More Quebecers See Immigrants As Threat: Poll

As an English-speaking, multi-generational White Canadian I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand French-Canadians have a lot of ethnic pride and solidarity and are far less advanced down the road to political correctness and its wasteland then Anglo-Canadians, which I admire. On the other hand it was the historic support of the federal Liberal party by Quebec (especially under Pierre Trudeau) that was so instrumental in opening the floodgates of third world non-White immigration into English Canada. Now Quebec is reaping what it has sown and getting a taste of its own medicine. Like I say mixed feelings.

I say, God bless the French.

I almost jumped for joy when I found out that my mother’s father’s side of the family was Anglo-Norman.

The French seem, to me, to be an inituive people, a people who FEEL what they believe.

If we get them on our side, I think victory is very nearly assured.

Intellectual ideas, by themselves, are fine, but when emotion is brought into the mix—there is the real power. The French, to me, seem to provide emotional power to intellectual ideas.

After all, they financially broke Great Britain, enabling the American colonies to become free.

Rachad Antonius, a professor of sociology at the Université du Québec à Montréal,

Names like RACHAD running things in Canada pretty much says where Canada is heading socially. Their professed GOOD opinion of muslims will change when there are enough muslims in Canada to do what they want without being bothered by White Canadiens.

I say, God bless the French. I almost jumped for joy when I found out that my mother’s father’s side of the family was Anglo-Norman.

The French seem, to me, to be an inituive people, a people who FEEL what they believe. If we get them on our side, I think victory is very nearly assured.

After all, they financially broke Great Britain, enabling the American colonies to become free.
Posted by Anonymous
……………………………
Forgive me, but I have to disagree. Sorry. I think you’re being very unrealistic. You think with the French on our side, victory is assured? An amazing statement! Are you aware of what is happening today in France? They can’t even help themselves, much less help us! What’s worse, they’re not even inclined to try.

As for saying “they financially broke Great Britain”, the fact is that the American Revolution (largely financed by France), financially broke France — leaving the its government bankrupt and thus leading directly into the French Revolution, the Reign of Terror, and many years of war, bloodletting, and chaos. Meanwhile, Britain went on to achieve the Industrial Revolution, the triumph at Waterloo, world supremacy, and the greatest phase of its imperial power. Who defeated whom?

Since France’s debacle at Waterloo in 1815 (and subsequent occupation), the French have been repeatedly unable to help themselves. Through three more invasions by Germany (in two of which we saved them) and now undergoing an invasion by the Third World, they have not been resisting … (and from which we seem disinclined to save them this time, undergoing the same invasion ourselves).

How I wish you were right!

“Who defeated whom?”

America, with the immense help of France, defeated Great Britain.

“They can’t even help themselves, much less help us! What’s worse, they’re not even inclined to try.”

On what do you base these statements?

Could not the same be said about America, Great Britain, and Germany?

“it was the historic support of the federal Liberal party by Quebec (especially under Pierre Trudeau) that was so instrumental in opening the floodgates of third world non-White immigration into English Canada”

No, the 1967 Immigration Act, with its shift to global immigration, was supported by both parties. In fact, it was a consolidation of administrative changes that had begun with the Conservatives under John Diefenbaker.

There were many reasons why Canada made the leap to global immigration in the 1960s. One reason was a desire to win over newly independent countries in the Third World (and keep out Soviet influence). Another reason was that immigration from Europe was tapering off. There were also big business interests in mining, agriculture, and other sectors that wanted to control labour costs.

But the main reason was that racial discrimination — in any form whatsoever — had become completely demonized. This is something that many Canadians, including small-c conservatives don’t understand. Anti-racism does not simply mean a better deal for minorities. It means that the minorities will become the new majority … throughout the Western World.

The matter of the attitude of Francophone Québecers (not «French - Canadians», an imposition of an wretched, patronizing «kanadian» «Anglicism» that makes about as much sense as «anti - abortion,» or «pro - choice), and Third World Immigration is somewhat complicated.

For an number fo years, Québecois nationalism was celebrated quite assertively, even aggressively; at the «St. Jean - Baptiste» celebrations on the Plains of Abraham (now re - interpreted as «la Fêté National»), non whites who lingered on after dark, and after the performances on stage had ended risked being the target of ethnic slurs, or even physical assaults.

Currently however, Québec Nationalism is in an «dormant» phase; possibly an consequence of the demographic decline of Francophones - in Québec. There is, in my opinion, an sense of malaise among Francophones, old and young. In my opinion, many young francophones believe that the future is so daunting, in terms of employment and career prospects («steeper ladders, narrower gates» in the assessment of Messieurs Murray and Herrnstein, authots of the «Bell Curve»), that nationalism is something hypothetically desirable. But, one which, nonetheless, must be placed «à côté» in order to earn the LLB degree, the M.D., accreditation, the «stage» (internship), with an top drawer attorney’s firm, and, among Francophone women, a good marriage to an similarly «focused» young, upwardly mobile, professional.

I don’t think many Francophones like the «newcomers» in their midst. The government appears to be sensible to their attitudes. An acquaintance of mine, from the Indian Sub - Continent (now known - by those in the know, simply as the «sub - con»), who happens to speak Tamil, has been hired by the Québec government to «interpret» the «hows and whys» of life - in the national capital of all places, to an group of Tamil refugees. Why, one may ask, have 60 (apparently), perhaps there are more of them now, Tamil «nationals» or «Indian nationals» been settled in the Québec City region? Additionally, however, he has been told in no uncertain terms, that if he speaks to the media concerning their presence, his contract will be immediately terminated.

There seems an lack of «national» will among Francophone Québecers to protest, to oppose the transformation of their society and culture by people utterly unlike themselves. An illustration of the «eloi» syndrome, articulated by Laurence Auster, one may assume. At the same time, the devious and surreptitious means, adopted by the federal and «provincial» governments to «promote» the «normalcy» of non - whites in Québec society is preposterous and grotesque.

As an example, an large (at least 5 foot by 3 foot), portrait of an smiling «Barack Obama» now beams down from one of the pillars of the «Atrium» of the université Laval student centre. And, in my local «Metro» store, an large poster, hung directly over the main pedestrian entrance, encourages applications for employment as an meat wrapper («emballeur»); there is an «trinity» of three persons in the photo : two middle aged men, and, in front of both, an young, smiling Asian female.

In another provocative development, in the foyer of the same «mini - mall, there is an night club of some local renown. Matters sometimes «get a little out of hand» although there are no shootings or knifings; merely some incidental property damage to surrounding shops. As well as doors and windows. The doormen are large, friendly, not teribly intimidating - and White.

However, as of last Friday night, and early (9:30 PM), an employee of «Garda» the Québec version of «Brinks» stood glowering across the concourse, facing the clubs main doors. He was very unpleasant of appearance and demeanor, and he was black. Why was he black?

In an area like Ste Foy, overwhelmingly white and Francophone, this was obviously an deliberate «move» by the authorities, directing Garda, to place an «visible» minority, in an place of public prominence. I am also utterly contemptuous of the policy, adopted by université Laval, itself, to deliberately and invariably appoint an Black student security person (who are absolutely not needed), to «supervise» largely, if not exclusively White social events.