American Renaissance
Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Send This Page       Date Archives       Category Archives

New Business-Group Ad Has Racial Undertones, Union Alleges

More news stories on Bizarre Racism Charges

Sam Stein, Huffington Post, November 4, 2009

A new ad from the Chamber of Commerce and its allies attacking Democratic-led efforts to pass health care legislation includes a storyline that union critics say is rife with racial undertones.

The spot, titled “Millions,” asserts that health reform could “wipe out even more jobs” than those lost so far. But it does so in a peculiar and perhaps controversial way.

The scenario of a distraught boss forced to fire an employee is illustrated by a white worker being summoned to the office as a black co-worker looks on.

An official with the AFL-CIO, who saw the ad air on Wednesday morning, argued that it was a perpetuation of the stereotype that minorities have a leg up on their colleagues because of affirmative-action policies. It gets at the heart of concerns raised by labor leaders like the AFL-CIO’s president, Richard Trumka, who fretted during the 2008 presidential campaign that Barack Obama’s candidacy would spur racial unrest within work forces.

“This is the same old right wing dog whistle politics,” said Eddie Vale, spokesman for the AFL-CIO. “They’re trying to use race and class to scare working people about a health care bill.”

{snip}

Original article

Email Sam Stein at stein@huffingtonpost.com.

(Posted on November 5, 2009)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment     Send This Page      Search

Comments

1 — Question Diversity wrote at 6:25 PM on November 5:

And it will be an effective ad. Not that the CoC has any interest in white people; they, like “Southern Strategist” Republicans, need the sympathy/votes of the white working class every once in awhile. “Black Hands White Hands” saved Jesse Helms’s political career in 1990; six years before that, his reading Sam Francis’s Martin Luther King speech also saved his career.

2 — Chris N. wrote at 6:53 PM on November 5:

“argued that it was a perpetuation of the stereotype that minorities have a leg up on their colleagues because of affirmative-action policies.”

Stereotype? If the purpose of affirmative action isn’t to give minorities a leg up, then what is it exactly?

3 — Anonymous wrote at 8:31 PM on November 5:

“it was a perpetuation of the stereotype that minorities have a leg up on their colleagues because of affirmative-action policies”.

Why is it a ‘stereotype’ that affirmative action hurts qualified whites, but seemingly ‘fact’ that righties use race and class and dog whistle politics to scare people? Only one of these is codified into law.

By the way, not sure if this is some kind of weird slight-of-hand, but… if they are really concerned about it… it’s people of color and their enablers who are scaring people. I’m not sure whites don’t have reason to be afraid. They certainly are afraid. But I suppose the media has that covered. It’s the fault of the right wing that whites are afraid. I think they’re being too modest.

4 — Tom in MI wrote at 9:33 PM on November 5:

If labor leaders really cared about black Americans, they would not support mass immigration and the “rights” of illegal aliens. American labor leaders have become globalists and rainbow utopians who don’t care about American workers—black or white.

5 — Svigor wrote at 9:40 PM on November 5:

The guilty flee when no man pursueth.

6 — jewamongyou wrote at 10:26 PM on November 5:

How typical. Not only is it “racist” to oppose racism (against whites), but it is even “racist” to acknowledge that it exists.

7 — Shawn (the female) wrote at 3:28 PM on November 6:

But imagine the outrage if a white co-worker was looking on while the black man gets the proverbial axe. Oh no, racism! As is stated on Amren virtually every day, “you can’t win regardless how you treat them.”


Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Send This Page      Search