David Yeagley, Bad Eagle: The Rantings of a Conservative Comanche, June 16, 2009
“Fifty years from now, there won’t even be any white people!” said my pathological Middle Eastern neighbor. He knew I was an American Indian, and he expected me to dance in his vision.
I didn’t. I found his attitude, and that of his angry black wife, repulsive. I don’t appreciate being presumed upon or being dictated to in any matter, especially in the matter of race. Nobody tells this Indian how to think. I’m free to like and dislike whomever I please, for whatever reasons I choose.
My two neighbors were racists, obviously. And they were making me a victim of their racism. Because I was non-white, they presumed I was a natural partner in their resentment and animosity toward the white race. I was judged by the color of my skin, so to speak.
David Yeagley.
This all happened many years ago, but, I never forgot it. Today, I see truth in the words of my neighbor. White women are leaping in bed with black men, or other darkies of the world, and popping out strange-looking children. Generally speaking, the male in these incidents could not care less about the children. It’s all about sexual aggression against the white race. They’re happy to conquer for the moment, and to create ghastly, permanent consequences. Marriage and family have nothing to do with these misanthropes, nor the lusus naturae they create.
This denigration of race is a cruel mockery of manhood. It is a pathetic testimony of the personal irresponsibility and malignant selfishness of failed men. Indeed, a careless woman is generally such for the lack of a caring father.
Like the universal law of aesthetics. We want beauty. Superior beauty lies in the white race. It is the variety of color, the red hair, the blonde hair, the green eyes, the blue eyes. All the other races in the world have only one coloring, the same black hair, the dark brown eyes and skin. A bit drab in comparison, can’t we say?
The darkies of the world are truly fascinated with the white race, and always have been. However, there is a certain envy that naturally, unavoidably develops. But the sexual encounter of the dark with the white makes the white dark. And what most people—especially white people—forget is the fact that the white race is the minority in the world. It is, and has always been, vastly out-numbered by the dark races. Moreover, the pigmentations of the white race are all genetically recessive. The whiteness is first to fade.
Therefore, integration tends to mean elimination for the white race. That’s simply the way of the genetic world. That the white race became the most powerful, dominant, ruling race may be attributed to cultural values more than anything else. It was of course the white race that adopted the Judeo-Christian religion. The social constructs and psychological hierarchies in this tradition evolved a people more astute and agile in every way.
Whatever ‘mental’ problems the white race developed as a result of being more powerful are only fairly recent evolutions. In his day the white man has created a throne like no other in history. If it is criminal at the foundation, the challenge is chiefly from envy—always the weakest charge. Besides, what’s the point of the dark man accusing the white man of not keeping his white morals, if the dark man himself does not believe in those morals? The charge of hypocrisy is moot, made in impotence. (The white man’s self-flagellation is the only hope of the darkies.)
I would not look forward to a time when there is no white race. My neighbors were nothing I would want to see more of in this world—certainly not their attitude. But that there is a growing number of people in the world who think like them is a concern. The Muslim world tends to produce such a disposition.
Disguised though it may be in moral and religious terms, political terms, or even genetic terms, the case is fairly obvious: “the hated white race” is such for its beauty and power.
{snip}
The beauty only whites can produce.
Original article
(Posted on July 14, 2009)
Comments
Hating people whom you think are better looking than you is a good reason to destroy civilisation. Every liberal knows that.
WOW!!!!! I have NEVER heard anyone who was not white speak the untarnished truth as this man has spoken. And he is completely correct…
I don’t think the hate can be explained by anything but pure racial jealousy over prosperity. Ignorant minds believe ignorant things. Ignorant minds are going to believe that some evil doin’ must be going on in order to have the average person of one race to have more than another.
White liberals feed it when they religiously deny racial differences in IQ, intelligence and other matters.
I’ve spoken on the subject of race with one of my Hispanic friends. Not surprisingly, he revealed much envy. He talked about “how white people had all the money.” He also told me about the time when he saw, in his words, a “white b****” driving his dream car, and was angry and envious over it.
I wouldn’t be surprised if these attitudes were held toward whites by the majority of the darker skinned people. Afterall, our race has invented virtually every technological advancement in this word and has created a civilization unmatched in beauty and progress by any other non-white civilization, so envy and resentment felt towards us by lesser people shouldn’t be surprising.
Therefore, integration tends to mean elimination for the white race. That’s simply the way of the genetic world. That the white race became the most powerful, dominant, ruling race may be attributed to cultural values more than anything else. It was of course the white race that adopted the Judeo-Christian religion. The social constructs and psychological hierarchies in this tradition evolved a people more astute and agile in every way.(FROM ARTICLE ABOVE)
Nonsense. The White Race became the most dominant race in the world due to genetics developed in a cold climate. Religion had nothing to do with it. White genes might have made them more accepting of Christianity, but that is not why they are dominant. In fact, one can argue that Christianity has made the White race weak.
What a: beautiful, refreshing, honest, and well written article!
There are many truths to be found here; however, there is one that is so glaringly obvious, it is unfortunate that it even has to be mentioned:
“White women are leaping in bed with black men, or other darkies of the world, and popping out strange-looking children. Generally speaking, the male in these incidents could not care less about the children. It’s all about sexual aggression against the white race. They’re happy to conquer for the moment, and to create ghastly, permanent consequences. Marriage and family have nothing to do with these misanthropes, nor the lusus naturae they create.”
Unfortunately, white women are not the only ones guilty of this abdominal behavior these days. There are far too many “white men,” who refuse to accept that degrading their race (and in their own strange way admitting to a failed white masculinity,) is nothing to be proud of! There is only one way for the white race to reproduce and to flourish, and that is through unions between white men and white women; all other approaches, no matter how “well intentioned,” are acts of auto-genocide.
Or put another way, miscegenation and white nationalism/race realism are 100% incompatible. To believe, or worse to behave, otherwise, is to embrace and celebrate the very core of the abject evil that is multiculturalism.
End of discussion and as always, God help us all!!!
I’m in solid agreement, of course, with what this guy writes, and I’m glad he wrote the article, but I have to say that if he thinks he can pass for an Indian then I can pass for an eskimo.
He reminds me EXACTLY of Ward Churchill. He claims full Indian blood because of some kind of mental disorder, but he’s obviously Caucasian, and in Churchill’s case he was outed as a fraud. Like Churchill this guy seems to think letting his hair grow long will convince people he IS an Indian.
I hate to have to write these things after so many compliments, but there’s no way this guy is Indian. He even expresses himself in writing like a white man.
NOTE: I just made a quick ‘Google.” It appears that this man’s adopted mother was a Commanche, and he is a white man who has assumed an Indian persona, probably for the above reasons I cited. Aparently he has had cosmetic surgery to make him appear a bit more “Indian,” it is claimed, but it didn’t come out like he wanted, because he still looks like a white man to me.
http://www.bluecorncomics.com/yeagley.htm
“David A. Yeagley is a white supremacist who poses as a Comanche Indian. He was mistakenly enrolled in the Comanche Nation because the stepmother who adopted him is Comanche. He falsely claims descent from the Comanche leader, Bad Eagle (1839-1909). Comanche elders and members of the tribal government all deny he is actually Comanche.”
As a race realist, I don’t hate other races. Individually, I’ve always gotten along well with diverse individuals.
However, I respect the true meaning of the word, diverstiy. Races are distinctly diverse and should remain so otherwise, you lose diversity. Races are not interchangable and we shouldn’t be forced to pretend they are. It’s unnatural and only creates increasing levels of anger, jealousy, and resentment.
While whites are more than happy to live with their own, other groups can’t standing their own kind and are naturally drawn to whites for safety, security, and prosperity (all of which they can’t seem to provide for themselves). Non-whites can’t live without whites. They do everything they can to be around us. Yet, they hate us and want us to die off. That alone should tell you who’s more intelligent.
I said I was a race realist but I got along with individuals. I used to work with an American Indian woman. On my birthday, she was the only one who gave me a present. It was a key chain made with bead work. She lived on a NY reservation and when she gave it to me, she proudly said, ‘it was made by a real Indian’. I still have it and never used it. I keep it in pristine condition in the box she gave it to me in. While we were good friends at work, at the end of the day, we each went home to our own people. Some see that as hate. I see it as love. I want to see her culture survive intact as much as I want mine to as well.
One thing I’m sure most White people don’t realize is the fact that members of other races - EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM - are jealous of Whites. All you have to do is put yourself in their position. There is no other emotion that one can feel, especially if you’re Black. There is no racism toward Blacks today or any other race by Whites, it’s all by every one of these races AGAINST Whites. The sad thing is that this media in this country has been conditioning Whites to back down, be subservient, and otherwise have a guilt complex the likes of which has never been fostered on any group of people in history. whites are literally LETTING people of every other race, religion color etc. to take over not only here in the U.S. but in every majority White country in the worlds.
Wake up White people. Please.
Interesting commentary. I don’t know about the assertion that we’re emulated for our “beauty,” but we’re certainly emulated, envied, and often hated for our power.
The race, like it or not, has been responsible for virtually all human progress in practically all fields of endeavor.
To be sure, East Asians and Indians are capitalizing on and extending what whites originally introduced them to and in some ways are actually surpassing us, Japan being perhaps the foremost example of this.
But the white race has. for the past two millenia, been at the forefront of human progress in practically all fields of endeavor.
That guy is an Indian?!? He doesn’t look like any Indian I’ve ever seen. I googled his bio. His daddy is a White guy. Some Comanche.
By the way, do the people at AmRen think only blondes and redheads are “beautiful”, or have they forgotten the fact most Whites are brunettes?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/35351732@N04/3295937198/
Don’t tell me only Whites can produce blondes and redheads, either, because I’ll tell you: you need to read up on physical anthropology.
http://www.ozoutback.com.au/postcards/postcards_forms/abor_children_3/Image/au377271.jpg
http://www.amgcarrental.com/images/travel/kalash_child.jpg
http://www.asiafinest.com/forum/lofiversion/index.php/t47619.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Palestinian_girl_in_Qalqiliya.jpg
…so I wish the author would clarify his boundaries for being ‘White’-though there are many races that would OBVIOUSLY not be considered White by any reasonable person. Similarly, it is a bit subjective, this article (though I agree with most of it). Yes I agree that many non-White nationalities are jealously, and viciously anti-White: (particularly, and for the most part) Muslims (generally Black and Arab), Blacks, and Hispanics. I think though that, to be fair, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I find that, on average, Kazakh, Japanese, and Korean women (on average) are far more attractive than the obese hordes we have in America (many of whom are, sadly, White). Not just in relative terms, but Korean and Japanese women (in addition to the already mentioned nationalities) are attractive even in absolute terms.
David Yeagley, Bad Eagle has it correct. The white race possessing the most advanced genes as showed by their civilizations holds the key to the advancement of this planet. Certainly, humanity will be in pure state of misery if the black race were dominate. But that will never happen for the yellow man will be the dominate race if the white man somehow disappears. It is very unfortunate that the red man’s voice is seriously missing on this planet for they also possess superior genes. But in ages past, the red man fought each other so hard that a large amount of the superior genes were eliminated.
Gee, the posters number 11 and 12 seem to be a little jealous themselves by what they have written..
#12 just says he finds Japanese and Korean women far more attractive BUT he then went on to say compared to the OBESE White women we have so much of in this country….notice he didn’t say compared to OBESE Japanese or Korean women? BTW, what are those “absolute terms” you speak of? Would be nice to have clarification of what you mean.
I forgot to mention I have read Yeagley for years. He used to have articles on Vdare and still does once in awhile. Comanche or not, I like what he has written
I’m not sure I understand:
How exactly does it benefit us to print articles by nutcases with no significance?
The agreement of an Uncle Tonto, Uncle Tom or Tio Tomas does not make me feel one more ounce of white pride.
This guy has stated some truths that White people would not dare speak. All Africans look the same, all Orientals look the same and even different nonwhite races look similar. You could put a Filipino, a Mexican, a North African and a Saudi in a lineup and many people would not be able to guess which nationality is which.
Beware of any article that uses terms like “Judeo-Christian” and singles out muslims.
I think I see a little bit of Native in him, looking at the eyes.
My mother is probably no more than 1/16 Cherokee but she does look Native and was told she looks at least half—and you could tell with my maternal grandmother. I used to get made fun of in school for my “Japanese” looking eyes…but it’s a throwback from my Native ancestry. I’m a brown-eyed brunette and I tan easily.
At any rate, I do agree that a lot of the hate is due to jealousy. I think blacks, being at the bottom of the totem pole, so to speak, are the most hateful. I’ve never heard too much about Native Americans going after whites in recent history, but there may be things I’ve never heard about, granted. I have a maternal uncle up in Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan who’s friends with just about everyone on the nearby Chippewa reservation.
Whether this guy is Native, Caucasian, or whatever, I still agree with what he says, regardless.
That guy is an Indian?!? He doesn’t look like any Indian I’ve ever seen. I googled his bio. His daddy is a White guy. Some Comanche.
By the way, do the people at AmRen think only blondes and redheads are “beautiful”, or have they forgotten the fact most Whites are brunettes?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/35351732@N04/3295937198/
Don’t tell me only Whites can produce blondes and redheads, either, because I’ll tell you: you need to read up on physical anthropology.
http://www.ozoutback.com.au/postcards/postcards_forms/abor_children_3/Image/au377271.jpg
http://www.amgcarrental.com/images/travel/kalash_child.jpg
http://www.asiafinest.com/forum/lofiversion/index.php/t47619.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Palestinian_girl_in_Qalqiliya.jpg
Having met other Native Americans, I learned that many of them are surprisingly more supportive of whites, than other non-white races. And he was not saying that white brunette women can’t be beautiful, he is simply saying that the variety found mostly in the white race is beautiful, and I firmly agree even if it isn’t modest or humble of me to feel this way. Those other groups aren’t even comparable. Aboriginal people only have blonde hair, while they are very young, and it hardly flatters their skin tones, sorry but that’s a fact. The rest of those people are rarities, in their native countries, where with white people, it isn’t even rare for members of the same family to have different hair colors naturally.
Your opinion 7:40, but I strongly disagree. I feel this mans point is still valid. Go to Korea, and the women would look far less diverse than white women in any given country. There is beauty in that, in my book.
By the way, do the people at AmRen think only blondes and redheads are “beautiful”, or have they forgotten the fact most Whites are brunettes?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/35351732@N04/3295937198/
Only white usually are described as brunettes, since it is whites who have so much variety. And Jaclyn Smith is indeed beautiful, you will rarely find a non-white woman with her delicate features, and porcelain complexion.
anon 7;23”
While whites are more than happy to live with their own, other groups can’t standing their own kind and are naturally drawn to whites for safety, security, and prosperity (all of which they can’t seem to provide for themselves). Non-whites can’t live without whites. They do everything they can to be around us. Yet, they hate us and want us to die off. That alone should tell you who’s more intelligent.
Further proof of the pathological jealousy he speaks of. A lot of it goes to the point of insanity. A world without whites would be, less progressive, less prosperous, more violent, more dreary, and definitely less beautiful.
It is our duty to mate with White Women, but we need pretend
Just look at this blond Aboriginal child you sent a link of
http://www.ozoutback.com.au/postcards/postcards_forms/abor_children_3/Image/au377271.jpg
http://farm2.static.flickr.co/1242/1355839310_e74a960977.jpg?v=0
From an aesthetic point of view, there truly is no comparison.
I’m sorry, but that hardly challenges his assertion that, beauty would still exist without whites.
ranger wrote: NOTE: I just made a quick ‘Google.” It appears that this man’s adopted mother was a Commanche, and he is a white man who has assumed an Indian persona, probably for the above reasons I cited. Aparently he has had cosmetic surgery to make him appear a bit more “Indian,” it is claimed, but it didn’t come out like he wanted, because he still looks like a white man to me.
http://www.bluecorncomics.com/yeagley.htm
“David A. Yeagley is a white supremacist who poses as a Comanche Indian. He was mistakenly enrolled in the Comanche Nation because the stepmother who adopted him is Comanche. He falsely claims descent from the Comanche leader, Bad Eagle (1839-1909). Comanche elders and members of the tribal government all deny he is actually Comanche.”
My understanding is that Yeagley himself claims to be of mixed white and Comanche ancestry. Whom should I believe — Yeagley or the usual leftist rabble determined to smear him?
http://steveintheswamps.wordpress.com/2009/07/13/sympathetic-american-indian-david-yeagley/
Here is an interesting response to Mr. Yegaley’s article!
@Ranger
Hold your fire, Ranger. Info with birth certificate:
http://www.badeagle.com/faq/
“I’m glad I’m White.”
Mick Jagger
The White Race became the most dominant race in the world due to genetics developed in a cold climate.
___
Let me disagree. Are Canadian Eskimos, Siberians or Sami people are more developed than Italians, Spaniards or Greeks?
Fertile crescent or Mediterranean coast of Middle East is where farming started. Italian people, -core of Europe in my opinion- seems to have far more contributed to Western civilization than Northern Europeans.
This is 100% accurate. I sometimes feel like a broken record on my posts here, but I routinely cite the overriding theme of intense racial resentment and envy on the part of non-Whites and their never-ending program of grievances and gripes against Whites. Indeed, the whole great egalitarian fraud of liberal western democracy is undergirded by a superstructure of naked hatred for Whites - and tragically many, many Whites have risen to the bait and accepted this monstrous lie as legitimate. Our doom is written in the language of this very phenomenon.
Hey Terrel! Yea, i know you’re looking. The guy who posted first on the article from the mestizo unleashing his vitriol about whites.
Isn’t this article SO refreshing and spot on? Whats more, unlike the mestizo, this guy actually has facts supporting him.
@Anonymous wrote at 7:23 PM on July 14:
Don’t kid yourself, when was the last time you saw a natural blonde black or brown walking about? Contrasted to natural redheaded and blonde whites. You’re fooling yourself if you think those photos prove anything other than some of those children are mixed (the last one in particular seems pretty Caucasoid) or just plain shopped/fake hair. The ‘blonde’ black in the first photo looks outrageously fake. Getting a little desperate to ward off the reality aren’t we? whites have a much more ‘diverse’ variety of hair color/texture and eye hue than do many other races. The fact redheaded/Blonde is associated naturally with whites further proves this. Im sure you being most likely liberal would like to tout “Whites are only making it seem that way!” But reality betrays you, as if you look around, you’ll be hard pressed to find anything to the contrary. Whites predominantly carry the genes for this kind of beauty, period.
Bicker about it all you want, don’t let the jealousy overwhelm you.
Actually there was anothe famous Comanche who’s Mother was white; Quanah Parker, “Last Chief of the Comanches”.
http://www.quanahparker.org/
Non-whites have always been jealous of white women. Sadly a lot of the white women who are dating black men are obese with short bleached blond hair.
One of the posters above mentioned a lot of the white women here in America are obese. I concur. However you see a ton of Mexican women here in California who are obese and so are their children.
If the white race were not a sign of beauty then why do Asian women have their eyes fixed to look like Caucasian women? I see Mexican women here in California highlight their hair and even bleach it blond (eek) to look more like the white woman.
That is why Black women straighten their hair and sometimes even bleach it as well. In Hollywood, the lighter skin blacks are the ones who get the leading roles. Very rarely do you see a really dark black person who is a tier 1 actor or actress. Men maybe, but not women.
“The white man’s self-flagellation is the only hope of the darkies.”
Though I don’t understand why everyone thinks that miscegenation is happening on a massive scale. Percentage wise(at least in the US) whites marry non-whites least than any other group. But since there are more of us it tends to look larger in terms of absolute inter-ethnic marriages. And this I got from a previous amren article.
Can’t say I’m too worried - while I have seen a few white woman/black male couples, the woman is usually either immensely unattractive(usually obese as well) or so stupid that it hurts just to hear her speak.
As an Indian from India, I completely agree with this Indian man (Yes I know he is a different kind of Indian).
I’m pretty sure the other white female readers of this site are very aware that black females are very jealous of our hair. Jealous to the point of pathological venom.
Re: Anonymous 19:23 14/7/2009
All those “proven examples” you linked to have Caucasian features; not just hair colors that are prevalent in whites, but straighter hair, lighter skin tones, more refined “Caucasoid” facial features, etcetera.
Those examples are mostly from the Middle East and Central Asia -where whites have mixed with darker-skinned people- due, historically, to slavery and warfare - the same kinds of threats that white people are facing now.
You are only proving what many readers of this site believe: white is beauty and beauty is white.
I find that, on average, Kazakh, Japanese, and Korean women (on average) are far more attractive than the obese hordes we have in America (many of whom are, sadly, White).
There are far too many overweight Americans today, that goes without saying. But while there are too many overweight white Americans, there are even more overweight Black and Hispanic Americans. There is data to back this one up. So to suggest that obesity is a white issue is ridiculous. In fact, decades back obesity wasn’t an issue in America, and in those days the country at least 90% white. Americas eating habits have changed considerably over the years, along with the level of activity, this is also true of school age kids. But again, obesity is hardly white trait.
Our two sons and two daughters learned from the moment they were old enough to understand… a non-White boyfriend or girlfriend is absolutely NOT ALLOWED! Marrying (or even having sex with) a non-White would get you DUMPED FOR LIFE from your family. In other words, our kids were made to understand a mistake like that would mean being permanently barred, disowned and disinherited.
That non-Whites are insanely jealous of Whites is a given. Mexicans are “eaten up” with envy of us. I see those Mexicans living on our street… furtively watching the Whites trying to see what they have… what they bring home from the store. If one has a new car, they can’t stop jabbering about it.
With Hindus, Asiatics, even with African Blacks in general, I firmly feel it’s insane envy of White accomplishments. After all, those races have virtually nothing to point to as to monumental accomplishments. Granted Asians had civilizations but virtually are able to boast of relatively few technologocal inventions or accomplishments. Africans, zilch! Which explains the massiveinferiority complex Africans can’t admit but have.
It’s the old, old story. The Industrial Revolution that really got things moving… started in England, Europe and North America. The steam engine was invented/developed in England; NOT, emphatically not in an obscure Asian village. Emphatically not in an African collection of huts. Just as the early intellects who gave us such a great start were those magnificent Greeks. Leading us into mathematics, philosophy, and so on and on.
Given the dark races — Africans, Asians, modern Hispanics owe everything they know and have to White accomplishments… their massive hatred, envy, and of course their built-in inferiority complex becomes quite understandable.
For example, why would we have to undergo the hype and nonsense of Black History month… if Blacks actually HAD any real history to boast of.
Don’t tell me only Whites can produce blondes and redheads, either, because I’ll tell you: you need to read up on physical anthropology. Anonymous
I think you’re missing the point of the article that only European/white descended people can produce the blonds and red-heads— like the two photos at the end of the article. Hair color is only one factor in determining race. In addition, our United States Government classifies Middle Eastern People (Arabs, Palestinians as in your pictures) as white. However, I agree with you that most whites are brunettes. I personally prefer dark-haired white women.
In virtually all the countries and cultures of the dark-skinned peoples those with the lightest colored skin are the most idolized and those with the darkest colored skin are considered to be inferior.
— Anonymous wrote at 7:30 PM on July 14:
I think though that, to be fair, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I find that, on average, Kazakh, Japanese, and Korean women (on average) are far more attractive than the obese hordes we have in America (many of whom are, sadly, White). Not just in relative terms, but Korean and Japanese women (in addition to the already mentioned nationalities) are attractive even in absolute terms.
After studying a gallery of Asian models, I noticed very few of them had not had work done on their eye lids to westernize them. In any case, many of them were cute. But like the writer above, I would not want to live in a world where white women were replaced by minorities, not just in the literal sense of word, but as objects of beauty. Beauty might well be in the eye of the beholder, but few of the models I observed, could adorn as many walls or male fantasies as this late great beauty did in the 70’s http://www.wickedlady.com/blog/farrah76c.jpg
This guy has an amazing physical rememblance to Clint Eastwood.
Indian or not, he speaks truth.
Maybe he is like old Grey Owl, the Englishman who passed himself off as an Indian, and was quite good at it. He probably has some Indian. You only have to be something like 1/16 to join the Cherokee nation.
There was an amazing diversity among the Indians. When I was in Colorado, I went to this museum that had the skulls of two tribes who lived side-by-side, and often fought each other. One skull looked Caucasian, the other looked like something from the caveman days—heavy brow ridges, big jaw.
The poster Mike is wrong. These White women that are with black men are not just the unattractive ones. Many are beautiful. Look at Tiger Woods wife. How about Heidi Klum with Seal? How about Nicole Simpson? The list goes on. I have seen the very unattractive obese White women with blacks also. But more and more are very pretty dumbed-down blondes. And yes, Mike there are thousands of Whites who are with blacks and it is growing daily. I see them everywhere. In Europe also.
Hey Stuck in No Man’s Land:
Those pictures that Anon posted are real. The first pic is not of Black children, but of Aborigine children. Aborigines sometimes will have blonde hair when they are young, but lose the color as they get older. And the others are of Central Asians, except the Mongolian girl. Light eyes and hair are not unknown in Central Asians, because Central Asia is a buffer zone between Europe and Asia and there is a long history of gene flow between the regions. I think Anon was just pointing out the falsehood that light hair and eyes is exclusive to Whites. There’s no need to get defensive; it only makes you look ignorant.
41 — Anonymous wrote at 9:47 AM on July 15:
The poster Mike is wrong. These White women that are with black men are not just the unattractive ones. Many are beautiful. Look at Tiger Woods wife. How about Heidi Klum with Seal? How about Nicole Simpson? The list goes on. I have seen the very unattractive obese White women with blacks also. But more and more are very pretty dumbed-down blondes. And yes, Mike there are thousands of Whites who are with blacks and it is growing daily. I see them everywhere. In Europe also.
In all fairness, I think it should be pointed out, that all of these black men are wealthy and famous. (Or now, infamous and incarcerated in OJ case). And while not all of them are always blond, many are, because I believe these black men are truly attracted to their polar opposites, in their quest to obtain the ultimate trophy wife. However, lower income black men, rarely attract super-model types from what I have observed.
7:23 Google search images of people in Afghanistan, Tibet, Mongolia, or any majority non-white country of your choosing, and you will still find that they whopping majority of them will have very dark hair, and very dark eyes. Only in the white race is this sort of variety common place. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/redhead,blonde,brunette.JPG
This thread is as good a place as any at AR to tell a true story that happened to me in 1989.
Santana and I were in the back seat of the car and we pulled up to a Korean Deli and Santana jumped out to get us some beers. While waiting for him George turned to me and said, “Why do White people think they are so superior to everyone.”
Anonymous wrote at 7:30 PM on July 14:
Integration withother races is suicide. the author is correct. but whites must remember, and teach their kids, that even if we are a minority, we can rule the world and control culture and our environment, because physical strength is important, but mental power and the capacity to put thought into action is all important. Strong bodies, strong minds, strong imagination. That must be our slogan. And one more: No Fear.
Anonymous wrote at 7:30 PM on July 14:
…so I wish the author would clarify his boundaries for being ‘White’-though there are many races that would OBVIOUSLY not be considered White by any reasonable person. Similarly, it is a bit subjective, this article (though I agree with most of it). Yes I agree that many non-White nationalities are jealously, and viciously anti-White: (particularly, and for the most part) Muslims (generally Black and Arab), Blacks, and Hispanics. I think though that, to be fair, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I find that, on average, Kazakh, Japanese, and Korean women (on average) are far more attractive than the obese hordes we have in America (many of whom are, sadly, White). Not just in relative terms, but Korean and Japanese women (in addition to the already mentioned nationalities) are attractive even in absolute terms.
Okay, here are pictures of your average Kazakh women
http://media-2.web.britannica.com/eb-media/64/89764-004-DB268742.jpg
average Korean women
http://www.buildingmovement.org/images/koreans.jpg
and average Japanese women
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Technology/Pix/pictures/2007/09/26/japanese_commuters460.jpg
Pleasant enough looking, I guess? But, I don’t care how politically incorrect this sounds to you, I still believe that average white women, are generally better looking.
Although too gushingly pro-White, the author has a point. Generally, unattractive and economically-challenged people will always resent and envy those who don’t suffer those. Any person of European descent living in areas that are majority non-European will immediately notice and feel this pathological hostility directed at them.
Like the universal law of aesthetics. We want beauty. It is the variety of color, the red hair, the blonde hair, the green eyes, the blue eyes. All the other races in the world have only one coloring, the same black hair, the dark brown eyes and skin. A bit drab in comparison, can’t we say?
Not long ago, while on another website, I clicked a link with heading “Only mixed whites are attractive”, which sent me to the African American forum. On it, some rather catty black women were saying that only Southern European women were beautiful, because in their words, “they had color”, and they got their dark beauty from their black roots, and really weren’t white. They went onto add, that real whites were those pasty faced people to the North. For them, fair skinned, fair haired, light eyed Europeans were something to disparage, because they are not a group they can so easily lay claim on. Although, it is just as preposterous, that they would try and claim Southern European women, are part black, just because they mostly have dark hair and olive skin. Because whites were blessed with diversity in hair and eye color, it seems the goal among some non-whites is to attempt to divide them. Light eyed, light haired, Europeans are white, dark haired, dark eyed Europeans are not. I think truly irks them, that one race could have so much variety, that they refuse to accept it.
Geronimo…A very intense man and though vicious was widely respected for his intelligence and audacity. At the world fair he is reported to have commented how kind and peaceful the white populace was and he was sure had he been around Mexicans he would have had to defend his life. In a book written by a Colonel Dodge back in the eighteen hundreds (our wild Indians)(not subjegated) he comments how one of his Indian friends willingly came over the to the white way of life due to the perpetual vindictiveness of his own. Basically what I’m trying to say is that a great deal if hogwash has passed for legitimate perception in the past 40 or so yrs of hate the white man syndrom. This author though to me appearing largely caucasion is telling a VERY obvious truth that has been covered up with very flawed romantacism, like the kunta kinte garbage so many half witt whites used as fuel to masochistically canabalize themselves about. When white people were in their struggle for a piece of the pie they never would have fallen so deeply for this horse hocky… but given a little suburban comfort that came after their accomplishments their minds often turned to mush, believing the refuse that entertained them on the apptly named Boob Tube. With their heads filled with this refuse and false self rightious indignation they went out to debase their ancestors in alleged compensation,..when in reality their real Hidden indignation was likely their self disgust (Unbeknownst to them) of their own lethargy and self betrayal in not maintaining the momentum of their ancestors. This Mr. Yeagley spelled it out as succinctly as could be hoped, not pulling any punches, ,,I admire his courage to say the obvious which has become such a liability in this age of Genetic Marxism!!!
“27 — WR the elder wrote at 12:27 AM on July 15:
WR: “My understanding is that Yeagley himself claims to be of mixed white and Comanche ancestry. Whom should I believe — Yeagley or the usual leftist rabble determined to smear him?”
ranger: First of all, let me reiterate that I don’t really like having to criticize the man, and I’m certainly the last one on here who would take the word of any left wing radical, but so far as I’ve been able to determine Yeagley claims he’s Commanche, not just half. I’ve never seen anything where he claims to be of mixed heritage. And if he is of mixed heritage, why doesn’t he say so instead of identifying himself as a Commanche? Half white/half Commanche doesn’t translate to “Commanche.”
He’s quite an accomplished man, and, without doubt, he looks white in the above photo, so it would seem to me that, as a white, he would want to identify with whites, since it is they who have excelled in the same areas he has.
I “googled” “david Yeagley, photos,” to get a better idea of how he looks, besides the above photo and came up with the following. In two of the photos he looks white, but in one of them he does appear to be half Indian, so I’m not sure now what to make of it all. Allegedly his hair was light brown, but he dyed it black. I suppose I could search until I find earlier photos of him, but quite frankly I’m not interested enough to spend the time.
I DO know that if he’s another one of these romaticists who find some kind of misguided desire to appear Indian and he’s really white, then I think he clearly undermines everything he has to say.
However, I’m willing to give him a pass, since he’s on my side, but I can’t help but resent him since there IS a very real possibility he’s white, but doesn’t want to say so. His many accomplishments are indicative of whites, not Indians.http://www.polson.k12.mt.us/salishian/99-00/issue1/page10/page10.html http://www.collegian.psu.edu/archive/2002/12/12-06-02tdc/12-06-02dnews-10.asp http://www.davidyeagley.com/
I think you’re missing the point of the article that only European/white descended people can produce the blonds and red-heads— like the two photos at the end of the article. Hair color is only one factor in determining race. In addition, our United States Government classifies Middle Eastern People (Arabs, Palestinians as in your pictures) as white.
Yes, technically the government classifies the above groups as white. Although, white is really synonyms with European. Racially however, they are Caucasians. All whites are Caucasians, while not all Caucasians are white.
Tiger Woods, being with a white woman, is an interesting senerio.
It is my contention, the qualities that make him a good (whose to say what is considered “great” in today’s sport’s world?,) golfer, are certain qualities he inherited from his Asian mother, not his black father.
So why did’nt he marry an Asian woman?
29 — William Cutting wrote at 12:34 AM on July 15:
“Hold your fire, Ranger. Info with birth certificate:”
http://www.badeagle.com/faq/
Well, it looks like he’s legitimate. After reading what he has to say about being “part” Indian, plus his many convincing answers to those questions, I think he’s the real McCoy.
He’s a very accomplished man and an excellent writer, writing clearly, concisely and cogently.
He has my support. His adversaries are the usual leftist dregs.
“It’s the old, old story. The Industrial Revolution that really got things moving… started in England, Europe and North America. The steam engine was invented/developed in England; NOT, emphatically not in an obscure Asian village. Emphatically not in an African collection of huts. Just as the early intellects who gave us such a great start were those magnificent Greeks. Leading us into mathematics, philosophy, and so on and on.”
But surely, the Greeks learned everything they knew from Africans, you know, the ones that built the Pyramids? THen we, as a race of people, covered up and destroyed all the evidence of Black acheivement in ancient times,like how they circumnavigated the world (but didnt colonise Madagascar, 300 miles from the African coast), and built vast empires, while Europeans were hunting Mammoths. Oh, and the Vikings were Black as well. Cant you tell, just look at the population of Iceland, mostly descended from Vikings. Black as your hat, every last one of ‘em.
“Maybe he is like old Grey Owl, the Englishman who passed himself off as an Indian, and was quite good at it. He probably has some Indian. You only have to be something like 1/16 to join the Cherokee nation.”
I worked with a guy in England, he spoke like a Cockney, drank milky tea and loved his football (soccer) and “avin a larf dahn the pub”, who’s grandfather was a full blooded Canadian Indian, who couldnt have been more Red Indian looking if he had tried. He was a very interesting fellow.
Anonymous wrote at 10:32 PM on July 14:
“anon 7;23 kalashi are descendants of ancient greeks”
Actually, they are not. That myth was laid to rest a few years ago.
http://www.springerlink.com/content/cu0k72w3mhlb45tv/
Centrist wrote at 5:57 AM on July 15:
“You are only proving what many readers of this site believe: white is beauty and beauty is white.”
And what, pray tell, made you think I disagreed with that contention? My whole purpose in posting those links in the first place was to call attention to AmRen’s habit of insinuating that light hair colors (esp. blonde) are the “ideal” of White beauty. If that is so, why is it that even to this day most Whites (even Northern European Whites) are brunettes? One would think that sexual selection by now would have created a preponderance of blondes.
Anonymous wrote at 10:27 PM on July 14:
“And Jaclyn Smith is indeed beautiful, you will rarely find a non-white woman with her delicate features, and porcelain complexion.”
Agreed. That is why I posted a picture of her to illustrate my point about the beauty of brunettes. I actually met her a number of years ago in Manhattan when she was at her prime. No picture could ever do that woman justice.
why is it that even to this day most Whites (even Northern European Whites) are brunettes?
Have you ever been to Europe? The only predominantly brunette part of Europe is the SE/SW. Northern and a very large section of Central/Eastern Europe is blond-light haired.
Here from Bertil Lundman:http://carnby.altervista.org/lundraces/lundman-races1.htm
As you can see, the most depigmented people are found in the dampest parts of Europe. The warmer and/or oceanic climate, the more darker people (very visible in the British isles)
The map circulating on web (on Wikipedia too) from amateur anthropologist Peter Frost and his funny “Sexual Selection” thesis are utterly wrong.
Light hair isn’t restricted to Caucasoids (there are even SE Asians with light hair and eyes and yes, they don’t have white admixture both anthropologically and genetically).
In my opinion, these are very old traits and can occur among all races, in Europe more, in other continents rarer, most probably something to do with to the climate.
Light hair may have been an advantage in snowy terrains of Central/Northern Europe while hunting (a better camouflage unlike dark hair?) like polar/grizzly bear difference.
According to another study, men tend to be more light eyed than the women which may also be related to hunting.
I don’t care for the author’s style. Writes like a savage civilized, probably to sound Apache Indian, though I expect he
And the attitude among the newcomers, I have been learning, is exactly as author presented in the example of his neighbors. They actually view whitey’s demise with satisfaction and they know they all feel the same way. This attitude is not how Americans have viewed minorities, nor do I believe it is the attitude most American minorities have had towards white people, who, like the author here, probably said nothing and walked away when the newcomers would gloat over bad things happening to white people.
Minorities, American minorities, resent the invaders as much as American white people do, and that is as it should be.
An aside here, I find the author’s giving the impression that there are not white people with black hair and/or brown eyes, rather peculiar.
Funny. One would think that it was self-loathing whites brainwashed by the media that are jealous of other races. Yet according to this guy, it’s the other races that are envious of whites.
“The steam engine was invented/developed in England”
It is unfortunate that this American Indian wants to trivialize the problems between the races as being stemmed from jealousy about something as petty as looks. Now to me he appears to be Caucasian, but he could be of mixed ancestry and he has the right to identify as he wishes. As a very light-skinned Black woman who has hair texture different from many Blacks, I do not like it when people mistake me for another race. But I feel there are enough issues in the Native American community and he can write something more constructive.
There have been many successful people (of all races)who probably would not win a beauty contest by any means. American sitcoms and reality shows are full of homely people. And the big screen has its share of homely stars as well.
Now I know studies have been claimed to show that how attractive you are CAN be linked to how successful you will be, and we all know that beautiful people enjoy many perks that not-so -pretty folks do not. But looks fade so make sure you have something else with it.
What worries me is some idiot claiming people want to attack Whites only because they are “beautiful and powerful”. There have been many homely white victims and perpetrators of crime, and let’s face it, many people of color feel Whites are weak. (I personally do not think that way) In most places in the U.S. Whites are the majority so they can make up a larger pool of victims and/or potential victims. I have heard some Blacks say that Whites are easy to rip off because they are so gullible (which is a stereotype in itself). But most people choose to commit crimes based on flaws within themselves. They could be just evil, psychologically unstable, or just lazy choosing to take from others instead of working for a living.
One thing I also find strange is how “the whitest of whiteness” is overrated. A White person of any ethnic background can be beautiful, but they would be beautiful because of symmetrical facial features not JUST because of eye color or hair color. I have seen a pretty brunette passed over for a homely blond many times(As was the experience of both of my college roommates who were White brunettes) It was too weird but I think the guys were probably lame anyway.
And what, pray tell, made you think I disagreed with that contention? My whole purpose in posting those links in the first place was to call attention to AmRen’s habit of insinuating that light hair colors (esp. blonde) are the “ideal” of White beauty. If that is so, why is it that even to this day most Whites (even Northern European Whites) are brunettes? One would think that sexual selection by now would have created a preponderance of blondes.
I don’t feel AmRen does any such thing. Yes, among whites, blondes are less common than brunettes, and redheads, even less common that blondes. But among my own white relatives, there are natural blondes, brunettes, and redheads. So it’s not THAT rare. It doesn’t matter if someone has an attraction for one hair color over another, that is all a matter of personal taste. But what’s great about it, is there is all this natural variety to choose from. Yes, some non-whites don’t just have dark hair, dark brown eyes, and brownish skin. But their variety is nothing like that of the white race, with hair that can commonly range from dark to light, and can be combined with brown eyes, hazel eyes, green eyes, gray eyes, and blue eyes. I think it is interesting how these liberal social engineers, try and program whites into believing they need diversity, in their boring cookie cutter lives, by bringing more non-whites to Europe, when these non-white immigrants often blend in with one another. It is whites have the most natural diversity, and I feel a lot of non-white resent it. It is usually not whites who promote a Nordic ideal, but interestingly, many non-whites, resent Nordic looking people, because it is look they can never achieve. A brown haired white woman, can lighten her hair to blonde, and look totally natural. A blonde white woman can dye her hair red, and look ravishing. But when non white women attempt it, they, usually look ridiculous, and unnatural. Quite frequently, it usually non-whites who promote darker hair and darker eyes as superior, even on whites. But that is because they yearn to be the standard of beauty.
“And Jaclyn Smith is indeed beautiful, you will rarely find a non-white woman with her delicate features, and porcelain complexion.”
Agreed. That is why I posted a picture of her to illustrate my point about the beauty of brunettes. I actually met her a number of years ago in Manhattan when she was at her prime. No picture could ever do that woman justice.
One quick thought… other than a few psychological cripples, how many White males would want to marry either an Afro-American of Hindu female? Next question: Why would they even consider it? Beauty is subjective. Most people would find it only among their own kind.
Re:Howard at 6:27 PM on July 14 - “In fact, one can argue that Christianity has made the White race weak.”
Yes, Judeo-Christianity has DEFINITELY made the White race much weaker than it once was. Judeo-Christianity, with its hideous “One World/One People/One Love” doctrine has been pushing multiculturalism down White throats for almost 2,000 years.
Judeo-Christianity has also been very dysgenic for the White gene pool, with many of the smartest White males not breeding in Europe for about 1,000 years because they were so often forced in to the celibate priesthood.
“Pleasant enough looking, I guess? But, I don’t care how politically incorrect this sounds to you, I still believe that average white women, are generally better looking.”
I think the average white woman looks better than the average asian women too. But whites are not reproducing in any great numbers. Also American whites are so mixed anymore that there has been a real downgrade in terms of their beauty. I see photos of people from the 50s and 60s when there was a high white birth rate and can see whites had high rates of very attractive people compared to now.
Primavera wrote at 3:21 AM
let’s face it, many people of color feel Whites are weak. (I personally do not think that way) In most places in the U.S. Whites are the majority so they can make up a larger pool of victims and/or potential victims. I have heard some Blacks say that Whites are easy to rip off because they are so gullible (which is a stereotype in itself).
Howard at 6:27 pm, I couldn’t agree more. Don’t get me wrong, I believe in God, however I do believe that whites have taken the christianity thing way too far when they will give their last dollar to some television preacher whom will blow it on some other race, or hookers for himself. The huge fancy churches and all the wrappings that go with it will NOT bring you any closer to God. Too many churches fund missionaries to other countries, and waste precious funds on people whom could care less. Too many churches use funds to supplement illegals in our own country. Contrary to popular belief, it was not the churches that raised the white race to dominance. It was the white race itself, belief in one’s own race and peoples.
Primavera wrote at 3:21 AM on July 16:
As a very light-skinned Black woman who has hair texture different from many Blacks, I do not like it when people mistake me for another race.
http://balder.org/avisartikler/billeder-racisme/blonde-little-girl.jpg Or wishing to see her type of beauty live on.
Lasher thought the steam engine was invented by Robert Fulton.
Mr. Yeagley is correct in so many of the things he says, especially that many “minorities”, hate and are extremely jealous of whites. I have experienced this on a personal level, over and over. Jealousy by fellow minority workers who wondered what kind of house I have, how big it is, etc. What my car cost me. How much money do I actually have, etc. The funny thing is, they simply assume that I have all of these things, in abundance, and leave it at that. It’s kind of an axiom for them to consider whites as being, rich, priviledged, powerfull in some way,etc. There really IS, a seething enviousness, or hatred, that many minorities have towards whites, and I say it not because of having read articles like the one above, but because of having direct experiences long ago, that proved it to me. In some cases, I have even been told that this is the case, by people who are minorities that I have been friends with. I really am losing respect for many whites, for as obviously smart as many are in so many ways, when it comes to the things that are RIGHT NOW, occuring in this nation of theirs, and that are DIRECTLY AGAINST THEIR OWN BEST INTERESTS, THEY ARE JUST PLAIN DUMB. SORRY, BUT IT’S TRUE. How can a people who did so many great things, fall so low?
Bobby:
You just made me think of something. In the last decade or so, there have been more and more companies, particularly large corporations, that have implemented the workplace policy of prohibiting their employees from discussing their salaries and wages that they make from the company with each other.
I think race plays into it somehow. I have two theories on how it plays in:
(1) Blacks making the same as whites on the same rung of the corporate ladder get mad when the whites have a better standard of living with the same income, and get ignorantly jealous. They don’t stop to consider that personal behavior and vices factor into it.
(2) Affirmative action means blacks are promoted into positions up the rung of the ladder that they are wholly unqualified to fulfill, but the work needs to be done anyway. So the company has some passed-over white do the work, and quietly gives him more money. They don’t want people talking about their salaries because the blacks on the same level of the white person in question would get mad and jealous, (not realizing that there was a very good reason why the white was getting more), and whine and scream civil rights lawsuits and NAACP.
A non race theory:
(3) Lilly Ledbetter. The company where she worked had this kind of policy, and as it turned out, it was all to conceal gender discrimination.
Anonymous wrote at 4:17 AM
64 — William Cutting wrote wrote at 11:56 PM:
“Have you ever been to Europe? The only predominantly brunette part of Europe is the SE/SW. Northern and a very large section of Central/Eastern Europe is blond-light haired. “
Here from Bertil Lundman:http://carnby.altervista.org/lundraces/lundman-races1.htm
As you can see, the most de-pigmented people are found in the dampest parts of Europe. The warmer and/or oceanic climate, the more darker [sic] people (very visible in the British isles)
……………………………….
Let me add that the distribution map you have referenced is based on statistics dating from 1900 and 1922! That’s quite meaningless today. After the upheavals and population displacements of two terrible world wars, Europe is another place now. (Even the neutral countries were affected, population-wise.) Some other statistics cited there go back even into the 1870s and 1880s! That was another world, long gone! The fairest regions today seem to be restricted to the areas bordering the Baltic and North Seas. Even the old map shows that. But, while it still holds true, it’s less applicable today. And in another hundred years (even fifty), given immigration and today’s trends, it will be true almost nowhere. That will all be a thing of the past. Sweden, for instance, will be a dusky country of mulattoes, resembling the Dominican Republic at the least. (Or Egypt at the fairest.) And with all the same types of problems that plague such places.
Could it be that we have a misunderstanding on what is meant by blond or brunette? I suspect so.
Furthermore, your oddly conflicting statements regarding the dampest parts of Europe and the oceanic climates (both being the British Isles) seem to contradict themselves.
72 — WHITE SURVIVAL wrote:
No argument from me, but to that statement you can also add smart white females, who were often put away into convents for a variety of reasons.
Hey, WHITE SURVIVAL. If Christianity made the European peoples
I don’t like stupid skinheads. If you want to “survive” you need a sound religion. Got it?
I looked at some of the webpages linked to above or from those on the topic of whether David Yeagley is Comanche or not. The following webpage comes close to saying if you don’t defend your own people, then you aren’t one of them:
http://davidyeagley.blogspot.com/2006/10/is-yeagley-truly-indian-actual.html
By this standard, liberals are not white and we don’t have a white Congress or white Harvard.
By the way, do the people at AmRen think only blondes and redheads are “beautiful”, or have they forgotten the fact most Whites are brunettes?
No, and nobody suggested such a thing! Since the early days of Hollywood, there have been celebrated blondes, brunettes, redheads, who were famous for their beauty. Think: Lana Turner, Ava Gardener, and Rita Hayworth. All were pinups in their day, and regarded as glamorous. Only thing that surprise some people, is that none of them started off in life, with different hair colors than they became famous for.
Lana started off a redhead, instead of a blonde
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2103/2432643739_43b925b8cc.jpg?v=0
Rita started off a brunette, instead of a redhead
http://claudia79.tripod.com/ritapix/ritandtex.jpg
And believe it or not, earlier on, Ava Gardener started off a blonde, instead of a brunette.
http://www.divasthesite.com/images/Diva_Baby_Pictures/Ava_Gardner_baby_picture.jpg
So, if we are to be honest, we have to acknowledge that sometimes women change their natural hair color.
On dark skinned women, red, and especially blonde hair, rarely suits their coloring. In some cases though some non whites can pull it off. Beyonce is light skinned enough, that her blondish wigs and weaves, usually suit her.
Peter K
Actually sir, youre the one thats ignorant. My point was the extreme rarity it is to find those genes in other races, its incredibly rare.
Unless you want to point out the last time you saw one?
That’d be just fine, point out the last time you saw a natural blonde nonwhite.
Ill be waiting. Send those pictures.
Ill even include my email address for this one.
Please sendem right over.
I wont hold my breathe.
I will add, that the areas and peoples least Christian in America have given way the quickest to displacement.
By that standard, you would have give the prize to Islam! Moslems are the most resistant to change, the most disinterested in other cultures, the most tenacious, the most hostile to displacement.
But would you want to be a Moslem? I don’t!
83 — Old Atlantic wrote at 8:29 AM on July 17:
By this standard, liberals are not white and we don’t have a white Congress or white Harvard.
end quote
Oh we definitely don’t have a White Harvard, and haven’t for a long time.
I strongly recommed reading it. It’s available online and is just ten pages short.
Some people are getting on Mr. Yeagley, stating he isn’t “Indian”. However, I went to school with a couple of kids, and now work with a fellow, who were all half White, half “Indian”. They actually look more white or completely white, even though one of their parents is not white (I’ve seen the parents). White features are usually submerged when mixed with non-whites, but not so much with “Native Americans”, at least in my experience. I’ve seen this a few times with mixed people who were White/E. Asian, and they looked White, mixed, or E. Asian. But usually E. Asian looking for the most part. Never see it happen with someone who is White/Black, although it’s possible.
Whites are hated for all they’ve done. We’re hated out of jealousy. Because other peoples have not done near what Whites have. They can point to their “earlier start”, their advanced civilizations from 3000 years ago. But once Whites became organized, they left all others in the dust. That is, until our enemies sidetracked us.
For those misinformed, I am exactly whom I say I am. I am the biological son of my Comanche mother. I’ve posted my birth certificate, and tribal records on my website, www.badeagle.com. Please search, before believing the libel of my pitiful opponents.
You see, no Indian is allowed to be a conservative, a Republican, or an American Patriot. The liberals claim that Indian image for themselves, to use in their stint of American hatred.
Since attorneys are excessively liberals themselves, I have yet to find a solicitor who will sue my opponents, which now include the Los Angeles Times, the University of Nebraska, Amazon.com, Google, and others. This is a simple case of libel, with malice.
It is precisely BECAUSE I am authentically Indian that my opponents behave as they do.
Sorry for saying this but some of you posters are indirectly proving my point when I say that whites are very smart on so many things, but the things that matter NOW!!!!!! For example, what’s this debate concerning David Yeagley? Is he an Indian or isn’t he? Is he a Comanche or isn’t he? TO MY MIND IT DOESN’T MAKE A HILL OF BEANS DIFFERENCE WHO HE IS. EVERYTHING HE WROTE ABOVE IS RELEVANT AND RIGHT ON. ISN’T THAT THE POINT??????????
This guy makes a good point about the beauty of the white race, i.e., its women, but perhaps because he too is a member of a minority race, he is too enamored of white beauty. I’ve seen some striking exotic darker skinned beautiful women who are just as equally as beautiful as white women. The point he makes about white social constructs has a valid point, and no other race has become more powerful, more innovative and inventive than the white race. The white race had better wake up and start looking after it’s own interests if it is going to preserve itself. There’s a potentially fatal flaw that’s inherent to the white race of a universal altruism that can lead to it’s own undoing if it is not held in check towards other races. No other race has this type of altruism either towards other races other than the white race as far as I know.
