why it was referenced.  It was referenced in response to your  request to offer data in opposition to your inaccurate figures.

            And it did just that.  You did not refute Wikipedia’s data stating your UCR stats were inaccurate,  misrepresentative and manipulative.

            http://tinyurl.com/3xgd8d2
             
             

          • JohnEngelman

            Until you are able to post a source of reliable data that substantiates your initial point that black crime is increasing, there is no point in continuing this discussion. 

          • libertarian1234

            John Engleman wrote:

            “Until you are able to post a source of reliable data that substantiates your initial point that black crime is increasing, there is no point in continuing this discussion.”

            So now, for the VERY FIRST TIME,  you are addressing my original point after all your obfuscations and off-point insistence on regarding overall crime figures from two years ago as a legitimate response. 

            Why didn’t you do that to begin with instead of wondering off on an irrelevant issue and concentrating on trying to support their accuracy to the point of fixation?

            And when information was provided via Wikipedia casting a shadow over the accuracy of those figures, you change your mantra in the form of an insistence that I provide irrefutable proof of my contention that black crime is worsening and will get far worse.

            Do you expect to change horses in midstream thinking that no one will notice?

            Well, in answer finally to your insistence for proof of increasing black crime, there is no data out there to support that, escept for the educated opinions of  informed pundits who draw the same logical conclusions that Buchanan does….and I agree with….that things are going to get a whole lot worse.

            And anybody who pays attention to economic conditions and societal degeneration can well determine that we are heading for BIG trouble.  They don’t need a UCR figure to know that.  It’s obviously apparent.

      • libertarian1234

        “From 1981 to 2010 the rate of violent crime per 100,000 in the United States declined from 758.1 to 403.6″

        These figures don’t reflect black on white crime, which anybody with a computer for the last several years knows has increased by quite a lot, nor do they reflect just Black Crime.  Knowing how the police play down black on white crimes,  I think it’s safe to say much of that has probably been suppressed,  and probably total black crime as well..

        I do know that some of the stats I used to  refer to on the US Dept of Justice’s web site have been replaced with ones that were not those I recorded just 4 or 5 years ago. 

        While the overall crime rate might have went down, that doesn’t mean black crime has been lower also, nor does it mean, as QD pointed out, that the police are reporting everything.  There’s just too many instances of crime committed by blacks that inundate the news that all point to increases.

        And there are far too many indicators that crime has increased substantially after this country had it’s sub-prime collapse in 2008.

        But, in any event, don’t take my word for it.  Just wait and see if the present increase in black crimes continues,  just as I described.

        • JohnEngelman

          Can you document your assertions? I can and do. The internet has made many of us more aware of black on white crime, but that does not mean that it is more common than it was a generation ago. Now a black on white crime anywhere in the United States can go viral on the internet. A generation ago it was difficult to learn about it. 
           
          My statistics on changes in the crime rate are compiled from FBI, Uniform Crime Reports. I do trust them.
          http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm    

          • libertarian1234

            “Can you document your assertions? I can and do. ”
             
            Yes, but you obviously don’t understand what was written, because you haven’t addressed the issue I raised which was that  ” this present, continuing trend involves more and more numbers of blacks who are turning to crime. It’s going to involve more and more black on white attacks. It’s going to involve a far greater increase in gang membership as well.”
             
            Your answer to that was that overall crime was down until 2010, which has nothing to do beyond that time nor does it have any bearing on my projection that I thought black crime was increasing and would get worse from here on out.
             
            If you have information that refutes my claim that black crime will  get worse during this demographic shift taking place let’s see it,  but spare us any tables you have that have nothing to do with that or specifically black crime and it’s promise of a lot more to come, because it’s an entirely different issue that has nothing to do with the subject that was raised, nor has it anything to do with Pat Buchanan’s  above column or the issues he raised. 
             
            I’m waiting………
             
             
             
             

          • libertarian1234

            “My statistics on changes in the crime rate are compiled from FBI, Uniform Crime Reports. I do trust them”

            Sorry, John, but the only government figures I trust are those the politically correct types don’t want to post, like black on white crime.

            Apparently Wikipedia agrees with me:

            There are fundamental limitations of the UCR system, including:[10]

            Inaccuracy: UCR statistics do not represent the actual amount of criminal activity occurring in the United States. As it relies upon local law enforcement agency crime reports, the UCR program can only measure crime known to police and cannot provide an accurate representation of actual crime rates.[11]
            Misrepresentation: The UCR program is focused upon street crime, and does not record information on many other types of crime, such as organized crime, corporate crime or federal crime. Further, law enforcement agencies can provide inadvertently misleading data as a result of local policing practices. These factors can lead to misrepresentations regarding the nature and extent of criminal activity in the United States.[12]
            Manipulation: UCR data is capable of being manipulated by local law enforcement agencies. Information is supplied voluntarily to the UCR program, and manipulation of data can occur at the local level.[13]

            Here’swhat City Journal has to say on the subject:

            http://tinyurl.com/3234pe

            Violent crime is down in New York and many other cities, but there are two big reasons to keep the champagne corked. One is that murder, rape, robbery, and assault remain at historic highs: the streets of Manhattan, like those of Houston, Philadelphia, Detroit, Chicago, and Los Angeles, remain much less safe today than in the 1950s and 1960s. Worse, though policing and prison policies matter, nothing affects crime rates more than the number of young males in the population—and by the year 2010, there will be about 4.5 million more males age 17 or under than there were in 1990: 8 percent more whites and 26 percent more blacks.

            not only is the number of young black criminals likely to surge, but also the black crime rate, both black-on-black and black-on-white, is increasing, so that as many as half of these juvenile super-predators could be young black males.

          • JohnEngelman

            You have not proven your assertions. I have. I am waiting for you to accept statistics compiled by the FBI. 

          • JohnEngelman

            Here’swhat City Journal has to say on the subject:
            http://tinyurl.com/3234pe
             - libertarian1234 
                  
            That City Journal article is dated 1996. According to New York Law Enforcement Agency Uniform Crime Reports the rate of violent crime in New York peeked in 1991 at 1,163.9 per 100,000 inhabitants. By 2010 that had declined to 392.1
            http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/nycrime.htm 
            According to FBI reports, the United States has experienced a similar decline during those years. In other words, black on white crime is declining. The only reason it may seem different is because the internet makes it easier to learn about crimes in other cities. 

          • libertarian1234

            What about the issues I raised above, John, regarding my original post?

            They do not show black crime as a separate issue.  You ignored that.

            And Wikipedia? 

            What about the other points?

            What about the fact your figures are not up-to-date, omitting 2011 and the first few months of this year, periods that are showing a trend toward greater numbers of crime?

            You haven’t refuted a single word I wrote and have, instead, kept up a claim about overall crime that includes neither black crime as a separate issue or the Wikipedia data, which, in essence, claims the UCI is inaccurate part of which is due to under-reporting.

            You’re ignoring everything but the issue you raised,  regarding overall statistics,  which prove nothing about what I wrote,  even if they happen to be accurate, which they’re probably not,  because they’re not reporting all crimes.

            Is it your contention that black crime is not going to get worse as demographs continue to change?

          • JohnEngelman

            Libertarian1234,
                     
            You did not post a link to the Wikipedia article you mentioned, so I assume you mean this article:
            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime_in_the_United_States  
                     
            Nowhere does it claim that black on white crime is increasing. I did read this:
                    
            “African Americans are given longer federal sentences than Whites who are sentenced for the same or equivalent crimes, even when factoring criminal records. African American jail sentences tend to be roughly 60% longer than white jail sentences for the same crimes, regardless of the length of or existence of any criminal history.” 
             
            I have looked on the internet for any reliable statistics that black on white crime is increasing. I have not found any. If you have, please post them. 
             
            I am not denying that blacks have a higher crime rate than whites. Nor am I denying that black criminals are more likely to choose white victims than are white criminals to choose black victims.
             
            My point, which I have thoroughly documented, is that violent crime has declined dramatically since 1992. Consequently, it is reasonable to conclude that black on white crime has also declined. 

        • Bon, From the Land of Babble

          I used to  refer to on the US Dept of Justice’s web site have been replaced with ones that were not those I recorded just 4 or 5 years ago.
          It seems the DOJ has been disappearing its own crime stats. For instance, this document about black-on-White rapes  (in “Image”)  has been since taken down.  This was saved as a screen shot by Incogman.

          This chart reveals that White rape of black women is statistically non-existent, while White women suffered 37,460 rapes at the hands of black men for this particular year. There is no reason not to believe the same kind of numbers occur every year

          Remember, this was TAKEN DOWN!!  Obviously the DOJ, run by the specious, White-hating, lying Eric the Holder is trying to hide black-on-White crime stats.

          Bon

          November’s election is NOT about electing Romney, it is about stopping 0bama and Eric the Holder.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_W25W7Z72IPG34VCBTTORC7GE3U Steven

        YOu must have missed the news from the other day showing Atlanta hiding crime stats, and proven wrong by the increases in insurance payments for victims of crime. When 100 blacks attack 2 reporters not even the newspaper they missed a week of work for covered it, and called it simple assault.

        • Bon, From the Land of Babble

          Also, many crimes have been downgraded by local police or the cops won’t even respond if you call — helping add to the “crime is decreasing” meme.

          With many city budgets strained beyond belief, police forces are being cut back.  Imagine calling the cops, they don’t respond and having to file your own crime report

          From USA Today:

          Budget cuts are forcing police around the country to stop responding to fraud, burglary and theft calls as officers focus limited resources on violent crime.

          Cutbacks in such places as Oakland, Tulsa and Norton, Mass. have forced police to tell residents to file their own reports — online or in writing — for break-ins and other lesser crimes.
          So break-ins are now considered “lesser” crimes!!  And California is NOT a CCW state, citizens here are unarmed — and woe be to anyone who tries any of that “stand your ground” stuff here!!!
          USA Today:

          ‘If you come home to find your house burglarized and you call, we’re not coming,” said Oakland Police spokeswoman Holly Joshi. The city laid off 80 officers from its force of 687 last month and the department can’t respond to burglary, vandalism, and identity theft. “It’s amazing. It’s a big change for us.’

           
          In Tulsa, which lost 110 officers to layoffs and retirements, the 739-officer department isn’t sending cops to the scene of larceny, fraud and car theft.In the Boston suburb of Norton, police told residents there may be delays or no response at all to some calls, including vandalism.Don’t think the criminals don’t know this…Bon
           

    • mikejones91

      Heres something I tell people (skeptics) to do. A little self experiment. You go on Wikipedia and choose a city with 100,00 to 1 million residents. If there is a separate tab for crime on the page, it will say one of two things. The city is very dangerous/or its a great place to live “ranked 10 on Forbes best place to raise kids” ect. If the city has a black majority, there will ALWAYS be a crime tab. If it is a white majority city, there will be a crime tab that goes into detail about the safety of the city, accolades and such. To be fair there are many Hispanic majority cities that are very nice and safe. Saying a city/town is a nice place to raise kids is the “politically correct” way of telling them there is VERY FEW/NO BLACKS.

      • mikejones91

        EDIT** There will either be a crime tab saying that it is VERY safe, or no crime AT ALL.

  • Jupiter7

    Pat Buchanan supports the immigration moratorium. The immigration moratorium calls for increasing legal nonwhite immigration-asian variety-in the event of a severe labor scarcity. Why would anyone who  is seriously pro-white want to do that? The immigration moratorium concedes the labor scarcity issue to the race-replacement enthusiasts. This is a death sentence for Native Born White Americans. Nonwhite immigration must be shut down permanently. The immigration moratorium is policy wonk-playing footsie with the enemy.

  • Occidentus

    Kind of a moot point, because that same demographic tidal wave will tear the USA apart.

    • Church_of_Jed

      “America torn apart by the demographics of the Diversity Curse isn’t the problem. It’s a hopeful first step to the solution to the problem. Presently, we are yoked together with Diversity against our White will. The time has come to break it up and let the pieces fall where gravity and gravity’s God intend.”
       
      -Rev. Jed DeValleyism, “The South should have stayed in the Union and shipped its Diversity north,” 2008

  • TomIron361

    Political parties hold nothing for us. Things have gone way too far for us to put any faith in them. Our future is on the battlefield, fighting against this tyranny of this govt. and their black and hispanic minions. Don’t worry about talking heads. That’s a thing of the past. 

  • Church_of_Jed

    I give up on the GOP, because they aren’t organizing the boycott of Corolla cars.

    TV commercial just now: White dude and his dignified black friend are eating at Chewy’s. Whitey is digging into big, sloppy sandwich. Safe black friend is watching him with great concern, and then sees Chewy’s worker take down A health rating from window and replace it with C rating. The magic n’gro slaps the sandwich out of Whitey’s hands (violent gesture) and saves his life (redemptive salvation). Then they drive off in a Carolla.

    Through the violence of Diversity, we are redeemed for our past segregationist tendencies.

    Have you noticed how many Whites now are walking around with black friends and eating with them in restaurants? These Whites always have some smug “I’m not a raciss” smile on their faces, as though through Diversity, they are given anti racist credits that make them superior to the rest of us.

    Once they learn up close about the Diversity Curse, they’ll keep their black friends, maybe even add more, because they will believe that being offended by hideous Diversity proves that they “still have more work to do” to hold their residual racist in check, so they will torture themselves with more Diversity to reach racial reconciliation and redemptive healing.

    “If your daughter brings home black friends from school, you are a failed and disgraced parent. If you won’t protect your daughter from Diversity, do you really love her? Does she love you? She’s about to give you mongrel grandbabies, so you figure it out.”

    -Rev. Jed DeValleyism, “Racism is our sacrament of White survival,” 2010

  • sgmpalm

    Incredible. Pre-1965 US 90% White. Now Whites number 66% with White newborns less than half of all births. California has 11% US population yet accounts for 1/3 of US welfare recipients. As of 2010 illegals comprise 11% California’s population. It’s a sure bet most of the welfare payments are going to immigrants and illegals. California is a sign of things to come for the entire US.
    40% of entire US Black populations receives some form of welfare (EBT cards, Section 8). With government assistance like that, it’s easy to understand why there are thousands of feril Blacks in all major cities, and why Hispanics continue with their high birth rate. Insane.
    These stats were obtained from Wikipedia.

    • mikejones91

      Not disputing these statistics but do you have a link you could post? It’s always better to just post a link for reference. Mostly, for outsiders who lurk on the site to try and debate us. You can’t fight fact, though many try. It’s not racism, it’s realism!

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OMEPKSZDT3A6YZSHL5EHU5TDKM Chris

      To that I would add that America for the first time has more people on public assistance than it has taxpayers to support them. Now I will quote Thomas Jefferson, whose uncanny foresight this nation needs a solid dose of:
       
      “The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.”
       
      I recently got a bumper sticker of this awesome quote from Cafepress.

      What were the search terms you used to get that information?

    • Fredrik_H

      Yes, it’s incredible how fast that has happened, yet a lot of people still can’t or won’t take in the real possibility that we can become a detested and bullied minority in many of our own lands.

      It’s going to get much, much worse before it gets better.

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

     My point being, assuming there’s no drastic change in course, (even though that could happen), the demographic wave will overtake us, but it won’t overtake us tomorrow.  Older people are the voters (ask Ron Paul about that), and there will be some time between our people becoming a literal minority in our own country and whites losing their majority status of voters.

    We just might have enough time to turn things around, if we can get our own act together.

    • Kurt Plummer

      Youth burns with stupidity looking for a cause without knowing what they want to fight for.

      The elderly vote conservatively to hold onto what they already have.

      The key to disenfranchising America was making the children of today have no reason to believe that they gain from commiting to a future where ‘their country’ is, in fact, no longer theirs.

      As such, you can look at the white demographic split as a majority elderly Republican base and a majority youth Democraftic one (if they vote at all).  And all this because, in our rush to be ‘fair’ to the other racial groups, we forgot that makework positions and freebies are a kind of cultural insurance program by which you buy-in the young as participants in the system.

      There is no future for whites in a non-white America because by the time white youth realizes that things are getting worse for -all- of us, it will be too late for the ostrich to pull their heads out of the sand.

      OTOH, if you create breakaway states (as what the globalists want to fragment America, if not disenfranchise it, completely) then you can give them the kind of identity base which allows them to look forward to specific rewards _for being white_.  Something they have been told before is not a good thing.

      As opposed to being asleep/ineffectual which is what they have been taught to go along to get along with.

      We must break our nation’s hold over the perception of whites as an unnecessary fragment of a growing brown existence.  ONLY by showing whites as a separate and successful population group can we still back our children’s minds as dreams.

  • mikejones91

    haha. L.A is bad, obviously but there are smaller cities with Hispanic majorities that are quite nice. Maybe using “maybe” was a bit of an exaggeration. The point is any city with a black majority, is hell on earth. However, there are cities with a Hispanic majority that are nice places to live, if your Hispanic. Detroit is hell for anyone, including the blacks who run it (ran it down). 

    • Ottawa4000

      Actually, the crime rate in L.A. is actually shockingly low for a city its size.

      But what you also need to know is that L.A. also lost a great deal of its black population to San Bernardino, Moreno Valley, Victorville and lots went out of state to Houston, Atlanta, Vegas and Phoenix. 

      • mikejones91

        Oh ok, interesting. I assume those other cities you listed have seen a spike in crime, naturally. 

  • mikejones91

    I’m sure both are perceptions are molded geographically. I read through some of your other comments and you have called out others ignorance/possible compassion (?) on others on here regarding the Hispanic population. Which I definitely understand. I live in the east. Southeast Pennsylvania/Philadelphia Area so there really isn’t too many Hispanics out here. You on the other hand (apologies if I am wrong) probably live out West. California/American Southwest/Colorado possibly. If that is true, you have definitely had more “encounters” with Hispanics than I. In the east, blacks are the biggest minority (as a whole). 

  • Anan7

    Repatriation of the “African” Americans should also be a top priority.

    However, you should really read “The Income Tax: Root of all Evil” by Frank Chodorov.  It will answer your questions.

    Income taxation is one of the most destructive things a government can do to the people under its rule.

    • ed91

       our government isn’t going to repatriate anyone.  They are falling over themselves getting more people here……  legal, illegal, they don’t care, they want more and more and more….. until you can’t sit down. 
      I don’t know why…….  maybe they think more gov jobs, more tax income……….  I just do not know……..

      • Pandemonium

        Labor.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3527B2BHQ3YXOKPLNC2P2ARS7Q ben k

    I lean towards the belief that in the near future, the White liberal will only be seen as a plastic figure in museums.

    It will be interesting to see where blacks will end up in that paradigm.   It seems to me that blacks believe they are loved all across the world despite the obvious fact that the entire world, with the exception of white countries,  has closed their borders to them.  As hispanics become the majority;   America will obviously resemble Mexico more & more,  Hispanics may use blacks as useful idiots for political gain, however Hispanics will undoubtedly start to show an absence of tolerance towards blacks once they have a foothold.    I do see blacks trying to ally themselves with whites when hispanics become the majority.  

    The real question is,  will things get realllllllllly ugly before all of that even happens?  I’ll leave my opinion to myself on that note.

  • Johnny Reb

    With all due respect to Mr Buchanan . . . he’s wrong.

    History isn’t shaped by “parties.”  The man comes first and then comes the party by which he controls.  What’s killing the Republicans isn’t a lack of whites . . . it’s a lack of leadership.  Every candidate they run is a soft, milky version of what a strong, no-nonsense leader should be.  Romney . . . McCain . . . Bush1 . . . Bush2 . . . Bob Dole . . . I mean seriously . . . Bob Dole?

    All nice guys but not true leaders.  Even Reagan was a little questionable.  Before him was Nixon, Goldwater, Eisenhower . . . again Eisenhower was a diplomat and a tolerably good manager . . . not a leader.

    The Republicans formed out of the Whigs in the mid-1800s.  Consider some of the great Whig leaders:  Daniel Webster . . . Henry Clay . . . Winfield Scott . . . Zachary Taylor . . . and hate him or love him . . . Abe Lincoln.  These guys were giants.

    The Whigs of the mid 1800s came from the Whigs of the Revolution . . . who also called themselves PATRIOTS:  Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine and John Adams.   Also giants.

    So what we have today are pygmies standing on the shoulders of giants. 

    You find a strong, tough leader, with a clear vision for a powerful America (which means he’s automatically a white guy with strong pro-white views) and he can lead the New Republican Party to new heights of power.

    But . . . I don’t believe the system today is designed to allow a strong, powerful leader to succeed.  We’re getting what we’re getting (weak, pusillanimous, politically correct and wishy-washy) because that’s how the true “masters” want it.

    • NYB

       Nobility of character is lacking in the electorate. 

      Men who have broke the current mold have failed to get popular support.     If Ron Paul had swept the nominations, it would have sent a message that the time had come for bold changes to leadership.

      Human behavior being what it is, the majority will wait until the eleventh hour before they accept the need for a Churchill at the helm.

    • Hispanic

      Very good post. I liked the part when you mentioned the whig party. The whig party are the republicans of old and today. You’ve probably heard all the liberal lies about how the parties switched sides. Well, like you said, the republican party needs to bring back leadership from the time of the whigs. What we’ve got are a bunch of compromising sack-less wonders. 

      • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

         The parties didn’t switch sides.  In the time period between Woodrow Wilson and Lyndon Johnson, the Democrat Party transitioned between a party focused on white southerners to a party focused on racial minorities and doctrinaire white liberals.  In all that time, the Republican Party barely changed, it is at its top levels the egalitarian-universalist-big business party it was during the days of Abraham Lincoln, the only major change is that it shedded trade protectionism in favor of free trade because the corporate establishment no longer needed protective tariffs.

        Once the Democrats threw out its white Southerners, they went to the Republican Party because they had no other place to go, and because of cynical strategies (“southern strategy”) to attract their votes but not their control.  All that happened is that white Southerners became another combatant in the up-down battle for the Republican Party, the “up” being the corporate establishment, and the “down” was mainly Midwestern and Intermountain Western “isolationists” who didn’t much think about race, and they were later joined by white Southern ex-Democrats.

    • ed91

       once we let women in the system, it morphed into a get along to work better type of attitude.  This drifted up to the top where ‘real’ men were considered too rough and out spoken…….. it was better to have ‘committee chairmen’ in leadership roles………..  over the decades this turned into the list you posted above…..  bush, dole, bush, mcain………………..   poor leaders — mccain sticks out a bit because he is so obnoxious………  his war record managed him to survive that aspect of a despicable personality—this trend started in the 1920′s after women got the right to vote……….  but it took decades to deteriorate into doles and mccains.  
       the blacks as a voting bloc was a side issue but added to the PC culture of ‘committee’ thinking.

  • JohnEngelman

    The employer investor class, which funds the Republican Party, and which is currently thriving as the standard of living for most Americans declines, favors a high rate of immigration because it creates downward pressure on wages. 

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Aunti-Occupy/100003232140389 Aunti Occupy

      The downward pressure comes from the increased burden of tax increases.  Blacks do not even have to pay taxes on cell phones because they get them free.

      • JohnEngelman

        Who gives blacks free phones? 

        • MrGJG

           The tax payer does, whether it be directly or indirectly, does it really matter?

        • Bon, From the Land of Babble

          Free cell phones and minutes AND deeply discounted Internet service:

          Cell phones:

          Right now, there are companies that are running advertisements specifically targeted at low income Americans informing them of the fact that all they have to do is sign up and they can get a free cell phone and hundreds of free cell phone minutes every single month and it will all be paid for by the federal government.

          http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/cellphone.asp

          http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/outrageous-the-federal-government-is-giving-out-free-cell-phones-and-free-cell-phone-minutes-to-welfare-recipients

          Internet: 

          When Comcast acquired NBC Universal earlier this year, an FCC-mandated requirement was that the cable giant offer cheap Internet access to low-income households. Comcast is making good on the mandate through a new program called Internet Essentials.

          Families who qualify will be able to sign up for 1.5-Mbps Internet access – the same download speed as AT&T’s basic DSL service – for just $9.95 a month. 

          Customers may also be eligible for a computer that costs just $150 and free Internet training.

          http://blog.chron.com/techblog/2011/08/comcast-offering-10-internet-for-low-income-families-who-qualify/

          http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/outrageous-the-federal-government-is-giving-out-free-cell-phones-and-free-cell-phone-minutes-to-welfare-recipients

          And Gasoline:

          A new bill has been introduced in Congress that would give “eligible” households money to help pay for gasoline….

          H.R.4010 – Low-Income Gasoline Assistance Program Act

          Low-Income Gasoline Assistance Program Act – Directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to make grants to states to establish emergency assistance programs to pay eligible households for the purchase of gasoline.

          To provide emergency assistance for families receiving assistance under part A of title IV of the Social Security Act and low-income working families.

          http://www.opencongress.org/bill/109-h4010/show

          Bon

          • JohnEngelman

            Government subsidized cell phones are not the reason pay checks for white blue collar workers buy less than they did when Bill Clinton was president. 

             

          • crazy_j

            JohnEngelman:

            No, but it’s one of the million tiny papercuts that is causing us to bleed out. Even if the whole program is slotted for ten or twenty million over five years.

            If it were eliminated, would you see the increase on a pay check? Doubtful. If that, and housing and gasoline subsidies were eliminated, would you see that on your check? Maybe, barely. If cellphones, gasoline & housing subsidies, free medical care, food assistance to generaltional deadbeats, and all the other perks minorities and illegals get were eliminated, would you see that? Damn straight you would.

    • Sherman_McCoy

      Perhaps that is true at the highest levels, but it is becoming less true all the time for most employer/investors.  Sadly (for all of us) they don’t see that they have facilitated the dispossession of their own children.

  • xxxtonygunsxxx

     why are all these white billionaires against their race? makes me sick.

    cofounder of facebook obama supporter and  campaigner
    chris Hughes was the coordinator of online organizing for Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign on My.BarackObama.com, the campaign’s online social networking website.[5] He was the subject of an April 2009 cover story in Fast Company
    magazine under the headline, “The Kid Who Made Obama President; How
    Facebook Cofounder Chris Hughes Unleashed Barack’s Base – and Changed
    Politics and Marketing Forever.”

    In March 2009, Hughes was named Entrepreneur in Residence at General Catalyst Partners, a Cambridge, Massachusetts, venture-capital firm.[6]

    He is the Executive Director of Jumo,
    which he founded in 2010. Jumo is a non-profit social network
    organization which “aims to help people find ways to help the world.”[7][8] In July 2010, UNAIDS
    (Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS) appointed him to a
    17-member “High Level Commission” of renowned politicians, business
    leaders, human rights activists, and scientists tasked with spearheading
    a “social and political action campaign over the coming year aimed at
    galvanizing support for effective HIV prevention programmes.”[9]

    He is also an invitee of the Bilderberg Group and attended the Swiss 2011 Bilderberg conference at the Suvretta House in St. Moritz, Switzerland.[10]

    In March 2012, he purchased a majority stake in The New Republic Magazine. He plans to become publisher and the editor in chief of the magazine, while Richard Just will remain as editor.[11]

    Personal life

    Hughes is openly gay[4][12] and in 2009 attended President Barack Obama’s first state dinner with his boyfriend Sean Eldridge, Political Director of Freedom to Marry.[13] Hughes and Eldridge announced their engagement in January 2011 at a reception in support of Freedom to Marry.
    it makes me physically ill…………………………….

    • xxxtonygunsxxx

       so being gay trumps being white…… makes me vomit. this piece of garbage owes an apology to every white non-leftist victim of a negro flashmob in the past three years . supports a “black” just to assuage his self-hatred and shame over being homosexual. sickening.these people make me physically sick.

    • robinbishop34

      why are all these white billionaires against their race?

      They’re affluent enough to afford a ‘progressive’ conscience.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OMEPKSZDT3A6YZSHL5EHU5TDKM Chris

    Very impressive wisdom from Buchanan. I’ve got two of his books coming in the mail. If anyone is interested, you can get most of his books on Amazon for only the price of postage. They are basically giving them away free.

    The declining white birth rate is very disturbing, especially that 10% !!! decline in one year. That is such a huge decline that it begs the question of the data’s validity. Still, it is not impossible. I know quite a few white women personally who think the Sex and the City lifestyle is something to aspire to. Being 50 years old, unmarried, no children, no pets, dressing and acting like a 20 year old, all the while pursuing only their own self-fulfillment. Today’s liberated women don’t need relationships, only their own happiness found from within. Meanwhile, we have the black guy in the news who is only 33 and is the father of THIRTY children. He’s only just getting started.

    Personally, as a white man, I think American white women are absolutely disgusting. They are rude, selfish, uncompromising, stand-offish, and walk around like they are royalty. Just attempting conversation with the average woman makes you feel like a child molester trying to get into an elementary school. It is true what they say that no feminist society has ever survived. I think the work of Riane Eisler in the Chalice and The Blade and Sacred Pleasure have shown the anthropology of the male-dominated society oriented toward the blade became dominant and survived over female dominated societies.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SGDRDPUZLH2ESKW6LEVJY7UXZQ Robert

    If black africans can’t feed Africa … Who thinks black americans will be able to feed America …  It’s NOT going to be unlimited growth,  just a whole lot of mass starvation and death.  Too bad we’ll be extinct and miss the show.

    • The__Bobster

      http://www.myfoxphilly.com/dpp/news/local_news/obama-pledges-%243-billion-to-help-feed-africa

      Obama Pledges $3 Billion To Help Feed Africa
      Updated: Friday, 18 May 2012, 11:09 AM EDT
      Published : Friday, 18 May 2012, 11:06 AM EDT

      President Barack Obama says the U.S. has a “moral obligation” to help lead the fight against hunger and malnutrition, announcing $3 billion in private sector pledges to help feed Africa’s poor.

      Obama was urging the world’s biggest economies to make good on their own financial promises. He outlined the food security initiative in a speech Friday kicking off four days of international summits.

      • Bon, From the Land of Babble

        Obama Pledges $3 Billion To Help Feed Africa

        Should read:

        0bama Pledges $3 Billion of Other People’s Money To Help Feed Africa.

        There, I fixed it.

        Bon

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Aunti-Occupy/100003232140389 Aunti Occupy

    WELL PUT BUT THE WHITE EYE ROLLERS JUST PRETEND AMERICA IS NOT OVER.

    White men cannot get jobs because of Government policy.  What few private sector companies still exist, Government demands Affirmative Action.  Few young entry level white men are getting Government jobs.  Most young white men are unemployed and will become permanently unemployed.  More white women who want to have families are discovering that the only way to do this is to marry a black man.  Only black males have jobs.  

    When will white people wake up.  Hear that before?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Aunti-Occupy/100003232140389 Aunti Occupy

    NONE OF THAT WILL HAPPEN, GET USE TO IT

    What do you plan to do to survive?  The bailed out GM CEO just gave a speech in China where he bragged to the Chinese that 7 of the 10 GM assembly plants are now in China.   Soon the two plants in the US will be moved or shut down.  Everything you ware and have in you home are all made in China by Chinese.  Don’t you realize its over and America is never coming back.  

    • Bon, From the Land of Babble

      AND, the Chinese are beginning to colonize the U.S.:

      A Chinese group known as “Sino-Michigan Properties LLC” has bought up 200 acres of land near the town of Milan, Michigan. Their plan is to construct a “China City” with artificial lakes, a Chinese cultural center and hundreds of housing units for Chinese citizens. Essentially, it would be a little slice of communist China dropped right into the heartland of America.

      This “China City” would be located about 40 minutes from both Detroit and Toledo, and it would be marketed to Chinese business people that want to start businesses in the United States. Unfortunately, this is not just an isolated incident. In fact, Chinese companies have been buying up land and businesses all over the country in recent years. There has even been talk of establishing(“special economic zones”) inside the United States modeled after the Chinese city of Shenzhen. It was inevitable that the Chinese were going to do something with the trillions of dollars that they have made flooding our shores with cheap products. Now they are rapidly buying up pieces of America, and many of our politicians are welcoming them with open arms.

      No Whites allowed.

      http://patriotupdate.com/22820/communist-china-setting-up-city-in-america

      Bon

  • Dave4088

    So Pat says that it’s “undeniably true” that the GOP must win more Hispanic votes to survive.  And this is someone who white people look to for hope?  The last thing we need is a supposed rhetorical firebrand like Buchanan conceding the need to win the hearts and minds of a people whose stated aim is to disenfranchise whites the moment they gain political power over us (See La Raza & Mecha).

    What’s undeniably true is that we can’t suffer fools and poseurs like Pat Buchanan for much longer.   The stupid party is even stupider now than when Sam Francis coined the term.  The GOP has but two options: 1) Advocate for white racial interests and let the chips fall where they may, or 2) Become a carbon copy of the anti-white Democratic party and pander for black and brown votes while actively working against white interests.    

    It appears the grand ole stupid party is leaning towards option two and American whites will be left out in the cold. 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_U66JJRCQNH2BBVU2ZCW7YE7XEI CA-WASP

    From  the article:
    “Government puts their kids in Head Start before public school and
    provides them with Pell grants and student loans after public school.

    From kindergarten through 12th grade, government educates their kids
    for free. Government provides them with free or subsidized health care
    through Medicaid and clinics. Government provides their families with
    public housing and rent supplements. Government provides the food stamps
    that feed the family. Government provides them with an annual
    earned-income tax credit, a check just for working.

    Government provides all these things, and what are Republicans going
    to do? They promise to cut government.”

    (1) I’d guess blacks also disproportionately do NOT have to pay income taxes. (2) I’d further guess that Asians DO disproportionately have to pay income taxes. These lead me to the conclusion that (3) you can substitute “Asian and Caucasian tax payers” for “government” in the quote above….

    Asian & Caucasian workers are subsidizing the black and Latino communities. Or, to look at it another way from a political perspective: through income redistribution, American blacks & Latinos have made American Asians & Caucasians their slaves….

    As I’ve said before, “IQ is waaaaay over rated”….

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    Republicans as a party are doomed. They seem to be under the delusion that if they can just get blacks and Hispanics to finally understand the party platform, they will see the error of their ways and become ‘natural Republican.’ Will. Never. Happen.

    Limited-government, Free-market principles are White conceits, it is pure fantasy to think non-Whites are going to embrace (let alone understand) such things as free speech, private property, self-determination and liberty.  These concepts are meaningless to them; for non-Whites, race trumps all and most have assimilated into Big Brother’s American Welfare State.
    The U.S. will not look like Brazil when Whites are a minority; it will either resemble Yugoslavia after the fall of the Kremlin with endless racial violence as various people groups fight over living space and limited resources…or it will resemble Russia before the fall of the Kremlin, an authoritarian, jack-booted police state lorded over by a small hostile elite.
    Either scenario will mean more violence directed at Whites by hostile non-Whites, sanctioned by the government.
    Bon

    • holyflower

      Bon: 

      “Republicans . . . seem to be under the delusion that if they can just get blacks and Hispanics to finally understand the party platform, they will see the error of their ways and become ‘natural Republicans.’  Never. Will. Happen.”

      ===

      John Derbyshire:

      “…conservative ideals like self-sufficiency and minimal dependence on government have no appeal to underperforming minorities—groups who, in the statistical generality, are short of the attributes that make for group success in a modern commercial nation. Of what use would it be to them to embrace such ideals? They would end up even more decisively pooled at the bottom of society than they are currently.”

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    I wondered the same thing.  There are NO majority Hispanic cities in California that are “nice” and “safe” — where a White would willingly move and have his children attend the local schools or play in the neighborhood parks.

    Hispanics have turned once “nice” and “safe” and BEAUTIFUL  Central Valley communities into graffiti-covered trash heaps, large parts of LA too.  

    Hispanic “quality of life” is FAR different from what Whites accept — unless you enjoy living in graffiti-covered, trash filled neighborhoods where broken-down houses have dirt lawns, young males hang out all day on corners and in the parks wolf whistling at and ogling 10-year old girls, loud music pounds 24/7 and people live 20 or more to a house.

    This is what happens when Hispanics move in. 

     Victor Hanson explains all in “Two Californias”

    http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/255320/two-californias-victor-davis-hanson?page=1#

    Bon

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OMEPKSZDT3A6YZSHL5EHU5TDKM Chris

    Well, I see Jewish Renaissance deleted my comment. There’s more free speech on Yahoo!

    • mikejones91

      I think your looking for Stormfront.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lucas-Evans/100001091600634 Lucas Evans

    Exactly, if we booted out all the illegal immigrants, it would significantly alter the demographics. The vast majority would take their children with them, even if they’re citizens.

  • TonyWestfield

    Oh, c’mon, nothing to worry about if we just go with the flow.  It’s the new America!  Democrats have strategies to cut the federal budget and save us from, well, from whatever it is that the Conservatives have been huffing and puffing about.

    Forget about entitlements and other boondoggles, it’s the DEFENSE budget that’s killing us.  So let’s cut it.  Democrats really CAN say “cut” (contrary to popular belief) and they say it with gusto about one thing: the military budget. 

    While the demographics of the new America continue to “evolve,” just think of all the money we can save on aircraft maintenance.  As the affirmative-action pilots crash, and crash…don’t replace the aircraft.  Get it?  Fewer assets means we save $millions on maintenance, not to mention the price of the new aircraft that we’re not buying to replace the old one.

    And clothing.  Can you picture the “new” Marine Corps, Army Rangers, Mountain Division, etc.?  We can save $millions on fabric for all those tiny uniforms–what, around 67 inches tall for the average Aztec?  Granted, this could pose difficulties in weapons handling or hand-to-hand combat…but we’re not worrying about the Russians anymore–remember?–it’s the Chinese, man, the CHINESE, and those guys are little, to match OUR new little guys.  Obama may even call it a “fair” fight.

    Finally, we will save $millions on remedial instruction and all those consultants figuring out how to put a thumb on the scale for test scores at OCS.  The new-style officer candidates won’t need the help because there won’t be any “traditional” candidates to leap-frog over.  Get it?  Obama may even call it “equality” with a smile.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/W5SZHDTSJWGADWNFGZRQSOADCQ Bill K

    In Socratic Athens, see pillar above, political empowerment was reserved for men in the military, and veterans in good standing. At the time, this political arrangement was deemed to be a radical experiment in democracy. Sparta won that round, as an aside.
     
    A photograph of President Obama’s supporters.

  • http://eradica.wordpress.com/ Firepower

     “”Pat Buchanan is a modern day prophet.  He sees where this  country is going””

    The problem is YOU DON’T see where “it is going.” FEW of you, do.

    WAKE UP: PB wrote TWO BOOKS on this identical subject -BOOKS.

    Books that “white america” apparently NEEDS in order to EXPLAIN
    WHAT THEY CAN’T SEE …when they go outside !

  • Pandemonium

    More likely is that the Power Elite don’t care because their children will be going to school in Switzerland and Austria then returning to America (perhaps) to their parents gated communities and oh-so-social clubs. 

    These elites care not about us, the great unwashed, as long as we toil in their vineyards from dawn to dusk so they can live in their gated communities and send their children…, but you get the picture.

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    Open the link above or the one at the bottom of this post.

    HR 4010 is named the Low-Income Gasoline Assistance Program Act and is sponsored by Senator Tom Udall (D-NM).

    Here are the co-sponsors:

    Julia Carson

    Rep. Emanuel Cleaver [D, MO-5]

    Rep. Danny Davis [D, IL-7]

    William Delahunt

    Lane Evans

    Rep. Al Green [D, TX-9]

    Rep. Raul Grijalva [D, AZ-7]

    Paul Kanjorski

    Rep. Mike McIntyre [D, NC-7]

    Rep. Frank Pallone [D, NJ-6]

    Robert Wexler

    Low-Income Gasoline Assistance Program Act – Directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to make grants to states to establish emergency assistance programs to pay eligible households for the purchase of gasoline.Amends part A (Temporary Assistance for Needy)

    http://www.opencongress.org/bill/109-h4010/show

    Open the link for further information.

    Bon

  • JohnEngelman

    He spells his name “Nicholas Stix.” Anyone can create a blog like that and make unsubstantiated assertions. His essay is not footnoted. Anyone can find something like that on the internet that confirms what one wants to believe. 
     
    It is important to be able to distinguish between sources that are reputable and those that are not.  The FBI Uniform Crime Reports, and the New York Law Enforcement Agency Uniform Crime Reports are about as credible as anything we can work with. Unsubstantiated assertions by an  obscure internet blogger with an obviously ideological agenda is not. 
     
    This does not mean that the   The FBI Uniform Crime Reports, and the New York Law Enforcement Agency Uniform Crime Reports are precisely accurate. Nevertheless, they are about the best sources we have to work with. There is little reason to believe that they are less accurate now than they used to be. Indeed, as statistical methods and the complication of data become more advanced they are likely to become more accurate. 
     
    Consequently, we can be confident that black on white crime is declining, and that the United States is becoming a safer country. This has political implications. It means that overt appeals to anti black sentiment will be less effective than they would have been a generation ago. 

    • Pandemonium

      “Consequently, we can be confident that black on white crime is declining, and that the United States is becoming a safer country. This has political implications. It means that overt appeals to anti black sentiment will be less effective than they would have been a generation ago.”  
       Appeals to anti-black sentiment will be less effective only if anti-black sentiment is motivated by the  black crime rate. For you to assert that “overt appeals to anti-black sentiment will be less effective than they would have been a generation ago” is unsubstantiated. How do you know this? How much, if any, anti-black sentiment is motivated by black crime? 

      The sense I get about those who post here is that regardless of the black crime rate, they would prefer to live away from blacks. When I read about black crimes, it simply underscores my desire to be away from them, but that desire has always been with me. I think it is instinctive and not a result of my knowledge of their propensity for crime.

      • JohnEngelman

        Because I have been robbed at gunpoint and mugged by blacks, I cannot think about blacks without thinking about crime. On the other hand, I have always had good experiences with Orientals. I enjoy living in proximity with them, and visiting their neighborhoods. 

  • mikejones91

    Yeah I get mad watching it. People try and say it is completely scripted but there is just NO way. Unless those blacks are the BEST (emphasis on best) actors on this planet. There is just no way it’s scripted. Blacks can’t act that good lol. Even if they were actors, the dialogue is just too raw to be scripted. 

  • Pandemonium

    We will not have a home if we do not work for it. We must work for that goal as we watch our once proud America crumble around us. 

    I want to know where the organization is to make that kind of thing happen. 

    Forming a White homeland will not happen by itself.

    • Celestial_Time

       How about more networking—regional, state, and local associations in the real world that happen more frequently than yearly or even monthly?

      • Pandemonium

        That kind of activity is the ONLY way we are going to be successful. But how to make it happen? 

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    Our Founding Fathers would be shooting by now.

    Bon

    • mikejones91

      Our Founding Fathers would have sent them back to Liberia and built a minefield around our Mexican border.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ran-Kelvin/100000674993311 Ran Kelvin

    Also presented is an excellent inside look at the Jewish drive to succeed in business. That’s ok to say isn’t it?

  • MissBonnie123

    There already is a political entity with European-American interests. It’s called the American Third Position. Merlin Miller, the presidential candidate of the American Third Position, wrote a book called “Our Vision for America.”

  • Bon, From the Land of Babble

    Much of the damage was done before the advent of the Internet,  when the ONLY information we had was from the anti-White, vile MSM.  Obviously the Internet has opened up an easily  accessible alternative source of information that has given us a realistic non-government/ non-PC version of things, to let us know that a planned genocide is being waged against our race.

    THE most destructive act, IMO, the 1965 Hart-Cellar Immigration Flood bill began the process of wholesale White race replacement, changed the demographics of the U.S. (not for the better) and is making Whites a hated minority in the country WE founded.

    From Wiki:

    “The 1965 act marked a radical break from the immigration policies of the past. In order to convince the American populace - the majority of whom were opposed to the act - of the legislation’s merits, its liberal proponents assured that passage would not influence America’s culture significantly…Edward Kennedy, hastened to reassure the populace that the demographic mix would not be affected; these assertions would later prove wildly inaccurate.”

    We have been triangulated against and brainwashed starting at a VERY young age – by a lefty-hijacked, White-hating American media, government and schools –into believing that because of past sins, real or imagined, the best course of action for us Whites is extinction.

    As Paul Craig Roberts wrote recently:

    Are Americans Catching On, Waking Up, Unplugging?Yes.  But is it too late? — First, we’ll  have to get the government’s boot off of our White necks.Bon

  • mikejones91

    We need a mole in government. Some young handsome white man to run for office next election. Only catch, he is a closest race realist and is very pro-white. Surprise!

  • Celestial_Time

    * Just listen to Republican Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa (of all places) :  “We need to increase legal immigration to stop illegal immigration.” *

    Wait a minute! This could possibly be the missing ingredient needed to bring America back to its glory. I mean, if we give all of our stuff away, then there won’t be a reason to break in and steal it. Why didn’t anyone think of this sooner? This guy is a genius!

    • KenelmDigby

      Grassley’s ‘logic’ is like stating that ‘we need to increase open thefts to stop burglary’.

    • Kurt Plummer

      CT,

      >>
      Wait a minute! This could possibly be the missing ingredient needed to bring America back to its glory. I mean, if we give all of our stuff away, then there won’t be a reason to break in and steal it. Why didn’t anyone think of this sooner? This guy is a genius!
      >>

      Does that include your daughters and sons?

      The genes of which are pure because their parents have created a lifestyle for them which gives -their- offspring a similar chance at dominance.

      The reality here is simple:  Capitalism works by trading power and wealth for access to resources which are then built as cheaply as possible by slaves.  To contain the rise of a wealthy elite from the middle classes (i.e. to avoid having to share power with all of Middle America as opposed to just a few Chinese or Arab dictators…) we are being competed out of existence by an equally, if not more, consumer hungry group of followon browns/yellows/blacks.

      HOWEVER!  What these ‘everything on schedule’ corporate socialists fail to recognize is that bringing down America to the level of the third world will not inspire us to fight for them.  Nor solve the imminent Malthusian Precipice as 12-14 billion people with average IQs of under 90 will be unemployable, screaming, mouths to feed.  By 2100.

      You cannot create a race of docile off-whites by breeding them into warrior browns.  We will -vanish-, as a culture group, long before then.

      And the megawealthy will not be able to hold the line without an established homeland as ‘nation’ (people) from which to enforce their view of a declining global society over whose few non-exploited resources, they retain control. 

  • holyflower

    “So?  Who is to blame?”

    ===

    To elaborate on your question: Who is to blame for Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the Hart-Celler Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965,  Green vs. New Kent County (1968), Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (1971), the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, blocking  California Proposition 187 in 1994, the long-standing misuse of the 14th Amendment’s  “Citizenship Clause” to grant automatic birthright citizenship to children born to illegal alien parents…?

  • Pandemonium

    Let’s see, I believe that was tried about 151 years ago. Deo Vindici!

  • Marc B.

    This is the only reason an Obama loss in the 2012 election is not already a forgone conclusion. The GOP will not statically have a shot at the White House after 2016, and it’s their own damn fault for being the party that historically supported the illegal invasion at the behest of their corporate masters, long before the Democrats got on board.

  • mikejones91

    People always downplay the changing demographics. If you just a normal (indoctrinated) white like most of us used to be, It can sound a bit cruel/”racist” to even bring up the topic itself, let alone voice opposition. What are some good examples of non-white takeover (population growth) in a white land? South Africa is one. People don’t seem to know these examples though, they don’t have any clear outcomes to show them would could/will happen.

  • KenelmDigby

    Excellent, well written, and well researched post.

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

     I’m hardly a nuclear engineer, but it is my understanding that conventional nuclear ordnance can’t last forever.  There is only so long that a conventional nuke could make a good bomb.  In our Ultra-Brazilified America, they will probably degrade to uselessness, and various terrorist groups will raid them for their useable raw materials.

  • Robert11110

    Well, a white minority America will likely be politically unstable and also broke.  The UN will broker a deal with the US government to give them cash infusions in exchange for nuclear disarmament and they’ll send their teams in to handle it.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/HMWZ2BOVLZVWF4A45YHMVZ6LFA Irene

    Rich Republicans are going to have their taxes raised, and the children of white Democrats will not be getting the crony union jobs.   That is the price for being shortsighted.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/YL6T3BJRP7N3DDTPORHM2J2GFQ Chris R; Something Clever

    I don’t really think that the country will last long enough for the Republican party to disintegrate IMHO.  If current trends continue the country will collapse.  It could collapse a la USSR where the country scaled back its territory and social safety nets with the effect of the country becoming more ethnically Russian, self sustaining and the Russian Federation being born.  Or it could collapse a la Yugoslavia where the country gets ripped apart along the lines of ethnic groups.  Let’s hope for the former and prepare for the latter.

    I wouldn’t underestimate the power of whites to make conditions inhospitable for their opponents, especially when they band together.  Take the Southern states for example.  It almost got to the point where some states were on the tip of becoming majority black.  Then Jim Crow happened and blacks scattered all throughout the country.  Look at what’s going on in Arizona and Alabama with respect to illegal immigrants. And of course when the economy tanks the freebies will stop being distributed.

    The plan for now should be for whites to breed like Mormons (so long as the couples can care for them of course) and be prepared to accept a semi-homesteader lifestyle in the future. Whites should move far away from nonwhite enclaves because their tax dollars will go to aid them. They should use as many loopholes as possible to avoid paying federal taxes so as to starve the beast.

  • Seek

    Secession in this case would constitute surrender of territory to those who have no moral or legal right to it.  No, my friend.  We stand and fight.  We’re not ceding Arizona or California or any other state to the Mexicans and we’re not ceding Detroit, Philadelphia or any other city to the blacks.  This is our country.   

  • Zorro

    This is why I believe that it is imperative to stop funding abortion, which has been targeted against White women. The Feminists are Communists and they have sold our women of the 1960s and 1970s the, “You Can Have it All” bullsh&t that had them avoiding marriage and motherhood.

    The men of that era were targeted in other ways with, “You Can Have Them All” as in the party, and a different woman each night, was the way to live. Cultural Marxists gave us this heathenistic attitudes, which has brought us to where we are today.

  • http://countenance.wordpress.com/ Question Diversity

     I think you’re being unfair to the general consensus of AR.  It’s not that we generally rail against RP, it’s just that we don’t worship him or any politician, therefore, we’re honest about his shortcomings.  And I don’t think any of us really like the Generic Republican.  It’s just that many of us will vote for him because the other guy on the ballot is non-white, and I said that I marginally preferred Romney over Santorum or Gingrich because Romney is the consummate political whore, and therefore, he can be “whored” over to our side on occasion.

    I voted for Ron Paul in our primary.  Because of the major remaining contenders, he was closest to me politically.  Not because he’s some white knight on a white horse that will save us all.

  • pbr90

    With currnt white birth rates, the inevitabilty of South African apartheid politics cannot be avoided unless America is willing to open both eyes to see the demographics of our current status. Racism is passe, and both survival and quality in America relies upon a minority population who has never been treated as really wanted, rather than tolerated.

    That has to change if America is to survive and thive. The Jim Crow of yesterday is antiquated, outdated, and ignores the immense potential that American natives of every color bring to their land, excluding what we tend to import to manage the workforce for those who have special commercial needs.

    Social class is in need of reform and resolution as an all inclusive concept that cannot be avoided by ignoring it, or wishing it away.