American Renaissance
Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Send This Page       Date Archives       Category Archives

Teacher: ‘All Whites Are Racist’

More news stories on Anti-White Discrimination

Peter Dyke, Independent (London), October 29, 2009

A BOMBSHELL new television show will tonight claim that all white people are racist.

An American schoolteacher and anti-race campaigner will conduct an experiment for Channel 4 to prove how prejudiced Britain is.

Jane Elliott, 76, whose nickname is The Bitch, travelled to the UK for the test.

Part of the show features former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher made up as a black person and US President Barack Obama as a Chinese.

Elliott is given a group of 30 volunteers, of mixed age and race, and splits them into two teams based on their eye colour.

Those with brown eyes are treated well, but those with blue eyes are ridiculed, humiliated and insulted.

Her aim is to create a mock “apartheid regime” to make the blue eyed people experience prejudice, discrimination and racism.

However at the end of the experiment, set in an old warehouse and lasting several hours, the white and black volunteers end up in a bitter row.

Some even walk out. Many of the white volunteers claim that black people do not have the monopoly on discrimination.

A middle aged white woman says: “They think racism is just for black people. I’ve had comments made about me because I’m blonde and white.”

However one dad, who is black, reveals how he never picks his daughter up from school because her mum is white and he doesn’t want anyone to know she is mixed race in case she is taunted.

At the end of the experiment, Elliott claims the white volunteers have shown their true colours.

She tells the C4 documentary tonight at 10pm: “White people should feel guilty about their behaviour.

“You don’t do things because you’re white, you do things because you’re ignorant.

“We are conditioned to the method of white superiority from the moment of birth.”

Original article

(Posted on October 30, 2009)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment     Send This Page      Search

Comments

1 — Question Diversity wrote at 5:51 PM on October 30:

Now I know who brainwashed California Education Secretary Jack O’Connell.

2 — Anonymous wrote at 6:10 PM on October 30:

Without knowing anything about Ms. Elliot—I probably agree with some of her observations. Whites are “racist” from birth; “racist” in the broad, modern use of the term, which means having some preference for one’s own race.

What “The Bitch” likely omits from her presentation is that other races also possess that same in group preference she ascribes only to whites. Thus, by opening our borders to other races—and fostering an atmosphere where whites are shamed and maligned for expressing any racial solidarity whatsoever—we are exposing ourselves to those same consequences that Ms. Elliot asserts non-whites are the victims of.

With that in mind—rather than trying to fix an unworkable living arrangement that can only deteriorate further, shouldn’t we be examining ways for the races to peacefully separate rather than futily trying to alter unavoidable proclivities of human nature?

3 — White, Jewish, and Proud wrote at 6:39 PM on October 30:

“She tells the C4 documentary tonight at 10pm: ‘White people should feel guilty about their behaviour.’”

I think this woman is truly pathetic, a racial apostate. And what’s really sad is that she is the apotheosis of this kind of neurotic thinking held by a whole lot of foolish people.

She then goes on to pontificate that, “You don’t do things because you’re white, you do things because you’re ignorant.”

And on that point I wholly disagree.

I think that the reason most white people who are averse to mingling with many non whites, particularly blacks, is is that they are just the opposite of being ignorant; they are informed. And they base that information gleaned from everyday, real life encounters with blacks and other non whites.

They recognize readily, if not immediately, that there are often very real innate and irreconcilable differences between the races.

4 — Madison Grant wrote at 6:53 PM on October 30:

Years ago I saw Jane Elliot blubbering on the Oprah show. She was in tears because she was upset about the fact that every time she turned on the news she saw footage of blacks being arrested by the police.

She told Oprah she was worried that people might get the wrong idea that blacks commit a disproportionate amount of crime.

5 — Dutchman wrote at 7:16 PM on October 30:

Sounds fascinating and predictable at the same time.
I have heard of these seminars being used in a business setting here in the states. The only result is to keep whites from expressing their true feelings in fear of being labled ‘racist’.

At my current work we were made to view an online training course about diversity. It was hilariously ineffective featuring discrimination between elephants and giraffes!!! Like our staff is in second grade.

6 — Flaxen-headed Strumpet wrote at 7:26 PM on October 30:

“We are conditioned to the method of white superiority from the moment of birth.”—-Jane Elliot

Well one (a rational white person) would hope that that would be a proposition accepted as a normal and expected behavior of the White race or any other race that could demonstrate a factual basis of superiority (either generalized or specialized). Unfortunately contemporary evidence abounds that pathological and crippling guilt complexes are really more the order of the day when analyzing attitudes and behavior patterns of Whites in a racial context.


7 — Daniel wrote at 7:37 PM on October 30:

At least we can all guess at how she got her nickname.

I agree that white people feel superior but I think that other races feel just as superior but for different reasons. I have known people of many different backgrounds and they all feel as if their race and culture has certain advantages.

This lady doesn’t seem to understand that even if you do away with race humans will form themselves into groups that will feel superior to other groups. It already happens with religious groups.

I don’t know how race got to be such a problem in the first place. History tells us that most of the wars ever fought were fought among our own kind. There is no real history of race wars and there probably wouldn’t be in the future if idiots would leave people alone and let them segregate.

8 — Anonymous wrote at 7:44 PM on October 30:

Jane Elliott, white woman, must be a racist, since she says all white people are racists. So she thinks she is a racist. I, who do not hold her view, do not admit to being a racist. She does.

What’s that you say? She is an exception? How convenient. So she gets to decide who is an exception and who isn’t, never mind whether or not she has ever met those whom she calls racist?

It’s logically incohesive, and she can thus be dismissed without further ado.

9 — Cassiodorus wrote at 9:51 PM on October 30:

It’s easy to say that this woman is unhinged (she’s claimed elsewhere that the paper and the English language are the inventions of blacks) but what’s far more sinister is the cultural regime in the US and now, apparently, in the UK, which has allowed her to make a fortune hawking the same tired absurdities. Who really expects such a person to check her opinions for internal consistency, or to examine actual facts? How on earth has she escaped brainwashing so many children with nary a peep from the childrens’ parents, or from responsible authorities? That’s the far more troubling question.

10 — Orion Blue wrote at 10:14 PM on October 30:

“We are conditioned to the method of white superiority from the moment of birth.”—-Jane Elliot.

This woman made her reputation peddling anti-white propaganda and it has obviously been an extremely lucrative and rewarding career for somebody of such modest and mediocre intellectual capacity.

I can understand such business-oriented opportunisims. What I cannot understand is why somebody would persist in peddling the same fallacious lies and inexactitudes over such an extended period of time; unless they are energised and motivated by a particular antagonism that perhaps finds it’s best expression in the ISD-10 or DSM-IV-TR(2004) manuals of dysfunctional psychology.

She is really pushing the boat out on 5th column treason and dissent in a manner that her feminazi co-conspirators could only find wholly inspiring.

11 — Anonymous wrote at 10:16 PM on October 30:

I watched this drivel. A Black women whinged about Black boys being 8 times more likely to be stopped and searched by the police. No one pulled her up on it and said that’s because they are more likely to be carrying weapons or drugs. And a mixed race man said he refused to meet his daughter from school, because he was afraid she would be taunted if the the other kids and parents saw what colour he was. No one pulled him up on the fact that he was prejudiced, assuming that all the kids and parents were racists.

12 — Anonymous wrote at 11:15 PM on October 30:

Don’t watch either Jane Elliot or television. I’ve known who she was for a long time, and I think she’s little more than a PC attention hound whose sick act jumped the shark a long time ago.

Never pay attention to people like this, and above all, never cooperate with them. That people supposedly possessed of good sense listen to her simply shows how uncommon common sense is. It also shows how morally and intellectually bankrupt television is.

13 — Ellen wrote at 11:34 PM on October 30:

Years and years ago I saw a TV show about this vile woman. She separated third graders by eye color and told the blue-eyed kids that they were inferior, lazy and stupid. She encouraged the brown-eyed kids to taunt and humiliate the blue-eyed kids. Then the next day she reversed it. I’ll never forget the clips of little children crying their hearts out over the cruel treatment and name-calling they endured. The woman is despicable. She hates her own race.

14 — sbuffalonative wrote at 12:04 AM on October 31:


When she says all whites are racists, is she including herself? Or is she, and a selected other few, exempt?

I suspect that she harbors great racial animosity which is why she projects this on everyone else. To escape scrutiny and take the attention of her own feelings, she accuses everyone what she believes.

15 — GenX in Oz wrote at 1:30 AM on October 31:

“You don’t do things because you’re white, you do things because you’re ignorant.”

In my life experiences I’ve had an African American step father and step siblings (a drum I’ve beaten to death on this forum in the past) and I’ve literally been the only White guy working amongst teams of Polynesians, Sudanese blacks, Southern Asians (numerous times), Vietnamese (hard workers) and Muslim Arabs to name just a few (along with working with various other ‘mixed groups.’)
So ignorance of other ethnic and/or racial groups is not my excuse.
In fact I’d like become more ignorant of other cultures and to ‘unlearn’ what I do know about them already.

When I went to school in NZ, they’d ram the dying Maori language (spoken by 45k people on earth roughly), various cultural practices and their belief system which was really just ‘myths and legends’ down our throats.
All this was done to promote mutual respect from us understanding their culture further.
But when I learned that this group thinks that half the of country that we were currently standing on was thought to be a whale carcass that was pulled out of the sea by some big gigantic Maori warrior who became a god (one of many).
Whether it was symbolic or not, it didn’t do much towards me respecting them as a people and frankly all I wanted was, all of that useless, incorrect information out of my head.

On the blue eyed and brown eyed kids getting separated experiment or lesson?
They did this to me when I was at primary school, it wasn’t as drawn out as described above.
Our teacher had us all stand, then she had the brown eyed kids sit down and the blue eyed kids remain standing.
Even back then in the 70’s we were in the minority (though this was is a heavy white majority town), then the teacher started asking us various questions along the lines of “how would you like it if…”, playing on the fact that we were feeling awkward and self conscious standing up with everyone staring at us.

It had the reverse to the desired affect on myself, as I looked around at the other kids who were standing and even though I was under 10 yrs old, I remember identifying that the other kids who were standing were the smartest and the better looking kids in the room.
So maybe it was the awakening of my racial pride.
So thank you meddling, Marxist White liberals you helped bring me here.
Kudos to you.

16 — Clairese wrote at 2:15 AM on October 31:

STOP WATCHING TV.

Most of White America spends far too much time in front of the IDIOT BOX, when had they used that time in their local communities, we could be making a dramatic change for the better, both locally and nationally.

So, throw the idiot box out, or at least, turn the damned thing off. Then get out and volunteer for political campaigns, at your local library, Fire and Rescue teams, or even stand for election to some local post. Kick the megalomaniacs out of office and get real citizen representation back in our government.

17 — reggie18b wrote at 11:36 AM on October 31:

If she hates whites so much why doesn’t she move to a non-white country?

18 — Anonymous wrote at 1:07 PM on October 31:

Given this crazy woman’s obsession with blue eyes, brown eyes, I wonder where she would place me? My eyes are green.

Would that leave me just some kind of outcast, rejected by both groups?

19 — white advocate - Canada wrote at 1:56 PM on October 31:

I’m surprised that she has been able to push her program for so long without being challenged. She’s never asked to defend herself in debate. What little writing she has is never peer reviewed. Over the years as conditions change she’s never asked to justify any updates in her methods. There doesn’t appear to be a competitive market where she has to defend her methods and costs against competitors. I’d ask her what she thinks about religious discrimination against abortion, gays and women priests. I’d want to put her in international context such as what she thinks about the Palestinian problem, how she would fight the Taliban, or what to do about illegal immigration. My hunch is that she is anti-white and only anti-white.

We know from brain science that intense, humiliating, bullying experiences can change the brain physically. That’s what her program can do. Are businesses allowed to change the brains of employees or schools allowed to affect the brains of students? There’s got to be a legal issue there.

For whites who want to put an end to her ugly program as well as end all these diversity brainwashing programs, I think a good thing to do is support white organizations like AmRen. There are other organizations in the links section here. If millions of whites supported these organizations and leaders, resources and talent would become available to do the job.

20 — Anonymous wrote at 2:29 PM on October 31:

“It had the reverse to the desired affect on myself, as I looked around at the other kids who were standing and even though I was under 10 yrs old, I remember identifying that the other kids who were standing were the smartest and the better looking kids in the room.
So maybe it was the awakening of my racial pride.
So thank you meddling, Marxist White liberals you helped bring me here.
Kudos to you.”


Exactly! I didn’t become pro-white or “racist” in the modern sense until I started having all the anti-white, multicultural stuff rammed down my throat. That, and after Trent Lott’s debacle 2002, I had the misfortune of reading my first article by that slimeball Tim Wise, then I luckily came across articles by Jared Taylor and read “Death of the West” by Pat Buchannan.

My point is, by trying to make whites “unracist” (again, my modern definitions), they are making whites like me, who had no contact with non-whites, who were not biased against non-whites, to further the cause of American Renaissance and other pro-white movements. Much in the same way Malcolm X didn’t hate whites until some black lowlife in prison convinced him that all of his troubles were because of “the white man”.

21 — john wrote at 4:28 PM on October 31:

Amazing how a witless ninny like this ridiculous woman can command the feigned respect of polite but hapless audiences simply by claiming that we’re all racists and inventing absurd and childish games to illustrate this “fact.”

As for the infantile blue eye/brown eye act, has anybody among all you AmRenners out there ever seen whites ridiculing, harassing, and laughing at blacks, either as a group or individually?

22 — Sosthenes wrote at 4:46 PM on October 31:

I’ve got an offer for this ditz. I’ll give her (rent-free!) her choice of apartments in either Gary, south Chicago, Harvey (Illinois), East Chicago (Ind), or Benton Harbor (Mich), for the next month.

We live within driving distance (a SAFE 1 hour or so) of these places and she’ll win a voucher of sorts if she writes an honest, factual account of her 30 or 31 days.

If she does not make it through the month I’ll win. Of course I’ll win regardless because I’m not dumb enough to live in one of these slums where “her” people live.

Come to think of it, where DOES this clueless woman live? Five’ll get you ten that it’s in an area with very few - if any -Africans.

23 — Sosthenes wrote at 4:52 PM on October 31:

Holy smokes, I found out where she was born, raised, and taught: rural Iowa!

There are about as many Africans in rural Iowa as there are on the U.S. Olympic ski team.

Got to give her credit. She’s really seen and felt those pangs of racism out there in the cornfields.

24 — JustSaying wrote at 6:06 PM on October 31:

I’m middle-aged & wondering if the younger generation falls for this malarky the same way we did. Someone please tell me they’re more hip/cynical/wise than we were. I have no reason to believe that, but sincerely want to.

25 — Anonymous wrote at 7:22 PM on October 31:

“We are conditioned to the method of white superiority from the moment of birth.”


Yes! That’s soooooo true. Every single waking moment out of my 31 years on this planet, whether it be during bathtime or going out on a date or doing homework or eating supper or doing my chores around the house, my parents ALWAYS talked about non-whites and ALWAYS how white people are the best. Not a single second out of my 31 years have I EVER thought about anything other than being white and oppressing black people.

26 — Anonymous wrote at 7:24 PM on October 31:

If white people were not afraid of being called “racists” people like here would be out of work. The only reason people like her and Tim Wise and other anti-white agitators (both white and non-white) are banking is because WE WHITE PEOPLE have let them do it to us.

27 — toto wrote at 7:24 PM on October 31:

There’s a divide between whites and blacks, because whites judge blacks by their character and not by the color of their skin.

Blacks and Hispanics treat everyone outside their race as outsiders.

Anybody like this poor fool has to spend 24/7 trying different tricks to keep the races from killing each other with some kind of incessant racial propaganda scheme. How much easier it would be on her if she accepted the real world for what it is and not what she wants it to be because of her obvious mental illness.

28 — Anonymous wrote at 8:59 PM on October 31:

“…has anybody among all you AmRenners out there ever seen whites ridiculing, harassing, and laughing at blacks, either as a group or individually?”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

No. What I have seen is whites - both individually and as organizations — bending over backwards trying to be extra nice and accommodating to them in every possible way. Extra nice in ways that they would not have been to just another white person.
We’ve all seen it. We all know it’s true.

And what do we get for it? Anger! Accusations! Demands! No matter all the grovelling and penance that we do to atone for the crime of being white, blacks (and race-traitors like this dizzy Jane Elliott) complain even more bitterly about institutional racism and tell us that we’re all racists … “from the moment of birth.”

It’s time to tell them all to get lost and don’t bother us anymore with this nonsense.

29 — Ross wrote at 10:07 PM on October 31:

Yes, of course blacks can also be racist, just like white people can.

To everyone reading this post who is white; have you ever been called “whitey” or a “honkie” by angry racist blacks?

Have you ever driven through an inner-city black section of any major American city and feared that, Heaven forbid, the car would break down and you would stranded in a bad, crime ridden section of town?

I am glad that American Renaissance is here to tell the truth about black racism.

30 — browser wrote at 10:11 PM on October 31:

“Come to think of it, where DOES this clueless woman live? Five’ll get you ten that it’s in an area with very few - if any -Africans.”
__ __ __ __

She comes from Riceville, Iowa — on the extreme north edge of Iowa, on the Minnesota border. Ms.Elliott is the most illustrious citizen of Riceville. (They don’t have many.) It’s population is [quote] “99.88% White, and 0.12% from two or more races”. There is no mention of any blacks in Riceville.

My sympathy goes out to poor Ms. Elliott, having to live among all those terrible haters and white racists! How can she stand it? It must be a great hardship on her.

31 — M wrote at 10:53 PM on October 31:

If pride in the tangible and real accomplishments of my “race” and a preference to associate myself with those of common heritage and history at the expense of others makes me a “racist” so be it.

It is White Man who steadily elevated all who care to participate

32 — Put 'em in the Gulag wrote at 12:24 AM on November 1:

Jane Elliott figured out a long time ago that her ticket to a comfortable life, meaning $$$$ without having to work hard, was to start grandstanding against her own people. It’s as simple as that. That’s how you get published today as well. Just b8&%# and moan about how horrible pre-1965 America was, how horrible whites are, and you’ll get some attention from the people that run the publishing houses.

All whites are born racist. So are all blacks, asians, etc. Because we all naturally identify with our own. It’s just that whites are made to feel criminal for it.

While I know the current regime is going to collapse and whites will regain control of their destiny, it’s a shame that by the time this happens, Jane Elliott will most likely have passed away. I hope she lives a long enough life to be put on trial for her crimes against humanity and is given the sentence she deserves.

I have read various stories and reports about Ms. Elliott that claim she is homosexual. Is this true? If so, it would explain some of her stances in other areas. No matter what her orientation, she is a crackpot who should have been locked up decades ago.

33 — George00 wrote at 3:28 AM on November 1:

Oh you guys, I’m going to start ridiculing a lot of people who post on Amren but some of the people who say they haven’t heard white people ridiculing and laughing at blacks must not be read the posts on Amren.
Secondly, I had to go through Diversity training at the start of my job and at the end of the presentation when we talked about what we just saw I just said what I thought. This was 10 years ago but I remember saying that I thought whites and nonwhites shouldn’t intermarry and have kids because I wanted the white race to survive and that I didn’t care if nonwhites intermarried other nonwhites. I also said blacks commit a disproportionately large percent of the violent crime. I said a few other similar things and you know what happened to me? Nothing. The black guy running the show said I was entitled to my opinion.

34 — A. Windaus wrote at 6:21 AM on November 1:

Last night I was having a chat with a woman who’s parents were born and raised in Cambodia. She herself was born here in Australia and spoke English like a natural. I did notice a few inflections in some words that she used and when I mentioned it she got very upset and began starting all of her sentences with “You whites…”

I realised where the inflections were coming from when she got upset, it was hip-hop culture. Her own person mixed Asian-European culture has adopted the worst parts of African-American culture. After a short while she admitted that she thinks all Whites judge her because of the colour of her skin and all the worlds problems are our fault. She then proceeded to tell me that only Whites could be racist without actually saying it which I have to admit was quite amusing to me. I knew she wanted to say it but couldn’t because she was surrounded by Whites in a White built and run country. Everything she enjoys in her day to day life has been created by our people and she couldn’t resolve that inconsistency. I know she’s been brainwashed by the most wretched portion of American society but she can’t self-reflect on what she has accepted as truth when in fact it isn’t.

35 — JasonC wrote at 6:50 AM on November 1:

might get the wrong idea that blacks commit a disproportionate amount of crime - Errrm but they do. That’s a fact.

This vile neo Marxist govt we have in England didnt like that fact so they stopped collecting the data back in 2001. No data no proof, its just racism, prove otherwise.

36 — Question Diversity wrote at 8:44 AM on November 1:

Put em in the Gulag:

Does this mean that Jane Elliot also inspired Morris Dees? I said earlier in this thread that she inspired Jack O’Connell, so she has a long but sorry legacy.

37 — reggie18b wrote at 10:48 AM on November 1:

I watched this programme with my (also racially aware) friend last night. It was very interesting viewing, and I recommend seeing it. It is still available at the ‘channel 4 on demand’ site, and is called ‘how racist are you?’.
Because liberal whites are so over confident of their unchallenged assertions, and because some blacks do not have the sense to hide their true feelings and emotions, it is the kind of programme where a lot of interesting insight can be gained.
Ms Elliot doesn’t just say that whites are ‘conditioned from birth’ into feeling superior. She goes even further and says ‘in fact, we are conditioned from BEFORE birth’. How can you be conditioned from before birth? Clearly, what she and blacks are so angry about is that we are innately different from before birth. Unable to accept this fact they transfer their jeolousy and hatred onto us and dress it up as our ‘racism’.
The whole blue colour/ eye colour set-up is supposed to demonstrate that all divisions and groupings are arbitrary and meaningless. But it is interesting to note that almost immediately the eye colour division becomes meaningless and the two groups start dividing along racial lines, with the brown-eyed whites either getting kicked-off the show or in one case deliberately sabotaging the stupid staged stunts. So, far from proving the meaninglessness of race it actually confirms its reality.
I was left more optimistic about whites than before. Maybe the anti-racists are starting to push their luck too far, and demand too much, but the whites did not meekly roll over and accept their guilt. Their only problem was that they still believed being nice to minorities was enough, whereas for the minorities themselves it is obvious that nothing will ever be enough to eradicate their feelings of inferiority. If they are wise the whites will have glimpsed a vision of the future of life as a minority.

38 — Anonymous wrote at 11:19 AM on November 1:

I saw this woman give a speech at a junior college in my area.
She stated that when a man sits with his knees far apart it is because he is trying to control all the women that are within the range of his spread knees. She claimed blacks invented electricity among other things.

sh

39 — voter wrote at 11:33 AM on November 1:

“My sympathy goes out to poor Ms. Elliott, having to live among all those terrible haters and white racists! How can she stand it? It must be a great hardship on her.”


Maybe she needs to try harder to get her hometown integrated.
Has she been making any efforts towards that end? (Instead of scolding white people in London!)

40 — Anonymous wrote at 11:47 AM on November 1:

“blacks commit a disproportionate amount of crime -
This vile neo-Marxist govt we have in England didnt like that fact, so they stopped collecting the data back in 2001. No data no proof.”
_________________

I wouldn’t be at all surprised, now that we have the Obama/Holder administration, if we may soon be seeing something similar here in the USA. Supression of the inconvenient truth, when you can’t control it, is their ultimate resort.

41 — True Resistance wrote at 12:51 PM on November 1:

I remember the brown eyes / blue eyes game from elementry school. In my school they did not let us speak to each other for one day. There was no taunting allowed.

I was one of three people in a group of two blue eyed people and one green eyed person. (I have blue eyes and blond hair.) All the rest of the people in the class had brown eyes.

The lesson I took from it was that I really did have something special. Something that was quite rare. Something that a great many people thought made me superior to others. Up until then, I thought I was superior because I got some of the highest grades in the whole school on all the tests. (There were several kids who rarely missed any questions and were already a grade ahead in mathmatics including the other blue eyed kid at the table with me. The vast majority of the high achievers had blue eyes and were in the other classes at the school.)

There was a subtle feeling at the time that I could not put into words until almost twenty years later: “How dare you show us up and look good at the same time?” This is like telling an athlete that he cheated by being born stronger and faster than most of his rivals.

Afterall, I still had the very traits that inspired the lesson.

42 — Barry wrote at 1:04 PM on November 1:

George 00:

I went through a diversity training session in 2007. There moderators were a Black woman and a White male. As was the case with your session, there were a number of people (including myself) who were very candid in our opinions about affirmative action, interracial marriage, immigration, hostility against White males etc… There were some particiapants who felt that Whites did have siginificant advantages.

Both the Black female and White male moderators would respond with some good points that could not be dismissed, however, there other points they made that some of us would effectively refute. At the end of the session, I do not know how much was actually accomplished, but nothing got out of hand and people did engage in a respectful and civil dialogue with one another. Theree was no screaming and finger pointing. I am not saying that these things do not happen, but they did not take place happen during my session.

43 — Grace wrote at 2:35 PM on November 1:

“Those with brown eyes are treated well, but those with blue eyes are ridiculed, humiliated and insulted.”

Isn’t that pretty much the real world anymore?

“The Bitch” isn’t teaching us anything new.

44 — truredwhite&blue wrote at 4:04 PM on November 1:

Saying “all whites are racist” is about as racist as saying, “all blacks are lazy.” What a stupid premise. The blacks have really nothing to point to that would indicate they have produced modern, civilized, peaceful, living - not in Africa, not in Haiti, and certainly not in any city in the U.S. where they are in control (Detroit, Chicago, etc.) Nope, any place where blacks rule you can absolutely count on finding brutality, crime, corruption, graft, drugs, prostitution, child abandonment and endangerment, cruelty to animals — you name the negative, and there it is. No argument can make these facts go away. THIS IS TRUE. And all the whiny black supremecists can squall “Racism!” all they want - but the evidence is very clear. Even Jesse Jackson was grateful it wasn’t a group of young black men that was behind him on that dark night….

45 — unreconstructed wrote at 6:17 PM on November 1:

I have looked for evidence that Jane Elliott has ever been married. I can find nothing to suggest this. I will presume that she has no children. If I am wrong, can someone let me know. She claims to be a teacher. What have her students learned that is worth anything. I suggest they have learned that Jane Elliott is an bitter old woman who is dissatisfied with her own life and blames her race for it. She has absolutely no idea what she is talking about. Therefore she is quite fit to be featured on PBS Frontline and other such dribble. If you tell the truth, the media will shun you. Hustles lies, especially lies against white people, and the media will take you to bed.

46 — Chief wrote at 7:48 PM on November 1:

She’s just doing her part to keep whites feeling guilty and on the defensive so that massive continued third world immigration can continue to destroy the white populations of western nations as the political and social climates “liberalize” as a result and the economic wealth of western nations can be redistributed among the third world while the first world along with the various ethnic white peoples become no more. Being communist and a feminist she abhors white males (the “oppressors” who hold much of the wealth in western societies and who are getting in the way of “progressive” change) and any form of patriarchism. It shouldn’t be any wonder to anyoneas to how she got her nickname.

47 — Anonymous wrote at 7:55 PM on November 1:

“A middle aged white woman says: “They think racism is just for black people. I’ve had comments made about me because I’m blonde and white.””

Who is this woman talking to? Jane Elliott or her small staff of helpers? Jane Elliott doesn’t care whether or not white people are the victims of racism. Jane Elliott is going to deny that white people can even be the victims of racism at all. To admit otherwise would expose the fraud behind her claims that only white people can be racist which are solely designed to keep whites feeling guilty and to add more layers of preexisting guilt for the purpose of morally disarming whites for the purpose of keeping whites from acting in their own interest while all the other ethnic groups, whos populations are rapidly growing, act very strongly in their respective collective interests.

48 — Anonymous wrote at 10:46 PM on November 1:

Is there a chance —just a chance, for purposes of discussion— that the white race might actually BE superior?

After all, Back Home In Africa The Glorious Origin Of All Humankind, nobody ever invented electricity, or polio vaccine, or mass production, or encyclopedias, or … but you get my drift.

Maybe the race that had all the ideas is, in fact, a better race.

OR … maybe it’s not necessarily race-based at all. Maybe the CULTURE that created Western Civilization is in fact superior, and the various tribal cultures that permeate Africa and the Middle East are demonstrably inferior. Are we allowed to point to cultural achievement and not skin-color as the basis for judgment? (And if not, why not? Do we really care if the racial-grievance-mongers lose their influence?)

After all, now we have a bi-racial man in the White House. How color-blind (and achievement-blind) are we expected to be in order to satisfy the whining racists like Ms Elliot who think blacks can’t succeed unless whites give them special treatment? (Yes, the ones who so publicly beat the drum of “racism” ARE the racists; the ones who judge on achievement are NOT. There are high-achievers and non-achievers of every race and color; achievers get hired and get promoted; lazy whiners do not.)

The idea of blaming whites for the deficiencies of non-whites serves to deflect attention away from the inadequacies of an under-achieving population. Race apologists want to pressure mainstream society to “make allowances” and treat their “disadvantaged” group as if they were equal in knowledge and ability (instead of insisting that the members of that group get an education and a job, follow cultural norms of prudence, thrift and responsibility, and generally raise themselves to the level of the greater society). As long as the demands for action are made only upon white society, and the “unequal” racial group is not held responsible for improving its success in society by changing its own behavior/culture, the activists will always have an inadequate population that “needs their help” to succeed. Job security for the professional race-agitators!

49 — Anonymous wrote at 8:57 AM on November 2:

33 — George00 wrote at 3:28 AM on November 1:
Oh you guys, I’m going to start ridiculing a lot of people who post on Amren but some of the people who say they haven’t heard white people ridiculing and laughing at blacks must not be read the posts on Amren.
Secondly, I had to go through Diversity training at the start of my job and at the end of the presentation when we talked about what we just saw I just said what I thought. This was 10 years ago but I remember saying that I thought whites and nonwhites shouldn’t intermarry and have kids because I wanted the white race to survive and that I didn’t care if nonwhites intermarried other nonwhites. I also said blacks commit a disproportionately large percent of the violent crime. I said a few other similar things and you know what happened to me? Nothing. The black guy running the show said I was entitled to my opinion.

But the only problem is that many whites aren’t like us. Most whites don’t see the brainwashing going on, nor would they have to balls to question the “diversity” agitators without being assertive.

50 — Gay Conservative wrote at 9:01 AM on November 2:

“It had the reverse to the desired affect on myself, as I looked around at the other kids who were standing and even though I was under 10 yrs old, I remember identifying that the other kids who were standing were the smartest and the better looking kids in the room.
So maybe it was the awakening of my racial pride.
So thank you meddling, Marxist White liberals you helped bring me here.
Kudos to you”

Good point, because I’ve always said the same thing about myself, having had the cult of multiculturalism shoved down my throat over the years, and as I got older, I started to ask myself “Why is the reality I’m seeing the complete opposite of what I was taught in public school?” Why is this realization becoming more and more apparent to me? I realized that I was lied to all thru school and it made me mad as hell. Over the years I truly came to realize how hypocritical and dishonest the Left truly is.

51 — Mark Parker wrote at 9:36 AM on November 2:

For the benefit of JasonC and anyone else interested - the UK Justice Department DOES maintain statistics on ethnic crime. See here:

http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/docs/stats-race-criminal-justice-system-07-08-revised.pdf

From the above PDF you can see that in the UK blacks account for 2.2% of the population but 10.6% of admissions to prison. I don’t doubt that admission to prison correlates directly with criminality.

They don’t record ethnic conviction rates - that would be interesting but perhaps a little to inflamatory for the government to risk.

52 — nonwhiteguilt wrote at 11:03 AM on November 2:

Non-whites have an inferiority complex towards whites. That is why they lash out at the invisible apparition that is “racism.” I believe a lot of it is merely physical. They simply can’t deal with being around people that much more beautiful than them.

How do I know this? I’m half Chinese. I know it is quite easy to feel jealous of whites that can actually grow a decent beard, that have piercing blue eyes instead of my dull brown-green ones, that have stronger builds, more dashing features, and better artistic ability, even though I’m a terrific artist, there’s just something I can’t grasp when it comes to true brilliance. But, as is, I’m happy looking white for the large part. I spent time at a party on Halloween night here in upper Manhattan, a party entirely dominated by blacks and Latinos. I can’t really count the number of times I was referred to as “white boy.” But that’s enough to make me fairly happy.

Do I wish I was white? Do I envy people that know what they are and lack physical and mental characteristics that I do? Of course. But does that make me so blinded with rage towards them for not being one of them that I want them to disappear from the earth? Absolutely not. Quite the contrary. I want them to survive in full, so much so that I’m willing to lay my life on the line for it. Because the “anti-racists”, miscegenators, and the multiculturalists are evil. The non-whites that chase white women of impossible beauty are evil. The non-whites that chase white men are evil. (My mother was one of them). This is one thing I’ve garnered through the moral blessings I’ve been granted through eastern and western blood. Anyone that seeks to threaten the existence of white childen is evil. The diversifiers are sadistic and genocidal. Nothing more, nothing less. Whites, you’ve got a friend in me.

But again, don’t worry. I intend to marry a woman that is of northeast asian and white heritage just like me. I am, naturally, against race mixing, even for myself. I’m just part of a new race that should never have existed in the first place.

53 — nonwhiteguilt wrote at 12:23 PM on November 2:

Do I wish I was white? Do I envy people that know what they are and lack physical and mental characteristics that I do?

___________

Correction: the above should say “Do I envy people that… don’t lack the physical and mental characteristics that I do.”

54 — Anonymous wrote at 3:51 PM on November 2:

“I suggest that Jane Elliott is an bitter old woman who is dissatisfied with her own life and blames her race for it.”
— Unreconstructed

That sounds about right. But, ironically, she is probably the richest person in her little town. And certainly the only celebrity there, in Riceville, Iowa.
She has done quite well, peddling race hate. Nice work if you can get it!

55 — Anonymous wrote at 4:22 PM on November 2:

40 — Barry wrote:
“I went through a diversity training session in 2007. The moderators were a Black woman and a White male. As was the case with your session, a number of people (including myself) were very candid in our opinions about affirmative action, interracial marriage, immigration, hostility against White males, etc… There were some participants who felt that Whites did have significant advantages…”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Not to criticize, but why would you tell her your candid opinions? What was the point? You can’t win. You’re a captive. If I had to go to such a session, I would just sit there, as required, but would not participate any more than I had to. I would offer no comments or opinions. I would volunteer nothing. I would go through whatever nonsense gamesthey require, watching the clock until the hell session is over. Neither would I want to get identified by management as a “problem” … one perhaps in need of further training. Or watching! If specifically ASKED, “What do you think about such and such”… I would say I have no opinion on the matter. Or I have no knowledge of it. If pressed further, I would say that my mind is my own and my opinions are private. I don’t care to discuss it. Period!

In other words, I would attend if my presence is required, since I’m being PAID for it and can’ refuse. But I would not allow them to pick my brain! There’s absolutely no point in arguing with them or telling them what your opinion is because they don’t care what your opinions are and the instructor is going to win anyway. It’s rigged that way. So just sit through it, don’t argue, hold your tongue, and count the minutes.

56 — white advocate - Canada wrote at 2:49 AM on November 3:

#55; fair enough, but somehow, someway, you must have a need to be heard. How about joining white organizations? That is my big issue. Support our organizations and our leaders. AmRen obviously, but others in the links section.

57 — Sardonicus wrote at 12:00 PM on November 3:

If she hates whites so much why doesn’t she move to a non-white country? Reggie

Why indeed Reggie? Where else could she make such a good living peddling nonsense? In academia she is still much admired. I consider her a charlatan.

58 — voter wrote at 12:50 PM on November 3:

“ironically, she is probably the richest person in her little town.
She has done quite well, peddling race hate. Nice work if you can get it!”
—————————————————-

The burgeoning Race Industry has proven very profitable for quite a few sharp-eyed people who were quick to get in on it — a whole new career field!

It imposes different requirements, though.
For blacks like Sharpton, they can peddle racial grievance. They can collect praise and benefits.
For Whites like Elliott, they must peddle racial guilt. They have to grovel, repent, and hand out apologies. (Even if someone else ultimately pays the price.)

Now who is being discriminated against here?

59 — ghw wrote at 8:50 PM on November 3:

Picture of Jane Elliott.

http://tinyurl.com/yjldpjz

60 — Anonymous wrote at 12:22 AM on November 4:

Just send her to South Africa and leave her naked in the street

61 — Johnny English wrote at 9:15 AM on November 4:

And here are two videos of the multicultural paradise Jane Elliott and her kind have helped to create in England’s once green and pleasant land:

62 — Anonymous wrote at 12:13 PM on November 4:

Jane Elliott is a child abuser and a sadist. She hurt children.

She is a criminal.

She is a bigot.

63 — Billy wrote at 12:04 AM on November 5:

Here is how to contact Jane …

http://www.janeelliott.com/contactjane.htm

Please share your thoughts with her!


Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Send This Page      Search