American Renaissance
Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Send This Page       Date Archives       Category Archives

Court Gives Santeria Priest OK to Sacrifice Goats

More news stories on Hispanic Immigrants

Linda Stewart Ball, AP, July 31, 2009

A federal appeals court reversed a lower court’s ruling on Friday that barred a Santeria priest from sacrificing goats in his Texas home, saying a city’s decision to prohibit the ritual violated the man’s religious rights.

Jose Merced, 46, accuses the city of Euless, Texas, of trampling on his constitutional right to religious exercise. The city claims the sacrifices jeopardize public health and violate its slaughterhouse and animal cruelty ordinances.

{snip}

“It’s a great day for religious freedom in Texas,” said Eric Rassbach, Merced’s lawyer, in response to the three-judge panel’s ruling.

{snip}

Euless city attorney, William McKamie, said he plans to file a motion for a rehearing.

“We respectfully believe that it’s an incorrect finding on the purpose of application of the Texas Religious Freedom Act,” McKamie said.

In court papers, Rassbach described Santeria as an Afro-Cuban religion with a complex ritual for ordaining priests, including the sacrifice of up to nine four-legged animals, such as lambs or goats, up to 20 chickens or other fowl and a turtle.

{snip}

Merced asked the city for a permit to slaughter animals at his home but was told the practice was prohibited. He said he hasn’t been able to initiate any new priests in the past three years.

Euless attorneys have said the ordinances outlawing animal sacrifices were passed before Merced’s arrival in 1990 and don’t discriminate against any individual or group. McKamie also said Merced isn’t equipped to handle many animals on his property or dispose of them in a sanitary way.

Original article

(Posted on August 4, 2009)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment     Send This Page      Search

Comments

1 — Frank wrote at 4:19 PM on August 6:

I suppose they will cry discrimination when they are refused the right to sacrifice people. The law does not prohibit people practicing religion, but in most places at least it does not allow this type of “practice.”

2 — Bobby wrote at 6:09 PM on August 6:

You won’t find animal rights groups, the ACLU, or any other humanists, taking issue with this decision. Afterall, Christians and most probably, long time Americans aren’t involved.

3 — Michael C. Scott wrote at 5:36 PM on August 10:

As long as the sacrificial slaughter is done in a humane way, I don’t have a problem with it. The real concern is what he will do with the remains. Certainly goat is edible (it’s actually pretty good). There are, though, lots of inedible parts of an animal. How will this guy dispose of the guts and bloody bones, even if he is eating them? His choice on this matter may land him in trouble with the local health department.


Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Send This Page      Search