Your Race Affects Whether People Write You Back

Some would say that black women being “talkative” is something other than “sweetheartedness.”

As far as WM/Middle Eastern women, I think WM, especially non-racial ones, fall for the taqqiya of Muslim women more often.

It’s interesting that white males do manage to reply to Middle Eastern women. Is there some kind of emergent fetish there?

Aren’t “Middle Easterners” more closely genetically related to whites than other races?

“Race shouldn’t matter in messaging”?… Really… What about appearance?… If we are admonished to be color and texture blind…wouldn’t it be more of a virtue to be completely blind/ oblivious to appearance?… and isn’t it a form of biggotry also to prefer intelligence over the lack there of? What you see here is that whites and native Americans prefer eachother’s company and that other races prefer whites company to their own,… no suprize…

“It’s here where things get interesting, for white women in particular. If you look at the match-by-race table before this one, the “should-look-like” one, you see that white women have an above-average compatibility with almost every group. Yet they only reply well to guys who look like them. There’s more data on this towards the end of the post.”

Personally, I think the disparities in these sets of data, reflect the conflicts that arise when abjectly malevolent propaganda (and what else is multiculturalism and its primary goal of white genocide via miscegenation, but totally wretched and diabolical cant) runs into the hard wall of reality. The United States is a Western society of the first tier; our culture and our people are (and can only be) based on the genetic and temperamental characteristics of Europeans. Yes, there are some differences between our country and the continent and its islands, but primarily we are the branches and roots of the same tree.

This is a fundamental truth that is reflected in both broad and personal social terms/trends. Thus, it should be no surprise that while the officially expected multicultural responses to any survey are given robotically by whites, when the actual fact of living them reduces to a personal choice, whites (at least the normal ones) tend to seek out their own. In other words, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist or brain surgeon to figure out why whites primarily seek out other whites to date or marry, even through computer matchmaking services.

That white women may respond more frequently than white men in general, is probably a reflection of the normal gender roles being somewhat equalized or even inverted on such websites. After all, men are used to seeking out and requesting romance, while women accept and reject in most other circumstances. On such websites as this OkCupid, anonymity offers an opportunity for some gender role reversal; or put another way, white men have more options in the accept or reject category.

There are other speculations and interpretations that I could make, but I think I will end them here for now,

John PM.

I want too see the reply rate for black males to white females. Probably would be very high.

Regarding the last part about White men getting the most replies, but responding about 20% less of the time. I wonder if there is a difference in the absolute number of replies given by White males? The thought behind my question is that White males don’t have any more time to respond than others, and thus, they can’t respond to an equal percentage of their more numerous emails. It’s good that White women prefer White men to the exclusion of everyone else. If that’s not the case, there can’t be a future that includes White people. I know the non-Whites and traitors lament this.

The author is jerk who somehow finds himself in a position of authority to tell people, especially white men, who they SHOULD be replying to and what that reply rate should be.

However, it’s good to see that most white men and women are showing some semblance of racial solidarity. I don’t think most are as miscegenistic as many are lead to believe.

“According to our internal metrics, at least, OkCupid’s users are better-educated, younger, and far more progressive than the norm, so I can imagine that many sites would actually have worse race stats.”

More non-sense. Everywhere I look, it’s those “better-educated” and more intelligent folks that choose to stick to their own.

“I want too see the reply rate for black males to white females. Probably would be very high.”

It should be 0% since white females shouldn’t be emailing black males.

Young white men, you are in demand! Even though you are disparaged by academia, the media, and many of Obama’s “czars,” other races secretly desire your beautiful genes, intellect and achievements.

Now, please be aware that it is probably not “YOU” personally these non-white women want, but the increased status they hope to achieve by being with a white man and having children who are better looking, smarter and possibly richer than they would be otherwise.

Don’t let anyone use you and don’t squander those rare, precious genes. Only one race is able to make blue eyes, green eyes, blond hair, light brown hair, red hair, etc. Only one race has invented almost everything in the modern age. Only one race has championed the individual rather than the herd.

I retired out of the military. It was not unusual for a solider to have a foreign born wife. What was unusual was to run across a women in the military that had a foreign born husband. It seems that an American husband will treat their foreign wife the same wherever they are. But a foreign husband will treat their American wife one way in America and another way when he brings her back home.

Being a white man really is great, I was on one of those stupid dating sites for about two weeks after I was bummed out from a break up and I got flooded with all kinds of responses from all kinds of women.

You could pick racial preferences which I originally had as “doesn’t matter” as a ploy to appear the paragon of equality and fairness but I got swamped by hispanic women nonstop until I checked the option for Caucasian only, and no change still got nonstop hispanic women. Like I am going to go up to the Bronx in the middle of the night to take some Dominican girl on a date and get stabbed by her latin king brother. Nahhh….. Just ended up deleting the account and worked things out with my ex and lived happily ever after with my plain old white girlfriend.

Daily separatist:

Perhpas you should pay a visit to a number of urban areas. You will see a number of upscale professional couples in interracial relationships.

If ‘racism’ no longer exclusively refers to advocating or committing violence against people solely because of their skin color then it is no longer anything to be concerned about. Beyond that line, efforts to ‘eradicate’ ‘eliminate’ ‘stamp out’ racism transform into an assault on the basic human right of freedom of association.

I found it most interesting that Indian men don’t respond well to Indian women. I guarantee that most Indian men on these sites are just there to find a white woman. Indians are, by far, the most racist ethnic group I’ve ever met, especially in relation to other Asian ethnic groups. I saw a poll a few months ago that showed that Indians in Virginia voted around 80% for Obama. Indians hate white males.

I’m going to skip the whole “Gee, I can’t believe a libtard is trying to dictate our lives” argument, since I can believe it. In fact, it is to be expected, otherwise the fanciful dreams of the liberals would never come true.

Instead, I was wondering if anyone understood this lecturing socialist drivel enough to understand how the heck he established what the reply rate “should” be. He seems to be begging the question when he makes the statement: “…we know race shouldn’t matter to replies because the races all match each other more or less evenly…” I saw no such proof that the races match each other evenly. Is the bit about the Zodiac signs supposed to support this claim? Because I can’t see how astrological superstition can be compared with biological and cultural variation in any way, shape, or form.

Then again, maybe I’m the idiot for thinking I could find a logical argument in a post that opens with: “Welcome back, dorks.”

The way I see it, these statistics reflect the obvious racial loyalty that is genetically ingrained in everyone.

The fact that White males receive the most replies (ironic, considering how much we’re emasculated and criticized in the West) is not surprising in the least. White men (on average when compared to other races, of course) are natural leaders, explorers, innovators, and most importantly, providers.

This article almost permeates with the subtle bitterness of the racial traitor/liberal who typed it. He seems to expect White women to abandon White men, on the basis of some deluded dream of “progress” and “equality.” It truly irritates me when I read this kind of nonsense, since it is always constructed so as to disparage White men and castigate White women for failing to live up to the miscegenation quotas. It is heartening, however, that even after fifty years of cultural Marxist indoctrination, most White women are still loyal to their male counterparts.

It wouldn’t suprise me if they were referring primarily to persian females, many of which could easily pass for white.

As for white males getting the most replies, can’t say I’m suprised. Despite our portrayal as undesireable in virtually every form of media, somehow women of every race still seem to figure otherwise. Probably something to do with recognition of the alpha male on a genetic level.

Funny, that.

As usual, an observation of white behavior that becomes sinister because the complexity that proves it mostly reasonable is unnoticed by incompetent, simplifying investigators.

A few interesting comments from the source site that might, if you were not an idiot, suggest an explanation other than “racism”:

“I am very racist against Hispanic men IRL, because I ride the metro in LA and get nothing but constant catcalls and whistles from them. It’s really gross.

Online, though, race doesn’t affect my responses. I respond to the messages I feel a connection to, and that’s that. However, I have noticed a lot of messages I get from black & Latino guys here run something like, “daym gurl u lookin fine, suk my c*ck.” I’m not saying all messages from black & Latino guys read this, of course, but in my experience… that’s all I’ve got to go on here. I have dated and been attracted to men of literally every race and color, but I know that that’s why MY response stats are skewed.”
— Antithestasia

“I think these results are likely to be massively skewed by the fact that there are a lot of men on OkCupid—mostly Asian men but also a few black men—who send generic messages like the following one (which, from the country code, is from a man in Nigeria):

“realy liked what i read about u.would realy love to talk with u on phone.heres my cell number…+234**********………..i must say i was impresed by ur profile,am quite new on this and will really like to hear from u.”

Or, indeed, less subtle ones like this one:

“You are very gorgeos
You have nice boobs
and
very sexy legs”

Personally, those are messages I’m not going to respond to. And broadly my experience has been that even though a few white men send messages like these, they are outnumbered by white men who send more appealing kinds of messages. I also note that these offputting messages are disproportionately sent by men who are actually living overseas.”
— ophelia_in_red

“You’re missing a key piece of information, which is how message content correlates with race. Almost every message I’ve gotten from a black male has been something like “yo wat up sexy” and we learned from a few blog posts ago that netspeak really kills your reply rate, I’m sure there’s plenty of racism, but I know that for myself that’s probably the biggest factor for why as a white female I reply to black males a lot less.”
— Renee

“Has anyone considered the question of how closely race aligns with culture, and how that affects these sorts of statistics? Personally, I haven’t dated a lot of African American or Hispanic men, but it’s not because of their race — it’s because I simply haven’t found I have much in common with them. I’m white, upper middle class, working in technology, and I do musical theater for fun. That means I’m much more likely to date Asian, Indian, and Caucasian men because I’m much more likely to connect with them and feel we have things in common.”
— Tanya

“I am a white male. I have responded to 100% of the non-white women (that is, three blacks from Africa and two Philippinas) who have contacted me. All of the Africans turned out to be scammers, and I now assume that any “African woman” who contacts me is a scammer. The Philippinas were serious Christians (I am an atheist) with poor English language skills. Even if I was interested in these women, I know from experience how difficult and expensive it is to bring foreign women into the United States. There is no way I would want to go through that again.

As I noted above, I have responded to all of the non-white women who have contacted me, but I can understand why most men wouldn’t. It isn’t necessarily racism.”
— Guy Fawkes

“At the risk of stereotyping … in an earlier blog entry, you mentioned that text-isms like “ur” and “wat” are big turnoffs. It seems to me that African-American women (can’t speak for the men, since I don’t read their profiles) do this a LOT more in their profiles than other users.”
— Catbus

I wonder: if they actually asked people why they acted as they did instead of just drawing their own conclusions from the statistics, what proportion of the responses would be like these? But certainly, if enough of them were that whites began to appear reasonable, at once their validity would be questioned. This is just an excuse for racism by people who cannot accept the truth, just like “I have a black friend”, or maybe you’re not racist consciously, but subconsciously you are, because you’ve absorbed the racism inherent in th…blah blah blah unfalsifiable, disgusting means to invalidate anything a white person says.

If I had a nickel for every time a Latina or southasian chick gave me the eye - and then the eye again - I’d be one heck of a rich guy. Alas, I moved to this urban area and got married so quickly - to an Indian chick. (Really hot, by the way, and very aryan.)

And yes, a lot of Middle Easterners, northern Indians and northern Asians have a lot of genetic similarities to European extracted peoples. Remember that the huge grasslands of Central Asia connected the two worlds for thousands of years and in the Middle East, the Greeks were all over the place, even as the Crusaders and others were there busy spreading their genes around. Even a large portion of the so-called Hispanics are all or nearly all white. So I do not consider it mycegenation if a white person marries someone from those types of backgrounds. Heck, southern Italians are the original mixed race people with white, Arab and other groups mixed in. Spain was an Arab dominated country for 700 years - that’s 700 years folks - and almost all people from there are half to a quarter Arab or Berber.

I think the most important thing we as Americans mustr focus on is preserving Western traditions and culture, rather than a shifting sense of racial purity. Remember when Polish and Ukrainian people and Irish and Italians were considered non-white?

We need to convert the non-whites to our more advanced culture and ways. Race will always shift slightly through the years. We white people in America don’t look like white people in Europe anymore. Have you considered that? But we shar a common cultural heritage, and that, my friends, is what can be preserved and expanded upon. Think about it.

What’s sick is that White males are writing Asian and Hispanic females so much, and that these groups reply so vehemently. Between White women being lost to black men and White men being lost to Mestizos and Asians, I’d say the gene pool has taken a 60% casualty rate in the last forty years.

It appears that white men are highly sought after by women of all races. Let this be a lesson to white women who plan to sport f*** the exciting bad boys and players while they’re young and hot and then wheel in a nice guy around 30, after their looks start to slide and they hear their biological clock start to tick. If they do that, the competition for the remaining decent white guys will be very stiff, and they’ll likely grow old alone with no one to keep them company except for their 30 cats.

To The Daily Seperatist:
“The author is jerk who somehow finds himself in a position of authority to tell people, especially white men, who they SHOULD be replying to and what that reply rate should be.”

Hold on fella!
I believe when the atuhor uses the word “should” what he is trying to get across is that is the amount that should have happened based purely on statistics.
I think it’s more a bad choice of words than anything.

“White men get more responses. Whatever it is, white males just get more replies from almost every group……………

….White women prefer white men to the exclusion of everyone else—and Asian and Hispanic women prefer them even more exclusively.”

This is obvious as White men on average are more handsome and attractive compared the men of all other races. Besides West African descended black and some Pacific islander males, they are manlier than the males of all other races. And other than East Asian males, they make the best husbands compared to the males of all other races (especially blacks). Indeed White men have the best combination of qualities any sensible woman would want. So this is hardly surprising?

The NERVE of these Racist White people. Refusing to respond to interest expressed by non-Whites. Obama should get a law passed, making it a major crime to refuse sex with or even not wanting to get involved with people not in your own racial group.

(One lesson OUR kids learned very early. You can be friends with non-Whites. But that’s all. Having sex, marrying a non-White and YOU are no longer part of this family. So don’t bother ever knocking on our door again.) Hard? Maybe some people might think so, but our family will always remain pure White. Something we call by BY CHOICE!

If you look at the match-by-race table before this one, the “should-look-like” one, you see that white women have an above-average compatibility with almost every group.

White men also have above average “compatibility”.

Alternatively:

1) On average, men tailor their match systems (honestly or not) to be pleasing to white women.

2) On average, women tailor their responses (honestly or not) to be pleasing to white men.

All races in the sample tune towards white values, thus the “compatibility” result.

Jay - Don’t speak for us. I’m not certain why you didn’t marry a Negress since it ain’t about “skin-color”. I’m an American and I live in the very xenophobic, nay confident East and I look very local. I have always considered the Irish, Poles and Ukraines (ahem) White thank you.

“Remember when Polish and Ukrainian people and Irish and Italians were considered non-white?”

No. Why don’t you provide a quote from a biologist, geneticist or physical anthropologist who made this claim within the last 130 years or so? Noel Ignatiev doesn’t count.

I found it most interesting that Indian men don’t respond well to Indian women. I guarantee that most Indian men on these sites are just there to find a white woman. Indians are, by far, the most racist ethnic group I’ve ever met, especially in relation to other Asian ethnic groups.

__

I guarantee that Indians strongly stick with their own community. Look to Britain and you quickly realize that South Asian-white couples are very rare. Indians are extremely arrogant and racist, especially against blacks. Never call an Indian black even when they are quite dark.

“One lesson OUR kids learned very early. You can be friends with non-Whites. But that’s all.”

I don’t believe this. Not at all. As an observant ‘race realist’ myself, I don’t believe it’s possible for a white to be Friends with a non-white. A door-mat, maybe. But that’s about it.

Jay,

If Indians and Middle Easterners are White according to you then Obama is White too. Race is much more important than culture as once race purity is lost it is nearly impossible to get back. Culture can be regained back. Europe during the Middle Ages lost a lot of classical Greek culture and thought but regained them several centuries later thanks to the Irish monks who preserved them. Culture can be regained as long as the racial genes are maintained which medieval Europeans did maintain.

And even if American Whites do not look like European Whites (Due to the mixing of various White nationalities and wee bit of Native American genes), they still do not look like Arabs, Indians or Obama look alikes. They still look White, behave nearly like Europeans and have the same capabilities as Europeans. American and Canadian Whites have built a civilization which is as advanced as and is extremely similar to Europe. The same cannot be said of Arabs and Indians, though Northern Asians do build advanced but non-Western (and thus alien) civilizations.

Why do you not ask Hindus if they would rather have India filled with White, Black and East Asian people living with Hindu culture or rather have genetic Asian Indians behaving as Whites, Africans or East Asians?

Uh, I’m a white male, am attractive, am polite, and I use online dating and write back to white females I’m attracted to and very few write back.

On the other hand, I’ve had black women and hispanic write me, when I clearly say in my ad I’m only interested in dating white women.

This is a lie desgined to distract and delude white men. As a single white male who has occasionally used such dating websites, I’m very unhappy to report that a staggering percentage of white women will reject us because we are not so called “african americans”. This trend must be curtailed as fast as possible if our race is to survive.

Jay:

I must say that what you have written is complete rubbish, and has no bearing on my (and most of Amren’s, I’m sure) opinion.

I don’t consider Indian women White, and definitely not Aryan. Do they have some “Aryan” genetic markers? I’m sure they do, after all, the upper classes in India have been greatly influenced by the Indo-Aryan peoples, and later by the British.

I certainly don’t consider Middle Easterners of the same “extraction” as Europeans, and the only Mexicans I consider White are those who are directly descended from Europeans; mestizos don’t cut it.

The Irish were never considered “non-White,” but rather “non-Anglo.” The Italians and Spaniards have very little Arabic admixture, despite the supposed “700 years of Arab occupation,” which was exclusive to the South of Spain. On that note, the so-called “Arabs” who occupied Spain were Berbers, who were in fact a Caucasoid people closer to the ancient Greeks than to modern day Semites.

Your post seems much like a trolls. It’s clear that you don’t have any serious (or extremely deluded) racial consciousness if you chose to miscegenate with an Indian woman. Unacceptable.

All I can say is that I live in a major college town and I see a considerable amount of interracial couples. However, it seems whenever I see a White man with a non-White woman, the couples seems to be upscale. With Black men and non-Black women, the reverse seems to be the case.

If you don’t want to marry or be in a relationship with a non-White, then don’t reply to an instant message. The whole purpose of an online chat is to lead to a meetup. It is otherwise a waste of everyone’s time.

In reply to comment 27

There is no distinct biological definition of “white” or any other race. There will always be a grey area between two races. During the 19th century people outside of Northern Europe were known as “Dark Whites” (i.e. racially half white and arab). Today we see them as white and rightly so. But there needs to be a definition of what constitutes white. As a person’s ancestry moves further and further away from Europe they look more and more like another race, and there’s always cases where a Greek person could pass for Lebanese and vice versa. Despite all the research on genetic markers etc., liberals can keep expanding the definition of white using the argument that in previous centuries, even countries which wns believe is white were not classed as such.

And even if American Whites do not look like European Whites (Due to the mixing of various White nationalities and wee bit of Native American genes), they still do not look like Arabs, Indians or Obama look alikes. They still look White, behave nearly like Europeans and have the same capabilities as Europeans.

Actually, I don’t even agree with that… I find that American whites (at least in the Midwest and Northwest where there aren’t too many Italians or Poles) strongly resemble the Dutch in appearance, albeit shorter. Likewise, Australians look like folks from the British Isles, perhaps somewhat more out-bred and therefore more attractive.

Jay,
You write a very confused post.Any geneticist worth his salt can immediately lay to rest the canard that southern Italians are a ‘mixed group with Arab and others thrown in’.If you ever care to actually look at multifactor genetic cluster analysis of typical southern Italian genomes you will find that they correlate closer with other Europeans as an ‘in-group’ - and not with any asiatic or african population.See the works of Cavalli-Sforza and his ‘genetic distance coefficients’ - Italians aren’t particular distant from such groups as ethnic French or even English.
Likewise, modern genetics tells us that typical Spanish genetics haven’t been altered much in thousands of years and apparently received little ‘Arab’ gene flow.
As for Poles and Ukranians being called non-White.Well you say you’re ‘old enough’ to remember this, the time of prejudice against Poles was approximately 100 years ago, so i doubt if you’re speaking from experience.Anyhow if you take a scientific measure of ‘whiteness’ (with a meter measuring skin reflectivity, perhaps the only objective measure of the concept), you will find that Poles would probably score the highest marks, as they would on a measure of the incidence of blond hair and blue eyes (I can only conclude you don’t go out much).Martha Stewart, for example, is of Polish extraction - only a mental defective would say she is ‘not White’.
‘Race’ was always a category in the US census.Never were Poles described as ‘not White’ in the US census.So what does this ‘considered’ not White actually mean?

5 — Anonymous wrote at 8:25 PM on October 6:
I want too see the reply rate for black males to white females. Probably would be very high.
————————————————————————————————

Hey Anonymous, I would like to see the reply rate for white females to black males…..now that would be very interesting!

Online daters are very choosy. They are people who aren’t happy or can’t find mates in the real world. They come online to date for a specific reason(s). America is a white oriented nation, so the white male and female online daters are going to get the most responses. Interracial dating is driven by biology. Black males get the most female dates because they are the strongest of the male bunch, Asian(and light skin Hispanic) women get the most male dates because they are the most feminine of the female bunch. Asian males and Black females are left out of the interracial dating game because of their biology. Our culture is based on biology. Both Asian males and black females are not biologically compatible with each other. Males are not suppose to be feminine and females are not suppose to be muscular.

If you are an Asian woman, and you didn’t want a non-white male mate in real life, you’re not going to want to meet on online for real life contact. If you are a white woman, and you didn’t want a non-white male mate, you’re not going to want to meet one online to meet in real life.

This is common sense…..

I think dating is icky. I’m so glad I’m happily married and finished with that scene. Nothing in my life has ever been so degrading and humiliating as dating.

I hope my sweet little white baby son finds his bride while he is still young. I can’t stand the thought of him using girls and tossing them out like an old shoe when he is done with them.

“All I can say is that I live in a major college town and I see a considerable amount of interracial couples. However, it seems whenever I see a White man with a non-White woman, the couples seems to be “upscale”. [Andrew]
———————-
Yes, “upscale” translates into “having more education”. And that means having been subjected to more race-numbing classroom propaganda. Very simple. All those years of indoctrination show through.

That’s why you see those nerdy, emasculated, deracinated, “upscale” wimpy males with non-white women. They may have good jobs and incomes, but that’s all. In the process, they’ve lost their manhood.

PS. I fully agree with “For Whom” that Jay’s post reads “much like a troll’s”. From the first boastful sentence (about all the women clamoring for him) it sounds highly fishy. I don’t believe it. And what’s that nonsense about shifting racial standards, and Americans don’t look like Europeans anymore, and Irish were not white? Rubbish! He’s a troublemaker.

I hope my sweet little white baby son finds his bride while he is still young. I can’t stand the thought of him using girls and tossing them out like an old shoe when he is done with them.”

What you shouldn’t stand is the thought of THEM using HIM.

“Black males get the most female dates because they are the strongest of the male bunch.”

Where in the world do so many posters here get this wacky stereotyped notion that blacks are some sort of supermen?
I see plenty of wimpy, scrawny little blacks!

So amusing! I followed the link to the original article, and there was a leave a comment section at the end, just like here, and I thought I could drop a line, which was:

“Fashion magazines around the world stubbornly feature white models, while the reverse is not the case unless occasionally. Wouldn’t it be that the white race is the most beautiful of all, and then is sought after by everyone, including themselves?”

It was there “waiting to be checked by administration”, I checked today, and it had been deleted! The merciless scissors of censorship fell over me! I didnt think or intended to make a strong statement.

All I can say is that I live in a major college town and I see a considerable amount of interracial couples. However, it seems whenever I see a White man with a non-White woman, the couples seems to be upscale. With Black men and non-Black women, the reverse seems to be the case.

I have often heard black women make this argument, but the truth is, I can’t really think of many black women I have met, or even seen with non-black men, to be able to prove whether this theory is correct or not. Granted their are some mixed raced celebrities, but most celebrities of any race, tend to “upscale” or financially well off.

It is heartening, however, that even after fifty years of cultural Marxist indoctrination, most White women are still loyal to their male counterparts.

I have found this to be true of most white women, although today the mainstream media tries to portray white women as being interested in dating outside their race. Black men tend to disagree with this the most, but the truth is usually it is wishful thinking on their part

“Black males get the most female dates because they are the strongest of the male bunch.”

I strongly doubt it. Have a look at World’s strongest man, dominated by Northern/Eastern Europeans, not a single black man, nor an Asian:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World%27s_Strongest_Man

Anonymous at 4:45:

I agree with you. For some reason many posters on this board seem to beleive that all Black men are 6’2 muscle bound adonisi’s whereas all White men are weak little specimens.

Like you, I have seen a number of small, dimunitive Black men. In fact, I have a friend who is a medical doctor who says that for the past ten years, statistics are showing that the average teenage Black boy is actually smaller than the average White male. He says that there are a number of reasons for this including the fact that many Blacks have children at younger ages, amny Black women who have children are in their late teens and early 20s and thus have not fully developed and because of this fact, their children tend to be smaller.

In another example, my daugther who is an elementary school teacher mentioned to me that she and her fellow teachers were discussing the fact that so many young Black boys seemed to be considerably smaller than they used to be 15 to 20 years ago, whereas, many White boys actually seemed to be bigger.

It is interesting.

Frank:

About three years ago, there was a small march of blacks in north St. Louis City, who were either related to or close friends to a young man that disappeared out of the blue a few years before that. At the time of his disappearance, he was 18 years old and 5’1” tall. The five-foot-one jumped right out at me. It could be a matter of nutrition, but the theory you stated is also a good one.

Iberian wrote: There was a comment section at the end, and I thought I could drop a line…

I checked today, and it had been deleted! The merciless scissors of censorship fell over me! I didnt think or intended to make a strong statement.
__ __ __ __

It WASN’T a strong statement. But it was a tabooed statement. You can say “black is beautiful” —- but not the reverse.

Anonymous at 8:42am:

The fact is that more than a few White women date outside of their race, as do many young people for that matter. What you see as “wishful thinking” is actually reality.

What is happening is that many doctors are giving Black women drugs in an effort to prohibit normal growth in their children. This is part of a larger conspiracy to practice genocide on Black men.

Anonymous at 4:45:
“I agree with you. For some reason many posters on this board seem to beleive that all Black men are 6’2 muscle bound adonises, whereas all White men are weak little specimens.”
— Frank
………………..

They’ve been watching too many TV advertisements, I’m afraid. They have swallowed the Kool Aid.

In addition to nutrition, or whatever — dissipation and drugs, so common and casually accepted among blacks, are surely another cause for the many scrawny black men one sees (in real life, that is, not on TV). Blacks tend to have unhealthy lifestyles that do not promote physical fitness. They have poor diets and are often addicted to junk food, greasy fried foods, and alcohol. Drug use is very common.

That brings to mind a colored woman I once had working for me. She was a nice person with a pleasant personality. She had a sweet and gentle disposition with no meanness in her, but she was alcoholic, I realized, and almost certainly used drugs as well. The poor thing had a son who was retarded and under-developed since birth. (Should that be any surprise?) Though a teenager, he was small for his age and required special attention; he was her main worry. I recall she had to escort him to school and pick him up after school, or he would be attacked by the other black children. Very sad.

She was later strangled by her boyfriend, so I heard. The police found her body stuffed under the bed. It was in the newspaper. I have no idea what became of her retarded son.

Darius:

Do you have any proof for your allegation? Is this what they are currently teaching you at the White Conspiracies Against Blacks Academy Prep?

Darius:

Really? So this is the latest information that yare teaching you guys at Hate Whitey Senior High school these days?

For the supposed strongest of the male bunch blacks are currently being run out of boxing, beaten in mma, wrestling, power lifting and world’s strongest man.

Also, if they are so strong then why does it always take a large group of them to attack one white on the street?