Sean Yoong, AP, May 10, 2009
{snip}
To be sure, Malaysia, a Southeast Asian nation of 27 million people, has been remarkably stable since the weeklong mayhem that began May 13, 1969. But as the country marks the 40th anniversary of the riots, its uneasy racial detente is coming under stress.
Ethnic Chinese and Indians, the two largest minorities, have become more vocal in demanding racial equality in part because of growing economic hardships, and Indians staged unprecedented public protests in November 2007. Mindful of the mounting disenchantment, a new prime minister is proposing a partial rollback of a main legacy of the riots, an affirmative action program for the majority Malays.
{snip} As Malaysians have grown wealthier and better educated, they have demanded a more open discussion of race, and the government has acquiesced to a degree. But the shift is also stirring old passions—the Malays and Chinese in particular don’t fully trust each other—and therein lies a risk.
Several Malay ruling party officials have pledged to defend affirmative action “to the last drop of blood,” and a top Malay newspaper urged Malays last month to “rise and unite.”
{snip}
The bloodshed of 1969, which took at least 200 lives, erupted when Malaysia was still emerging from the legacy of colonial rule, only a dozen years after attaining independence from Britain.
Racial divisions ran deep. The Malays held political power but were largely poor. The Chinese, many of whose ancestors immigrated in the 18th century, had prospered through trade and tin mining. Indians, mostly laborers, had little say in politics or business.
The riots were sparked by politics. Chinese opposition supporters, whose parties made sweeping election gains, held a victory march in Kuala Lumpur and jeered at residents in Malay neighborhoods. The Malays staged their own rally, and in ensuing clashes, mobs armed with pistols and knives roamed the streets, killed people of other races and torched their homes.
{snip}
Seeking to curb economic disparities, the government launched an affirmative action program in 1971 that enabled Malays to get into universities more easily, buy homes at reduced prices and enter business through rules requiring many companies to be partly Malay-owned. The main government-funded schools teach in the Malay language, while schools that use Chinese and Tamil get less aid.
Many Malays prospered. Their share of corporate wealth surged from 2.4 percent in 1970 to about 20 percent today, and they make up nearly two-thirds of the population.
The minorities say it is time to wind up the program. Chinese make up a quarter of the population and own about 40 percent of corporate equity. Indians are about 8 percent of the population and have a stake of less than 2 percent, while the remainder is mostly foreign ownership.
Complaints about affirmative action and religious disputes—such as the demolition of Indian Hindu temples on illegal sites by Malay authorities—became more apparent during the tenure of former Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, who governed for five years from October 2003. He is credited with allowing more space for discussions of long-sensitive issues in the government-controlled media and on independent Internet forums.
{snip}
Many high-profile disputes are religious in nature. Minorities have complained that Islamic courts—not secular courts—are given jurisdiction in family disputes that involve both Muslims and non-Muslims. Some Malay Muslims consider these complaints as a threat to the status of Islam, the country’s official religion.
{snip}
In the capital of Kuala Lumpur, office workers from all races work together relatively amicably. Lunch crowds include Chinese women in skirts and Malay women draped in multicolored, loose-flowing dresses. Very often, they can be seen tucking into “dosa” rice pancake and curry, an Indian favorite.
Though most people still have friends predominantly of their own race, there is interethnic interaction and respect. For example, many Chinese avoid eating pork in the presence of Malay companions.
{snip}
History textbooks, referring to the May 13 riots, warn that racial harmony must be nurtured. The last deadly clash—between Malays and Indians—was in 2001 when six people were killed.
{snip}
[Editors Note: See also Jared Taylor’s essay on Malaysia, “Preferences for the Majority,” here. ]
Original article
(Posted on May 12, 2009)
Comments
I rcently had the opportunity to hear a man of Chinese ancestry speak reverently of his Chinese nationality.
This man lives in Canada, had emigrated from Malaysia, and had no direct ancestors who had lived in China for at least four generations.
Where stands a Chinese stands the Chinese nation. Ex-pat Chinese are eager to show loyalty and solidarity to the motherland and the race.
Just yesterday I was re-reading Jared Taylor’s piece about Malaysians and majority racial preferences. I think that the Malays are smarter than Whites in America. We give people that are different from us the advantage. They are giving themselves the advantage.Good for them!
Malaysian Chinese might hate AA but they are less vocal and violent compared to Indians. Indians are the poorest(of the three racial groups) and think pro-Malay affirmative action stifles their growth.
I agree with them, Affirmative Action is wrong, but at the same time those successful Chinese were imported, along with Tamilians, by the British to work on rubber and tin plantations. Did the Malays also conspire to have non-AA reserved spots in medicine and engineering only for the Chinese too?
It’s pretty sad that the Malays had to institute an affirmative action program…for themselves…in their own country. The Malay experience should sound a warning bell for Europeans and Euro-Americans.
I don’t have a dog in this fight, but on principle, I support the Malay’s right to dominate their own country. The Chinese have China, the Indians have India, let the Malays have Malaysia.
“Indians, mostly laborers, had little say in politics or business”.
Gee….and maybe there was a reason for that.
I agree with them, Affirmative Action is wrong, but at the same time those successful Chinese were imported, along with Tamilians, by the British to work on rubber and tin plantations. Did the Malays also conspire to have non-AA reserved spots in medicine and engineering only for the Chinese too?
Posted by Anonymous at 7:18 PM on May 12
Anonymous,
The reservation system in Malaysia is based on the
numbers of a particular ethnic group. Malays make up
60% plus whereas Chinese make up 30%. Indians are
only 7%. Quotas are based on these numbers.
For example, out of 100 seats, 60-65 seats will
automatically go to Malays because of their race just
like that. Another 30-35 seats will go to the Chinese
because of their somewhat large population.
Only around 5 seats will be left for the Indians.
In other words, due to their much smaller demography
they are at a disadvantage in a system that favors
comparatively large minortites and majorities.
Starting a private business is also not so easy since
business licences will be awarded on the basis of race
and color as well.
Affirmative action for minorities against a majority
undermines the majority. Affirmative action for a
majority against a minority, particularly a very small
one undermines the minority.
So in a nutshell, AA is an undermining force for
any group subjected to it under any circumstance.
“I don’t have a dog in this fight, but on principle, I support the Malay’s right to dominate their own country. The Chinese have China, the Indians have India, let the Malays have Malaysia.”
Posted by Schoolteacher at 9:44 PM on May 12
I couldn’t agree more.
Whether the native population is smarter or dumber doesn’t matter, the Chinese and Indians should go home to their ancesteral lands and allow the Malays to have their own.
This is just another diversity project with different players that has gone wrong, as diverse societies eventually do….and always will….everywhere.
A much more violent repeat of 1969 is in the offing as the world economy continues to deteriorate.
China, and India will be hit the worst: China from a lack of food and water, and India for the same reason, plus they have a diversity situation there that is just waiting to strike like their many cobras.
Apart from anything else the Chinese in Malaysia are 5 or 10 or more IQ points above most Tamils and practically all Malays.
The Malays have a right to a homeland but the problem for them is they want both a country where they are in charge and wealth. But they can’t have both since the Chinese create the wealth.
Whether the native population is smarter or dumber doesn’t matter, the Chinese and Indians should go home to their ancesteral lands and allow the Malays to have their own.
I suppose the English, Germans, Irish, Italians in the US will do likewise. Afterall if the Chinese, who have in been in Malaysia for longer than most whites have been in the US, should go home then so should whites return to Europe.
And if we discuss morality - the Chinese at least did not invade Malaya and do to the Malays what whites did to the American Indians. So if we consider the moral perspective, it could well be argued that the Chinese have more right to be in Malaysia than whites have to be in the US.
China, and India will be hit the worst: China from a lack of food and water, and India for the same reason, plus they have a diversity situation there that is just waiting to strike like their many cobras.
Posted by ice at 3:18 PM on May 13
Nonsense,
Indians in India are related people racially,
culturally, spiritually and civilizationally for the
most part. Indian “diversity” is a homemade variation
that has roots and connections in the Indian soil.
Indians are compatible with one another, so there is
no real problem.
America’s diversity dilemma is indeed due to the fact
that you guys have incompatible races and cultural
mentalities that ultimately originated in some other
part of the world with no roots or connections
with one another or even in America itself. Hence,
you have a problem. The situation in your country is
vastly different than the one in our country.
Also, Indians were lacking food and water even 60-70
years ago. The condition then was much worse than
it is today. Even then they were able to pull
together peacefully and make some progress on this
front.
I have to agree with Anoraj, to a degree anyway. India has its problems, but they learned from the British, they did not waste the experience of colonialism. They have established within their country of a billion peasants or so, a modern nation of a couple hundred million. That’s enough to keep them progressing. Compare them to the Arabs, who have wasted most of the trillions of petrodollars that came to them. What have they to show for it? Gigantic towers in Dubai, designed and built by outsiders, strictly for show.
“China, and India will be hit the worst: China from a lack of food and water, and India for the same reason, plus they have a diversity situation there that is just waiting to strike like their many cobras.”
Posted by ice at 3:18 PM on May 13
“Nonsense, Indians in India are related people racially, culturally, spiritually and civilizationally for the
most part. Indian “diversity” is a homemade variationthat has roots and connections in the Indian soil. Indians are compatible with one another, so there is no real problem.”
Posted by Arnoraj at 12:55 AM on May 14
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/06/0602_030602_untouchables.html
India’s “Untouchables” Face Violence, Discrimination
Hillary Mayell
for National Geographic News
June 2, 2003
“More than 160 million people in India are considered “Untouchable”—people tainted by their birth into a caste system that deems them impure, less than human.
“Human rights abuses against these people, known as Dalits, are legion. A random sampling of headlines in mainstream Indian newspapers tells their story: “Dalit boy beaten to death for plucking flowers”; “Dalit tortured by cops for three days”; “Dalit ‘witch’ paraded naked in Bihar”; “Dalit killed in lock-up at Kurnool”; “7 Dalits burnt alive in caste clash”; “5 Dalits lynched in Haryana”; “Dalit woman gang-raped, paraded naked”; “Police egged on mob to lynch Dalits”.
(snip)
Arnoraj: “Also, Indians were lacking food and water even 60-70years ago. The condition then was much worse than it is today. Even then they were able to pull together peacefully and make some progress on this front. “
ice: The situation concerning natural resources has never been worse than it is today. Any country that is overpopulated, as India and China, are disasters waiting to happen. Food riots, water scarcity, internal conflicts, will occur spontaneously over minor issues when not enough bread can be found and very little water to quench the thirst of over a billion people.
Shall I give you more examples like the above, plus armed conflicts within the country and the situation with Pakistan that is set to explode any day now? I can, you know. Many more.
In effect, you are saying this country is bad, while India is the epitome of success.
But, let me cut this short by asking you this one question: “If things were so good in India, then why did you leave? Why did you come to our country and add to the multicultural problem that you yourself described?
“I suppose the English, Germans, Irish, Italians in the US will do likewise. Afterall if the Chinese, who have in been in Malaysia for longer than most whites have been in the US, should go home then so should whites return to Europe.”
Posted by John Liu at 9:52 PM on May 13
Why? There is no similarity.
Whites here in America, as in South Africa, settled a wilderness, and pushed nobody out. If you are referring to the PC dogma that whites “stole” Indian land then you are ignorant of history, my friend, and have eagerly lapped up the propaganda disseminated by our Cultural Marxist enemies here who wish to deconstruct our society. And you do so quite gleefully, too, don’t you?
For the most part it was the Indians who greedily trekked to where the white man’s settlements were in order to steal his livestock and other assets. They committed atrocious massacres in the process of that also.
The Indians started an unnecessary war with the white man and got smashed for their underhandedness. Now, all they can do is do as all of you non-whites do, and that is to whine about some kind of alleged injustice.
“And if we discuss morality - the Chinese at least did not invade Malaya and do to the Malays what whites did to the American Indians. So if we consider the moral perspective, it could well be argued that the Chinese have more right to be in Malaysia than whites have to be in the US.”
The Chinese and Indians most certainly DID invade Malaysia, just as the Mestizos invaded our land, trying to push us out, and which your kind is trying to do to us also.
China is a decadent country that is going to realize ungodly shortages of food and water in the next few years. Already there have been riots there because of the serious drop in exports now taking place, and with over a billion mouths to feed and water any slightest imbalance in supplies will have the potential to be a catastrophe.
But let me ask you the same question I asked the Indian: If you think whites are so bad, why did you come to our country?
Of course, the answer is that you came for the same reason he did. Neither of your peoples have the ability to create a successful society in your own countries, and you come to our land splitting us into tribal factions, criticizing us every chance you get and spitting on our ancestor’s graves.
You can whine all you want, but your mere presence is proof of your failure. If you dislike whites and fail to recognize white accomplishment so much, why do you stay here?
We have been successful as a result of our abilities; you have not. If you had been, you would be in your own country right now.
The Malays have a right to a homeland but the problem for them is they want both a country where they are in charge and wealth. But they can’t have both since the Chinese create the wealth.
Posted by Anonymous at 8:50 PM on May 13
The only basic reason why Chinese are successful in
business in these South-East Asian countries like
Malaysia, Indonesia ect is due to a combination of
total ineptitude of the Malays as well as the fact that
Chinese generally tend to be much better connected
at an international level. For example, they have
Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan where they have
family/extended relatives to bank upon for funds and
other type of material support.
This insulates them from their non-Chinese host govts
when they pursue discriminatory policies as well as
enables them to bribe a racist, hostile govt to act
somewhat in their favor in certain matters, like the
economy for example. That is the reason for the
Chinese control of the South East Asian economies.
The Chinese in Malaysia are aided by financial support
through their international networks with other Chinese
enclaves like Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan ect.
They have external supports to prop them up in a
hostile environment. That is the only reason why they
are able to get around the affirmative action policies
of the largely Malay govt.
Why are Whites suffering in Africa nowadays?
Whites are much smarter than Blacks but Whites today
no longer have political power nor any international
support from any extended/national White family
outside of Africa. Add to the fact that Whites are
also a small minority in Africa. This is the basic
reason behind White decline there.
However the Chinese immigrants in the West like America
Canada ect are a big threat to the continued
independance and even survival of White people as free
people because they will try to do the same thing here
as they have done to the SE Asian countries. With
their external financial backing, they are no more than
a 5th column for the projection of Chinese imperial
power over other lands by way of the vehicle of
economy. Whites would do better to just shut them
out completely from their countries.
I am not a White person by the way but that need not
stop me from wishing White people all the very best.
Kind regards to all the White people.
Rajput Warrior.
India’s “Untouchables” Face Violence, Discrimination
Hillary Mayell
for National Geographic News
June 2, 2003
“More than 160 million people in India are considered “Untouchable”—people tainted by their birth into a caste system that deems them impure, less than human.
“Human rights abuses against these people, known as Dalits, are legion. A random sampling of headlines in mainstream Indian newspapers tells their story: “Dalit boy beaten to death for plucking flowers”; “Dalit tortured by cops for three days”; “Dalit ‘witch’ paraded naked in Bihar”; “Dalit killed in lock-up at Kurnool”; “7 Dalits burnt alive in caste clash”; “5 Dalits lynched in Haryana”; “Dalit woman gang-raped, paraded naked”; “Police egged on mob to lynch Dalits”.
Posted by ice at 1:06 AM on May 15
Ice,
I find it funny how the Western Media is utterly
biased in its reporting on India. While they talk
about these “clashes” which has more to do with power
and domination, they never show the other side, that
is that Dalits have made good progress at the socio-
economic level over the last 50 years due to the fact
that they have been given preferential treatment
in terms of job opportunities and education.
The socio-economic situation of Dalits today is
undoubtedly so much better than it was some 100-200
years ago. Many of the Indian politicians are in
fact from the Dalit section of Indian society only.
Dalits are in fact the King-makers in India today.
These caste clashes that you talk about largely
take place in the rural and more socially backward
areas of the country where illiteracy and a more
feudalistic way of life still predominate. That can
easily be solved by introducing education and better
cultural awareness programs. In the cities and more
developed areas of the country, caste isn’t even an
issue for the people. Hardly anybody bothers about
it.
Another thing you need to keep in mind is that Caste
is not a race/ethnicity. Indian Dalits are like the
Russian Serfs in Tsarist Russia. They may have been
treated badly at one point of time but the reason for
the bad treatment was not because they were different
from the others but due more to power equations in
society.
Do you know who Dalits really are? They
were members of the upper classes at one
point in time who were excommunicated due to
lack of carrying out their caste duties to
the greater society. In other words, Dalits
are the excommunicated upper class.
There is a difference between the Caste System
and “Casteism”. In none of the Hindu works
is discrimination and violence in the name of
Caste condoned (ie.Casteism). If some people
are indulging in it, it is because they are
culturally illiterate and ignorant about what
the Hindu scriptures actually teach. Those
people who indulge in such behaviours usually
have a sincere desire to abide by tradition
but they are not well informed or knowledgable
about what the tradition actually says, so these
types of social perversions happen due to lack of
correct understanding of the tradition, largely
aided by illiteracy and ignorance.
As for the armed conflicts within the country,
those are ideologically oriented. For example
the Naxalites are a bunch of Marxist terrorists that
want a “Communist Utopia”. The Islamic terrorists
are inspired by the political ideology of Islamism,
a world-wide Islamic empire as with the Christianist
terrorists. These are all ideological enemies of
us Indians. We are against all these enemies.
Also these are alien ideologies that have nothing to
do with our heritage and are seeking to enslave us
to a Global imperial agenda but we will oppose to
the last man if necessary.
Lastly, I never said America was a bad country.
You are putting words into my mouth. All I said
was the situation in your country is not the same
as it is in ours, which is true. That is all.
“Ice,”
“I find it funny how the Western Media is utterly
biased in its reporting on India. While they talk
about these “clashes” which has more to do with power
and domination, they never show the other side, that
is that Dalits have made good progress at the socio-
economic level over the last 50 years due to the fact
that they have been given preferential treatment
in terms of job opportunities and education.”
Ice: Now, you’re referencing bias, my friend. First you told us of how peaceful and serene India was and how everbody got along, not like the USA, you wrote. Now you’re giving us reasons for the conflicts and telling us there is one-sided reporting about them. Isn’t that an admission that what I said was true? I checked the facts. The above story is absolutely correct. Besides the above, there is horrendous violence in India. It’s backward also, because only part of the country even has toilets. It has been estimated, by scholars on the subject, that 50% of Indian children go to bed hungry.
“Dalits are in fact the King-makers in India today.”
ice: Doesn’t sound much like a democracy to me if one single faction dictates who is on top.
“These caste clashes that you talk about largely
take place in the rural and more socially backward
areas of the country where illiteracy and a more
feudalistic way of life still predominate.”
ice: Well, since you admit caste clashes occur, your claim of peace and happiness and no problem with diversity exists, does it?
“Another thing you need to keep in mind is that Caste
is not a race/ethnicity.”
ice: Who is claiming that caste is an ethnicity or race? When any population is divided intensely along any lines the result is diversity. And diversity is VERY dangerous.
Too, what you are apparently unaware of is that many different ethnicities are involved in the settlement of India, and it has been claimed by anthropologists that whites at one time inundated the area, which is probably true, because many Indians have striking white features.
Most of the caucasian-featured types of India live in the northwest states, but not exclusively. Orissa people look very australoid/mongoloid, the types found in Southeast Asia.
But, whatever, Indians are not the pure ethnicity you are claiming.
About 5000 B.C., and forward, caucasians literally inundated parts of your area, and other parts of Asia, as well as the entire Mediterranean area well down into North Africa, as part of the great Caucasian migration. However, today, in many areas they have been absorbed into the Arabs, Semites, and a small number into the Nubian population, but it isn’t unusual to find many Lebanese, Iranians, Afghans and, yes, Indians, who could pass for white. Remember the cover of Life mag I believe it was, or Time, of the green eyed Afghan? She could pass for German, English, French, whatever.
And all you have to do is look at the photos of Egyptian mummies to find ones with blond and red hair, a coloring found only among whites. Also take a look at the busts of the Roman Cesaers, or Alexander the Great, the Macedonian who had bright blond hair, or many othe historical evidence, as to what the people looked like around the Mediterranean and even into North Africa, and the Middle East.
“As for the armed conflicts within the country,
those are ideologically oriented. For example
the Naxalites are a bunch of Marxist terrorists that
want a “Communist Utopia”. The Islamic terrorists
are inspired by the political ideology of Islamism,
a world-wide Islamic empire as with the Christianist
terrorists. These are all ideological enemies of
us Indians. We are against all these enemies.
Also these are alien ideologies that have nothing to
do with our heritage and are seeking to enslave us
to a Global imperial agenda but we will oppose to
the last man if necessary.”
ice: Well, here again, my friend, you are admitting to conflict.
“Lastly, I never said America was a bad country.
You are putting words into my mouth. All I said
was the situation in your country is not the same
as it is in ours, which is true. That is all.”
Quote from your post: Ice: “China, and India will be hit the worst: China from a lack of food and water, and India for the same reason, plus they have a diversity situation there that is just waiting to strike like their many cobras.”
Posted by ice at 3:18 PM on May 13
Arnoraj: “Nonsense,
Indians in India are related people racially,
culturally, spiritually and civilizationally for the
most part. Indian “diversity” is a homemade variation
that has roots and connections in the Indian soil.
Indians are compatible with one another, so there is
no real problem.”
ice: Doesn’t the above quote from your post say that, “Indians are compatible with one another, so there is
no real problem?”
I’m not trying to “sharpshoot you, my friend, but the tone of your entire post, unintentionally it now appears, seemed a bit derogatory, and you contradicted yourself many times.
Keep in mind that most non-whites we get on this site are like the Chinaman above who is telling us we are killers and steal other people’s lands. Right away the inclination is to go into attack mode if a post has a derogatory tone.
I wish the Indian people well, myself, but I still have to say that China and India are in for great problems before this depression plays itself out, because of severe overpopulation and rapidly declining natural resources.
Likewise, there will be great turmoil here in the US and throughout the Western world, because of the many different tribes that have fled their failed countries to come to our prosperous one.
And many of these same people hate us, because we have domination and control and they want this country for their own, so long as it is extremely wealthy. The Chinaman above is only one of millions who think exactly as he does.
Our greatest weaknesses is that we have cowardly, spineless leaders who have allowed our land to be inundated with people who are not of our race and culture. We will erupt into tumultuous civil upheaval because of it.
Soon, that point will not have to be supported with debate, because observable facts don’t neccessitate debate, since they are occurring for all to see. Don’t take my word for it. Wait awhile, then see for yourself.
“many of these same people hate us, because we have domination and control and they want this country for their own, so long as it is extremely wealthy. The Chinaman above is only one of millions who think exactly as he does.
posted by ice
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That’s what they think. Little do they know that “we” don’t really have the “domination and control” that they think we have. The joke is ultimately on them.
Too, what you are apparently unaware of is that many different ethnicities are involved in the settlement of India, and it has been claimed by anthropologists that whites at one time inundated the area, which is probably true, because many Indians have striking white features.
Most of the caucasian-featured types of India live in the northwest states, but not exclusively. Orissa people look very australoid/mongoloid, the types found in Southeast Asia.
But, whatever, Indians are not the pure ethnicity you are claiming.
Posted by ice at 2:59 PM on May 16
No, you are mistaken completely. The last
genetic “splash” that took place in the
country was 60 000-70 000 years ago, during
pre-historic times during the migration of
early human beings out of Africa. Since then
there has been no genetic contributions at
least in a big way.
As for the so-called ethnicities and Whites
“inundating the area”, this is also false.
The ethnicities you are talking about lived in
what is Afghanistan and Pakistan, not India.
You are confusing India with these two
countries. Also India always had quite a
large population during every historical
period so it was never an empty land that
was simply ready to be colonized as you are
alleging.
The reason some Indians have light skin
is because of genetic mutations over a
period of time (60 000 years). The similarity
in general appearance between Indians and
Whites is largely because the pre-historic
ancestors of what would be the modern European
population is ultimately traced to India.
This is a view that some geneticists and
anthropologists like Stephen Oppenheimer hold.
Take a look at his book, The Real Eve.
Orissa Indians are Indo-European speakers.
The Oriya language is an Indo-Aryan language.
If Orissa people were all Australoid people
who settled en mass, then why aren’t they
Australoid speakers today? There is also a
theory that Australoid people originated in
India before migrating into South-East Asia
and a handful even migrated back to India.
But this took place in a pre-historic setting
before the races of the world started to
differentiate from one another. You are
confusing Orissa people with some Indian
tribes like the Mundas. But these tribes
are only a handful in number. Most orissa
people don’t look like what you are claiming.
They look like other typical Indians.
You are simply over-exaggerating.
Indians are in fact a pure ethnicity for the
most part. Around 99% of them are pure.
Maybe less than 1% could be mixed.
About 5000 B.C., and forward, caucasians literally inundated parts of your area, and other parts of Asia, as well as the entire Mediterranean area well down into North Africa, as part of the great Caucasian migration. However, today, in many areas they have been absorbed into the Arabs, Semites, and a small number into the Nubian population, but it isn’t unusual to find many Lebanese, Iranians, Afghans and, yes, Indians, who could pass for white. Remember the cover of Life mag I believe it was, or Time, of the green eyed Afghan? She could pass for German, English, French, whatever.
And all you have to do is look at the photos of Egyptian mummies to find ones with blond and red hair, a coloring found only among whites. Also take a look at the busts of the Roman Cesaers, or Alexander the Great, the Macedonian who had bright blond hair, or many othe historical evidence, as to what the people looked like around the Mediterranean and even into North Africa, and the Middle East.
Posted by ice at 2:59 PM on May 16
In 5000 BC, which would be around 7000 years
ago, the ancestors of modern White Europeans
were living in the Central Asian-Caucasus
region. This is confirmed in the Indian
literature known as Brahmanas like Aitareya
Brahmana as well as the Puranas. Also the
Tocharian mummies prove that Europeans were
living in Central Asia at one point of time.
However, that does not mean that White
Europeans were living everywhere in the area
like India, Iran, Greater Middle-East or
even North Africa. That claim is simply
illogical. Also there is no objective
evidence showing that Whites ever inhabited
the above mentioned countries/geographical
areas. They were present at one time in
the Central Asian-Caucasus regions.
From the Central Asian-Caucasus regions, the
“Great White Migration” took place in a North-
Westerly” direction towards Europe through
the Volga into Eastern Europe and finally
throughout the rest of Europe. This is also
known as the “Kurgan” expansions into Europe.
There is also archaeological evidence for
these expansions towards Europe but
interestingly no evidence showing a movement
towards India, Iran or the rest of Middle East
and North Africa.
According to Indian Sanskrit literature, the
people inhabiting Central Asia were known as
barbarians (ie.Sanskrit Mlecchas). Since
at that time, Central Asia was not inhabited
by Turks or Mongols or even by Iranians or
even Indians, the only possibility of who
inhabited Central Asia could only be White
Europeans at that distant time.
But there is a catch here though. According
to the Rig-Veda, an INDIAN tribe by the name
of Druhyus were defeated by other Indian tribes
like the Purus, Anus, Yadus, Ikshvakus and
expelled from India. The Druhyus migrated out
of India into Central Asia and became kings
of some of the European peoples there. This
is confirmed in the Aitareya Brahmana as well
the Puranas. The Indian Druhyu kings ruled
over the barbaric European peoples in Central
Asia and by a process known as “Elite Dominance”
made the Europeans switch over to Indo-European
dialects.
The proof that Europeans were never originally
Indo-European speakers is proven by the very
existence of the Basque and Finnish languages
which are non-Indo-European. Genetic studies
show that racially, Basques and Western
Europeans are the same people, YET one of them
speaks non-Indo-European and the others Indo-
European languages. It is the same with the
Finns. Basque is a much older language than
its surrounding IE languages.
The reason for this dichotomy is that non-
Indo-European speakers like Basque and Finnish
migrated towards Europe before the newly
converted IE speaking Europeans did. The
Europeans who remained behind in Central Asia
after the Basque and Finnish speakers left
were Indo-Europeanized in language by the
process of “Elite Dominance” by the incoming
Indian Druhyu tribe from India.
That is the basic reason why there is a
linguistic connection between Indians and
Europeans.
By the way, White Iranians have an IQ of 84
compared to White Europeans of 100. If IQ and
racial affinity are correlated, then your theory
that Whites in Iran and the Middle-East is false
because the IQ show that we are talking about
different races here even though they are
IE speaking! The very fact that a White Persian
doesn’t have the same IQ level of a White European
disproves your argument of these people being the
same race as Europeans.
Just because some of the Egyptian mummies may have had red/blond hair doesn’t mean that Egyptian society itself
was White or that Egyptian civilization was started by Whites. Otherwise how do you explain the fact that on the
murals and paintings done by the Egyptian artists, members
of Egyptian society appear Brown-skinned disproportionately?
Egypt is a country that is located close to Europe, so it is
possible that some White migrants might have been living there
but to say that those Whites were a part of the older “Great
White Migration” and they were the ones who started the Egyptian
civilization is a bit of an overstretch.
Ice,
What I believe that Mr.Arnoraj is saying is
that diversity is of two types: solvable and
unsolvable. When he says that “Indians are
compatible people”, what he means is that there
is a common racial/cultural/civilizational
framework that they can take recourse to
to solve any issues that may surface among them
if need be.
The question he is asking is whether
Americans, particularly, White and
Black Americans can unite and
organize around an overriding uniting
principle that goes beyond racial
considerations.
Another thing that needs to be kept in mind
is that in all human societies, there is bound
to be some conflict since humans are also animals
beneath their skins. In a family for example,
you may see brothers sometimes coming to blows
but they are still brothers and they are of the
same family. Are you saying that Whites have
never known conflict in their histories? Just
because Whites have fought other Whites in the
past doesn’t mean that Whites can’t eventually
come together and accomplish something together.
The caste clashes are also not that regular
as it is made out to be. These clashes are
a product of a very ancient institution that
has been misunderstood/perverted over time
due largely in part to culturally illiteracy
and ignorance. These clashes, when they do
happen, are in fact an aberration.
“The Chinaman above is only one of millions who think exactly as he does.”
“That’s what they think. Little do they know that “we” don’t really have the “domination and control” that they think we have. The joke is ultimately on them.”
Posted by Anonymous
— — — —
When I was much younger I used to think this country was ours and that “these people” envied us. Now, I realize that was a very deceptive notion. They, and I too, have been mistaken all along. So are most Americans. People like Mr. Liu resent us because they think we’re the boses and owners here. But we’re not.
Finally, I have come to understand that this is not “our” country at all; we just live here. If we were truly the bosses and owners, would we be permitting ourselves to be replaced? Would we be passing discriminatory legislation against our own kind, penalizing our own descendents? We are like tenants in an apartment building which has come into the possession of new owners. We are just occupants, not owners, rentpayers living on someone else’s property. It was once ours, true, but it’s not now.
But we’re allowed to go on thinking that it is. That keeps us from making trouble. The realization that it’s not could be very unsettling to a great many. The new owners don’t need that kind of trouble.
If anybody has any doubts about what the Indian
caste system is really all about, here are some
passages from the Hindu literature about the
Caste System being organized on the basis of
division of labor and not race or color:
Mahabharata: Shanti Parva: 188/11-15
“The Division is not based upon any
physical differences between the
individuals. They have the same kind of
body and blood”.
“When Brahma created mankind, everyone was
made a Brahmin. Everyone was virtous.”
“With time and degeneration of the mind and
activities, people moved into other
castes”.
“A Brahmin who is princely, passionate,
courageous and intelligent but has a
sharp temperament that gives into emotions
like anger is a Kshatriya”.
” A Brahmin who protects the cow but earns
a livelihood from agriculture or business
is a Vaishya”.
“Those who love violence, falsehood, are
greedy and selfish and live by doing menial
jobs are called Shudras”.
You see, in this way, on the basis of
differences in abilities, activities and
temperament, Brahmins have been classified
into castes.
Mahabharata: Shantiparva: 188/10
“All castes have their birth in Brahma(God)
therefore it is wrong to make any
differentiation about any being higher
or lower”.
Manusmriti:
“All are born pure. They are
differentiated on the basis of their
sanskars, their abilities and activities”.
“One who follows the Vedas is a Brahmin.
One who knows Brahma(God) is also a
Brahmin”.
Rig-Veda: 5/60/5
“There is no difference amongst people
at birth. None is big or small”.
Rig-Veda:
“Krunvantu Vishvam Aryam” (Sanskrit phrase)
Meaning: Make the whole world Aryan.
The word Arya/Aryan basically means noble
or good. The phrase here is basically
saying make all the peoples of the world
abide by righteousness and devotion to
God within the frame-work of the Vedic
tradition or Dharma.
I will quote a passage from the Bhagavad Gita that
clearly defines what is Caste exactly:
Sanskrit Passage: “Chaturvarnyam Maya Shrishtam
(Gita) Guna Karma Vibhaagasah”
Hindu God Krishna speaking to the Hero Arjuna.
Meaning of the passage: The four-fold system
was created by me and
differentiated on the
basis of quality/character(Guna)and action/
occupation (Karma).
I am a Hindu myself but it is too bad that some of my
Hindu Brethren don’t know all this which is why some
of these social perversions like Casteism(issues over caste)
unnecessarily exist in our society but this is undoubtedly
due to cultural illiteracy and ignorance among some Hindus.
Hence, caste clashes, if they do happen, are largely an aberration. It can be solved through education.
Amoraj: Is it true that some Hindus regard Hitler as a
Demigod?
You are wrong about the Basques and Finns. Genetically,
the Basques as well as the Sardinians are different than the
rest of the European family. And the Finns are different linguis-
tically: their language is not Indo-European.
Your model of Elite-Dominance is important and explains
much of White History. Traditionally, Whites are a conquering
elite whose genes get drowned in the people they conquer. The
conquerors are conquered in bed by the women of the conquered.
This, I believe, is what happened in Iran. The Aryan minority
is now almost completely absorbed into the low IQ indigenous
population. This ancient Elite had a sky god pantheon very close
to that of th Rg Veda. And needless to say, the same genetic ab-
sorbtion has happened in India. Of course, there may be other
factors as well. One White racial theorist believes that there
was a very dark skinned race of Caucasians who settled India be-
fore the Aryan invasion. This would explain the existence of the
cities like Mohenjo Daro which the Aryans sacked. And it would
also explain the high IQ and fine Caucasian features of many dark
skinned Hindus. If their dark skin came from Aboriginal blood,
their IQs would be much lower. And there is alot of inferior
blood in India even if you are not willing to admit it.
Pakistan was in ancient times part of the Hindu cultural
sphere. And at its height, even Afghanistan was partially under
Buddhist Indian influence.
Amoraj: Is it true that some Hindus regard Hitler as a
Demigod?
You are wrong about the Basques and Finns. Genetically,
the Basques as well as the Sardinians are different than the
rest of the European family. And the Finns are different linguis-
tically: their language is not Indo-European.
Your model of Elite-Dominance is important and explains
much of White History. Traditionally, Whites are a conquering
elite whose genes get drowned in the people they conquer. The
conquerors are conquered in bed by the women of the conquered.
This, I believe, is what happened in Iran. The Aryan minority
is now almost completely absorbed into the low IQ indigenous
population. This ancient Elite had a sky god pantheon very close
to that of th Rg Veda. And needless to say, the same genetic ab-
sorbtion has happened in India. Of course, there may be other
factors as well. One White racial theorist believes that there
was a very dark skinned race of Caucasians who settled India be-
fore the Aryan invasion. This would explain the existence of the
cities like Mohenjo Daro which the Aryans sacked. And it would
also explain the high IQ and fine Caucasian features of many dark
skinned Hindus. If their dark skin came from Aboriginal blood,
their IQs would be much lower. And there is alot of inferior
blood in India even if you are not willing to admit it.
Pakistan was in ancient times part of the Hindu cultural
sphere. And at its height, even Afghanistan was partially under
Buddhist Indian influence.
Posted by Eric the Red at 1:39 AM on May 20
Eric the Red,
Actually, the Basques are genetically/racially
connected to other Europeans. Here is the link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basque_people#Genetics
The Finns are also genetically/racially connected
to other North Europeans as well. Here is the link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finnish_people#Genetics
The important point to consider is that both of these
groups are non-Indo-European speaking. This
undermines the possibility of Whites being the
historical IE people who spread the IE dialects/
language in the historical period.
The very fact that the Basque have been living in
Europe since 8000 BC in a continous manner is also
an indicator of how long other White groups have
been living in Europe due to the genetic/racial
kinship between the Basques and other European
groups. Since linguistic evidence shows that Basque
language is comparatively older than the surrounding
IE languages of the other White groups, it is highly
unlikely that Whites started out as IE speakers in
their history. The existence of Basque language and
Finnish language lends a certain strenght to my claim
above.
The possibility of an Indian homeland for the IE
people and language is actually quite strong. I
wrote about this in a previous blog. Here it is:
The evidence for the Indian tribal migrations
from India is backed up by the Rig-Veda and the
Persian Avesta. Before you condemn these sources
as “religious” and therefore unreliable, you
should know that the scholars acknowledge these
works as important in the reconstruction of Indo-
European history and accept them as such.
So these sources are fair game in the debate.
The Avesta knows around 20 homelands, if I
remember correctly, listed in the Vendidad/
Videvdad that mentions the lands that the Iranics
inhabited in the course of their history. This
may surprise you but none of those lands are
located in Central Asia or even in Modern Iran.
Most of them are located in Afghanistan and in
fact the area of Pakistan(ie Punjab and kashmir).
Take a look at this book: The Life and Times of
Zoroaster by Roberto Gnoli.
The Rig-Veda knows only the Indian geography and
no other. The dating of the Rig-Veda is
immensely important for Indo-European history
because it would tell us approximately how long
IE languages have been in India. The Rig-Veda
knows two rivers in India that once existed,
namely the Sarasvati and the Drshadvati rivers.
Recent excavations and satellite imagery have
rediscovered the dried up river beds of these
lost rivers as described in the Rig-Veda.
The Sarasvati dried up completely by 2000 BC and
the Drshadvati by 2600 BC. The Rig-Veda
describes these two rivers as being mighty in
their flow at one time, so the logical conclusion
is inescapable that the Rig-Veda must be before
at least 3000 BC in its composition and not
after 1500 BC as standard history text-books say.
What this means is that Indo-European speakers
must have been living in India prior to 3000 BC
as the Rig-Veda is composed in Vedic Sanskrit,
undoubtedly an Indo-European language.
As for the Mittani, note carefully that the
Mittani kingdom contained a population that spoke
Hurrian, a NON-INDO-EUROPEAN language. The elite
of this society were INDO-ARYAN speakers who
worshipped Vedic deities and used the same
Sanskritic terminologies for their Gods like
Inar/Indra, Nasatya, Varuna ect. That could only
be if there had been an Indo-Aryan migration from
India, perhaps during or soon after the decline
of the Indus Valley Civilization around this time
(ie. 1400-1500 BC). The language of the Mittani
was differentiated already from Indo-Iranian or
even early Iranian. Here is the quote from the
article you cited, Zorba:
“The numeral aika “one” is of particular importance because it places the superstrate in the vicinity of Indo-Aryan proper as opposed to Indo-Iranian or early Iranian (which has “aiva”) in general”.
For more information on the Indo-European migrations
from India and the evidence from various fields of
science like archaeology, linguistics, literary
evidence ect, please take a look at the below links
on this subject:
Indo-Iranian homeland:
http://voiceofdharma.org/books/rig/ch6.htm
Indo-European homeland:
http://voiceofdharma.org/books/rig/ch7.htm
Historical Identity of the Vedic Aryans:
http://voiceofdharma.org/books/rig/ch5.htm