American Renaissance
Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Send This Page       Date Archives       Category Archives

Bill Will Ban ‘White-Only’ BNP

More news stories on Britain

Paul Waugh, This Is London, June 11, 2009

The British National Party will be forced to admit black and Jewish members under the Government’s new Equalities Bill, ministers revealed today.

Commons leader Harriet Harman said the new legislation would make it illegal to have a “whites-only” political party in the UK.

Under the BNP’s constitution, membership is “strictly defined” as “indigenous Caucasian”.

Ms Harman said the bill will outlaw such restrictions in a bid to stop “apartheid-style” politics being imported to Britain.

She told the Commons: “We have all been shocked and horrified by the fact that two great regions of this country—the North-West and Yorkshire and Humberside—are represented by the British National Party—a party who have in their constitution a provision that you cannot be a member if you are not white.

“In the Equality Bill passing through this house, that constitution will be unlawful.”

Ms Harman said she hoped the Tories would now stop opposing the bill because “it prevents us having an apartheid political party in this country”.

She said: “I think all of us should agree there’s no place for a party in this country to have an apartheid constitution.”

Original article

(Posted on June 18, 2009)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment     Send This Page      Search

Comments

1 — Anonymous wrote at 5:49 PM on June 18:

She said: “I think all of us should agree there’s no place for a party in this country to have an apartheid constitution.”

So it’s not OK then for Muslims to exclude whites, and so forth?

2 — passingthru wrote at 6:04 PM on June 18:

What right does anyone have making “whites-only” illegal?!

Will “Asian” organizations be forced to accept non-Asians? Will black organizations be forced to accept non-blacks?

3 — Question Diversity wrote at 6:06 PM on June 18:

Then, as a poster here would say, fake troll minorities will join the BNP only to be able to sue the party when they don’t get promoted up the party’s ranks.

Using this logic, then the Tories and Labor should be eliminated, they discriminate based on ideology. The Tory Party first, because it’s as white as the BNP.

4 — sbuffalonative wrote at 6:18 PM on June 18:


The noose is tightening and time is running out.

If “indigenous Caucasian” has to be removed, does the platform have to be amended too? If they’re forced to let in non-indigenous Caucasians, so be it but those who join should join knowing and supporting the platform.

If the goals of the party are forced to change, that’s an entirely different matter.

5 — Richard Hoste wrote at 6:22 PM on June 18:

How exactly will this work? Let’s say the BNP wants to kick all blacks out of England. They’d be forced to accept any black who agreed with that position?

Conservative parties tend to be all white anyway.

6 — Anonymous wrote at 7:33 PM on June 18:

This was inevitable. Once this bill becomes law (and make no mistake about it, it shall) the Left will flood the ranks of the BNP with their operatives, effectively gutting it. When that happens, the illusion of democratic government in the UK will end once and for all. Britons who have been complacent up till now will then be faced with a dilemma: either stand and fight for their ancestral homelands or else cravenly abandon them for the creature comforts of places like Australia.

7 — John PM wrote at 7:44 PM on June 18:

“Ms Harman said the bill will outlaw such restrictions in a bid to stop ‘apartheid-style’ politics being imported to Britain.”

This is beyond laughable!

So what I say, let them force blacks and other nonwhite interlopers into being allowed membership in the BNP. How many do you really think will join it?

Maybe between 5 and 25?

I feel sorry for the Tories, they might just lose all of their “diversity” to the BNP soon!!!

8 — publius wrote at 7:46 PM on June 18:

I wonder how Ms. Harman will take to wearing islamic head gear. It’s the future people of her stripe are condeming Britain to.

9 — WR the elder wrote at 8:08 PM on June 18:

Will they ban the black only black police associations, black only black lawyer associations, etc.? In the U.S., will Congress ever have the guts to ban the Congressional Black Caucus? Segregation is only deemed evil when it’s white people doing it.

10 — Anonymous wrote at 8:56 PM on June 18:

The BNP already allows Jews to join and even has a Jewish council member.

As for blacks, are there actually any British blacks who want to join the BNP?

11 — Anonymous wrote at 9:39 PM on June 18:

The tyranny of the sore losers.

The leftist establishment will fight like cornered rats, now that their position of privilege is threatened. Democracy is about to bring them down, so they scuttle democracy.

12 — Anonymous wrote at 9:58 PM on June 18:

The BNP has already been infiltrated from the start. Do you honestly think the powers that be will allow a White Nationalist party anywhere in this world? The BNP is a smokescreen to make Whites think they have a voice when in reality they do not.

They (the BNP) were set up just for this very reason so as to make LAWS that ban any group of Whites fighting for their own survival. Cannot Whites see this is the case? Whites will get nowhere using the political system of the world.

13 — Svigor wrote at 10:09 PM on June 18:

Make lemonade. Enforce ideological purity in the party and only allow membership to non-whites who so qualify. E.g., if a black starts talking about how Britain is inherently multicultural, dump him.

This would qualify the BNP as both “anti-racist” and “pro-white,” and the party could emphasize either depending on the audience.

14 — Anonymous wrote at 10:15 PM on June 18:

This is the free country so many Britons died for? Good Grief. The Labour party has undermined Britain more then the Nazis ever would have.

15 — Svigor wrote at 10:23 PM on June 18:

As for blacks, are there actually any British blacks who want to join the BNP?

Exactly. The doom-and-gloomers should understand that this is just the beginning. If you want it easy, you’re in for disappointment. The BNP is on the front line in the war for the Anglosphere, a war that includes an ongoing legal campaign. If the BNP (or something like it) wins (i.e., becomes a defining force in British politics), the Usual Suspects could very well lose the entire Anglosphere. Let’s hope their reach exceeds their grasp vis-a-vis this battlefield.

I think American ethnic nationalists should consider supporting the BNP (or any replacement) as if it were the ANP.

As for tactics going forward, the BNP should have its lawyers ready to ensure that any legal restrictions against it apply equally to the rest of the political spectrum. E.g., if the government sets minority quotas for BNP membership and/or leadership, those quotas should apply to all other parties as well; you can bet the Tories aren’t going to turn their party over to blacks just to do the same to the BNP.

Or maybe I’m wrong - I’m just using common sense; for all I know the British system is corrupt enough to apply laws only to the BNP, but my guess is, as in American politics, they can’t do without their fig leaves (“fairness,” “equality,”), lies which dupe the public but also hold a double edge.

16 — Lapouge wrote at 10:32 PM on June 18:

“Bill Will Ban ‘White-Only’ BNP”

In other words self defense will be illegal for whites. Of course they wouldn’t do this to any Muslim organizations. This is just another disgusting double standard.

17 — Anonymous wrote at 10:35 PM on June 18:

“Once this bill becomes law (and make no mistake about it, it shall) the Left will flood the ranks of the BNP with their operatives, effectively gutting it.”

I would be more concerned about an organization ‘controversial’ enough average folks are afraid to join. This is more fertile ground for ‘leftist’ operatives. Who else would join? And be eager to join. Of course I’m pretending now the BNP leadership hasn’t already been properly groomed. If only they had a problem with overflowing membership…

Personally, I welcome this bill. It’s a move that can only bring more respectiblity to the BNP. Is there another major political party in UK that has race exclusive membership? In fact, what’s the point of the BNP doing this (white only membership) in the first place? If purple people want to promote the interests of white in the UK, why stop them? It certainly works that way for the other races.

18 — Eric the Red wrote at 10:46 PM on June 18:

I vote with the previous poster: they will be innundated
with minorites who will tie it up into knots. Blacks want to
go wherever they aren’t wanted. Muslims understand sabotage very
well too. The time of talking is almost over. The precipice is
dead ahead. Jump or fall. Fight or be enslaved. Survive or per-
ish.

19 — Optional wrote at 11:13 PM on June 18:

Does that mean all those various Jewish congresses are frowned upon too? Probably not … right?

20 — ranger wrote at 11:15 PM on June 18:

“Bill Will Ban ‘White-Only’ BNP,”

LOL!

The self-appointed elites obviously think they are going to contue ruling in the next few years, arrogantly thinking they are on the verge of losing it all.

If they were smart, they would understand that every unjust action precipitates a payback situation that would be quite scary for them if they were bright enough to see it.

21 — Anonymous wrote at 11:25 PM on June 18:

Whites around the world have to help each other. What happens to the BNP affects whites everywhere. If you have some money, the BNP is allowed to take donations from non-British whites. There is an annual upper limit placed on foreign donations.

There must be many indigineous or ethnic political parties in countries around the world. I haven’t heard of any UN prohibitions against them. Maybe the BNP could approach the UN for a ruling to head off any British government schemes.

22 — Anonymous wrote at 1:11 AM on June 19:

Life on the job, in a Neighborhood, or at School can be pretty tough, if no one every talks to you.

Let’s just say that the British Liberals managed to pass this absurd bill into becoming law. Who will ever talk to those non-Whites in the first place?

What non-White is going to want to join this Political Party, other than Government informants?

Perhaps the BNP wants to discuss curtailing non-White Immigration into Britain, then changes the date of the meeting, informing every White member, by e-mail, of the new time and date for that meeting.

The fact that the Blacks, or Muslims, were never notfied is simply an oversight. After a few times, they’ll get the message.

I have had to deal with Minorities this way, who have irritated me on the job, and I have vowed never to talk to them, or interact in any way, again.

It’s all how you approach it. Just simply act like they are not there.

There could be two of us in an Elevator, and I will stand there for the 10 flights up or down, and not utter a word, nor will I respond, if spoken to.

I may have to work in the same office or Building with them, but I don’t have to talk to them, or in any way, be sociable.

And for those who say what if you have to ask this person a work related question, I use e-mail, in the formal manner.

23 — fred wrote at 1:27 AM on June 19:

They can’t stop the BNP. Nick and the boys are too smart for them. All this will do is drive more voters into the BNP camp.

24 — JasonC wrote at 2:28 AM on June 19:

British blacks who want to join the BNP? - Yes there are, youd be surprised at the number of blacks that agree with the BNP’S views of marriage and the family. All very odd

25 — Kenelm Digby wrote at 5:33 AM on June 19:

Great Britain - The nation where it is illegal for individual human beings to associate freely.

Yes, the same nation that forever pontificates about being the ‘mother of democracy’, the nation that funds ‘Amnesty Internatal’ and is forever hectoring various third world nations about ‘human rights abuses’.
To all you Americans out there the nation that you fought and defeated in, in the name of liberty, in 1776 still hasn’t changed its spots.
To the free-born, air breathing human being, apart from the right of free speech (also denied in Britain), what greater liberty is there than to associate freely without the interference of opressive tyrants?
Where are our John Wilkes, our Edmund Burkes, our John Lockes?

26 — Anonymous wrote at 8:50 AM on June 19:

She said “I think all of us should agree there’s no place for a party in this country to have an apartheid constitution”.

‘Should agree’? By its very existence the BNP does not and will not ‘should agree’.

Admit Jews? Pray tell, and Britain does not admit a Jew named Michael Savage from America?

The BNP admits Jews and the British government doesn’t.

Harriett Harmon of Britain. Any relation to Jane Harmon of California?

27 — sam7707uk wrote at 8:52 AM on June 19:

At the moment I would not rate the chances of this Bill being passed as all that
likely…it could well be more huffing and puffing than anything else..

Remember that Nu-Labour have already begun to disintegrate some while back
and the recent performance of individual members has been farcial to say the
least…a serious squabbling rat fight going on right now..

Even if the Bill gets passed the BNP would likely get to have more fun with it
than anyone else..!!
More targets for Us to go at than you could even think of…
If opening up admission to ethnics was made compulsory so what..??
The membership fees would come in useful and how many ethnics would be
happy to give up two or three evenings a week to go out leafletting…

Again if they were …then so much the better …leafletting is a crucial part of
BNP campaigning power…
Could the Party be swamped by large numbers of infiltrators..??
Highly doubtful in my opinion..such an operation would have to be organised
and paid for…you would need serious money for that..
Remember….huge numbers of people became paid up members over the
period of the European Election Campaign so any white lefties that wanted to
infiltrate will already have done so..

Big numbers of ethnic infiltrators..??
Would be comically obvious every move they made…they could be
outmanoeuvred whatever they tried on..
Might be possible to get a white member of parliament elected in a black
area…..lol
The Chairman of the British National Party can modify the constitution and the
rules as when and how he deems necessary…
.
Last but not least…regarding Infiltration…
Two can play that game…
.

28 — Anonymous wrote at 9:10 AM on June 19:

The BNP already allows Jews to join and even has a Jewish council member.

This is what I had already known, so the article seemed unusual to me. The BNP is considered by some Nationalists as not Nationalist enough because of its refusal to bar Jews from its party. And yet the left-wing media still went into a frenzy over them.

29 — Anonymous wrote at 9:55 AM on June 19:

Yes, the same nation that forever pontificates about being the ‘mother of democracy’, the nation that funds ‘Amnesty Internatal’ and is forever hectoring various third world nations about ‘human rights abuses’.
To all you Americans out there the nation that you fought and defeated in, in the name of liberty, in 1776 still hasn’t changed its spots.
To the free-born, air breathing human being, apart from the right of free speech (also denied in Britain), what greater liberty is there than to associate freely without the interference of opressive tyrants?
Where are our John Wilkes, our Edmund Burkes, our John Lockes?

They’ve been replaced with socialists, British politicians selling out to muslim extremists, and a country in which the native british whites will be a displaced minority very soon. Next question.

30 — Anonymous wrote at 9:57 AM on June 19:

So the BNP has to include non-whites, yet somehow among the numerous amounts of non-white organizations (funded with government money, I might add) can exclude anyone they want. Sounds like white privilege, doesn’t it, Mr. Wise?

31 — Simmons wrote at 10:54 AM on June 19:

All doom all the time, but I guess that sells to WNs. The BNP should adopt as its attitude and prevailing ideology the tenets of Bob Whitaker’s Mantra, that the policies of the “anti-racists” (meaning anti-white exclusively) are genocidal in nature towards whites. Then allow the diversity cases join, and make them useful in defending whites.

32 — Whiteplight wrote at 2:43 PM on June 19:

Perhaps the BNP ought to study the Japanese law that deftly avoids racist issues by qualifiers that virtually guarantee that any non-White or Jewish person that might be allowed membership would be a non-threat to their goals and also a resultant very tiny group within their community.

33 — Jimmy wrote at 9:18 PM on June 19:

The twits in England are practicing genocide against their own people as they try to force everyone to mix together. It’s a massive program to destroy all white people.

Meanwhile, Prince Charles is out prancing around the place trying to stop the genocide of the native red squirrels at the paws of the grey squirrels. And, like the rest of the genocidal twits, he doesn’t even realize that the same principles that apply to squirrels also apply to humans.

Resist the genocide! Stay white.

34 — GenX in Oz wrote at 10:58 PM on June 19:

The BNP could have multiple levels of membership such as ‘friends of the BNP’ who could support them financially, but who have no real power internally.
And then have a ‘full BNP member’ with the requirement being that they have to be able to prove their British ancestory back to say the year 1900.
Just an idea, and I’m ignorant to the legal specific’s of political party membership in the UK so be kind.

35 — Ted wrote at 6:22 AM on June 20:

It is very encouraging to see so many comments from Americans in support of the B.N.P.The British people have been bullied for years by this Nu Labour regime.We absolutely hate them.It is a hatered that I have never known.We are being invaded and everybody I know or speak to is worried.
Harriet Harman will not succeed with this.What about all of the other Nationalist parties in Europe who have been around for years.They must have met and overcome such obstacles.

36 — Super Dave wrote at 3:24 PM on June 20:

“This was inevitable. Once this bill becomes law (and make no mistake about it, it shall) the Left will flood the ranks of the BNP with their operatives, effectively gutting it.”

That about sums it up. The left will indeed begin infiltrating the BNP to make it just another center-left organization that is wholly indifferent to the interests of white Britons. It may still pay lip service to white interests but will not back it up with activism and deeds like the lion hearted Nick Griffin and others. It will simply become a covert ally of the anti-white left and will stand down while Briton is further transformed into a haven for Africans and Islamic radicals.

37 — Gary wrote at 4:12 PM on June 20:

The more one opposes the left the more tyrannically fascistic they become.

The “Equality Bill” they are conspiring to pass would terminate forever the right of citizens to free association.
It is in fact a re-enactment the middle ages, returning the British people to indentured serfs of the state.

It empowers government as thought police over anyone who disagrees with its policies - even policies that degrade the basic quality of their lives. In other words, a malevolent government.


38 — Svigor wrote at 9:00 PM on June 20:

It is very encouraging to see so many comments from Americans in support of the B.N.P.

The pleasure is all ours. It’s very encouraging to see the BNP standing up for the British peoples, and standing up against the madness threatening Europeans, particularly Anglophones.

God bless you, and may fortune smile upon us all.

39 — Anonymous wrote at 9:55 PM on June 21:

The BNP already admit Jewish members, just not non-whites. They even have a Jewish councillor.

The notion that they’re an anti-Semtic party is nothing more than a persistent media smear.

40 — chief wrote at 10:52 PM on June 21:

So the citizens of Britain speak and Britains ruling establishment and their new labour whores don’t like it so they simply change the rules. At what point is this considered literal tyranny?

41 — Historama wrote at 9:06 PM on June 22:

Well, I don’t have any sympathy for them. They are just getting what they deserve. Britain is reaping the consequences of deciding to stand for egalitarianism and ‘tolerance’ in the 20th century. They had their chance, and they made their choice. They chose to fight against the German people, their kin and natural allies. They could have helped them to advance racial science, eugenics, etc. They could have worked together with the other Germanic communities around the world to preserve our common civilization, but they didn’t. They were corrupted by tyranny and power-hunger. Now they are feeling the wonderful pleasures of ‘tolerance’, up close and personal.

The English have nearly always put economics and ‘status’ ahead of racial considerations; that’s why they put so much effort into building their decadent ‘empire’. I don’t see why they should be able to go back on their beliefs (i.e. egalitarianism) at this point in their national life.


Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Send This Page      Search