American Renaissance
Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Send This Page       Date Archives       Category Archives

Jared Taylor on Russian Television

More news stories on AR in the News

YouTube, February 2010

Jared Taylor appeared as a guest on the “Cross Talk” program on the Russia Today channel.

Source: YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/v/UMjwc-SOvHE&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0

Original article

(Posted on February 8, 2010)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment     Send This Page      Search

Comments

1 — Anonymous wrote at 6:31 PM on February 8:

Ochen Horosho, Jared!

Try to get a more-or-less serious discussion like this on CNN.

2 — Anonymous wrote at 6:42 PM on February 8:

I haven’t finished watching this yet, but based on only the first 7m of this, I can honestly say that neither of Mr. Taylor’s nonwhite opponents have made even one coherent point. No, I don’t mean “haven’t made a point I agree with” — I mean they haven’t haven’t made any sort of point AT ALL! Every single utterance both from the black man and the brown woman so far has been nonstop meaningless cliches and vacuities with nothing that could actually be called a point. The contrast between the minorities’ vague values-based “social justice” redistributionist gibberish and Jared Taylor’s elegant fact-filled no-nonsense style couldn’t be more pronounced.

As usual, on a fact-for-fact basis, Mr. Taylor not only beats his debating opponents but WIPES THE FLOOR WITH THEM!

BTW, I’m sure if the Russian host had his druthers, he’d have ditched the two dusky dummies and just spent the whole half hour talking AmRen with Jared! In fact, Mr. Taylor should try for a re-appearance on that show to do precisely that. I’m sure Race Realism is much more discussable on Russian TV than American.

3 — Anonymous wrote at 6:49 PM on February 8:

Jared did better in this debate than previous ones. He showed more nerve.

4 — John PM wrote at 7:04 PM on February 8:

Probably the most “unexpected” data found in this video, is the fact that the “Most Americans” and White Americans categories are evenly split in terms of Comrade BO’s racial background insignificantly. After all, for the former it is 27% and for the latter 24%. Mind you, with substantial majorities in both these groups inclining toward him being a mulatto and not a “black.” Ironically, the numbers for Hispanics are quite similar with both of the above other two groups; and then they demonstrate blacks clinging to the reverse, but only by a majority similar to the numbers of whites that voted for McCain in 2008.

This is the fallacy of multiculturalism, in “affirmative” action mode!

As is expected, whites balance it all out; blacks and Hispanics on the other hand, are so divided, one wonders where the nebulous charges of “racism” could or should be applied here. Both groups may want what “whitey” has built, but they recognize each other as rivals in that game of predation and perdition.

Moreover, both groups see a man of color, but they also see him mostly in terms of their respective “purity” and hybrid statuses.

As always, God help us all!!!

5 — Fran Ellis wrote at 7:17 PM on February 8:

I have just watched Jared Taylor, Donna Hernandez and William Ackah on RT (Cross Talk). Viewing is highly recommended. Jared Taylor successfully and consistently pointed out the flaws in Donna Hernandez’s position: on the one hand, we are all expected to take cognizance of the black point of view (and any other non-white point of view); on the other we must ignore black pathologies, violence and abysmal academic performance. Naturally, if we whites notice black failure we are obviously racist and so on. Taylor was quite right to point out that Obama’s background is distinctly atypical. Moreover, is Obama the first black president? Surely not, I thought he had a white mother and a black father. As an Englishman, I have absolutely no intention of being lectured to by a Ghanaian (Ackah) on the alleged benefits of multiculturalism. I have seen the results in our cities. Nor is Africa a good advertisement. For people like Ackah I have a straightforward message: return to the heart of darkness and take your alien and repulsive multiculturalism with you. It is has no place in England.
As a postscript let me point out that today, one of Scotland Yard’s most senior police officers, an Iranian (!), a one Ali Dizaei, was jailed for four years for making a false arrest. In 1999, the same year in which the Macpherson Report was published, Dizaei escaped punishment after a long and expensive internal investigation. There is no doubt in my mind that the climate of fear induced by the Macpherson Report was a major factor in Dizaei’s escaping punishment.

6 — Cal wrote at 7:30 PM on February 8:

The race issue in the US is not about equal rights, never has been. It is about which race will rule the streets and business and government. The worst offenders of this racism are Blacks and Hispanics. Whites have become so vain and arrogant that they have essentially giving up everything. The Hispanic lady here is simply nonsensical other then she admitted Hispanics are racists(racialist). However she gets very offended if whites want to push forward their power. The African man is even worse, he is just good at holding back his racial warfare attacks, although it did peak out a bit in this interview. This makes the non-whites aggressive conquistadors whose only agenda is racial warfare against white America and will never be satisfied even if every white was gone from the continent. I can almost hear the African man, 100 years from now, with NO whites in North America, STILL blaming whites for their crime and ghettos. The entire methodology of today’s race agenda is perverted and will never end with a natural conclusion. Not until the truth of things be told.

7 — Anonymous White Person wrote at 7:33 PM on February 8:

With non-whites, you’re damned if you do and damned if you don’t. If you focus too much on their race and try to ascribe certain traits to them on the basis of their race, you’re stereotyping and being racist. If you just treat them as plain human beings, you’re denying their unique history and culture, which is an infringement upon their essence. Therefore, we must refrain from stereotyping them while at the same time “respecting their history and culture” (translation: we must know of all the horrible things they have suffered at the hands of whitey).

As Mr. Taylor pointed out, if that is what it takes to live in a harmonious multiracial society, then is living in a multiracial society even worth it? Also, as for that one Hispanic woman incessantly pointing out the need for policies, that is a bunch of rubbish. As I’ve learned from my history classes, groups do not want equality, but special privileges of their own. Therefore, while anti-racists claim to only want full equality, they really want to advance special privileges for blacks at the expense of whites. For blacks and Hispanics, they have every reason to pursue their own interests, and I guess the Tim Wise types make good money by embracing the anti-racist cause. What bothers me is that whites are so afraid to advance their own interests. If we really are so powerful and dominant as everyone makes us out to be, then we ought to use that power in order to save ourselves.

As Mr. Taylor constantly points out, which is something that his detractors never directly answer, why should we seek a multiracial society? Name me one successful multiracial society in the world? I know that some will say the United States, but this nation’s greatness comes from its legacy of being a predominantly white nation, which is no longer the case. Is it any coincidence that the decline of educational standards, good jobs, and vibrant cities coincides with the black liberation struggles and 1965 Immigration Act? Yes, I know that blacks faced vicious discrimination and were fighting for their rights, but did that have to entail integration? Marcus Garvey and Malcolm X certainly weren’t interested in integration. You can promote equity without integration. A better solution would have been to pay blacks some reparations and allow them to separate, because there is absolutely no way whites and blacks can share the same living space.

Speaking of failed multiracial states, I doubt this Hispanic woman (by the way, am I the only one who finds their accents annoying?) can name one successful Mestizo/Mulatto state in Latin America/The Caribbean. The only stable and somewhat prosperous nation (in terms of standard of living) is Argentina, which has always claimed to be the “only white nation in the western hemisphere.” Regardless of some past economic success, Brazil and Mexico are both multiracial quagmires plagued by violence and conflict. I find it amusing the way we are constantly told about the wonders of diversity, yet very few actual benefits are present. To the extent that certain whites like diversity, they only like diversity because of the different ethnic foods present at various restaurants. Either that, or they occasionally like to “go ethnic” and flirt with the music, women/men, and other unique elements of different races. When it comes to their residential patterns, they definitely don’t like true “diversity” (anti-racist translation: blacks and hispanics).

The reason why nations such as South Korea, Japan, and China are so successful and have eclipsed us is because while we were busy focusing on “social justice,” “equality,” and ensuring “diversity,” they were busy educating themselves and improving their economies. Those nations don’t have to worry about racial conflict because there isn’t racial diversity. After all, you can’t have racism without different races living together.

Therefore, contrary to the belief of radical leftists, we are not white supremacists who seek to viciously oppress “people of color” (sorry anti-racists, but the non-white rainbow coalition isn’t working out). Rather, we simply want to live in a predominantly white society where we don’t have to be bothered by non-whites (mainly blacks). We’re simply tired of having to bend over backwards in order to accommodate a bunch of demanding non-whites.

8 — Big Daddy wrote at 7:54 PM on February 8:

Yes, to answer his two questions at the opening.

And thankfully, we are waking up to the fact that the race problem is based on race differences. When we talk about race, we need to stop talking about race conditions and start talking about race differences. Take Hip Hop Rap, for instance.

What can whites learn about blacks from studying that most authentic and energetic forms of their cultural expression? Heidi B. and Abe F., please tell us. Tell us. We are waiting. What? Nothing? Not a word? Why not?

If blacks demand that whites admit to them our unearned white privilege, and we should hope they do, then we can hold them accountable to us for giving them their unearned Diversity privilege.

Ever African American who is not in Africa has a debt to us that can never be repaid.

9 — Anonymous wrote at 7:56 PM on February 8:

There are to many differences for 25 minutes to cover

10 — q wrote at 8:01 PM on February 8:

Well, the first thing that occurred to me when the panel was introduced is that the two non-white mouths weren’t going to let Taylor get a word in edgewise. When non-whites are allowed to speak up at anytime, then there is no debate. They can’t sit still and listen while another person speaks without jumping up like children and interrupting, because they’re not mature enough to wait their turn.

Also, I’d like to mention that I don’t agree with Taylor that Sarah Palin is a simpleton. She’s not. In fact she’s moderately bright.

But that misses the point altogether. People in the millions are behind Sarah Palin, not because she’s a genius, but because she represents the average everyday person, and people are sick and tired of putting in prima donnas in Washington. People see Palin as being different from the usual privileged elitist who has zero ability and an out-of-touch view of real life. They see her as representative of the common citizen. So, it is not her they are enamoured with, it is what she represents.

The millions in the growing tea party movement are behind her 100%, so I don’t think it is wise to alienate them, because with just a tiny nudge many would be on our side in a heartbeat.

Realistically, there is NEVER going to be a race conscious person elected in this country. We have to keep trying to get the next best thing and working from there.

Too, I disagree with Taylor that Obama wants to be the president of all the people. No way. There is just too much evidence and data revealing just exactly the opposite.

Obama is a Jeremiah Wright look-a-like in disguise.

But, for my money, any further discussion on race is immaterial anyway, because, like so many other people, I FIRMLY believe this country is headed for break up, beginning this year when the economy worsens to critical levels.

11 — Tim in Indiana wrote at 8:02 PM on February 8:

Well I see “Russian” television is a lot like American television: they are so terrified of having a balanced discussion about race that they had to make it a case of two against one. The Ghanian and the Hispanic woman presented views that were practically carbon copies of one another. Jared Taylor added a little spice to the discussion—without him it would have been a real snoozer—but the program seemed to feel guilty about having him on! But Mr. Taylor successfully exposed the inanity of Ms. Hernandez’s claim that we should be constantly cognizant of a non-white’s race while pretending that we live in a “post-racial” world!

12 — jewamongyou wrote at 8:22 PM on February 8:

Good show Jared! Also kudos to Cross Talk for allowing a serious discussion on race.

13 — Mike Harrigan wrote at 9:10 PM on February 8:

Allow me to humbly critique this video.

You could see frustration in Mr Taylor as he was interupted. He clearly prefers a forum where one can finish his point without being continually interupted and talked over. As most of us do. The rules of this particular show allowed for “jumping in” whenever one desired. Seems to me that will result in much confussion for those on the panel as well as those listening in. Fortunately things didnt progress to that point in this case.

I am seeing a “new” Jared Taylor. One who is speaking more forcefully and demanding to be allowed to finish his point. Also one who isnt afraid to speak up out of turn if the situation calls for it. And I like it.

Mr Taylor did his usual outstanding job and of course the others on the panel threw out the usual cliche’s and mouthed the same tired blah, blah, blah that we’ve come to expect from non White “racial experts”.

14 — white is right, black is whack wrote at 9:11 PM on February 8:

Notice that most of the talkers are black or hispanic? I’m sick of the arrogance that only blacks are allowed to talk about race. It must scare the liberal jerks that Mr.Taylor is a white man who can be pro-white and do so in an intelligent and civilized manner. All the blacks are blathering on about “equitable” and “leveling the fields for people of color.” Like it’s somehow whites fault that blacks don’t earn the money we do. It’s their sneaky way of saying, “More money and power needs to be taken away from whites and given to blacks without having to give anything to whites in return.” I’m glad the moderator was white. If the moderator was non white, certainly black, he’d been cutting Jared off and giving more time to his ‘brutha’ and ‘sista’

15 — Everett Mansfield wrote at 10:40 PM on February 8:

I have the utmost respect for Jared Taylor (and his exemplary patience in tolerating the inanities of both Hernandez and Ackah during this exchange). So, I’m intrigued to hear him say that he thinks Obama is trying to be a president for all the people; on its face, I simply cannot agree with that. I believe Obama most certainly hates whites.

Taylor is correct about Palin. And I think she would be terrible on immigration; she’s campaigning next month for Juan McAmnesty. Further, I think she should really be an EXAMPLE for this nation and go back home to Alaska and RAISE HER CHILDREN. If the republicans run her in 2012, they will lose.

I wonder how much money Hernandez makes for what she does. She comes across as very stupid, unqualified, and obnoxious. It’s disgusting that someone of her ilk is being paid (probably quite well) for being such an ignorant annoyance.

16 — sbuffalonative wrote at 10:43 PM on February 8:


American Renaissance needs to move into the digital video age.

AR should be producing their own weekly interviews and posting them on this site and all the public video sites.

AR could pick their guests and the topics without fear of mainstream media censorship.

17 — Awakened wrote at 10:53 PM on February 8:

It seems any time Jared debates someone, he’s always the one being interrupted constantly. If you noticed they had 2 Blacks and one White. Wouldn’t the fair thing to do be to have ONE White against ONE Black? The rabidness of these people is incredible. They know they want our civilization and they know that they want to destroy us. How much longer are Whites going to be asleep?

18 — Observer wrote at 11:26 PM on February 8:

Jared Taylor called Sarah Palin “Simpleton.” He basically said she was a fool. Wow! I am surprised! Mr. Taylor should show more civility than this!

19 — Soprano Fan wrote at 11:30 PM on February 8:

In the James Bond movie, “Die Another Day”, Bond (Pierce Brosnan) says to Jinx the assassin (Halle Berry), “Just because we’re on the same side, doesn’t mean we’re after the same thing”.

That says it all about multiculturalism.

20 — Robert wrote at 11:48 PM on February 8:

Beware of Russia today. Any non-Russian they can find is employed by them. If you watch the tape you will see a black/Russian (I think there are about 90 of them in a nation of 140 million) Anyway, she is actually the product of a Zanzibar prince and a Polish Jew that was born in the Soviet Union. So yeah, Russia today is very much a western creation and not very Russian at all. I mention the black woman only to illustrate on how far Russia today will go to find one non-white to represent the station in a nation that more than likely has many thousands of correspondents and potential news presenters. Kudos on them letting Mr Taylor speak. Mr. Taylor once again destroys the flimsy arguments of the quota gang that stood before him. In fact the latina (in reality a African that speaks Spanish) knew that Mr Taylor had whipped her and tied her up in her own words. For someone like me that speaks Russian as well as writes it I feel it my duty to inform other white Race realist as to the true nature of the station Russia Today in the case they watch the station in the future.

21 — Al wrote at 11:52 PM on February 8:

Mr. Taylor struck me as being somewhat supportive of President Obama.

22 — Mike wrote at 11:58 PM on February 8:

Jared Taylor at his best. Good job Mr. Taylor.

23 — Anonymous wrote at 12:23 AM on February 9:

q wrote: Realistically, there is NEVER going to be a race conscious person elected in this country. We have to keep trying to get the next best thing and working from there.


I disagree. This is what white nationalists are working to get. But I do agree with you on one point, Sarah Palin is no friend to our cause.

24 — Anonymous wrote at 12:49 AM on February 9:

Anonymous White Person wrote: “We’re simply tired of having to bend over backwards in order to accommodate a bunch of demanding non-whites.”…


Your ancestors should have thought of that before bringing Africans over. The future of Blacks is now largely intertwined with those of Whites since your past actions have made them dependent on you.

Europeans spent hundreds of years invading or otherwise trying to get into non-White societies. History says that it’s simply not in your nature to leave others alone. The irony is staggering and hopefully it isn’t lost on you.

25 — NBJ wrote at 12:50 AM on February 9:

This discussion ended when it was just about to get REALLY good! Still, it was rather amusing watching Mr. Taylor point out the flaws in the Hispanic womans argument.

The one thing that annoyed me the most was the caption at the bottom of the screen that said crimes against African Americans have increased since the election of Obama. REALLY? Where? It came across as if whites were commiting these crimes. Every reader here knows nothing could be further from the truth. I wish Mr. Taylor could have had a chance to set them straight on this issue!

26 — WR the elder wrote at 1:06 AM on February 9:

I’ve long liked Russia Today. They provide a perspective that you just can’t get from the mass media here in the United States. Would CNN, MSNBC, ABC, or CBS dare to bring in Jared Taylor on a discussion like this? If so they’d only bring him in as an example of one of those dangerous racists-in-a-suit-and-tie that the $PLC is always warning us about, and they’d be certain to have a team of Tim Wise and Michael Potok clones to shout him down. The first rule of the U.S. press is to only allow dissenting views if you can make the proponents of those views look as bad and ignorant as possible. (It always helps if you can include clips of Nazi rallies in your footage, just in case the viewers don’t get the hint of how evil the dissenter is.)

What we’ve learned from Donna Hernandez is that race is vitally important except when it must be ignored entirely, and it is up to leftists like her to tell us which case applies at every moment of our lives. Any time I hear about a Professional Minority who’s job description includes “Racial Justice” I know I better hang on to both my wallet and my guns. “Racial Justice” means blaming Whitey for every failure of blacks and Hispanics, and making Whitey pay and pay and pay.

I wouldn’t go so far as to call Sarah Palin a simpleton, but she is hardly someone to impress you with her Presidential qualifications. The worst part of the McCain-Palin ticket was McCain — a half senile pro-illegal immigration war monger. Listening to him give a speech just creeped me out. It was as though the Republican Party was deliberately trying to lose. I disagree with Obama’s policies, but neither McCain nor a left wing white President would have been any better.


27 — Anonymous wrote at 1:19 AM on February 9:

q praised Sarah Palin:
(Respectfully): Hey q: you have to look at Palin’s recent tripe on immigration: see VDARE.com …it was in the last week or so. I think the article was also on AmRen: she sidestepped the issue of illegal immigration in an interview…by taking the Lou Dobbs approach! Hey, let’s talk about LEGAL immigration!
What a sell-out. I would positively vote AGAINST her!
Dobbs.
Palin
McCain.
They’re all too enamoured with power to do the right thing, too affraid to lose the limelight or the brass ring, to have guts.
Don’t vote for a sellout.
And if the Tea Partiers can’t voice up against immigration, they’re no frends of ours-or even themselves.

We can’t afford more of the same.
MARK MY WORDS: PALIN HAS ALREADY FULLY ANNOUNCED TWO THINGS: ONE: SHE WANTS TO BE PRESIDENT. TWO: SHE IS A DIVERSITY HOUND, A VOTE-SEEKER AT ALL COSTS, AND AN AMNESTY/ IMMIGRATION ENTHUSIAST.
REPUBLICANS TRULY SUCK. NO BETTER THAN DEMOCRATS.
ESTABLISHMENT POLS ARE THE DEATH OF THE WHITE RACE>

28 — danjack wrote at 2:10 AM on February 9:

jared taylor just doesn’t get it. he is constantly available to debate with non-whites, in order to prove his point. does he not realize that these people would not agree to his point if he made the best argument in the world, and backed it up with all the correct data? they do not want equality, they want preferential treatment. these people are not progressive, they are still living in 1840, you can tell by their consistent arguments about how the white man has abused the black man. they do not want to know it is 2010, because if they can keep the argument in 1840, they win. this is all revenge driven, and they will not be happy until the white man is subserviant to them. they want preferential treatment written into law, they want the white mans wealth, they want his property, they want his females, and they want to eliminate him. this disagreement will never be settled in conversation, quit trying. it will only be settled in the streets. the race problem in america is not caused by whites, it is because blacks refuse to let slavery be forgotten and harbor hatred toward whites. nothing else. jared taylor being the wise man he is should see this and discontinue any discussions with non-whites. they are out to eliminate us mr taylor and the sooner you see that the better off you will be.

29 — Anonymous wrote at 4:30 AM on February 9:

Why on Earth would anyone be suprised that most people who think Obama is black are themselves black?

Hell, most people who think Beethoven is black are themselves black.

30 — Ozzy wrote at 4:46 AM on February 9:

Thanks Jared.

You are an inspiration to us all.

Please keep up the good work.

31 — ky8 wrote at 6:00 AM on February 9:

q if you think sarah palin is good for whites you are either a government mole spewing propaganda or a true republican(stupid party)FOOL!!

32 — Anonymous wrote at 7:58 AM on February 9:

My favourite part was the last one: “We have policies that preferentiate blacks and hispanics over equally qualified whites”

33 — Jupiter wrote at 8:04 AM on February 9:

As one commenter mentioned, Jared Taylor dominated this debate because he went for the jugular. The issue of the masive race-replacement should be the only thing that has to be discussed. White Nationalist have to completely define the terme of the “Debate”. The immigration enhusiast should always be put in the position of having to defend themselves against the racism charge. Have them explain explain why NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICANS should be in favor of an post-1965 immigration policy that will very rapidly reduce them to a very small racial minority withn the borders. Of course the immigration enhusiasts will then resort to threats such as “too bad…get used to it”. Jared should respond:”Well you haven’t given NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICANS” any reason to support their own race-replacement at the hands of post-1965 asians,hispanics,muslims and africans so you shouldn’t be shocked that WHITE RESISTANCE to race-relacement grows stronger with each passing year.” Evry debate should be reduced to this issue. Grab on to t like a pit bull.

The intent of nonwhite immigration enthusiast is to race-replace NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICANS with asians,hispanics,muslims and africans. They feel very confortable with the beltway consensus on this. WHITE NATIONALIST should should make them very uncomfortable.

34 — Yellow Man wrote at 8:22 AM on February 9:

I thought the panelists agreed more than they disagreed on key subjects:they all believed that race was important. In fact up until 6:00 Donna Hernandez actually said she agreed with Mr. Taylor on that key issue.

Jared Taylor was in the odd position of defending Mr. Obama and saying that he was trying to be a President for all Americans and not just black Americans. The sight of a white nationalists defending the Obama presidency was utterly surreal. Hell has truly frozen over.

I believe the panelists certainly disagreed at the end but was stunned at how much they seemed to have in common with one another. What an odd experience.

35 — olewhitelady wrote at 8:33 AM on February 9:

Blacks in the U.S. are content to vote for blacks because they know whitey is always there to pull their fat out of the fire. In some sub-Saharan nations, blacks are asking whites (and northern Asians) to return to lease land and make it productive. In Haiti now, many are begging Bill Clinton to take over.

36 — kc wrote at 9:06 AM on February 9:

re:Fran Ellis-“Moreover, is Obama the first black president? Surely not, I thought he had a white mother and a black father.”

Correct,Obama’s mother was White and of Irish ancestry. People sometimes refer to John Kennedy as the former Irish-American president, well what people never mention is that Obama is half Irish-American.

37 — Anonymous wrote at 9:13 AM on February 9:

re:Cal-“This makes the non-whites aggressive conquistadors whose only agenda is racial warfare against white America and will never be satisfied even if every white was gone from the continent”

This is because they arrogantly and ignorantly believe that once they chase Whitey off, they’ll just step in and take the reigns and inherit all the wealth and goodies mean old racist Whitey has been hoarding from them. Of course they don’t understand that whatever wealth is in North America didn’t just happen, it was created by Whites. When Whites go, so does the wealth, the higher standards of living etc. Then of the course the continent would go to hell in a handbasket and all of these non-Whites would then be fleeing somewhere else White, say some European country or Iceland and the whole process would start again.

38 — Jack McShane wrote at 9:38 AM on February 9:

America is NOT worth saving. This is a Politically Correct Nightmare NOT a country.

39 — Tom Iron wrote at 10:25 AM on February 9:

38 — Jack McShane wrote at 9:38 AM on February 9:
America is NOT worth saving. This is a Politically Correct Nightmare NOT a country.
__________________________________________________________

Don’t lose heart Jack. Things are slowly turning our way (imperceptable to the naked eye right now). But most assuredly, they are turning. I agree, it took awhile, but pc’ness is a defence of illusion. Reality is finally making it’s presence known in all areas of our society. The people are awakening and they don’t like what they see. Interestingly, it’s the younger people who are coming to their senses for the most part. Even though they’ve been the target group of the worst of the Anti-American/Anti- White propaganda.

Tom Iron…

40 — Shaun wrote at 10:36 AM on February 9:

@ comment #28- Jared doesn’t do interviews to convince the guests who are invited to balance him(or try to anyway). Jared does interviews so whites can see the flaws in orthodox racial thinking. TV is an excellent outlet because so many millions get to see him.

I wish Jared had remembered BHO’s comment about “typical white folks”, throwing that statement right back into Sambo’s face would have been lovely.

Hell of a job Mr. Taylor, thanks for your life’s work.

41 — alex wrote at 11:04 AM on February 9:

WARNING!!! ATTENTION!!!

Fresh news from Russian ITAR-TASS

ZIMBABWE HAS STARTED A POLICY OF RACIAL SEGREGATION

Zimbabwe implements a law that ownership of any kind of a company, a firm, an enterprise can belong only to a man with black skin. The white business people who will refuse to surrender control over the businesses to black people voluntarily face jail incarceration up to 5 years. The businesses with the capital over $500,000 have 45 days to execute the law, which becomes effective on March 1th.

The law was established in 2008 when in power was only one ruling party ZANU-PF headed by president Robert Mugabe. Today the power belongs to a coalition government. Foreign investors as well must fulfill the order of “transferring economic power to native Zimbabweans”, those who, according to the official definition, “suffered from racial discrimination in time of the colonial domination of the Great Britain”. Thus 20,000 white Zimbabwe citizens get deprived of their rights to ownership.
ITAR-TASS

42 — Bon, From the Land of Babble wrote at 11:12 AM on February 9:

[Palin] is campaigning next month for Juan McAmnesty…. If the republicans run her in 2012, they will lose…”

I agree with M. Taylor’s view of Palin.

I wouldn’t count out obama in 2012. I think he’s got a good chance of winning re-election and if Palin is his opponent, it is a done deal and he’ll win easily.

The MSM has already sharpened up its knives and is attacking and excoriating Palin unmercifully—and will continue to do so, front and center, for the next two years. It’s a play straight out of alinsky’s handbook.

Obama can read speeches written for him over a tele-prompter and becomes a bumbling idiot when his lifeline is cut off—reverting to ummms and errrss— and is given a pass—but Palin writes her notes on her hand and all hell breaks loose in the media.

As for her knowledge and intelligence, Game Change (my new favorite book) reports:

“…Steve Schmidt, Republican campaign chief, turned to the experts he had recruited and said: ‘You guys have a lot of work to do. She doesn’t know anything.’
Ms Palin was sat down at a table with a map of the world before her and given a potted history of foreign policy.

However, according to the book, the vice presidential candidate’s mental state began to falter.

While being drilled for upcoming interviews, ‘she would routinely shut down - chin on her chest, arms folded, eyes cast to the floor, speechless and motionless, lost in what those around her described as a kind of catatonic stupor’.

The former Governor of Alaska [had] wild mood… and was in a ‘catatonic stupor’….Palin’s behaviour was so erratic that at one point senior figures in the McCain campaign began to seriously discuss the possibility that she was mentally unstable…”

The hostile MSM is already running with this and they’ll repeat her shortcomings continually during the campaign as proof of her being ‘unfit for the highest office of the land’ and ‘unsuitable to handle US foreign policy.’ Meanwhile, the subversive MSM continue to praise and laud obama, portray him as a Messiah, and report that the ‘economy is improving’, the ‘economy has started to grow’, ‘the recession is behind us’ and ‘employment figures are growing.’

The true story is that the economy is on the brink of imploding, the unemployment rate is double what is reported, the deficit is exploding, the dollar is about to go under—of course, obama and the MSM will blame ‘what they inherited from bush.’

Bon


43 — Blaak Obongo wrote at 11:46 AM on February 9:

“Your ancestors should have thought of that before bringing Africans over.”

They weren’t my ancestors, all of whom came to the United States after the Civil War. Nevertheless, I certainly do wish that the Whites of the day had refrained from bringing such a terrible burden to our shores, but that’s over and done with and can’t be changed now. What we have to deal with now is the present and future, and endless whining about historical grievances, no matter how good it makes you feel, is irrelevant.


“The future of Blacks is now largely intertwined with those of Whites since your past actions have made them dependent on you.”

Whose past actions? Certainly not mine. Nor any of my European ancestors, for that matter. But again, this is irrelevant. Were this, say, 1875, I would agree with you that blacks are dependent upon Whites to a large degree. But that has all changed in the past fifty years. Today, in 2010, no black is required to be dependent upon Evil Whitey. Any black with intelligence and ambition can do quite well in American society. Probably even better than an equally qualified White, since blacks have the benefits of Affirmative-Action quotas, set-asides, and preferential treatment of every conceivable variety. Given all these advantages, there is no real excuse for black and brown failure or dependency.


“Europeans spent hundreds of years invading or otherwise trying to get into non-White societies.”

And blacks and browns are now putting forth all their efforts to invade and get into White societies, so what’s your point? This obsession with past grievances — valid or otherwise — seems to be a recurring theme among blacks and browns, yet the present and future are what matter now.


“History says that it’s simply not in your nature to leave others alone.”

White nationalists are trying to do exactly that right now, by separation. I would think you’d be happy to support that effort. But once racial separation is achieved, blacks and browns will have to demonstrate their competence entirely on their own, without any White handouts. I would think you’d rejoice at such an opportunity.

“The irony is staggering and hopefully it isn’t lost on you.”

The irony is staggering indeed, yet it’s pointing at you, not at Whites. And I can see that it has been lost on you.

44 — Tim wrote at 11:56 AM on February 9:

Tom Iron:

I would like to agree with you, but all of the evidence I see poves otherwise. It was young people who put Obama over the top in 2008. They are also the group where you see the most miscegentaiton. Given the fact that a disproportionate number of them are biracial or multiracial,and have grown up with a steady stream of mulitcultural propaganda, many of them have a natural inclination toward leftwing propoganda.

There was a poll recently conducted that stated that even among young people under 30 who identify themselves as conservative, 73% support gay marriage. Even more disturbing was that 66% approved of interracial marriages. I can only imagine what the percentages would be for liberal young people of this generation.

I cannot engage in wishful thinking anymore. I think that many of our young are a lost cause.

45 — Anonymous wrote at 1:07 PM on February 9:

“Your ancestors should have thought of that before bringing Africans over.”

Yes, our ancestors shouldn’t have brought slaves over so the proper thing to do would be to return them to their homelands. You also forget many Africans sold their own into slavery too.

“The future of Blacks is now largely intertwined with those of Whites since your past actions have made them dependent on you.”“

See it’s wrong for them to be dependent on us, we need to change that. We need to make them independent.

“Europeans spent hundreds of years invading or otherwise trying to get into non-White societies. History says that it’s simply not in your nature to leave others alone. The irony is staggering and hopefully it isn’t lost on you.”

Look at history, every race has invaded others over the last thousands of years, non-Whites were no different than Whites. The non-White mongols, Arabs and others tried to invade Europe. This has what to do with today? Anyway, when it came to colonization, the Europeans did finally do the right think and go home. Now it’s time for the non-Whites to do the same. Anyway, if Whites are equal to non-Whites in all ways, then they should have no need to go to White countries, after all, non-Whites inhabit most of the world, so they have the whole world as theirs.

46 — ice wrote at 1:11 PM on February 9:

38 — Jack McShane wrote at 9:38 AM on February 9:
“America is NOT worth saving. This is a Politically Correct Nightmare NOT a country.”

Tom Iron: “Things are slowly turning our way (imperceptable to the naked eye right now). But most assuredly, they are turning.”

Sorry, but reality reveals that this multicultural mess is here to stay. While I agree there is a paradigm shift via the tea party crowd, the movement is good ONLY for uniting whites….NOT causing a reversal of the deterioration that is taking place and has taken place in this country. There are still 100 million non-whites in this country who are anti-white, to one degree or another, and they want control of the nation. That will not change.

Jack is right. This mess has degenerated to the point where the country isn’t worth saving, even if we could save it which is VERY doubtful due to the collapse in the economy, which is still dropping. Our best bet is to successfully secede or to self-segregate to one area of the country we can call our own; however, that won’t happen either. We’re headed for break up, and it will come about all on its own.

While it is important to be optimistic it is even MORE important to be realistic first. And saving this country just isn’t realistic.

47 — q wrote at 1:25 PM on February 9:

“23 — Anonymous wrote at 12:23 AM on February 9:
q wrote: Realistically, there is NEVER going to be a race conscious person elected in this country. We have to keep trying to get the next best thing and working from there.”

“I disagree. This is what white nationalists are working to get. But I do agree with you on one point, Sarah Palin is no friend to our cause.”

q: I didn’t say that Sarah Palin WASN’T a friend to our cause. She’s a friend to white people and any words she mouths that has to do with amnesty or political correctness is strictly for the purpose of reducing criticism against herself and the movement.

You have to understand that no movement…none…..zilch….is going to embrace sending illegals home or fighting for white power, and that the stance taken by Palin and others is strictly for the purpose of show. The only dork we had that was pro-amnesty and for political correctness was George Bush, the Idiot Prince.

Keep in mind, though, that I think discussing which person is going to bring America back is a useless debate because nobody can EVER bring this country back. As I’ve said before, we’re headed for a reorginazation into various nation states, peacefully or otherwise.

48 — whiteraven wrote at 1:34 PM on February 9:

2 — Anonymous wrote at 6:42 PM on February 8:
“… I can honestly say that neither of Mr. Taylor’s nonwhite opponents have made even one coherent point. No, I don’t mean “haven’t made a point I agree with” — I mean they haven’t haven’t made any sort of point AT ALL! Every single utterance both from the black man and the brown woman so far has been nonstop meaningless cliches and vacuities with nothing that could actually be called a point. The contrast between the minorities’ vague values-based “social justice” redistributionist gibberish and Jared Taylor’s elegant fact-filled no-nonsense style couldn’t be more pronounced.”

That’s EXACTLY my impression. Both non-whites offered nothing but useless drivel and, mindless ramblings, especially the Hispanic.

And it amazes me that the RET staff thinks that there have been legitimate attacks against blacks, obviously ignorant of the fact that black on white attacks are numerous and vicious. Are they uninformed or just plain dim-witted? If they are uninformed, aren’t they professional enough to research the data? The lies are amazing.

Count me in with the people who think this country is too far gone to save.

49 — Excel wrote at 2:19 PM on February 9:

24 — Anonymous wrote at 12:49 AM on February 9:

[/quote]Your ancestors should have thought of that before bringing Africans over. The future of Blacks is now largely intertwined with those of Whites since your past actions have made them dependent on you.

24 let me correct you.

Europeans spent hundreds of years invading or otherwise trying to get into non-White societies. History says that it’s simply not in your nature to leave others alone. The irony is staggering and hopefully it isn’t lost on you.[quote]

So whats your point? Arabs, Asians, and Africans have been trying to invade others for centuries, too. Whites for centuries had to fight off Muslim, Asian, North Africans, etc, from encroaching on our borders. We just happened to invent the weapons and technologies that made it possible to do the things that if Blacks (or any other race)had the chance they would have also done.

Our ancestors should have re-considered, but African ancestors should have thought before they sold Africans into slavery. If not for Blacks selling themselves into slavery there wouldn’t have been an African slave trade. The slave trade was established in African society long before Europeans arrived. Arabs, and African tribes were already deep into the slave trade among themselves. When whites came upon Africans enslaving other Africans, it was the African that encouraged Europeans to participate in their already well established international slave trade.

So, it is Africans themselves thanks to their slave trading ancestors who made themselves dependent on whites. And since slavery ended 160 years ago, and since slave owners accounted for a small percent of white Americans (blacks owned slaves too, and white indentured servants were equally slaves), and since the black is no longer living under the white American’s house, being fed, or working for the white American as a slave—-than we no longer have any responsibilities to take care of them.

If you want special privileges (something already received) and reparation go look for the modern relatives in Africa of those who sold your ancestors into slavery, and those tribe leaders in Africa who encouraged Europeans to participate in their slave trading ways. After all, what a pain in the rear it must be to be an African-American. The horrors of owning a car, living in a house, eating USDA inspected food. If anything with or without slavery the Black in dependent on others just look at Blacks in Ireland (a nation which never participated in African tribal slave trading ways).

50 — Vince wrote at 6:05 PM on February 9:

Tom:

I have to disagree with you. It seems that where I live, the strongest proponents of miscegeanation and interracial minxing are young people.

Maybe you are correct, but from my vantage point, I do not see the racial consciousness among young Whites that you speak of.

51 — Anonymous wrote at 6:26 PM on February 9:

Mr. Taylor, thank you for championing the only race in America not allowed to organize for its own benefit, survival or simply joy of companionship.

On a separate note, our politicians need to be asked why all other races in America have a multitude of organizations to advance their racial interests but Whites are called haters and Nazis for caring about our own people. Will we be allowed to organize when we are down to 15 percent of the USA?

52 — Hank wrote at 7:08 PM on February 9:

I simply cannot believe some here feel the need to defend Sarah Palin. What do some of you think AR is about? For those who haven’t yet figured it out, it is about RACE - the White race specifically! AR is not here to prop up “conservative” politicians and pundits, but here to preserve the White race - something, I might add, Sarah Palin seems to have very little interest in. Wake up folks!

53 — GetBackJack wrote at 7:24 PM on February 9:

Thank you, Jared, for so clearly pointing out the absolute nonsense spewed by the diversity crowd.

The blacks and browns are always ranting on about “level the playing field” and “equal opportunity for all.” The former meaning “lowering of standards” and the latter meaning “we want what you have.”

The white man’s biggest - and longest - suicide mission is his quest for CHEAP labor throughout the centuries. The labor the lower classes prefer to avoid and the upper classes refuse to adequately compensate. End result: the importation of blacks and browns that will be our demise.

We imported the blacks for slave labor and we are now importing the Third World masses for slave labor. We haven’t learned our lesson because the whites doing the importing are not the ones stuck with the resulting problems!

54 — generalquagmyer wrote at 12:52 AM on February 10:

The whole thing was mediocre IMHO, with nobody really “crushing” anyone else or making fools of themselves. Jared Taylor certainly seemed the most articulate and I enjoyed his dismissal of Sarah Palin as a “simpleton.” Someone commented about the others interrupting him, but he did it too a couple of times.

Don’t understand the bit about “Russian television”; what was so Russian about it?!

55 — danjack wrote at 1:30 AM on February 10:

for all of the folks that think this county is done for, you are 234 years too late. this country was always doomed, even before a constitutiuon was written and the country was established, during the colonial days, blacks were brought here as slaves. when we brought them here to begin with, it was over. it just requied them to breed, and grow greater in numbers for the country to continue to go downhill. they were effectively neutralized up until the 1950s, but continued to multiply hence the decline of america. we put a couple of bad apples in our original bushel. blacks are the cancer of the earth. it shows everywhere they live.

56 — Anonymous White Person wrote at 2:08 AM on February 10:

I think that Blaak Obongo, 45, and Excel all did a great job at refuting poster #24, but I’d like to add a little more.

I know that whites have committed atrocities in the past. I know that for the past few centuries we have meddled in the affairs of others. However, we were simply more technologically advanced and organized than other races. The Moors, Arabs, Turks, Mongols, and others had been trying to subjugate us for centuries. They simply weren’t successful, while we were. And no, the irony isn’t lost on me.

Still, I don’t care about what whites have done in the past anymore than the Japanese care about what they did to the Koreans and Chinese. As a white person, I am tired of constantly dealing with demanding non-whites in TODAY’S society. Yes, it was foolish of us to meddle in their affairs in the first place, but as whites, we have the power to ensure that they don’t meddle in our affairs. All I’m saying is that we should start exercising that power.

Also, as white nationalists, we are not supremacists who seek to impose our will on others. In fact, we are quite willing to relinquish some territory if that’s what it takes to successfully separate. While some of our ancestors may have encroached on non-white societies, we advocate the exact opposite. We simply believe in separation and self-determination.

57 — Anonymous wrote at 8:58 AM on February 10:

52 — Hank wrote at 7:08 PM on February 9:
I simply cannot believe some here feel the need to defend Sarah Palin. What do some of you think AR is about? For those who haven’t yet figured it out, it is about RACE - the White race specifically! AR is not here to prop up “conservative” politicians and pundits, but here to preserve the White race - something, I might add, Sarah Palin seems to have very little interest in. Wake up folks!

I’m through with both parties. They’re all about proving which white man is less racist and less sexist. It’s all pandering and apologizing. That’s why I am not voting for any!

58 — Tom Iron wrote at 3:29 PM on February 10:

Interesting responses,

What you all don’t understand is, America/Americans are the best the world has ever seen. America was conceived by men who were putting together the summation of Western Civilization (of course they didn’t understand it at the time either). This place and these people started something that can’t be vanquished without destroying this world. Why do you think every revolution since has more or less based itself on the ideas thought of in 1776 to a greater or lesser degree? Because they were all trying to duplicate what happened here. Mao, Ho cChi Minh, Pol Pot, Abdel Nasser, Jomo Keyatta, Castro, and a thousand more were running around quoting Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, etc. What, do you think they were all fools? It’s because they wanted for their people what we have. The only thing they didn’t know was they didn’t have the human material that was here, and still is. Why do you think these bums who have seized control of our country are in such a frenzy all the time trying to destroy Americans who resist them by word or deed? It’s because they know they’re defending something that doesn’t make sense. That America and Americans are bad stuff. A bunch of hooey. It just doesn’t make sense.

As for our young people, yes, many of them who aren’t too good and those type of young people will not survive the coming blood letting, but I assure you that there are many more who are good Americans who will stand tall and make our people proud. No, they don’t realize it at this point, but when the blacks go mad, as I assure you they will, the young Whites will show the world what an American is. The world will stand dumbfounded, not understanding what they’re seeing. Especially after our young White people finally are victorious over the minorities. What would be done anywhere else in the world is that the victors would exterminate the defeated foes, but as we’re Americans, we will do the right thing by those foes who survive.

Don’t worry, I’m right. You will all see and it will be sooner than later.

Take care and don’t lose heart.

Tom Iron…

59 — White Patriot wrote at 1:37 AM on February 11:

Tom Iron:

We can only hope you are. It’s a long shot, be we do have to keep our faith if we are to keep the will to keep on fighting for our people.

60 — ghw wrote at 1:38 AM on February 11:

I find nothing to criticize in Taylor’s performance here. I liked it — including his characterization of Sarah Palin, although perhaps, in the heat of the moment, he chose an excessivly strong word. (Moron would have sufficed!) But basically he’s right. I also agree with his comments on Obama.

And putting two against one wasn’t really a problem in this case, as the African was so inarticulate that he hardly had anything to say, and the mulatto woman was (typically) so tangled up in her own garbled clichés and hackneyed stereotypes that she was unable to make much sense. She was out of her depth. Taylor handled both of them. The moderator, fortunately, seemed to be impartial and did not attempt to steer the discussion against Taylor or make him look foolish (unlike the disgusting example of Griffin’s treatment on BBC). I guess it takes a Russian program to show us some fairness (!!!).

Also, the interruptions were not really unfair (or annoying) as they were allowed by the rules of the program (which was made clear). Taylor made a few of his own, and he discharged himself quite well, I thought.

61 — Thrasymachus wrote at 9:06 PM on February 11:

Gosh!

The level of intellectual activity required in dealing with ordinary social situations — required by these demanding non-whites — is mind-boggling! Really, the mental strain that the multiracial setup is creating for the individual is an outrage!

A natural society, where people have a common heritage and ancestry is obviously necessary to reduce stress to a manageable level and allow for the more mundane and ordinary business of everyday living to proceed in a spontaneous and natural manner.

The endless struggle and toil necessary to hold the multicultural and multiracial society together simply takes all the joy out of living. I’d really rather be dead than have to deal incessantly with this inner-conflict of the collective mind implicit in the multicultural society. Either dead or Amish!

Man is made to enjoy a simple and natural life, not to labor to resolve identity problems and conflict that actually, fundamentally, have no resolution. This is the clearest proof ever that this multicultural setup is flawed, unnatural, doomed to failure, and the source of potential misery that can expand to throw all civilization into chaos and anarchy.

There are so many good things in life to think about and enjoy — but the misfortune of the never-ending race-relations troubles is such a huge drain on Man’s intellect and time and energy and resources! This Brave New World type multicultural society is not the kind of social order that makes for personal happiness and the enjoyment of life as it was meant to be experienced. What a tragic waste and wrong road the leaders of the West have taken for Western Civilization.

62 — John wrote at 1:05 PM on February 13:

GHW:

I disagree. I thought both the African profesor and the Hispanic woman made their points directly. I disagree with them, but they certainly were articulate.

63 — A Swain wrote at 4:43 PM on February 15:

GetBackJack wrote at 7:24 PM on February 9:
“We haven’t learned our lesson because the whites doing the importing are not the ones stuck with the resulting problems!”

To begin with, the Whites doing or more pertinently, engineering and conducting the importing, are not genetically White at all.


However, many of their traitorous helpers are.

64 — John Smith wrote at 3:05 AM on February 16:

Obama’s “culture” isn’t his coffee skin color. His culture is white. White liberal elite white.


Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Send This Page      Search