American Renaissance
Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Send This Page       Date Archives       Category Archives

BNP Racist Video: ‘Spot the White Man’

More news stories on Britain

Jordan, NowPublic (Canada), November 5, 2009

A racist video has appeared on AlanSugar1’s Youtube channel called “Spot the White Man”, which claims that “indigenous white people” were displaced by non-white immigrants, and that this could happen to your neighborhood!!!!!! If you watch the video, you’ll immediately notice that the walk along this Peckham Rye high street shows a totally normal street scene, with normal people doing normal things, like chatting, shopping, waiting for the bus. But, because these people aren’t white, this is somehow a bad thing. My anger over this video isn’t based in political correctness, but in distaste for a clearly b******t argument. This video is blatantly racist, and appeals to the closet xenophobes out there, most likely those who are unaware that 1/4 of English people have French blood.

I used to live in South London, in a predominantly black and South Asian neighborhood. The only difference I noticed was that . . . actually, there was no difference compared to the “white” neighborhoods in London that I lived in. Being in Zone 3, things were far less expensive, which obviously makes it favorable to immigrants, of which I was one. I was just as much a stranger to England as someone from Somalia or Kenya, but I seriously doubt that the proponents of this video would have as much of a problem with me.

The modern world was built on immigration, and no mistake. “Indigenous white people of Peckham” . . . oh, please.

(Oh, and that’s obviously not the Youtube channel of the real Alan Sugar, former owner of Tottenham Hotspur)

[Editor’s Note: “Spot the White Man” has been removed from YouTube owing to “terms of use violation.”

Original article

(Posted on November 16, 2009)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment     Send This Page      Search

Comments

1 — sbuffalonative wrote at 6:13 PM on November 16:


Found it:

http://tinyurl.com/yb6jdvr

2 — WR the elder wrote at 7:23 PM on November 16:

The modern world was built on immigration, and no mistake. “Indigenous white people of Peckham” … oh, please.

The modern world was built by white people, who discovered the laws of mechanics, the laws of electricity and magnetism, the laws of chemistry, quantum mechanics, most of molecular biology, most mathematics beyond elementary algebra, and most of the technology based upon these sciences.

And yes, the indigenous people of Peckham are indeed white.

3 — Anonymous wrote at 7:29 PM on November 16:

1/4 of all Brits have French blood… Well I guess anything is Ok then.

4 — sofita wrote at 7:42 PM on November 16:

This video is blatantly racist, and appeals to the closet xenophobes out there, most likely those who are unaware that 1/4 of English people have French blood.

Oh horrors! A fourth of English people have French blood. Well then what does it mean to be English after all? OMG people give me a break.

5 — Anonymous wrote at 7:47 PM on November 16:

Another youtube video along the same lines.
For those of you outside the UK this may come as a great shock to you.
I weep for the future.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1b9J8D3tOg

6 — HH wrote at 7:57 PM on November 16:

“…1/4 of English people have French blood.”

Ah, the Brit version of the American, “We are a nation of immigrants” fraud! Nice try idiot - but it is hardly a little French ancestry that the BNP, etc. are concerned with. Just as America’s history of White, Western European immigrants has no parallel with an invasion of third-world cast-offs from every disparate corner of the globe.

Even in their endless complaining about all us evil “racists,” the enemy cannot be intellectually honest.

7 — Anonymous wrote at 9:11 PM on November 16:

“The modern world was built on immigration”

Don’t do drugs kids, this is the result

8 — Anonymous wrote at 9:16 PM on November 16:

I live in Canada, and downtown Toronto has become an alien city of Third World people, surreally overlayed on streets and buildings built in the last century entirely by whites.

Seeing a majority of people of foreign origin in white-built cities is unnatural and incongruous, alerting the eye to something gone awfully wrong in nature.

9 — Linus wrote at 9:39 PM on November 16:

“This video has been removed due to terms of use violation.”

Uh-huh. If you can’t whine about “racism” and “xenophobia” (or invent some new insults), censor it.

Pathetic.

10 — Anonymous wrote at 10:02 PM on November 16:

It appears that the video “Spot the White Man” has been removed from Youtube. However, I can easily find NOFX’s “Kill the White Man” and Kamau Kambon’s advocating genocide against white people. Can we say double standard?

11 — Anonymous wrote at 10:41 PM on November 16:

It’s not as if there are anti-immigrant abuses that desperately need to be checked. Quite the opposite. ‘Positive action’ and political correctness are running rampant, as well as immigrant crime. Not to mention the all pervasive ‘white oppressor’ mentality. If it’s wrong to stereotype, indeed to actively judge by race, why is it enlightenment to name whites and only whites as racist, oppressive, privileged etc.

This white guy is being remarkably short sighted. It truly looks as if it will only be when whites are so obviously facing extinction - only then will they begin to wake up, count for something, and have rights too. By then I would imagine it will be too late. I would imagine that’s the nature of demographics and simple math.

12 — François wrote at 11:35 PM on November 16:

I am of French extraction, and let me tel you something: We are as White as are the English. And the British are aware that the population of their country is made of people mixed Anglo-saxon, Scottish, Irish, French and Scandinavian blood!

Obviously, to anyone who has ever seen any of them, people like the Pakistani immigrants look nothing like people pf European extraction!

Is the author of that text, either blind or mentally challenged?

13 — P Norman wrote at 12:21 AM on November 17:

“…1/4 of English people have French blood.” WOW! I had no idea the French were non-White. You learn something everyday, don’t you?

14 — Anonymous wrote at 12:22 AM on November 17:

What a pompous, deluded fool this writer is. “1/4th of English people have some French blood”. So what? The French are just across the Channel and have interacted with the people of the British isles for thousands of years. Probably 1/4th of Germans have some French blood too. Is having some French blood some kind of argument against opposing non-White immigration? I don’t even understand the fool’s point. In any case the video is “spot the White man”, not “spot the Englishman with a drop of French blood in him”. What an ass! “The modern world was built on immigration”. This is a bald-faced lie. Neither Britain or the rest of Europe (or many other places) were ever “immigrant-countries”. Is he saying that Britain was not a modern country in 1948 when the treasonous Labour party opened the floodgates of non-Whites? This is ridiculous.

15 — Cassiodorus wrote at 12:46 AM on November 17:

“A racist video has appeared on AlanSugar1’s Youtube channel called “Spot the White Man”, which claims that “indigenous white people” were displaced by non-white immigrants, and that this could happen to your neighborhood!!!!!!”

If in fact the video shows a London neighborhood inhabited completely by non-whites, it is not making a “claim;” it is documenting a fact.

“The only difference I noticed was that … actually, there was no difference compared to the “white” neighborhoods in London that I lived in.”

Of course not. Those crime statistics are a pack of lies.

16 — Howard W. Campbell wrote at 1:25 AM on November 17:

Maybe somebody can walk down the streets of Fargo, ND and post a video called “Spot the Black Man” (If some offended minorities want equal time). You notice that in the video, the electricity and telephones work; the train didn’t derail and fall off the bridge; and the pavement of the streets seem to be in good order. The infrastructure hasn’t been destroyed - yet, but this looks like it could come right out of some third world dump. In 20 to 30 years, that street will look no different than it would in Zimbabwe. Who keeps the infrastructure going, it certainly isn’t the residents of the neighborhood who were on the video.

I recently saw a DVD called “World’s Toughest Fixes” that was created by the National Geographic Channel. One involved replacing a TV (Broadcasting) antenna that was 1800 feet in the air in the middle of South Dakota. The entire crew was white, as were the electrical lineman replacing 60 year old line in NJ. The bulk of the people in this series were white. This guy can whine about people being racist, but who keeps the lights on and makes things work?

17 — Can4Amren wrote at 2:26 AM on November 17:

I took the liberty of checking out the story at the source. By and large, NowPublic seems to be a gathering forum for left-wing hand wringers and naval gazers. However, they do allow comments, and by the looks of it the VAST majority of them for this story have been pro-White and intelligently posted. I’ll bet this self-hating White Jordan fellow wasn’t expecting such a response! I say more of us AmRen’s should head on over, and deal these liberals a few more sucker punches! Heck, we may even be able to pop their self-righteous bubble for a little while…..

18 — Reggie18b wrote at 2:40 AM on November 17:

My grandparents had a rather French sounding name, so I may be one of the Brits with French blood he is talking about. I hereby promise Jordan at NowPublic that if he can get the third-worlders in Europe to go back to Africa/Asia then I will gladly ‘go back’ to France.

Deal?

19 — Boudreaux wrote at 3:36 AM on November 17:

Well, God forbid that Western Europe actually have Europeans in it.
So tell me again why it’s so important ti “fight for indigenous rights of all indigenous people” and yet somehow, there’s a people forgotten, and who are being treated as if they never mattered and should in fact be exterminated?

As a child indoctrinated in liberal schools, I am truly confused. Please explain.

20 — Anonymous wrote at 4:00 AM on November 17:

Anybody who has the means to do so is free to roam the streets of London and actually see for themselves.After all there’s nothing to beat eyewitness testimony.
Just walk down the main thoroughfares of Wembley, Peckham, Southall, East Ham, Bethnal Green, Ilford, Harrow, Tooting, Elephant & Castle, Brixton, Thornton Heath, Lewisham, Ealing, Hackney etc etc take in what you see as a purely objective disinterested observer.Just take in what you see - no prejudice, no axe to grind, just cold hard objectivity.
Now, an honest observer would get a distinct impression of the ethnic makeups of these neighborhoods.
Basically that is all these videos purport to do - purely eyewitness reportage of a camera filming, unedited, down local ‘High Streets’, taking in all that any casual walker will see.
Now how can that possibly described as ‘racist’ or ‘hateful’.

21 — Kenelm Digby wrote at 4:14 AM on November 17:

Anyone who has the means to do so is free to travel to London and walk the streets and see for themselves.
Travel to such neighborhoods as Wembley, Southall, Ealing, Acton, Harrow, Greenford, Hackney, Bethnal Green, Whitechapel, East Ham, Ilford, Peckham, Lewisham, Tooting, Elephant & Castle, Thornton Heath, Brixton, Harlesden, Tottenham etc etc.
Just walk down the main thoroughfares as a cold, objective eyewitness with no prejudices and no axes to grind.Just take in what you see around you.
Now, that is all these videos purport to do.They are nothing more and nothing less than the cold seeing eye of a video camera being pointed down a ‘High Street’, unedited and purely recording life as it goes on.
So how can this possibly be construed racist? - How can reportage of reality be possibly described ‘racist’ - this just shows how desperate and irrational the enemies of the BNP are.

22 — Anonymous wrote at 4:19 AM on November 17:

The funny thing is the street they show is actually the walk from the station to a place I worked briefly at. That job and what I saw really opened my eyes so congrats to Wales BNP for making it.
Horrified me then and still does now. If it opens just one or two others eyes then its worth it.

23 — Anonymous wrote at 6:22 AM on November 17:

Georgy Girl and Mrs. Brown`s daughter…nowhere in sight.

24 — ic1male wrote at 6:36 AM on November 17:

You tube had to ban it because the UAF started a campaign on their blogs encouraging other lefties to complain about it.The reason i read on a red fourum was, “if floating voters watch it they might vote BNP”. In other words they are worried (about our vote) and don’t want people to see the truth. http://northfieldpatriot.blogspot.com/

25 — Sardonicus wrote at 8:06 AM on November 17:

“This video is blatantly racist, and appeals to the closet xenophobes out there, most likely those who are unaware that 1/4 of English people have French blood.”

Oh, the humanity, I have French blood myself so I must be part English! The Third World invasion of England is no different than William the Conqueror? How many French Normans came over with William 10,000 to 20,000? How many Third Worlders have come to formerly Great Britain in the last thirty years—millions!

26 — Anonymous wrote at 8:44 AM on November 17:

Whites are being displaced and kicked in the teeth by the race traitors who have seized power. These race traitors and their allied minority minions can be erased overnight if a mere handful of white patriots arm themselves and take action. For the life of me I can’t understand what is holding them back…

27 — jewamongyou wrote at 9:59 AM on November 17:

“…1/4 of English people have French blood.”

Well then, I guess it’s no tragedy that Europeans overran the native Americans - since surely most native American tribes were mixed with other tribes anyway. Was there such a thing as a “pure Mohawk”?

28 — Dagworthy wrote at 10:27 AM on November 17:

Nationality is not the same as race. The borders between France and England have moved around; for example, The Hundred Years War saw the border in western France move quite a bit. The author would have a better case arguing Celtic vs. Nordic inhabitants of Britain.

The real issue is the displacement of the indigenous population. Lefties go into a swoon if some native tribe in New Guinea has a Western mining company build a town in its region, yet scream ‘racist’ if I don’t want to press ‘1’ for English.

29 — Jasper wrote at 10:59 AM on November 17:

This is nothing less than genocide of White people. The governments of most White nations are traiters. Until all non-Whites, who are nothing less than invaders and the Whites who support them are kicked out of Europe, our struggle will go on. Let these liberal traiters live in Pakistan or Nigeria. After all those countries are just like England to them. You must realise that our elites hate us. Get this straight in your head. Our elites in the government, in the media, in academia and even in industry hate us and are our enemies. Everytime we watch and pay for cable TV or for movies, we are helping our enemies, everytime we pay taxes we are helping our enemy and the enemy of our children.
If our governments were really concerned about us they would have been like the Indian government for example

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Biz-visas-to-Chinese-Tharoor-assures-steps-to-stop-misuse/articleshow/5184156.cms
Last year, the Indian government had issued 58,500 business visas to Chinese nationals.

In case of skilled workers, it would be imperative to prove that the particular skill was not available in India.

http://trak.in/news/illegal-workers-on-business-visa-asked-to-leave-india-by-oct-31/17986/


http://trak.in/news/tharoor-concerned-about-misuse-of-indian-business-visas/19059/
Tharoor said it was ‘a concern for three ministries – External Affairs, Home ministry and Labour Ministry’.
‘If unskilled workers are coming with these visas, they are taking the jobs of Indian unskilled workers,’ he said.


Source: Tharoor concerned about misuse of Indian business visas.

Contrast the concern for Indian workers in the Indian government to the complete indifference Western governments have for their own labourers.

30 — PaleRider wrote at 1:18 PM on November 17:

Eminent philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer said it best:

“The highest civilisation and culture, apart from the ancient Hindus and Egyptians, are found exclusively among the white races; and even with many dark peoples, the ruling caste or race is fairer in colour than the rest and has, therefore, evidently immigrated, for example, the Brahmans, the Incas, and the rulers of the South Sea Islands. All this is due to the fact that necessity is the mother of invention because those tribes that emigrated early to the north, and there gradually became white, had to develop all their intellectual powers and invent and perfect all the arts in their struggle with need, want and misery, which in their many forms were brought about by the climate. This they had to do in order to make up for the parsimony of nature and out of it all came their high civilisation.”

In the USA, founded in 1776 by and for ‘white people’, the mongrelization of culture continues, exemplified by high crime rates and a profound ignorance by its citizens of those principles that made this country great.

As the non-white immigration builds over time to its majority-voter status, white people will probably realize too late what many of us understand right now: what is happening to white displacement all over Europe is headed our way, and sooner than you think!

31 — Anonymous wrote at 9:30 PM on November 17:

“the video “Spot the White Man” has been removed from Youtube. However, I can easily find NOFX’s “Kill the White Man”.

“You tube had to ban it because the UAF started a campaign on their blogs encouraging other lefties to complain about it”.

I’m not sure that’s so much a reason as an excuse and a rationalization. If there were vocal support for ‘Spot the white man’ Youtube would say something about supporting principles over public opinion and it would still get the boot.

32 — Kick Them Out wrote at 9:51 PM on November 17:

It’s back up on Youtube. They keep taking it down, people keep putting it up: http://tinyurl.com/y9bs89a

33 — Johnny English wrote at 5:58 AM on November 18:

Even if the writer’s surprising claim that a quarter of the English have French blood were true it would constitute no knock-down argument against the transformation of once homogeneously white, English neighbourhoods into exclusively third-world slums (as accurately and ungainsayably documented by the “racist” videos).

It is possible (although unlikely) that a quarter of the English population have some NORMAN blood; possible because the Normans did indeed conquer and settle in England, unlikely because they constituted a small, elite ruling class who would have been unlikely to interbreed extensively with the Anglo-Saxon/Norse majority. (Incidentally, it is worth pointing out to our French poster that the Celtic peoples of Wales, Scotland and Ireland have stubbornly remained ethnically and culturally distinct from the predominantly Anglo-Saxon and Norse indigenous people of England, whom they continue to dislike and denigrate.)

34 — Rick wrote at 6:46 PM on November 18:

By reading this fools statements, I am convinced that he and ALL other deluded multi-cults believe that the entire globe was created and built up by every other race of human kind, EXCEPT for the EVIL white race, who usurped the other racial groups from their pre-eminent positions and enslaved them. It always intrigues me how such high achieving, intensely brilliant and creative brown “super cultures” were so easily deposed by such a wretched, lazy, war mongering and physically inferior white race; how we stole “their” ideas and built up our societies on “their” backs, while we sat on purple satin pillows being fed grapes by beautiful nubian princesses. You would think that these lofty minds could have conspired to rid the Earth of, as Susan Sontag so poignantly stated, “the cancer of human history.

This article enlightened me to the fact(?) that the French aren’t white! WHAT AN EPIPHANY!! I have been deceived all these years! Damn my public school education!

35 — SKIP wrote at 2:54 AM on November 19:

Even if the writer’s surprising claim that a quarter of the English have French blood

Let’s keep in mind that the FRENCHMEN most are thinking of are WHITE!! NOT the troublesome black African muslim invaders. The Emerald Isles have their own troublesome muslim Pakistanis to deal with.

36 — Historama wrote at 11:28 AM on November 19:

“Is having some French blood some kind of argument against opposing non-White immigration? I don’t even understand the fool’s point.”

Perhaps it has something to do with his understanding of what constitutes a meaningful identity. Unlike most people who believe in ‘white nationalism’, certain people in the world take ethnicity very seriously, including myself. IMO, ethnicity will ALWAYS trump race, because race is merely physical, whereas ethnicity involves many significant things besides just physical similarity. Believe it or not, to some it DOES make a difference whether one’s ancestors came from England as opposed to Armenia or Transylvania, or other places where ‘Caucasoids’ are indigenous…

The fact is, the vast majority of Americans simply don’t have any meaningful identity; most ‘whites’ in the US, for instance, were not regarded as such when they arrived. They have become ‘white’ simply because they have no genuine identity based on family history, ethnic background, etc. They cling to ‘race’ because, seemingly, it is all they have. In a way I almost feel sorry for them…

BOTTOM LINE: Meaningful identities are based on actual experience and actual relationships that have substance (i.e. family, community, language, culture, history, etc.), rather than just skin tone by itself. Why do you think that Europeans have been slaughtering each other for so long? Heck, why do you think that ‘white America’ has put up basically ZERO resistance to the attack on its supposed ‘identity’? Well, the answer is because most ‘white Americans’ don’t understand what it means to be a ‘white American’ in the first place. After all, what does that mean? Can you explain it? If you can’t draw solid, clear-cut boundaries around yourself as a people, then how can you really say that you ARE a ‘people’ to begin with? What is the difference being a ‘member’ and a ‘non-member’?

You’d think that ‘white nationalists’ would start by thinking about these sorts of things, rather than just chanting one-liners like ‘us whites, we got to stick together,’ or ‘halt non-white immigration!’ etc. Until those questions are faced, I honestly can’t see what your ‘cause’ is really about…

37 — Schoolteacher wrote at 4:15 PM on November 19:

36 Historama: You are claiming that this writer Jordan has a better understanding of “…what constitutes a meaningful identity…” than a White Nationalist? A White man from Canada who says that he is just as much a stranger to England as someone from Somalia or Kenya? That is absurd.

38 — Sardonicus wrote at 4:38 PM on November 19:

“Perhaps it has something to do with his understanding of what constitutes a meaningful identity.” Historama

Actually, we do have a meaningful identity based in Western European cultural traditions. We have great authors like Mark Twain, Nathaniel Hawthorne, John Steinbeck, Herman Melville, Ernest Hemmingway, etc., great painters like Winslow Homer, John Singer Sergeant, John Singleton Copley, Edward Hooper, etc. great composers like George Gershwin, Samuel Barber, Charles Ives, etc,Great architects like Louis Sullivan, Frank Lloyd Wright, Philip Johnson, etc. Political theorists like Jefferson, Madison, Adams, Washington, etc.

Identity is based in history. If our history is both lost and confused, I blame political correctness and multiculturalism for making it that way. I live in the South and we still have a strong white identity down here.

39 — l wrote at 6:05 PM on November 19:

Whites are by nature, by genetics, very individualistic, but they certainly can and more and more do see themselves as a distinct group. A racial group. In fact, with the Hate Laws now rising up, more whites will be forced into this type of thinking. Read AG Holder’s remarks, and basically you can decide who our enemies are, as he lists the anointed, those who will be “exempt” from enforcement. Historama is one of several people who claimed that White Nationalism was as silly as “Pan Asian” thinking, stating that the latter doesn’t exist. But in fact, Pan-Asian thinking and beliefs have been around for over a century.

I know Amren allows posts by these dopey interlopers in order to demonstrate the silliness and lies spewed by and believed in (by some) of the enemies of the white race. But as others have pointed out, the entire MSM gives the Puppet Masters a 24/7 outlet from which to stream their horse manure. The only reason these tools post here is to hopefully cause enough discomfort in newcomers, in those at the tipping point, to go away. To doubt things. “Ethnicity”. That can be sorted out by whites after things are cleaned up. The other sides lumps all whites together while it categorizes the blessed in every way possible. One would have to be an idiot to not see how well this actually works in our favor, never mind believe in the circular arguments and amateur rhetoric tossed about to try and derail the inevitable. The inevitable white backlash. Once enough whites are forced to see their kids going hungry while the chosen subjects of the New Order are well taken care of, it’s over. And that day is coming. That’s why the increasingly shrill posts from the other side are becoming more numerous. If they were so confident in their beliefs and plans they wouldn’t bother posting here. They’d ignore the site.

Anyway, we know the opposition is held to a lower standard, but things are to the point where maybe the opposition should be ignored when it comes to posting “opinions” here. Or at least weed out a lot of the repetitive silliness. We can get that garbage 24/7 from the radio, TV or by listening to any one of thousands of brain-dead, brainwashed college cretins who are capable only of repeating worn out, re-tread Marxist dogma, while possessing no true critical thinking ability. But the back-patting they get for toeing the line stokes their egos just enough for them to keep chugging away for their masters. It’s Pavlovian.

40 — Historama wrote at 1:14 PM on November 20:

“Ethnicity”. That can be sorted out by whites after things are cleaned up.

HOW? How are you going to sort them out? Most people here are absolutely in favor of creating some sort of pan-European mish-mash. They don’t even make a secret of it; how is that ‘sorting things out’? What does that mean for those people who aren’t ethnically mixed and who want to maintain their identity, will they be seen as ‘snobs’ or ‘purists’ simply because they don’t want Hungarians or Italians in their bloodline? Nations are just breeding populations, after all, and if you can’t sort this out right now then I seriously doubt you’ll have any better opportunity in the future…


“The other sides lumps all whites together while it categorizes the blessed in every way possible.”

Who cares? So what if they do that; does that make it correct? Why let other people predetermine your own options?

41 — Big Mazungo wrote at 11:49 PM on November 20:

40 — Historama wrote at 1:14 PM on November 20:“The other sides lumps all whites together while it categorizes the blessed in every way possible.”

Who cares? So what if they do that; does that make it correct? Why let other people predetermine your own options? —-

But that’s exactly what Historama seeks to do with the all over the place mish-mash of ill-conceived ideas that he and the people he follows post here and at other sites.

It’s noticeable that like most of the people the individual in #39 wrote about, Historama can’t really refute or counter his arguments. That particular post was concise and cutting without being snarky. The people desperately trying to deny white identity don’t seem to have people on their side who are able to clearly express ideas like #39 and some of the other people in this thread who posted inarguable facts. The other side always tries to engage in word games, denial or flat out ignores the people they can’t keep up with. I guess to the uneducated or ignorant they come off as somewhat intellectual. It is always very interesting to see this type of thing, a leftist trying to deflect concrete ideas by presenting them as meaning something else. Or it’s possible Historama couldn’t grasp the ideas he was trying to counter.

More and more it seems as if the classes in rhetoric and debate taught in colleges today must be designed for lightweights and true believers. This must be why the “Spot the White Man” video is so irritating to them.

42 — kc wrote at 8:07 PM on November 21:

re:”Historama”-“The fact is, the vast majority of Americans simply don’t have any meaningful identity; most ‘whites’ in the US, for instance, were not regarded as such when they arrived. They have become ‘white’ simply because they have no genuine identity based on family history, ethnic background, etc.”

This is nonsense. American Whites are and have always been considered White because they are, they didn’t become such. Also, there most certainly is a distinct American culture and ethnicity, as well as regional cultures and all nations have a culture and ethnicity.

43 — Anonymous wrote at 10:04 AM on November 22:

I wasn’t surprised by the video. It looks pretty much like any street in Philadelphia or in Montmartre in Paris.

44 — A Swain wrote at 2:02 PM on November 22:

Re Historma

“HOW? How are you going to sort them out? Most people here are absolutely in favor of creating some sort of pan-European mish-mash. They don’t even make a secret of it; how is that ‘sorting things out’? What does that mean for those people who aren’t ethnically mixed and who want to maintain their identity, will they be seen as ‘snobs’ or ‘purists’ simply because they don’t want Hungarians or Italians in their bloodline? Nations are just breeding populations, after all, and if you can’t sort this out right now then I seriously doubt you’ll have any better opportunity in the future…”

Native Northern Europeans comprise the same race. Nationality is based on territory, heritage, belief system(s)culture and also ethnicity.

Furthermore, nations are far, far more than simply breeding populations.

A nation is a living embodiment of ancestral lineage, language, religion, creative energy as manifested in scientific and technological discoveries and actual inventions, literature, art and customs, all of which fit together to form what’s known as heritage AND culture.

Those who wish to remain ethnically separate are perfectly entitled to do so and no indigenous legislature or foreigner has a right to force them to do anything else.

Whether those who don’t wish to mix are seen as snobs and/or purests or not, is not the business of foreign nations to interfere in. All nations have a right to pursue what policies they deem best for their nation as long as such policies don’t impinge on the security and well-being of others.

In the interim, all that matters is that the members of each white European descended nationality start enacting their individual survival strategies, ie, one for one and one for all, in other words. Joint co-operation will naturally follow between the nationalities for the purpose of streamlining and consolidating overall fightback, and ultimate collective preservation.

45 — Historama wrote at 12:41 PM on November 23:

44 — A Swain wrote at 2:02 PM on November 22:

“Native Northern Europeans comprise the same race.”

No they do not. Even among Northern Europeans you see considerable variation, not only between countries but within countries. Look at the British Isles, for instance: because of successive waves of immigration/conquest, there is considerable diversity in eye color, hair color, etc. These ARE racial differences; yes, they are similar in a ‘basic’ way, but that doesn’t mean they are the ‘same’. Sameness and similarity are different concepts.

“Nationality is based on territory, heritage, belief system(s)culture and also ethnicity.”

Indeed, and these things are distinct from race.

Multiple races can create a single, unified ethnicity through interaction, shared culture, language, etc. But, that doesn’t mean that they are the same race. The races from the British Isles are a classic example of a collection of races that ultimately ended up creating a unified cultural structure (i.e. ‘Anglo-Saxon’ culture).


“Those who wish to remain ethnically separate are perfectly entitled to do so and no indigenous legislature or foreigner has a right to force them to do anything else.

Whether those who don’t wish to mix are seen as snobs and/or purests or not, is not the business of foreign nations to interfere in. All nations have a right to pursue what policies they deem best for their nation as long as such policies don’t impinge on the security and well-being of others.”

Okay, well how does this play out with regards to different ethnocultural groups who are presently in a multiethnic, multicultural society such as the US? So, in your view, it is perfectly reasonable for Anglos to keep separate from others, both physically and culturally, and still be able to cooperate with other Euro-descended people for the purpose of overthrowing multiculturalism?

46 — Laughing in Cali wrote at 1:31 AM on November 24:

I think the Big Mazungo took the wind out of Historama’s sails with his observations. The facts in some of the other posts were also apparently too much to overcome. There is a white identity. That bothers a lot of people. Especially the whites who don’t consider themselves white. Think about that.

47 — A Swain wrote at 5:25 PM on November 29:

Historma

“No they do not. Even among Northern Europeans considerable you see variation, not only between countries but within countries.”

Northern Europeans ARE the same race. The fact that there are variations in eye, hair and skin tone (not skin colour), does NOT signify different races. Such variations are naturally occurring.

“Look at the British Isles, for instance: because of successive waves of immigration/conquest, there is considerable diversity in eye color, hair color, etc. These ARE racial differences; yes, they are similar in a ‘basic’ way, but that doesn’t mean they are the ‘same’. Sameness and similarity are different concepts.”

I repeat! Eye and hair colour do NOT denote separate racial groups. You are lying through your teeth and you know it. These variations are naturally-occurring in the Northern European peoples, the peoples under discussion on this thread. In the Bantu race, for example, red and even yellow hair, although quite rare, does occasionally occur yet we are talking about the same race of people.

Nationality is NOT distinct from race. It is part and parcel of race. The same race of peoples do consist of different nationalities with their distinct languages and cultures.

“Multiple races can create a single, unified ethnicity through interaction, shared culture, language, etc. But, that doesn’t mean that they are the same race. The races from the British Isles are a classic example of a collection of races that ultimately ended up creating a unified cultural structure (i.e. ‘Anglo-Saxon’ culture).”

Multiple races CANNOT ‘create’ shared cultures and languages. Your statement to the contrary, is false. However, people of different nationalities (same race) can create a single unified ethnicity although cohesion and unity may not always result either where multiple nationalities of the same race even migrate into a homeland or homelands not their own, in too close a timeframe because it prevents gradual assimilation which is the key to success.

Ethnicity also encompasses race. It is NOT possible, therefore, to create a single unified ethnicity where there are multiple races sharing the same living space.

“Okay, well how does this play out with regards to different ethnocultural groups who are presently in a multiethnic, multicultural society such as the US? So, in your view, it is perfectly reasonable for Anglos to keep separate from others, both physically and culturally, and still be able to cooperate with other Euro-descended people for the purpose of overthrowing multiculturalism?”

Ah! now you’ve just revealed your true agenda!

You are a Marxist multiculturalist who is intent on pushing wholesale miscegenation and whose aim and ONLY aim as the bottom line, is the wipeout of the White European genome.


Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Send This Page      Search