American Renaissance
Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Send This Page       Date Archives       Category Archives

Should We Even Have a Columbus Day?

More news stories on the War on White Heritage

David McGrath, Christian Science Montior, October 12, 2009

Oct. 12 is the important anniversary of the opening of the Americas to settlers, and one that merits celebration, but by commemorating it as Columbus Day, Americans stand to ignore part of the past that deserves to be remembered.

While the holiday has been used to teach ideals of patriotism, and Christopher Columbus has been used as a symbol of an immigrant’s right to citizenship, the other side to the discovery of the new country is death and destruction. To many native Americans, Columbus symbolizes slavery.

In order to bridge this gap, perhaps the government should take a cue from Hawaii and call the day Discover’s Day?

{snip}

It was Columbus who opened the way for European colonizers, whose wars and infectious diseases wiped out massive numbers of native Americans. They set the standard by exiling the rest to rural, out-of-the-way reservations.

{snip}

Granted, Columbus was not the sole precipitator of the displacement and suffering imposed on native Americans for the next half millennium, and certainly his navigational, scientific, and sheer physical accomplishment, which rank him with or above such figures as Marco Polo, Ferdinand Magellan, and Lewis and Clark, cannot be denied.

Yet Columbus was more than just an inevitable cog in history’s colonial machine. His own words survive in his letters as proof of his dehumanization of the indigenous people, whom he considered the property of Queen Isabella. He enslaved many of the Tiano Indians, while the rest he subjected to war and destruction.

Often, the first step to healing is recognition of a problem. By changing the name of this holiday we will draw attention to the plight of the native Americans, not so they can be pitied, but in order that their situation, which began with Columbus, can be addressed.

Perhaps replacing Columbus Day with “Discover’s Day” would stretch Americans to recognize where we have come from. It would also give a nod not only to what led to the influx of ideas and people on which this nation was founded, but to some abuses that the United States must remember to avoid. In so doing, we gain intellectual honesty.

Another solution would be to replace the adulation for Columbus with a native American hero. Crazy Horse’s monument is already in place near Mount Rushmore.

Chief Joseph might be more politically acceptable, though. The great savior of the Nez Perce tribe had the wisdom of President Lincoln and the inclination toward nonviolence of Martin Luther King. His recorded reflections are an inspiration for all patriots:

{snip}

The prospect of swapping Columbus for an Indian chief, in one fell swoop, may be a hard sell, especially in view of the paucity of political influence wielded by American Indians.

But the first step, and one everyone can embrace right now, is to honor the truth by terminating the celebration of Christopher Columbus, while commemorating the importance of this historic day in all its implications. It might just help with the healing of all America.

Original article

(Posted on October 12, 2009)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment     Send This Page      Search

Comments

1 — Conan wrote at 5:35 PM on October 12:

How about a St.Brendan The Navigator day?

2 — GetBackJack wrote at 5:56 PM on October 12:

I am sick and beyond tired of the vilification of everyone and everything white. I respect Columbus and plan to honor him every year. Reminder: we fought the Indians and won! We need to boot all the Marxists out of this country and let them crawl and apologize in some far away place. The one thing we should have done is banned immigration from Eastern Europe at the turn of the Twentieth Century! Too many of them came with Marx in their heads and hearts.

3 — Question Diversity wrote at 6:10 PM on October 12:

There is a well-accepted theory that it wasn’t Columbus and his crew that bought syphilis to the indigenous American population, it was the other way around. The Indians had built up resistance to the syphilis virus that was common among them; once Columbus took it back to Europe, Europeans didn’t have that immunity.

4 — Anonymous wrote at 6:14 PM on October 12:

As a recent article in Newsweek said, “It’s horrifying to imagine (White) kids being proud.” (Newsweek, Oct. 4, 2009, page 60). Their stated goal is to not have a single White hero, except for those Whites who work for the good of Minorities, such as Mother Teresa. That is why on every TV show and Movie, most of the leading men and women are non-European, but the criminals are.

This attempt to remove Columbus and Washington’s Day, and replace them with Martin Luther King and Ceaser Chavez Days are examples of this.

5 — Kenn wrote at 6:25 PM on October 12:

Suggested viewing: Mel Gibson’s Apocalypto (2006)

It captures the brutality of inter-tribal warfare, brutality and human sacrifice that abounded in the America’s prior to European colonization.

The Trail of Tears ended 200 years of Indian warfare. Posthumously award Andrew Jackson the Nobel Peace Prize.

6 — John PM wrote at 6:32 PM on October 12:

“Often, the first step to healing is recognition of a problem.”

Indeed Comrade McGrath, indeed it is!

However, the problem is not Columbus Day, nor the fantasized “atrocities” fools like you place upon him; the problem is your unforgivably high treason to your own people in the name of multiculturalism. There is no gray areas with this as far as I am concerned. It is a black and white issue and if you are on the black side of things, calling you a traitor or a Red is simply being kind.

Far kinder, than you actually deserve!

Enough is enough, every year on October 12 we are subjected to this kind of prevaricating and insidious nonsense. There is no such thing as “Discover’s Day” or “Indigenous People’s Day.” However, on October 11 and October 13 of every year there should be two new holidays; these should be: Revile the Idiots’ Day and Punish the Traitors’ Day.

Enough said!!!

7 — concernicus wrote at 6:45 PM on October 12:

I remember when they no longer let kids have the day off from school because they felt the holiday was racist towards the Indians. I slightly agree with that, and Columbus certainly wasn’t the first person to discover America. However I always notice how many people love taking the day off just because they can.

8 — Garrett wrote at 6:55 PM on October 12:

Nice try. Columbus and the European explorers opened the door for Western Civilization to spread to North America. The stronger cultures have utilized the weaker ones for all of human history, it’s a part of human nature. I’ll always consider it Columbus Day and Western Civilization Day no matter what happens.

9 — We're Screwed wrote at 7:44 PM on October 12:

“It might just help with the healing of all America.”

Healing? Healing? Ha!

As long as the permanently aggrieved can extract money from stupid, guilt-ridden Europeans and Americans for events that tooks place generations or even centuries ago, the “healing” will never take place.

We should take a page from Obama’s political playbook and inform these aggrieved parties that “We won,” and then ignore them.

10 — Visine wrote at 8:45 PM on October 12:

Writers like McGrath excoriate Columbus because he actually ACCOMPLISHED something, instead of just weepily emoting on various topics all day like the unintelligentsia of the Leftist elite.

Columbus was a great man. He did great things. He deserves to be honored by those of us who benefit every day from living in the New World. The flow of disease that altered lives went BOTH WAYS, and if the explorers of the New World had not brought it to the Indians then it would have been brought later by someone else. Inevitably.

Isolation does not convey immunity, and Europeans did not intentionally engineer the viruses that wiped out so many lives in the past. Vilifying Columbus for the immune deficiences of the Indians is the absolute height of idiocy.

11 — Anonymous wrote at 9:40 PM on October 12:

Let’s just do away with anything and anyone that has to do with WHITE history to satisfy the enemy within. They are sure doing a number on us while we sit idly by. Where are our White warriors? How about some Christian warriors. Did we not use to have those?

12 — June wrote at 10:05 PM on October 12:

By terminating the celebration of Columbus Day, “it might just help with the healing of all America.”

Gee! We didn’t know we were broken until the anti-Americans told us we were. Who’s next? Will the reputation of George Washington be shredded because he was a slave owner? In another 20 years, we won’t even recognize the history facts that today’s adults were taught. I’m sorry for the children of today’s world. It’s a far cry from the one that existed before the destruction began. But many voted for “change” did they not? And now they know what that change meant.

13 — RHG wrote at 10:45 PM on October 12:

First thing we have to do is get past this “Native American” thing. There is no such thing as a “Native American”. The race of people known as “American Indians” are immigrants to this land too. Yeah, they may have gotten here before anyone else, but they are immigrants none the less. And to label them “American” considering their ancestors were here before this country was even known as “America” is the height of arrogance.

14 — Anonymous wrote at 12:08 AM on October 13:

Technically, Vikings (more evil whites) stumbled upon America before Columbus. There’s strong evidence that the Chinese found it as well though they didn’t realize what they had stumbled upon. But Columbus alone was the beginning of European colonization of the Americas. We take for granted how easy it is to travel these days. For the right price, I can get from Washington D.C. to Hong Kong within the next 24 hours.
In the time of Columbus a trip to the New World was no less perilous than a trip to the moon is today. The bravery and spirit of exploration personified by Columbus and the countless other European explorers of his time cannot be overstated. No matter what the publik skoolz teach, I hope American children continue to admire him and the rest of our brave ancestors who claimed this land for The West.

15 — flyingtiger wrote at 12:43 AM on October 13:

Discover’s day? It would be nice to honor John Cabot and others.
What plight of the Indians? They lost some wars. That’s what you get when you force a greater military power to fight you by burning their farms and kidnapping their woman and children. As part of this discover day children should be told of the innocent white civilians killed by the indians.

16 — BeenHereTooLong wrote at 12:54 AM on October 13:

Am I looking at this the wrong way, or should the proposed name be “Discoverer’s Day”? I Googled it, and found entries under both, although they consistently seemed to indicate that in Hawaii there is a “Discover’s Day”. Maybe Europeans should have left the Americas (guess they wouldn’t have been called that if not “discovered” by Columbus so someone could apply Vespucci’s name to the continents) to the devices of the ingenious indigenous populations instead of introducing all our European backwardness and cruelty to this part of the world.

17 — Bud wrote at 1:06 AM on October 13:

It goes without saying that the people who decry Columbus Day are waging the same type of colonialism against whites today, complete with rape, murder and diseases. Actually they’re worse because, unlike Columbus, the GOAL of their colonialism is genocide, the extermination forever of white people off the face of the earth. It’s not an economic policy, they’re not looking for riches, it’s a pure, hate-motivated policy of extermination at its roots.

It also goes without saying that they aren’t concerned with, for instance, the Indian tribes who chased the Apaches from the Northwest to the Arizona desert, or the victims of the Aztec empire. The left’s white-hating racism consists to a large degree of holding whites to standards they hold no other group to, and they should be called on it every time they do.

18 — Stone Greaser wrote at 3:09 AM on October 13:

The Columbus demonizers seem to always forget that this man was around in the 15th Century (and not the 20th!).
A much more brutal time when “political correctness” was completely unknown…

19 — Anonymous wrote at 5:00 AM on October 13:

An inferior culture meets a superior culture and crumbles. Same result all through history.

20 — Rebelcelt wrote at 8:39 AM on October 13:

But the first step, and one everyone can embrace right now, is to honor the truth by terminating the celebration of Christopher Columbus, while commemorating the importance of this historic day in all its implications.

What a stupid man…celebrate the discovery but not the discoverer.
This idiot lives a life of dreary office work and wants to demasculate our great manly leaders that faced real trial, hardship,battle,uncertainty, etc.

David McGrath go back to yur Latte and dreary existance and leave the thinking to more capable minds.

21 — Anonymous wrote at 10:39 AM on October 13:

How multiculturalists forget. Look at the takeover of europe by muslims. Could this be viewed in the same light as the Columbus expeditions? I think not.
Whites brought “enlightenment” to the “new world” not the future repression and conquest that the muslims are bringing to the “old world” (europe).

22 — aj wrote at 10:44 AM on October 13:

Columbus day IS racist… towards Norwegians! Lets give credit where credit is due people, from now on I celebrate Lief Erickson day!

23 — Anonymous wrote at 10:51 AM on October 13:

It is easy for people to pass judgement on previous historical events. Slavery, although abhorrent by today’s standard was seen as a natural condition of the times. In parts of africa, slavery is still seen as a normal part of the “human condition”.
It is unfair and illogical to judge our past history by today’s standards.
alex haley’s “roots” series did much to falsify the true conditions of that “peculiar institution” called slavery. Blacks were sold into slavery by THEIR OWN KIND. The image of the southern “gentleman farmer” sitting on the veranda with a pina-colada while his slaves worked under a cruel overseer was a total fabrication (designed to demonize the white man). More often that not, he was in the fields with his “slaves”. Life was hard for all at that time.
The “slave chronicles” was a set of interviews with former slaves taken about 1910. Many of those interviewed stated that they actually had it good under slavery. Many of them became skilled at various tasks and did establish their own successful businessses.
Most people are shocked to find out that many well-to-do blacks owned slaves and were quite proficient at slave-trading. Cinque, the slave that won his freedom portrayed in the movie “amistad” made numerous trips to africa to procure slaves and was quite successful at it.

24 — Great White Observer wrote at 11:03 AM on October 13:

Why in the name of God are almost all of the leader’s of these anti Western movement’s White’s, such as this David Mc Grath character and the author of the preceeding article. That one is actually worse considering that it was written by someone who goes by the name Christine Armario. What is wrong with and what causes a race to become so filled with guilt and self haterd?

25 — Arcadian wrote at 11:16 AM on October 13:

I like to check out David Yeagley’s site on these topics, he stirs up those leftist multicultists no end. The guy is a realist who doesn’t wallow in emotive recollections of 100 year old losses or demand recompense because his side lost. Yeagley loathes the victim status so many seek to impose upon him and his people. If only more were of his ilk.

http://www.badeagle.com/

Arc.


26 — Anonymous wrote at 4:03 PM on October 13:

Anonymous #14-

Technically it was the white Clovis people who came to North America before anyone else. They walked across the Atlantic from southern France on the frozen icepack more than 60,000 years ago. They settled around the great lakes but were wiped out by a comet strike. There is archeological evidence to confirm this. So if my white ancestors were here first, then this IS my native soil, and that supercedes any claim that the so-called “native Americans” have to this land.

27 — Anonymous wrote at 4:55 PM on October 13:

If these self-loathing leftists are so unhappy with America’s history, then why do they still live here? They should either face the facts, or go live somewhere else. We’d be a lot better off without them.

28 — Anonymous wrote at 4:57 PM on October 13:

“Why in the name of God are almost all of the leader’s of these anti Western movement’s White’s, such as this David Mc Grath character and the author of the preceeding article.”

They get paid to do this. And mostly what they do is try and scare the rest of us enough so that we wont ever object any time in our lives.

29 — Anonymous wrote at 5:02 PM on October 13:

“Why in the name of God are almost all of the leader’s of these anti Western movement’s White’s, such as this David Mc Grath character and the author of the preceeding article”.

They get paid to do this stuff. And mostly what they do is scare the rest of us enough so we wont object any time of our lives. It seems to be self-perpetuating now, even though most rank and file liberals don’t seem to really believe in it anymore themselves. There was an interesting quote of dubious intention, made by a rather bad person in history, that said, “The great strength of the totalitarian state is that it forces those who fear it to imitate it”. You can see this in trivial things today all the time.

30 — Anonymous wrote at 5:11 PM on October 13:

So if Columbus is persona non grata now, what to do with the name of our capital’s district, the District of Columbia? They should have a contest for elementary school kids to rename the district.
I have a few ideas: District of Indigenia. District of Color.
District of the Oppressed. Obamaland.

31 — Arcadian wrote at 5:41 PM on October 13:


Anonymous #14 you said:
“Technically it was the white Clovis people who came to North America before anyone else…”
You are right, but I think you mean pre-Clovis whites. The Clovis NM peoples are the descendents of the Asians who walked across the Bering land crossing., These Clovis folks were considered to be the earliest settlers, but as you say, most recent research on flint tools provides evidence that others, Whites from the European continent walked or maybe followed the Southern ice pack in boats across the Atlantic, they originated in Southern France and Spain: Solutre.
Interested folks can read more here http://www.clovisinthesoutheast.net/stanford.html
and elsewhere on the web:

And of course there is still our old freind Kennewick Man.
Arc.

32 — Anonymous wrote at 8:30 PM on October 13:

Yes, those “racist white settlers” really ‘destroyed’ civilization right? I guess we should have let the indians keep cutting people’s scalps off. I guess we should get rid of hotels, restuarants, the constitution, cars, trains, airplanes, sanitary food and clean drinking water. Probably ought to get rid of the internet while we’re at it. I mean, that “ruined” the indians’ civilization…right?

33 — Bon, Tax Slave of Kalifornia wrote at 9:31 AM on October 14:

“…Whites from the European continent walked or maybe followed the Southern ice pack in boats across the Atlantic, they originated in Southern France and Spain: Solutre…”

Posted by Arc:

The History Channel aired a wonderful show, Journey to 10,000 BC, positing this theory, . I watched it with my 15-year old thinking it was about saber-tooth cats and wooly mammoths. It was about that, but also about the theory of Caucasian migration from Europe by the Soluteran people of Spain and France who possibly followed their source of food (seals) across a sea that was much lower at the time—either from from ice berg to ice berg or island to island.

http://shop.history.com/detail.php?a=113450

I read the reviews from leading archeologists, paleontologists and other scientists who generally dismissed this theory outright—some even admitted that they hadn’t seen the documentary and ‘didn’t need to.’ A few called Dennis Sanford of the Smithsonian and his theory of European migration an outright nut. A few pre-10,000 BC Caucasian-looking skulls have been found—and have been suppressed or dismissed by academia.

I’m sure the prevailing wisdom in academia is that America was peopled solely by those who walked across the Asian land bridge and anyone who says otherwise is dead wrong. Interesting, isn’t it, that the Clovis-point resemble spear-heads used by the Soluteran and not those used in Siberian (this too is dismissed).

According to Dr. Göran Burenhult, professor of archeology at Gotland University in Sweden:

“…On ancient Caucasians in America, Kennewick man, has not been the only find. Others include the 13,000 year old Peñon skull found in Mexico, the 12,500 year old Monte Verde site in Chile, the 9,400 year old Spirit Cave Mummy…Pre-Clovis and Clovis stone tools found in America are similar to those in North Western Europe known as Solutrean. Such tools have never been found in Siberia…”

http://tinyurl.com/yl9h4yj

Wouldn’t want to give Caucasians credit for anything, would they? It might also punch a hole in the Native Americans’ claims as to who first peopled the Americas—and give a new look at the modern grievance industry.

Controversial to be sure—but does it not merit further study?


Bon

34 — ghw wrote at 11:18 PM on October 14:

Europeans did not intentionally engineer the viruses that wiped out so many lives in the past.
Vilifying Columbus for the immune deficiences of the Indians is the absolute height of idiocy. — Visine
…………………..

Well said. Certainly, no one has vilified Asians for “intentionally” creating the Black Plague and bringing it to Europe, claiming 75 million lives and wiping out as much as 60% of the population. *

Nor should we blame them. It is thought to have come along the Silk Road from China. But no one had any idea of germs in those days. Any harm was unintentional.

I don’t think any schools are teaching impressionable young children about the death and suffering that came to us from out of Asia.

*[About 40,000 people died of plague in Paris — nearly half the population. Florence’s population was reduced from 120,000 to 50,000. At least 60% of Hamburg’s population perished, and more than 60% of Norway’s. It took 1/3 of Stockholm’s population and 2/3rds of Helsinki’s. Whole regions of Germany were depopulated, with an estimated loss of 6 million. It continued to return and ravage Europe periodically for the next 300 years.

On its return to London in 1603, the plague killed 38,000 Londoners. In 1625, 35,417 more Londoners died of the plague, and another 10,000 in 1636.
The Great Plague of London in 1665–1666 was a massive outbreak that killed an estimated 100,000 people, 20% of London’s population, claiming a toll of 7,000 deaths per week.

About 200,000 people around Moscow died of the disease from 1654 to 1656.
In 1656 the plague killed about half of Naples’ 300,000 inhabitants.
Amsterdam was ravaged in 1663–1664, with a mortality at 50,000.
The Great Plague of Vienna in 1679 caused at least 76,000 deaths; and in 1681, Prague lost 83,000 to the plague.]


35 — Recovering Republican wrote at 2:33 AM on October 15:

If celebrating the great explorer, symbol of Europe’s creation of the New World, is now optional, how about the same for Martin Luther King? As Jared Taylor observed, only King’s and Jesus Christ’s birthdays are national holidays. Yet no one makes anyone celebrate Christmas. Around “MLK Day,” two great Americans, Robert E. Lee and Benjamin Franklin, also have birthdays. Let Americans choose whom to celebrate, and quit jamming the affirmative action saint down our throats, if we’re deconstructing Columbus.

36 — Anonymous wrote at 5:19 AM on October 15:


Meaning no lack of sympathy, but American natives were not the only ones who suffered the ravages of imported disease. (And I suppose you’d stand much better chances against Smallpox than with Plague.) They were not unique. Why do we only hear about all the harm and suffering that Europeans brought them? Would they be better off living in their natural state today?

“It took four hundred years before Europe’s population recovered and again equaled the pre-Black Death figures.”
http://www.insecta-inspecta.com/fleas/bdeath/Europe.html

37 — Anonymous wrote at 6:02 AM on October 15:

David McGrath is hardly neutral on this matter.
He is emeritus professor of English and of Native American Literature at the College of DuPage (in Glen Ellyn, an affluent suburb of Chicago). Glen Ellyn is 89.5% white, and the median income for a family is $112,000. It is 2% black.
http://www.geocities.com/profmcgrath2004/index.html

Bill Ayers is a native of Glen Ellyn and attended school there.

Apparently, the Native American Studies Program is rather big at DuPage. http://tinyurl.com/yhfkmja
DuPage is also big on Diversity. http://tinyurl.com/yl574jf

38 — John PM wrote at 7:35 AM on October 15:

To ghw:

That was an excellent post, one of the best I have read in a long time. All here would do well to copy or memorize it for future battles with the “enlightened.” Another point also, is the fact that the Mongols had quite a booming slave trade!

Again, great job ghw,

John PM!!!

*KRONOS*

39 — ghw wrote at 2:22 AM on October 16:

Thank you for the compliment. Unfortunately, for the sake of brevity there was a lot more that I left out. For instance, the fact that the countries around Baltic, such as Poland, lost a third of their population to the plague. The Indians of the Americas were by no means unique in suffering from imported diseases from which they had no immunity.

On some further research, I also find that smallpox was not a European “invention” after all. Nor was there any such thing as European immunity, contrary to what is taught! (see below) Like so many other diseases, right up to the very present, it too was an Asian import. And no one was immune. (Not that I’m blaming Asians, mind you. None of these scourges were engineered or intentional.)

“Smallpox, believed to have originated in India or Egypt, is one of the most devastating diseases known to humanity. In some ancient cultures, smallpox was such a major killer of infants that custom forbade the naming of a newborn until the infant had caught the disease and proved that it would survive.

The disease killed an estimated 400,000 Europeans each year during the 18th century (including five monarchs). A further complication was blindness — a third of all reported cases of blindness was due to smallpox. Between 65–80% of survivors were marked with deep pitted scars (pockmarks), most prominent on the face. Of all those infected, 20–60% —and over 80% of infected children —died from the disease As late as the 18th century, smallpox killed every 10th child born in Sweden and France, and every 7th child born in Russia.

Edward Jenner’s demonstration, in 1798, that inoculation with cowpox could protect against smallpox brought the first hope that the disease could be controlled. In 1967, when WHO launched an intensified plan of eradication, the “ancient scourge” threatened 60% of the world’s population, killed every fourth victim, scarred or blinded most survivors, and eluded any form of treatment.

Except for immunity induced by vaccination, human beings appear to be universally susceptible to infection with the smallpox virus. [There was no such thing as European immunity.]

Smallpox was finally pushed back to the Horn of Africa, and then to a single last case, which occurred in Somalia in 1977.
… [Smallpox is now considered to have been completely eradicated.]
— World Health Organization …. http://tinyurl.com/yzt4nq3

http://tinyurl.com/dh7lz5
http://tinyurl.com/yf46a3y

Another interesting fact regarding Asia is that following the Mongol conquests, an unintended result of the ensuing peace which their empire established, the Pax Mongolica, enabled the opening of the Silk Road and the passage of diseases like the plague, which would have been far more difficult previously.

While fashionably lefty teachers such as Mr. Kolowitz in Florida may teach their impressionable young pupils about diseases that were spread by wicked European colonizers, what goes unmentioned is that it was also Europeans who developed vaccines and medical procedures for the prevention/treatment of such diseases, thus saving the lives of countless millions around the world, irrespective of race or nationality. It was Europeans who eventually eradicated the disease. Why is that never mentioned?

Although people in many countries (outside the New World) suffered the scourge of smallpox, it was European whites who finally did something about it. Where is the credit?

Incidentally, as is often mentioned here on Amren, whites didn’t have it that easy either — not even when they came to America. Indians weren’t the only ones who suffered from diseases and epidemics. My mother’s grandmother caught smallpox on the boat from Europe, at the age of three. She survived the disease, but it left her face scarred for the rest of her life, about which (I was told) she was always self-conscious. She wore veils and tried to hide her face. Even after arriving in America, life was no party. She grew up to have a large family of her own: seven or eight children. An epidemic (perhaps typhoid fever) came along and, within the space of several weeks, wiped out all her family, except my grandfather and 2 others. Her husband became blind and feeble, and could no longer work. Because of having no breadwinner, my grandfather, at eight years old, had to go to work in the coal mines to support his family. He got no schooling beyond third grade. Why don’t “educators” like Mr. K teach their young pupils about things like THAT?

No, whites weren’t all sitting on the verandah sipping juleps, or playing polo, while blacks toiled in the fields to support our idle lives of luxury. But that’s not according to the textbook.



Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Send This Page      Search