American Renaissance
Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Send This Page       Date Archives       Category Archives

Swine Flu: Is There a Racial Link?

More news stories on Special to AR News

Jared Taylor, Special to AR News, May 15, 2009

The flap over Swine flu—or H1N1 flu as the pork breeders would prefer that we call it—appears, so far, to be much ado about not much. Although as of today the disease is reported to have spread to 34 countries, there have been deaths in only four—Mexico, USA, Canada, Costa Rica—and at least 90 percent have been in Mexico.

There are no official reports on whether there are racial differences in susceptibility or fatality rates, but this can’t be ruled out. Mexico is the only country so far in which the disease seems to be killing otherwise healthy people. Of the 64 confirmed deaths in Mexico as of May 15, the most common age bracket has been 20 to 29.

Things are different outside of Mexico. Of the 3,320 confirmed non-Mexican cases, the four fatalities in the United States and the single fatality so far in Canada have been of people who had chronic medical problems. Likewise, the flu-related death in Costa Rica was that of a 53-year-old diabetic who had a chronic heart condition. These people had the flu when they died, but they had other serious problems, and it would probably be an overstatement to say that they died of the flu.

Why does the disease appear to kill healthy people only in Mexico?

Although there is no information on the ethnic mix of the fatal cases, it may be that this disease is particularly dangerous for Amerindians. The original inhabitants of the Americas crossed the land bridge from Asia before animals were domesticated, so they were never exposed to the animal-born diseases that later ravaged Europe and Asia. Aside from llamas and related species, Indians had few domesticated animals of their own and did not evolve strong immune systems. They were overwhelmed by the Old World diseases the Spaniards brought to America, and it may be that today’s Latin Americans are still more vulnerable to diseases that originated in animals.

But in that case, then, why isn’t the new flu killing people all over Latin America?

It is possible that the virus hasn’t had a chance to spread, since Mexico’ s southern neighbors took such stout measures to keep the flu out. Cuba, Argentina, Ecuador, and Peru all barred flights to Mexico. Uruguay and Brazil refused to send soccer teams to play in Mexico—which so annoyed the Mexicans they broke off official sporting ties. The United States, on the other hand, did nothing to keep the flu out.

It could also be that all populations are equally vulnerable to the virus, and that the only reason it kills Mexicans is that their medical system is no good. But if a disease is going to behave differently in different countries it’s something worth knowing. So far, no one is asking the question.

(Posted on May 15, 2009)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment     Send This Page      Search

Comments

1 — Paul wrote at 6:42 PM on May 15:

In colonial times, smallpox was known to be more dangerous if contracted from a close relative than from a stranger. We know now this is because close relatives share 50% of their genes and are more likely to have similar immune systems. So the strain of virus that has survived your brother or father’s immune system already has a leg up on beating yours.

Because colonial-era Amerindians lived in basically extended family groups, the smallpox virus could get better and better as it jumped from person to person.

Therefore, it would be conceivable that the swine flu virus in Mexico City could have made the jump from pigs to humans because it took advantage of some genetic feature in the local population’s immune systems not common elsewhere.

(The AIDS virus — widely believed to have jumped from monkeys to humans in Africa — also seems to be better able to infect blacks.)

2 — Anonymous wrote at 9:17 PM on May 15:

I think it’s more of whether the people in question live in close proximity to each other. Overcrowding tends to breed disease. I’m mostly of Native heritage and am sick maybe once a year with the usual respiratory bug. Other than that, I’m good.

3 — john wrote at 10:22 PM on May 15:

Racial variation is a factor:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090512081744.htm

4 — Alexandra wrote at 1:43 PM on May 16:

Interesting.

I have no more than about 3% Native ancestry myself and I get a cold or whatever maybe twice a year…could be allergies. Other than that I’m hardly ever sick. Same with my son.

Never had the flu, and I never had a flu shot. My younger half-sister, I think, has slightly more Native ancestry than I do, and she gets the flu every time she gets a flu shot…sometimes even twice in a season.

5 — factualist wrote at 6:21 PM on May 16:

I’ve said the same thing myself. The way African Americans have more immunity to malaria and about 14% of European Americans have total immunity to HIV, it’s plausible that ethnic genetics are a contributing factor here. The earliest colonists brought devastating germs to Amerindians which hadn’t affected the former group probably owing to stronger genes selected by their European ancestors who survived the bubonic plague.

6 — Fed Up wrote at 8:19 AM on May 19:

A racial link? Affecing health members of a specific minority? Too much to hope for, I’d expect. It would read like a Robin Cook medical fiction novel.

7 — Anonymous wrote at 8:47 PM on May 20:

Marine Biological Laboratory via eurekanet.org ^ | 05/20/2009 | Kozul, C.D., Ely, K.H., Enelow, R.I., and Hamilton, J.W.
MBL, WOODS HOLE, MA-

The ability to mount an immune response to influenza A (H1N1) infection is significantly compromised by a low level of arsenic exposure that commonly occurs through drinking contaminated well water, scientists at the Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) and Dartmouth Medical School have found. Joshua Hamilton, the MBL’s Chief Academic and Scientific Officer and a senior scientist in the MBL’s Bay Paul Center; graduate student Courtney Kozul of Dartmouth Medical School, where the work was conducted; and their colleagues report their findings this week in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives.


Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Send This Page      Search