St. Louis Suburb’s Immigration Law Upheld

More news stories on Immigration Law Enforcement

AP, June 5, 2009

A federal appeals panel has upheld a suburban St. Louis town’s ordinance prohibiting the hiring of illegal immigrants, a case that some observers believe could have national implications.

A three-judge panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday unanimously affirmed a lower court’s ruling in favor of the city of Valley Park.

Similar cases have been heard around the country. Last year, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an Arizona state law that also bars the hiring of illegal immigrants. Meanwhile, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia is weighing a similar case out of Hazleton, Pa.

“The Valley Park case is being cited around the country,” said Kris Kobach, a University of Missouri-Kansas City law professor who represented Valley Park and also argued on behalf of the Hazleton law. “This decision has nationwide consequences.”

The Missouri case was brought by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of Jacqueline Gray, a Valley Park landlord who hires people for odd jobs and maintenance.

ACLU lawyer Omar Jadwat in New York said it was too early to say what future legal steps might be taken. He didn’t view the ruling as a defining one on illegal immigration issues. He said Valley Park had amended its own law in recent years, in part due to legal action.

{snip}

Then, in 2007, the city revised the law again, this time to repeal a provision prohibiting renting to illegal aliens, but keeping the provision prohibiting hiring them. The ordinance sets out a procedure for lodging complaints, and requires those applying for a business license to sign an affidavit stating that they do not knowingly employ unlawful workers.

{snip}

Mayor Grant Young {snip} said Valley Park spent about $250,000 in recent years on legal fees related to the immigration law.

{snip}

Alderwoman Stephanie Reynolds wondered why so much effort and money was spent on a law that may never be enforced.

“Pretty much a lot of money wasted,” Reynolds said.

Kobach disagreed. Regardless of whether the city is enforcing the law, publicity about it appears to be deterring businesses from hiring illegal immigrants in Valley Park, he said.

{snip}

Original article

(Posted on June 10, 2009)

---

Comments

1 — Question Diversity wrote at 6:20 PM on June 10:

The original Valley Park law also punished landlords that rented to illegals. That part was stricken out by the FedJudiciary.

This ruling portends will for Missouri and other cities and states ordinances of similar nature.

These ordinances actually do very little against illegal aliens themselves, but those that hire them (and formerly rent to them). In a tight resource climate, this is actually the best thing to do, for most illegal aliens will self-deport if there is nothing here for them. Those that were thinking about self-importing will not.

2 — Bobby wrote at 3:09 PM on June 11:

Again, this is insane. Why does there need to be a ruling that validates existing U.S. Immigration Law, which already says that illegal alien foreign nationals may not stay in, work in, or be in the U.S. period. Of course the judges did the right thing, now what abouot the rest of the nation?

The contents of this website are copyright © 1990-2009 New Century Foundation. All Rights Reserved.