Fawn Johnson, Wall Street Journal, June 2, 2009
Tough economic times may be a boon for supporters of a broad overhaul of the nation’s immigration policies, according to pollsters who are testing the waters ahead of an upcoming White House summit on immigration.
‘If anything, the economic climate has actually improved the environment for immigration reform, at least as far as the public is concerned,’ said Celinda Lake, who heads Lake Research Partners.
‘A salient issue is that reform would make immigrants all taxpayers,’ Lake said during a telephone briefing.
{snip}
A recent survey by Benenson Strategy Group showed that 71% of likely voters think illegal immigrants should take steps to become legal taxpayers. Benenson does polling for President Barack Obama, along with other elected officials and Fortune 100 companies.
{snip}
Immigration overhaul also is a top priority for businesses in the U.S., from high-tech manufacturing companies to the landscaping and farming sectors. Companies such as Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) and Oracle Corp. (ORCL) have long advocated for greater access to foreign labor.
But lawmakers on Capitol Hill, particularly in the House, are wary of confronting the immigration issue. Both Republican and Democratic moderates fear they will be skewered by voters if they support proposals to legalize illegal workers.
Recent interviews with citizens suggest otherwise. ‘They want a level playing field and they don’t have one today,’ said Lake, whose firm recently conducted a series of in-depth focus groups on immigration. ‘There’s a huge pool of workers that are playing by a different set of rules than they are.’
The public also isn’t interested in harsh punishments for illegal workers, Lake’s research suggests.
{snip}
Pollsters believe a majority of voters support an immigration overhaul, but opponents of legalization are organized and vocal and can endanger some elected officials if they vote to allow undocumented workers to earn legal status.
{snip}
Original article
(Posted on June 5, 2009)
Comments
In Oakland, Ca, the city council, in response to the high unemployment rate and lack of affordable housing, decided to issue identification cards to illegal aliens.Only one did not vote for it, but he didnt vote against it either, he was the only black.
Okay, so we’re talking about polls by open borders cheap labor shills, in an open borders cheap labor newspaper. And I’m supposed to believe it?
Where did they conduct this polling, at the headquarters of NCLR?
“‘A salient issue is that reform would make immigrants all taxpayers,’ Lake said during a telephone briefing.”
Wrong. Most of them won’t have jobs and will be on the public dole. Those that are working are in a wage bracket that will not be taxable. The only thing they’ll be paying in the way of taxes is sales tax, and they’re paying that right now, legal or illegal.
Another thing is that those working under the table will continue to do that. Not having a paper trail that can verify income will mean they’ll qualify for more social benefits.
Is there a radical liberal in the world with even half a brain?
As far as I’m concerned I hope they do get amnesty so they can put the finishing touches on this economic collapse with the huge monetary expenses they will incur, and that will mean this dysfunctional country will be insolvent and we can get busy dividing it up, peaceful or otherwise.
What an absolute mess the leftists have made of this country.
What lies! Didn’t we all know this is how they would spin it? Turn them into taxpayers? They TAKE more than they will ever pay and we all know it. This just insures they will continue to take by making them eligible for SSI/SSA and all the other freebies that the REAL taxpayers pay for.
BTW, show me an illegal who even makes enough to pay any taxes to begin with. What with all their kids as dependents and all the breaks they will get for having all those kids. They will just drain us even more than they do by being illegal. Not to mention them bringing in all their extended family members to burden us even more.
Peejay:
So you’re telling me that the Oakland City Council voted to make in essence the city’s illegal aliens as citizens? I fail to see how it will help the economy or make housing more affordable. It’ll really make unemployment worse, more people competing for fewer jobs, especially fewer in Oakland for its crime. As far as affordable housing, Hispanics are notorious for cramming a lot of people into a house, and this has the effect of driving rents sky-high, because each person in the house working or collecting welfare can contribute to the rent.
As a stop gap measure before deportation, I would pass a city ordinance or state law that states while that more than one working or welfare collecting person can live in a house, only one person’s income can be taken in consideration for leases and mortgages.
“A recent survey by Benenson Strategy Group showed that 71% of likely voters think illegal immigrants should take steps to become legal taxpayers”
Nonsense. About 2 years ago, when congress proposed amnesty, their was a huge outcry across the country and polls show people are overwhelmingly against it. Of course, one can skew any poll in ones favor with the right wording.
“Immigration overhaul also is a top priority for businesses in the U.S., from high-tech manufacturing companies to the landscaping and farming sectors. Companies such as Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) and Oracle Corp. (ORCL) have long advocated for greater access to foreign labor.”
Of course, they want access to cheap labor. What they don’t seem to get is that if amnesty is given, the first thing illegals will do is start demanding higher wages, better working conditions etc.. We’ll have a huge, angry costly underclass. Also, because of their lack of skills and high birthrates and low wages, even legal immigrants take 3 dollars for every one they put into the economy.
Make them legal and they become taxpayers?? How about make them legal and thus make more of them earned income tax credit beneficiaries and further legalize the longstanding illegal claimants of earned income tax credits that we already have?
“A recent survey by Benenson Strategy Group showed that 71% of likely voters think illegal immigrants should take steps to become legal taxpayers”
Nothing in this suggested legalization, just the issue of taxes.
Beware of any Wall Street Journal article about immigration as in my opinion they are just shills for globalism, and push for open borders for the United States. Oh yes, the WSJ sometimes feins patriotism when they are pushing for the United States to be the world’s (corporation’s???) police force but God forbid we stop the invasion at our own border.
For a witty, insightful look at the dark, neoconservative (a.k.a. liberal) heart of the WSJ and immigration check out this video by Michelle Malkin. Especially, view the nasty comment by Danny Henninger at 4:02 despising the concerns of Americans about mass immigration because their “objection is fundamentally cultural”.
I certainly have no “fundamental cultural objection” if the WSJ becomes another casulty of the world-wide recession.
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/06/07/new-vent-gorilla-warfare-against-the-open-borders-wsj/
‘A salient issue is that reform would make immigrants all taxpayers,’
This suggests that if they were made legal, they would stop working under the table. How many of them are going to give up tax-free income?
Illegals become citizens - they demand equal pay - government taxes them to the point of their being unable to send remittances home.
Mexico sends the next tidal wave to supply cheap labor and it begins again - the marches, the flag waving and the next amnesty/citizenship.
Does anyone remember the United State of America.
There is no economic argument for the race-replacement of Native Born White Americans.
The Wall Street Journal employs a cabal of enhusiasts for wage slavery from the Cato Institute. The Wall Street Journal exists for no othr reason than to facilitate the massive transfer of wealth form millions of ordinary Native Born White Americans to the greedy cheating class.
America is not reducible to collection of free market interactions.
I consider the editorial writers of the Wall Street Journal to be economic war criminals. They should be sent off to live in Chad for the rest of their lives.
i used to be a liberal of sorts and i loved california. as recently as the early ‘90’s a friend of mine and i went to l.a. to get certified in medical technology. first, we took the test in a big testing center with about 95 percent filipinos who were rumored to have the answers to the tests. this was the first sign calif. was on the skids.
after seeing many more signs calif. was on its way down, we used to talk to people in prospective places we’d like to live. one such place was thousand oaks. one could look around and see the place was around 90 percent white. we passed the high school to see proudly displayed on their marquee..highest test scors in the state. little wonder.
we would sit in mcdonald’s eating breakfast and talking to the patrons. they related similar tales i’ve read in the posts about mexicans moving into all-white neighborhoods and staying 30-40 to a house. sleeping in sleeping bags all over the floor and so forth. this was in ‘92-‘93.
i hear now that thousand oaks, ca. has since been inundated with mexicans and property values have plummetted. this demographic change could have been predicted by what we heard. needless to say, their school test scores weren’t still no. 1 in the state.
June makes the excellent point that amnesty just leads to more illegals. Amnesty for illegals is just as much amnesty for those who hire them. Rewarding breaking and entering leads to general contempt. When legalization makes labor more expensive, employers just hire new illegals … and on and on.
Re: “polls”: while I’ve never heard of any that supported amnesty before, it’s true that the share of “likely voters” who are non-whites is greater than ever. Most non-whites are reliable Democrats, who want amnesty to create even more Democrats. Many have blood ties to illegals. Whites, too, are propagandized from all sides that any opposition to the invasion means they’re the dreaded “R”-word. The cowed and brainwashed probably do utter to leftist pollsters words construed to fit the anti-white agenda.
Question Diversity; I made that statement to be facecetious. I should add that most other city governments in this state are just as bad, or else worse.An article in the Marxist SF Chronicle said that the only critics of them giving them the cards were white males. One of them was a carpenter, who said that employers prefer to hire illegals over anyone else.This shows how much they care for the poorest of our society.
The massive numbers of illegal immigrants, the vast majority of which are Hispanics who have a mixed grasp of English, means that legalization will lock in these job robbers and keep out legal Americans from work.
Moreover, legalization means illegals’ relatives, now “legal” as anchor relatives, will flood into America, stealing more jobs as they work for low wages, qualifying for welfare, food stamps, medicaid, and public housing. Legalization also means the children of the illegals stay forever and qualify for scholarships and federal/state benefits. And as Obama begins his likely successful nationalization of health care, high cost illegal immigrants and their gigantic families will drain the system from day one, sending costs through the roof while paying nothing towards the cost of their health care driven by their ridiculous high fat, high carb, diets and out of control breeding.
These kids of the illegals, many of whom are “legal” if you buy the theory that if you’re born here, you’re an American,will eventually replace in the workplace, millions of native Americans(and I don’t mean just Indian tribe members!) These kids are also expensive to educate given their low IQ, poor English, and cultural proclivity towards laziness and no concept of Northern European hard work and work ethic nor any concept of what American capitalism and self reliance are all about. Obama loves them as they fit into his plan to destroy American values and economic power.
We must protest to Congress that the immigration “reform” means more unemployment for Americans, a higher deficit to pay for more welfare and education costs for illegals, and thus more inflation since federal spending is less and less based on taxes and more and more on funny money printed by the diabolical and communistic Bernanke at the Federal Reserve.
.
..and since the newly legal citizens incomes will be under the poverty level, they’ll apply for The Earned Income Tax Credit Rebate on their very first Income Tax paperwork.
Our not so stealthy Moslem, Socialist possibly Kenyan President will be giving our tax money to illegal aliens to purchase American citizenship so all these brand-new bouncing baby Bolshevik voters will whore themselves to the welfare state.
Illegal immigration is fraudulent voter manipulation coupled with a massive unarmed infantry assault across our southern border.
Can you say .. “Intifada La Raza”?
.
If they made illegals legal the cheap labor people would have to get another batch of illegals. The cycle never ends.
The first thing I heard on the radio when I got in my car this morning was that California’s unemployment rate had reached 11% and is still climbing. Of course, Governor S. had to pipe up that the high unemployment rate and massive budget deficit was ‘absolutely’ not caused by massive illegal immigration.
According to Hispanics: A Statistical Report:
“…Fifty percent of Hispanic households use some form of welfare, the highest rate of any major population group….”
As I’m writing this, the Marxists in the statehouse are busy plotting as to how to raise massive new taxes on the battered taxpayers and businesses of California. The Republicans are barely hanging on and I believe the next attack will be to eliminate the two-thirds majority vote needed for tax increases and mandate a simple majority instead. This is a state that is dependent on ‘the rich.’ According to City Journal:
“…Half the state’s personal income-tax receipts come from its top 1 percent of resident earners, some of whom have begun an exodus to Arizona, Nevada, or Colorado….”
I’ve learned that the government rarely reports anything that is true so I suspect the unemployment rate and budget deficit are much higher.
So the government’s solution? Open up the floodgates to more uneducated, unskilled, impoverished Third World dregs who will require entitlement services generation after generation—and become a voting bloc that will vote themselves more government services.
Some of you here have suggested that I leave California like a rat leaving a sinking ship. But as California goes, so goes the nation—it’s everywhere.
Bon
I heard that Governor Schwarzenegger, being that California is now bankrupt, was unsure whether he should pay people on welfare or the cops/firemen. I asked someone if he was joking, but Governor Schwarzenegger was dead serious.
‘…whether he should pay people on welfare or the cops/firemen. I asked someone if he was joking, but Governor Schwarzenegger was dead serious…”
Yes, he is dead serious. I think he’d bail out of Sacramento now if he could and not look back—better to retreat to his gated Kennedyesque compound in exclusive Pacific Palisades with his reported 250 million fortune (wonder if he’s fleeing the dollar?).
So here’s the choice the Cal. government is faced with: Larger, more vicious deadly wildfires because of a lack of firemen or larger, more vicious deadly riots because the welfare spigot is shut off (and there are fewer policemen).
I don’t wonder why people in my neighborhood are surrounding their property with 9-foot high re-enforced concrete walls—some topped off with metal spikes or barbed wire and buying large police-type dogs.
Investment guru Lee Bellenger writes that in the wealthier neighborhoods of LA, many are quietly installing large generators and underground fuel tanks.
Bon