Europe to Become Muslim in a Few Decades

Hey, look on the bright side fellow readers:
As the Islamic hordes in Europe grow - fuelled by mass-migration, high birth-rates between Muslims and their Muslim/native-convert concubines and even conversion - the same Leftists and “liberals” that screamed RACIST! whenever anyone posited what importing millions of Islamic peasants and peons*, and giving them free reign in, Europe would do will be lamenting their new Islamic overlords soon enough.

What’s that? You honestly believed that Muslims raised on the Koran would choose women, gay and animal rights and other Enlightnment-values over their holy book?

* Let’s face it: The vast majority of Muslim immigrants to Europe in the last half-century or so have been working-class dogmatics - not like the nominally “Christian” elites of the West who’d abandon their faith in a minute if they could get an extra dollar.

When my family and I were in London we visited the awesome St. Paul’s Cathedral, designed by Sir Christopher Wren.

I started calling it “the Temple of Apollo” because of its classical style and statuary.

LET IT BE THE TEMPLE OF APOLLO, THEN, if Christianity has failed Europe.

DON’T LET IT GO MUSLIM, because …

I keep thinking of the awesome Buddha statues that the Taliban blew to smithereens. They don’t even allow representations of the human form, from what I gather. Not good news for Europe’s cathedrals.

Can the ancient Aryan religions attract Europeans, when Christianity seems to be dying? Was it not the European spirit that made Christianity what it became?

We cannot allow these people to destroy the sacred heritage of Europe, the awesome expression of our people’s experience of the divine.

There is no telling what they will do.

The sad thing here, is that nowhere in this video did they name the real problem the West faces. Indeed, Islam may be a symptom, but the vile and malignant disease is multiculturalism.

Until all of the West accepts this, we cannot stop this waltz to the charnel house our elites have staged for us.

As always, God help us all!

Massive 3rd world immigration into white Western nations (ie. multiculturalism) is a tool the global elite have been using to slowly break apart white Western nations. Ethnic/racial balkanization always results when different “tribes” occupy the same land. A cursory look at the last 6,000 years of recorded history proves this. The global elite know that multiculturalism will tear any nation apart from within, which is exactly why they have been pushing multiculturalism for the past 50 years on the West. The global elite want a one world gov’t and Western nations stand as the #1 obstacle to this goal, this is why the elite set out some 50 years ago to destroy the West. They have no army to do so and hence they use massive 3rd world immigration to achieve this goal. Combined with massive immigration is a slick public relations campaign with slogans like, “diversity is our strength”, “celebrate diversity”, etc. All nonsense. Diversity is a weakness, a cancer… history proves this.

Don’t be fooled into believing multiculturalism is a strength. The truth is that whites are being targeted. Have you ever noticed that it’s only white nations which are subjected to massive immigration and who must henceforth “celebrate diversity”. Do you hear about diversity campaigns in Japan, China, Middle Eastern countries, African countries, etc.????? Never.

In this video, which perfecly serves as a wake-up call to the western civilization, most figures about the birth rate of (white) Europeans seem to be in accordance with the numbers I’ve seen in other sources.
However, I can’t believe that the birthrate of muslims in France is 8.1 as stated in the video - this figure is even higher than the birthrate of the world’s most fertile islamic country, Somalia. Can someone verify these numbers, as well as the claim that 50% of all newborns in the Nederlands are supposedly “islamic”?

I realized a while ago that most figures on islamic population in European countries used by mass media seem to be outdated. For example, every time the British media published an article which was related to the muslim population in Britain, it stated a number of 1 million. Ironically, the same number was stated in articles published from the year 2001 or so, which means that the current numbers must be higher - much higher I guess.
Why do the media deliberately report faked data? To avoid shocking people? Which shock? The leftist media were at the forefront in their campaign of promoting immigration and multiculturalism, now why do they hesitate to disclose real data to the public? They have a chance to show us how far they have gone with multiculturalism.

Another mystery to me is the muslim population in the United States. Last time I read an article at MSNBC I think their number was 3 million - which is far away from what the commenter in the video stated (9 million). Any more sources on the US?

Would I be wrong not to be concerned if these ‘muslims’ were actually white? Strangely, if they were white, folks who just held very odd fundamentalist religious beliefs, political correctness would not have kept them from being kicked out and they’d be long gone by now.

Hey, I want to know why Crunchy Cat wasn’t in this video?

Would it have offended the Muslim “community?”

Clearly there is some diabolical plot afoot, when so kinetic a kitten was excluded from this YouTube video!

See this AR link, to enjoy the soothing meows of the fabulous feline in question, and then don’t worry and be happy about Islam ;)

http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2009/04/video_demonstra.php

By the year 2030 we’re going to need 50% more food in order to feed the growing masses, and by 2050 we are going to need one hundred per cent more

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/professor-warns-of-global-food-riots-1675459.html

“Professor Douglas Kell, chief executive of the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), is calling for an additional £100m a year to be spent on food research in the UK to help the world meet growing demand.

‘He told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: “We have seen already in Indonesia and Mexico riots because of food shortages and what is undeniable is that the amount of food we are going to need to produce to deal with the world’s population increases is an extra 50 per cent by 2030 and a doubling by 2050.’

RK: Doesn’t it seem a bit silly for these leftist types to constantly publish articles like the above about Muslim numbers telling us that whites are going to be losing their land and influence long into the future, yet they NEVER mention anything to do with resource shortages, which, unlike deomographics, are far easier to forecast more accurately, since demographic projections can turn on a dime?

I wonder if they ignore more crucial matters in favor of racial demographics, because they want whites to accept defeat without a peep, making whites more amenable to their rainbow coalition.

Too, isn’t it amazing in a time of intense economic turmoil they are so certain that their predictions are inevitable?

“A call to action”. - Yeah but WHAT action?

I think there are some exaggerations in the numbers: probably only about 3 million Muslims at most in the US - Muslims are always exaggerating their numbers - but the Western World and its democracy based civilization is in very serious trouble as anyone can see who studies and disovers the horrific nature of Islam (Read Robert Spencer).

What this program doesn’t show, however, is how the situation deteriorates as the Muslim population increases. For this see the video “What Islam Is Not”:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8789NMWZ9EI&feature=PlayList&p=F79C98259EEFC9D0&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=12

That’s right-and all these Neo-Con yahoos who
want to start WW3 with Iran haven’t a clue. France
will be a Muslim Nuclear Power in a few decades-in
fact they are already lost to NATO due to their Mus-
lim minority. And the Armed Forces will be majority
Muslim much sooner than the nation as a whole. And
these same Yahoos are in favor of bringing ever more
Muslims into America. One has to ask why. And there
is an answer: these people aren’t just traitors but
lunatics.

Unless the video verities it’s resources and source the statistics they provide, this video is rendered useless and false.

Back in the 70’s my wife and I settled on having one child because of the “population bomb” scare, too bad the rest of the non-white world didn’t get the word.

Religion means “binding together.” When people agree to bind themselves together for a common fate and common ideals, Nature rewards them with children. Inside that binding or ring of shared identity, they are protected from the corruption of the outside world.

When people abandon that binding, when their ring of mutual protection is dropped to the ground, then they will be prey to outside forces. When people abandon their shared ideals and pursue individual goals, they will no longer grow and prosper. They wither and die because they have no hope for the future.

Atheism is a death sentence. Period. Racialism might never be a dominant ideology in the United States, but Christian Constitutionalism is much more real for most people. It’s better in a way, since it taps into our shared Christian roots.

People who have many children out of wedlock are not Christians. People who rob and loot and depend on the government for a living are not Christians. Men and women who spend their lives pursuing ego gratification instead of putting work into family life are not Christians. People who break the law and come into someone else’s country are not Christians. People who are addicted to drugs are not Christians. See how this goes?

Combine that with Constitutionalism and the American tradition and you have something very powerful and real.

the birthrate of muslims in France is 8.1 as stated in the video - this figure is even higher than the birthrate of the world’s most fertile islamic country, Somalia.

Well, maybe our U.S. census is including the more than 200,000 breeding Somali, black muslims we have breeding HERE now. How many muslims and mosques are in Dearborn, Michigan now anyway. The population of muslims and black converts MUST be in the tens of millions now and the black overall population of the U.S. is STILL WAY ABOVE the 10-12%, it’s mnore like 45% I’m sure.

Do these feminists and gays ever worry about an increasing Muslim population? No. And they should be! They should be hysterical but the fools are not! For when the Muslims take over, both feminism and homosexuality will be outlawed and punishable by death. And the liberals, ooooooh will they get what’s coming to them!!!

The first commenter wrote:

“What’s that? You honestly believed that Muslims raised on the Koran would choose women, gay and animal rights and other Enlightnment-values over their holy book?”

Excellent point. Euro-Lefties will have to choose between Enlightenment and Multi-Cultural Diversity and Tolerance. You can’t have both.

The 1991 census showed there were around three million people born overseas living in the United Kingdom. Thirty years ago, there were around two million. Across the country, the proportion of overseas-born residents is now around 10 per cent; but in London, it is closer to 30 per cent and in some parts of the capital, it is 50 per cent. Such record levels, plus greater longevity, have caused the Government actuaries to recalculate population growth. They now think it will pass the 65 million mark in 2023 and reach 70 million by 2031, placing huge pressure on public services and pensions. The Government maintains that its points-based immigration system will arrest this growth but many analysts doubt it will make any difference.

The cross-party parliamentary balanced migration group, using the Government’s own figures, recently calculated that immigration would have fallen by about 12,000 last year if the new measures had been in place. To hold the population to 65 million - a rise of about four million on current numbers - would require a reduction in net immigration to near zero, a migration level last seen in the early 1990s. In other words, net annual immigration would have to fall by 180,000 if the population is not to hit 70 million. When ministers were supporting large-scale immigration, they liked to depict Britain as a nation of immigrants that in the past has absorbed Huguenots from France, Jews from Europe and Asians kicked out of east Africa, often to its advantage. But today’s levels of immigration are far higher than anything seen before and will have a far more profound effect on the shape and nature of our society than previous migrations. Even senior Labour figures such as Frank Field have voiced their concerns that the country is unprepared, both culturally and practically, to cope. More immigrants being imported but 50% of babies born are non-white

Where are the white people of Europe suppose to go after the Islamic hordes overrun that continent?

The United States? Hardly. The only reason the U.S. hasn’t been completely overrun ourselves is the Atlantic and Pacific oceans prevent massive immigration. But we will soon be in the same boat as Europe.

The only hope for white people is Canada and Siberia. Of course when white people move there non-whites will quickly follow.

One thing usually overlooked is the breakdown of immigrants.

A great many of the immigrants moving into Europe from Islamic countries are young, single, surly males.

Unless these guys are going to take a solemn vow of chastity the women of Europe are in big trouble.

I have had the opportunity to travel to Western Europe many times over the years. I have friends who go there regularly to enjoy the high level of culture,(there isn’t much in the Southwest)including, wine festivals, symphonic music concerts, and even beer gardens,etc. One of my long time friends is an antique piano dealer and often travels to Europe on business and to hear concerts. Western Europe can be a fun place.

Western Europeans,in general, have become the most lamblike, docile,and submissive individuals in the world. Most have been taken in by the multiculturalism taught in their ultra liberal universities. That they may be overtaken by Muslim culture soon, would surprise no one who has interacted with Western Europeans. They aren’t even conscious of the meaning of the bloody battles of the past,that their ancestors fought to be rid of Islamic influence. It means zero to them. Their hundreds of magnificient cathedrals should be an inspiration to them of the willpower and faith that their ancestors had, but instead,are irrelevant to most Europeans.

Excellent point. Euro-Lefties will have to choose between Enlightenment and Multi-Cultural Diversity and Tolerance. You can’t have both.

Not so, they will have to choose between conversion to muslim or death, there will be no option C.

The Government maintains that its points-based immigration system will arrest this growth but many analysts doubt it will make any difference.

These policies in the U.K. and the U.S. are like a sinking cruise ship, once the water level reaches the portholes, it is all over but deciding WHO gets a seat on the lifeboats.

“I have had the opportunity to travel to Western Europe many times over the years. I have friends who go there regularly to enjoy the high level of culture,(there isn’t much in the Southwest)including, wine festivals, symphonic music concerts, and even beer gardens,etc. One of my long time friends is an antique piano dealer and often travels to Europe on business and to hear concerts. Western Europe can be a fun place.

Western Europeans,in general, have become the most lamblike, docile,and submissive individuals in the world. Most have been taken in by the multiculturalism taught in their ultra liberal universities. That they may be overtaken by Muslim culture soon, would surprise no one who has interacted with Western Europeans. They aren’t even conscious of the meaning of the bloody battles of the past,that their ancestors fought to be rid of Islamic influence. It means zero to them. Their hundreds of magnificient cathedrals should be an inspiration to them of the willpower and faith that their ancestors had, but instead,are irrelevant to most Europeans.”

Posted by Bobby at 6:01 PM on May 1

Good post - Actually living in Europe, outside of all American influence is even better. I did this for some time and I can tell you that life is much richer for the average individual in Europe than in this country. Here, it is all about consuming and trying to be the best and have the best - but not really knowing what that even means.

Today’s Europeans, even the Eastern ones, want to live in Elysium. They don’t want to dwell on the bloody, lousy past. They are a bit like latter day Romans who want pleasures, but no reminders of a painful past or present. They hate being goaded into doing anything. They have become quite adept at playing the U.S. government for all its worth as well because this allows their illusion to continue. But this fits in with my previous post about how Europeans are as a people, emotionally drained. They have nothing more to offer the history books. Two devasting World Wars killed off most of their best. Whatever the reason, my impression is that the European has retreated from the front, permanently. They revel while life lasts with not much thought of the future. They just pretend that life is beautiful and they make it so - with increasing difficulty, for the present.

My heart aches for them, and us.

First of all, I think some of the data in this video is false. Second, people need to realize how these demographic projections are made: the estimators take the current data - birth rates, immigration rates, etc. - and calculate what will happen if these current rates remain constant over decades. There are several problems with this - 1) Muslim birthrates will drop. Initially, immigrants always have elevated birthrates. After a generation or two, the immigrant group’s birthrate levels off and resembles that of the host nation. 2) The current levels of Muslim immigration will not remain constant. European nations are already beginning to restrict immigration, and this will only increase in the future as Europe becomes more and more crowded and Europeans became more and more concerned over immigration.
I think Muslim immigration is a huge threat to Europe, but videos like this are unneccesarily alarmists. They do more damage to our movement than good because they cause many people to believe that our situation is hopeless. Here are some positive things to keep in mind: 1) when you hear that the population of a certain European country is 20% foreign-born, keep in mind that, usually, at least half of these “immigrants” are just people from other European countries, 2) with the exception of France, pretty much every country in Europe is at least 90% white, 3) most European countries have very strict citizenship requirements, so most of these immigrants and their children can be told to leave at any time, 4) even though Europe is still much “whiter” than America, Europeans are already beginning to wake up and support for nationalist parties across the continent is increasing, 5) there are some indications that European birthrates have bottomed out and may slowly begin to rebound, 6) polls tend to indicate that European youth are much more “right-wing” when it comes to their views on immigration than there parents are, so the future is in good hands, 7) immigrant populations in Europe are concentrated in large cities, making it appear to the common observer that the situation is worse than it actually is, 8) the economic downturn will likely cause many European governments to have to dramatically scale down social services, eliminating one of Europe’s major magnets for third-world immigration. The list could go on and on. Certainly, things are bad, but now is not the time to lose hope and give up. Stay positive and keep fighting.

I can’t help but feel that part of the problem is the United States. For far too long America has coddled Europe and allowed it to shelter under its defensive wing. This has encouraged Europe to turn itself into a welfare state-continent and think that Americans will always look after them. America should withdraw from NATO and FORCE Europe to get realistic about its situation and prospects.

I honestly wonder whether Europe will become part Islamic by 2100 or even 2050, especially places like France, Italy, Spain, and maybe even Germany and the UK. The rest of the Europeans will retreat to the north, and the line will be drawn when Russia moves west and drives back the advancing Muslims.

Don’t forget folks, whites do have the US and Canada. Think about that. The cities have minorities, but whites have most of the countryside. That means something. We need to hold onto the green forests, the cold mountains, the rivers and lakes. That is our natural habitat that Nature fashioned us for.

I believe the Muslim threat to Europe is greater than the United States because the European countries in question are smaller. However, in my lifetime, I’ve certainly witnessed the growth of Islam from an insignificant number of adherents to a substantial minority. They have already surpassed Jews in numbers as our largest non Christian minority.

As their numbers increase, I believe they will be much more politically assertive—we can count on that. With multiculturalism being the dominant American philosophy does the Muslim demand for separate “Shiria” courts seem so farfetched for the future? Demands for Gay marriage were unthinkable twenty years ago. Will Muslim polygamy be officailly recognized in another twenty years?

I honestly wonder whether Europe will become part Islamic by 2100 or even 2050,

PART ISLAMIC!!!!!! when were you in, France for excample, the last time, it is black muslim now, and it appears the Congo is running the customs areas of Francarabia

“I believe the Muslim threat to Europe is greater than the United States because the European countries in question are smaller. However, in my lifetime, I’ve certainly witnessed the growth of Islam from an insignificant number of adherents to a substantial minority. They have already surpassed Jews in numbers as our largest non Christian minority.”

This is true simply because Europe is right next door to Muslim countries. If the Muslims decide to unite and launch an offensive on Europe, they are right there. In Europe Muslims are a demographic threat. That is damned real, and they have done it before.

In the US, Muslims are a terrorism threat but not a real military threat or demographic threat. They can lobby and even try to sneak in a dirty bomb or bio weapon or something harmful, but they cannot move an army in and occupy us.

Here in the US the problem is drug cartel ruled Mexico that might collapse any time, Chavez and Castro flirting with Russia, and massive immigration of Hispanics. That is a demographic threat. If you think the Hispanics can’t take back California, Arizona, New Mexico, or Nevada, you better read up on how we took over Texas.

They can lobby and even try to sneak in a dirty bomb or bio weapon or something harmful, but they cannot move an army in and occupy us.

They (muslims) can of course, do all of the above. Speaking of the muslim army though, all that is needed is for Saudi masters to see that all of the muslims already here get the weapons, explosives and vehicles they need and much havoc can and would be wrought. I’ve said before that the muslims are just waiting to make such a move as they have done in so many other countries.

“I honestly wonder whether Europe will become part Islamic by 2100 or even 2050, especially places like France, Italy, Spain, and maybe even Germany and the UK. The rest of the Europeans will retreat to the north, and the line will be drawn when Russia moves west and drives back the advancing Muslims.
Don’t forget folks, whites do have the US and Canada.”
Posted by Anonymous at 8:53 AM

……………………….

I do agree with SKIP that your view is naive and completely unrealistic.

Good grief! When were you last in France or the UK? And they will be saved by Russia? Given the disparity in birthrates, Moslems are increasing in Russia as well.

And how much longer will whites have the US and Canada?
Please get real!

“This is true simply because Europe is right next door to Muslim countries. If the Muslims decide to unite and launch an offensive on Europe, they are right there.”
Anonymous

They don’t even have to launch an offensive. If Turkey gets into the EU (a project that the US government [under Bush,and now Obama] is insanely pushing) then a country with 76 million people and a high birthrate - virtually all Moslems - will be INSIDE the EU. It will be (after Germany) the most populous country in Europe, which can (and will) easily overrun the others; and it will be a funnel for the rest of the Middle East to come pouring in too.

For Europe, it will be a demographic and cultural disaster. It will, quite simply, be the end of Europe as we’ve always known it.

Of course, the forces of multiculturalism, whoever they might be, are thrilled at that prospect. They are eagerly awaiting it.

To Sardonicus

Aspects of Sharia law are already officially recognised in Britain. Furthermore, its tax and benefit system already recognises and rewards polygamous marriages that have been “legally” contracted abroad; it cannot be long before polygamy itself is accepted by English common law, or by officially-sanctioned Sharia here.

Canada people, last time I was in Toronto I thought was in Mecca/Beijing/Mumbai, and I am from Brooklyn

“Good grief! When were you last in France or the UK? And they will be saved by Russia? Given the disparity in birthrates, Moslems are increasing in Russia as well.”

Where did anyone say “saved” by Russia? Taken over is more like it.

Last time I checked, speaking out against the Muslim invasion is a criminal offense in places like the UK, France, Germany. The Western Europeans are far too rich, weak, atheistic, and apathetic to lift a finger in their own self defense. These cultures are officially on suicide watch at the moment.

Russians, for all their deficiencies, are still religious and still militaristic. It takes fire to fight fire, and they are the only Europeans I see with the mettle to stand up to the advancing Muslims.

Do you have any idea what Russians are like? Watch and learn:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0fUuOtyaVo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWZ8hBWNHKs

A far cry from the French wimp who let himself be assaulted on a school bus by shrimpy Arabs. Russians also have a lot of power over Europe with oil. Did you notice what happened in Iceland last year?

That’s not to say that some Scandinavians might push out the Muslims and form a northern alliance of some kind, but that will be to defend their territorial sovereignty more than to save the rest of Europe from Muslim proliferation. But the French and the British? I’ll believe it when I see it.

Where did anyone say “saved” by Russia? Taken over is more like it.

[Quote:] “the line will be drawn when Russia moves west and drives back the advancing Muslims.”

“Don’t forget folks, whites do have the US and Canada.”
Posted by Anonymous at 8:53 AM
………………………………..

Dives them back? Sounds like being “saved” to me. As for Canada, I agree with Anonymous from Brooklyn. The last time I was in Toronto, it looked more like like Karachi than Canada. And Vancouver was trying very hard to look like Canton — and succeeding!

“Do you have any idea what Russians are like? Watch and learn:”
Anonymous

Yes, I do have an idea! Do you? I have been there and don’t need to watch a video of a few freakish nazi-style exceptions strutting in the streets, to see “what Russians are like.” These are NOT your typical Russians! Historically, Russian peasants have been — both in the 20th century under the Bolsheviks and earlier under the czars — some of the most docile, apathetic, gullible, easily controlled people anywhere. A glimpse at Russia’s terrible history reveals the amazing amount of suffering and abuse they will put up with. Never in their tragic history have they known any kind of self-rule or freedom. It’s alien to them. Despotism has always been the standard. Their very best time was under the authoritarianism of the Czars. They are good people and they have my sympathy, but I don’t think they are the models or saviors we should be looking toward.

Europe will need to learn to save itself.

“Historically, Russian peasants have been — both in the 20th century under the Bolsheviks and earlier under the czars — some of the most docile, apathetic, gullible, easily controlled people anywhere. A glimpse at Russia’s terrible history reveals the amazing amount of suffering and abuse they will put up with.”

GHW, the question at hand here is nationalism and keeping out non-Russians. This is not a debate about who makes the best croissants or who has the most picturesque skyline or who has the best internal political system.

This is about the ability of Russians to remain non-Muslim and not walk down the Western European path of whites adopting PC toleration while all the non-whites ramp up their ethnic and religious demands against the white majority. Since you bring up Russian history, you might want to consider that Russia is a border state and that the Turks they are beating up are descended from people that conquered them.

If you think these Russian racist thugs are abnormal and totally at odds with the values of Russian society, you are wrong. The thugs and the narrators on those videos consistently say they have tacit support from the police. The worst thing said against them by a politician is that they are wasting their productive years on street thuggery. That is completely at odds with the political condemnation they would get anywhere in Western Europe, the US, Canada.

GHW, national particularism is not the same as racism. Nobody is advocating that Anglo-Saxon societies adopt Russian despotism as a culture of political system. A different point is being made: Russians are some of the only Europeans right now with the social support to remain ethnically Russian. Their only weakness is the same demographic weakness (not enough babies to keep population levels) that is facing all of Europe.

GHW, I question the degree to which you conceive of these problems as real geopolitical issues. France and the UK are in great danger of losing their cultural and ethnic integrity, and their reaction is to roll over like curs to insist on being beaten more. You are garbling these issues with intra-European poiltics and missing the bigger picture.

GHW,
I don’t think that the belief, apparently widespread in the uSA, that historically the Russian people (or peasantry or what have you), are typically a bovine, passive crowd of people really holds up to examination.
Firstly, communism was imposed (with popular support of a certain section of ethnically Russian workers and peasants, although the leaders might have been of another ethnicity), in the aftermath of popular discontent over the course of World War 1 and its effect on Russian living standards - it was a genuine popular revolt, the revolt involved much bloodshed on the part of its protagonists and was a long bitter struggle, the civil war between the ‘Whites’ and ‘Reds’ lasted many years and cost thousands of lives.
Previous to the revolution of 1917, Russia seetehed with popular discontent and the Anarchist and anti-monarchy faction were involved in much terrorism.
The Russian pogroms occurred around the same time in 19th century - and they show that the Russian peasant is far from a gentle humble creature.
Prior to that there were many ‘peasant revolts’ in Russain history, notably the Chmielnicki rebellion.
In fact Russian history is nothing more than a tale of resistance against some rather ruthless and unsavory eastern invaders - and the Russians prevailed in the end.
The history of Russian truculence continued through the communist period - a forgotten civil war waged in Ukraine through the late 40s, dissidents like Solzhenitsyn published, despite dire consequences and a great deal of hidden truculence occurred amongst the workers.
In short, I believe that the problem with Russai is that the Russian people are UNgovernable rather than being too docile!

Funny how the European peoples wore themselves out with so many fratricidal wars while ignoring the common and true enemy to the south of their continent.