Baron Bodissey, Gates of Vienna, April 25, 2009
This is what real fascism looks like in Europe today.
Modern fascism does not originate on the right wing, nor does it involve neo-Nazis.
It arises within the ruling social democratic establishment, and its goal is the intimidation, harassment, and suppression of any organized opposition to its oligarchic rule. Its victims include any party that questions political correctness, Multiculturalism, mass immigration, or the supremacy of the European Union and its compliant functionaries within the “provinces” of Europe.
This is an account of the struggle of Vlaams Belang against the fascism of the Belgian state:
Original article
(Posted on April 27, 2009)
Comments
I’m certain Obama, Pelosi, Reed and their hacks are looking closely at how Belgium and others have managed to squash the opposition and free speech in their countries.
They’ll be attempting to see what they can get away with over here.
Their enablers will probably be just like in Europe - the media and the publishers.
I protest against communism being identified as fascism.
I promised to myself a long time ago - I will always vote only to the most “radical”, conservative, pro-white political parties.
I find it rather sad, the culture of self-entitlement that is alarmingly prevalent nowadays.
It also slightly angers me when people don’t want to accept the fact that if they emigrate to a new country, they are subject to the new country’s laws — including immigration laws.
It is happening in the U.K. now. The labour party and conservative party are in bed together to keep the BNP out of government. In the U.S. the democrats and republicans are the same party. In the aforementioned countries, and many others, freedom of speech is being stripped away from once free peoples. All in the name of One-world government. Europe has the EU to destroy the free peoples of Europe. The U.S. will have the North American Union to destroy it. The plans are being implemented as I write this comment. God help us all, we are in big trouble.
Everybody seems to have a different idea of what “fascism” is, other than that it’s supposed to be a really bad thing. It would be most accurate to call the Belgian political establishment totalitarian. They place no bounds on the power of the state, and brook no opposition.
Race realists are always called fascists by the left, even if they vote for the most libertarian, anti-government, pro-freedom, pro-peace, least fascist politician in office — Ron Paul.
What’s really upsetting is that the majority of these jackboots are White men. How can they do this stuff to their own people?
I will vote neither for Repubs or Dems, I will vote for Independent, Green, NAZI or anything but the same ol, same ol. AND I will vote AGAINST each and every encumbent politician and NO PROFESSIONAL POLITICIANS. Lawyers should also stay out of politics, they can’t be trusted any more than muslims.
Socialism.
National Socialism.
Two sides of the same coin. Hatred, intolerance and violence are at the core of the philosophy.
Hatred of people who do not agree with them and a willingness to suspend Democracy and freedom of speech in order that the populace “submits” to their ways.
Just like Islam.
Don’t forget - Hitler and the Nazi Party were very close allies with Radical Muslims in the Balkans who slaughtered tens of thousands of Serbian Christians. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem colluded with Hitler in Palestein.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d51poygEXYU
Socialist European leaders, together with your President Clinton, attacked the Serbs and threw them out of their Kosovan homeland. Now the churches are either rubble or mosques. The graveyards are being paved over for car parks.
Now Islam is in the ascendant. Christianity has been trashed.
Why is it that Socialists cosy up to Islamists all the time? Why do the hate the indiginous European people?
”Why is it that Socialists cosy up to Islamists all the time? Why do they hate the indigenous European people?”
I believe the answer is in the actions of the Belgian state in the video. The neo-Marxists who control the EU are aware that sites like Amren, BNP and other nationalist sites on the Internet are awakening millions of slumbering white people to the fact that they are being dispossessed of their European states by the neo-Marxist EU elite. Their campaign is in overdrive and they are desperate to make multiculturalism by mass immigration into Europe irreversible before they are kicked from office and have to face the wrath of the betrayed European peoples. If one state breaks away others will follow and the EU is finished. In the video you see the totalitarian behaviour of the Belgian state which is a puppet of the neo-Marxist EU. Islam is also a totalitarian ideology and that is what these two seemingly opposites have in common. These two totalitarian systems and their stooges hate the freedom that epitomises Western civilisation and wish to destroy European nation-states.
As one of the commentators on the video rightly points out, the writings of “Fjordman”, especially his “Defeating Eurabia” blogs on the Gates of Vienna website, are essential reading for anyone who wants to understand WHAT is currently happening in Europe and WHY.
The neo-Marxists who control the EU are aware that.nationalist sites on the Internet are awakening millions of slumbering white people to the fact that they are being dispossessed by the neo-Marxist EU elite.
Their campaign is in overdrive and they are desperate to make multiculturalism by mass immigration irreversible before they are kicked from office and have to face the wrath of the betrayed European peoples.
Yes, they do seem to be in a desperate rush to make it irreversible. I agree.
I was in Brussels over the Easter week, the first time in a dozen or more years. I was curious to see it now, as I’ve been reading that it’s near the tipping point. As I remember it from before, it was already very heavily Africanized.
This time, I stayed in the “European Quarter” — so called because it is where the European Union buildings are located and where the politicians and diplomats all stay. I was not familiar with this area before.
The first thing I noticed was the atrocious prices: $35. for breakfast! (Brussels is the 2nd most expensive city in Europe.) But then I realized that the EU bureaucrats who live or visit there can just charge everything to their government expense account and let the poor fool taxpayers back home pay the bill. That makes it easy. For them.
The next thing I noticed was that there was hardly a black or Moslem anywhere to be seen! In a week strolling around this fashionable and expensive area, one would never know that Belgium is under invasion and that Brussels is at the tipping point. This scene reminded me so much of New York’s tony East Side, where the only “minorities” you see are nannies, maids, or store clerks. Well, maybe chauffers and door men. Or Beverly Hills, or so many other such places.
As everywhere, the ruling elite are out of touch with reality and do not have to be bothered with immigrants next door, nor with their dirt, noise, and crime. And then the rulers wonder what is wrong with the cranky lower classes who are so prejudiced against these wonderful newcomers who are enriching us with their diversity; and providing us with their interesting ethnic foods and cheap domestic labor. What is wrong with those Archie Bunkers?
Well, thank goodness our rulers know what is best for us — even if we don’t!!!
To ghw at 2:30 AM on May 1:
Very interesting post!
Just an aside on Archie Bunker—I listened to a commentary that pointed out that while “All in the Family” seemed to be giving Archie’s views equal airing, what Archie was really modeling for all of us was his submission.
Archie griped, but he submitted. The moral high ground in the show was implicitly ceded to his “opponents”, his daughter and son-in-law.
“Archie griped, but he submitted. The moral high ground in the show was implicitly ceded to his “opponents”
That’s true. Archie griped … but in the end he submitted. Archie was plainly a loser, not a winner. He was fighting a losing battle, and that was very plainly shown. It was important for it to be shown.
I could even say he was a whiner, not a winner! To have shown him as winning any ground would have been unthinkable. He never won. Never! Someone like Archie had to be shown as losing.
He had to be shown being scolded by someone like Edith who, even though not too bright herself, still had a better sense of morality, justice, decency, and right versus wrong. Archie (and by implication, anyone like him) was always wrong.
Archie was resisting “the flow of history” — kicking and screaming all the way — but going with the flow nonetheless.
The other side was always morally right. The manner it was presented, it could have been no other way.
HD, Browser:
Even though you’re all correct about Archie Bunker always coming out as a loser, that character legitimized the postjudices in a lot of American whites. Norman Lear was that arrogant — he thought his Archie Bunker character was mocking American white men, but it turned out to do just the opposite.
He had to be shown being scolded by someone like Edith who, even though not too bright herself, still had a better sense of morality, justice, decency, and right versus wrong. Archie (and by implication, anyone like him) was always wrong.
Correct. That’s another important point: that even Edith — tho none too bright — STILL had more sense and decency than Archie.
Her better instincts led her always to support the liberal point of view. She wasn’t quite a moron, tho close, but she was still superior to caveman Archie.
And Archie always caved in. The implication being that “social progress” is inevitable, why fight it?
