American Renaissance
Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Send This Page       Date Archives       Category Archives

An Ancient Textile Factory?

More news stories on Ancient History

Robert W. Carter, Creation Ministries (Queensland, Australia), October 1, 2009

A recent report of an ancient textile facility, of sorts, is turning heads. Sifting through the debris on a cave floor in the Republic of Georgia, scientists recently discovered evidence that the early cave dwellers processed textiles in the cave. While searching for ancient pollen grains, they found tiny flax fibers in the dirt. Some of these fibers were woven, some were cut, and some were dyed black, gray, turquoise, or pink. They also discovered evidence that these people were processing fur (for clothing) and animal hides.

What is surprising about the find is that this was supposedly happening 30,000 years ago (according to the C-14 dates obtained from several organic samples taken from the dirt). This is prior to the advent of civilization in the evolutionary history of man. This is even prior to the invention of farming. How can primitive “cave men” have advanced textile processing skills? How could these “hunter gatherers” have had enough time to devote to textile processing when they were supposed to be focused almost solely on finding food? According to most paleontologists, a division of labor that would allow some people to devote themselves to such activities is not supposed to occur until after the advent of farming, where enough food can be produced by few enough people to allow others to do things unrelated to food production (like build cities, weave clothes, or to free up the chemistry nerds to study the properties of assorted plant dyes).

There seems to be a tremendous bias against the abilities of ‘early’ man, and the evolutionist only yields ground on this grudgingly.

This report of early textile technology suggests very strongly that man has always been intelligent, industrious, and inventive. There seems to be a tremendous bias against the abilities of “early” man, and the evolutionist only yields ground on this grudgingly. From the recent discovery of extensive, pre-Columbian civilization in the Amazon, which contradicts many just-so stories about tribal cultures, including much of what Darwin wrote about primitive peoples, to the recent discovery of the “People that Time Forgot”, it is clear that primitive societies can devolve from more advanced ones. This would be the case with these textile-weaving cave dwellers. These people lived after the Flood in the vicinity of the Mountains of Ararat. Yes, they lived in a cave, but this was probably for expediency rather than due to a lack of knowledge. Any people group with the cultural and technological ability to harvest, process, dye, and weave plant fibers is certainly smart enough to build a warm and dry house out in the open.

This seems to be a ‘shot across the bow’ by these scientists against the Out of Africa Theory.

Interestingly, the report of sophisticated textile processing falls on the heels of new reports from the same region of the “oldest” human fossils ever found. A supposedly 1.8 million-year-old skull has been unearthed in the Republic of Georgia. It appears “primitive” and diminutive (much like the Flores Hobbit man fossils) and the date puts it prior to the Out of Africa event that supposedly led to the colonizing of the world by modern humans. This seems to be a “shot across the bow” by these scientists against the Out of Africa Theory.

Not to be outdone, however, there are also recent reports of ancient technology in Africa. According to these evolutionists, some people in SW Africa were fire-hardening rocks in order to change their properties so that better and different tools could be manufactured from the rock as early as 164,000 years ago! Putting the dates aside for the moment, this technology would involve many of the same cultural features as the textile-weaving evidence from farther north. So would the complex superglue used by “Stone Age” man in Africa thousands of years ago, the “35,000-year-old” flute found in Germany, and evidence that man was caring for the disabled12 and manufacturing stone blades as early as “500,000 years ago”.

What is clear is that man is as intelligent today as he has ever been, and evidence for “primitive” man is deceptive and misleading. We use laptops and drive motorcars if we were fortunate enough to be raised in a society which could teach us those skills from its pool of cultural “know-how”, not because we are intrinsically smarter than our forebears.

Original article

(Posted on October 2, 2009)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment     Send This Page      Search

Comments

1 — ciccio wrote at 7:50 PM on October 2:

When the first white men came to Uganda, they found most of the men wearing animal skins. The Baganda was the most advanced tribe, whilst the others were still wearing loincloth, the Baganda women were wearing dresses. They had not mastered the art of weaving - I am talking about the pre-historic days of the middle of the 19th century- there is a type of tree that grows there whose bark when pounded turns to something like cloth. I saw it being worn even in the 1960’s.

2 — Curtis Sprissler wrote at 10:17 PM on October 2:

I’m not sure this affects the out-of-Africa hypothesis… which I don’t fully believe, but it has very little bearing on the science of racial differences.

OOA still leaves 30,000 years for nature to breed northern humans into an entirely different creature than African ones.

Consider that up until about 10,000 years ago, there were 8-foot long beavers in North America, by which point in time they had been fully replaced by modern, small beavers.

Evolution can happen fast, especially when an creature is near extinction, which almost all animals were by the end of the last glacial period.

3 — WR the elder wrote at 4:21 PM on October 3:

At least some of the “Out of Africa” theories had our ancestors leaving Africa 100,000 years or more ago, so textile makers who lived 30,000 years ago would not disprove that.

4 — Enwhiten.com wrote at 9:08 AM on October 4:

Those amazing cave paintings in France are also as old as 30K yrs. They look like they were done by a talented art student just yesterday. Clearly, modern whites have been around for a long time.

5 — Anonymous wrote at 11:29 AM on October 4:

From creation ministries? I trust archeologists and biologists over preachers—doesn’t the bible say that all of god’s children are the same, that all have the same souls, and isn’t the new testament a manifesto for universality, without “christians or gentiles, romans or greeks” etc?

6 — concernicus wrote at 12:52 PM on October 4:

All I’m saying is the minority of white people have been more or less ruling the world since humanity began. Meanwhile the masses of blacks and others haven’t even pulled themselves together enough to form one uncorrupted government. Not to say white governments aren’t corrupt, ours just give back to their people. I wonder why?


Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Send This Page      Search