Human Rights Farce: Meet the Serial Criminal Who Cannot Be Deported

Alastair Jamieson, Telegraph (London), July 3, 2011

Mr Sufi, 24, has at least 17 convictions for crimes including burglary, fraud and indecent exposure since he entered the UK illegally eight years ago.

But an attempt by the Home Office to send him back to his homeland of Somalia has been thwarted by judges in Strasbourg, who ruled last week that he would face the risk of inhumane treatment if he was returned. He is now living freely in London.

The ruling in the key test case means that more than 200 further Somalis appealing against deportation, most of them convicted criminals, will be able to remain in Britain.

Critics say the ruling illustrates how human rights legislation is being exploited by lawyers and foreign criminals to make a mockery of British justice.

Sufi’s case was taken to the European Court of Human Rights by the AIRE Centre, a legal advice body which has received funding from the Equality and Human Rights Commission and the European Commission. Because the Home Office lost, both sides’ costs will be paid by British taxpayers.

Judges considered Sufi’s case together with that of another Somali criminal fighting deportation, Abdiaziz Elmi, a 42-year-old heroin addict with multiple convictions for drug-dealing and robbery who lives with his family in Camberley, Surrey.

The court ruled unanimously that sending either man back to his homeland would breach Article 3 of the European Human Rights Convention, which bans “inhuman or degrading treatment”.

The judges rejected the Home Office’s argument that the men could live safely in parts of Somalia. They ruled that the country as a whole was too dangerous to send the men home to.

“The court reiterated that the prohibition of torture and of inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment is absolute,” they said. “Consequently, the applicants’ behaviour, however undesirable, could not be taken into account.”

The judgment described it as the “lead case” against the UK, meaning the outcome will set a precedent for 214 pending cases brought by Somalis attempting to avoid deportation, around two-thirds of them criminals.

Sufi arrived in Britain as a 16 year-old in 2003, having paid a trafficking agent for false identity documents to get on a flight from Somalia via Dubai. He sought asylum, claiming that he belonged to a clan persecuted by militia, but his claim was rejected and a tribunal found his account was “not credible”.

Nevertheless, he was placed in the care of social services until he turned 18. In that year, 2005, he was convicted of burglary and dishonestly obtaining goods by deception, and ordered to spent 18 months in Feltham Young Offenders Institution. He later committed further crimes, including indecent exposure, theft and making threats to kill, culminating in a 2009 sentence of 32 months for five counts of burglary.

Following his latest release from an immigration detention centre, Sufi is back on the streets of west London, drifting between bail hostels and a friend’s flat.

Tracked down by The Sunday Telegraph, he said he was not even aware of the European court’s decision in his case, or its implications.

He apologised for his criminal record and said he wanted to start a new, law-abiding life as a bus driver or security guard.

Speaking through an interpreter, he said: “I have not spoken to the lawyer. They got me out of the detention centre so I am very pleased, but I am not celebrating as I still do not have money to eat.”

“I am seeing a psychiatrist for my nightmares and I do not sleep at night. It makes it difficult for me to be normal.

“I want to contribute to society, not to be costing the country money, but I have been unable to get education and skills here because of my status.

“I am full of shame for having to beg or borrow to live and I do not want to be a burden to anybody.

“I understand why people are angry that I committed crimes, I see their point of view and I am sorry. I did not come to Britain to commit crimes.”

His father, a successful clothing shop owner and farmer, was persecuted by the Hawiye militia because his family were from a minority clan, Shanshi.

“Everything we had was stolen or destroyed, and my family was killed,” he said. “My mother contacted relatives and we scraped together enough money to pay people to get me out of the country to be safe.

“I did not choose Britain, it was just where they took me. Later I heard my mother managed to get to Sweden but she died there.”

The court’s judgment said that while it was possible for well-connected individuals to live safely in Somalia’s capital, Mogadishu, anyone else being returned would face serious harm.

Mahdi Aadam, director of the Pan African Relief and Development Organisation, a refugee support charity based in west London, said: “Mogadishu is worse now than ever.”

He said the rise of the country’s al-Shabaab Islamist insurgency had made the country “deadly”, but added: “It is a civil war, not a religious conflict.”

Mr Sufi said his 2007 conviction for indecent exposure followed an argument with a female warder over laundry at the West Drayton immigrant detention centre in west London.

Topics:

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.
  • Anonymous

    “The court ruled unanimously that sending either man back to his homeland would breach Article 3 of the European Human Rights Convention, which bans “inhuman or degrading treatment”.”

    The US has also been reluctant or “unable” to manage any actual deportations of Somalis — now matter how horrible their rap sheet — because of this “cruel and inhuman stuff”. And also because Somalia has no actual government through which to conduct the diplomacy of deportations.

    And yet Canada — notorious as the softest touch for bogus Third World “refugee” claimants in the entire world — somehow managed to successfully return to Somalia a 20-something immigrant gangbanger. (The story was on AmRen sometime within the past year.) The gangbanger’s father objected loudly to this “cruel and inhuman” treatment of his worthless son, but the deportation was carried out just the same.

    If a lily-livered collective farm like The People’s Republic of Canada can find a way to kick this trash out permenently, so can the US and the UK.

  • June

    Has the whole world gone insane? Stop all immigration to developed countries. Send all illegals to their home counries. We are in terrible debt because we pour money into these hell holes and still they come to be taken care of. It must stop or we, and the other countries who are to PC to stop the invasion of third world people. will perish!

  • Anonymous

    Canada just recently deported a Somalian criminal to Somalia. http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1492381

    Canada has no higher court of appeal than its own (once upon a time, the final court of appeal was the high court of Britain).

    The former colonies are now more free than Britain. In an ironic turn, the British no longer have sovereignty over their own territory, instead they are being ruled by unelected foreigners.

  • Scott Wilson

    Heaven forfend that Somalis should have to deal with…gasp…other Somalis.

  • SKIP

    ” has been thwarted by judges in Strasbourg”

    I’ve looked at a map of England and I can’t seem to find Strasbourg on it, is it near London? It must be the capitol of the country since so much is done there against real British White people (sort of like Washington District of Coloreds in the U.S.) NOPE! still can’t fine Strasbourg on the English map.

  • Who In Their White Mind?

    You have to love their reasoning on this one. The egalitarians, that is. So he cannot be judged by his behavior. Even though the leftists admitted that his behavior is undesirable. I mean come on, silly people with common sense. That old adage to the effect “actions speak louder than words” doesn’t apply to African UK-dians.

    So another way of putting it is, his crime record cannot be used to determine his deportation. I don’t even think here in the “Divided States of America” would let a Mexican or S. American off the hook on something like that. How pathetic Britain’s injustice system has gotten.

  • Tom Regan

    The European Court of Human Rights? These bodies are just paper tigers. If Britain ignored the ruling and deported them anyway, what would the court do? Invade? Declare war? There’s nothing it can do.

    So rather than blame the court, the real fault lies with Britain for paying any attention to what it says.

  • Marduk

    Is it some kind of a sick joke? A notorious criminal cannot be sent back to Somalia, because it is a country full of notorious criminals? Didn’t anyone notice that Mr Sufi belongs exactly to the kind of people who make Somalia the hellhole it is? And how would be it cruel to put him among his peers in criminal behaviour?

  • Un-Indoctrinated

    Poster 5: Thank you for that link about the African-Canadian getting deported back. This guy should fit right in with his brothers back in Mogadishu. He can trade one gang (Crips) for another(al- Qaeda), & learn to rebel against the Western governments that tried to help him out. What lunacy! I bet he makes his way to Egypt, then closer to Europe thru Turkey & ends up in Western Europe, where, according to this article, he’ll never be kicked out. What a world we live in.

  • shane

    The solution is so easy its in the Geneva convention…. all asylum seekers must apply to the first safe country they reach. So we set up refugee camps in Kenya (or Dubai, they’ll keep them in line) and start deporting our Somalis there!

  • SKIP

    ” set up refugee camps in Kenya (or Dubai, they’ll keep them in line) and start deporting our Somalis there!”

    I don’t know about Kenya, but the UAE will accept NO REFUGEES, muslim or not, not gonna happen. Saudi, Kuwait and UAE when they do have Somalis working in their countries IMMEDIATELY deport them back to Somalia when their contract is finished and the Somali BETTER LEAVE OR ELSE! The OR ELSE does NOT mean free housing, free food, money, white women…in islamic countries being an ILLEGAL means something else entirely, and it is not pleasant.