Letter from a UK Union to Its Branches
Communication Workers Union (UK), March 19, 2009
Excerpt from the CWU’s latest “Urgent Information for Members”:
“The Race Advisory Committee has recently been discussing the issue of the BNP and their likely efforts to increase their votes before the European elections. As a consequence of these discussions the issue of the ‘conscience clause’ was raised and the need to make all postal workers, particularly those who work on delivery, aware of the ‘conscience clause’ which allows a delivery person the right to refuse to deliver election material, if the material they are delivering is considered offensive due to personal circumstances or beliefs that delivery of a particular item may incur personal risk.”
(Posted on March 24, 2009)
Comments
Except that the BNP has the most popular political website in England, any post office machinations might not matter.
Those intent on the destruction of Europe will stop at nothing to implement their Final Solution. We can expect the BNP website to be banned, its members persecuted and even assassinations of its leadership. The EU cronies and the Labour Party are unprincipled and ruthless. And yet they have the nerve to accuse people like us of being “haters”.
This is why any government employee who joins a union ought be fired, stripped of all acquired benefits, and blacklisted for life. A government union will eventually become a policy making body. The power to stop a government agency from doing any work is too great a power for Reds to overlook. What they can’t get through the legislature or the courts, they’ll get by having the civil service break the law.
All I know is if I were British I would sure vote for the BNP.
Does that mean that Postal workers can refuse to deliver election material from the Labour and Tory parties also?
There was an attempt at the Euro elections in ‘04 to persuade postal workers not to deliver BNP literature, with the result that some of the Party’s fliers were found discarded in skips etc. - all very illegal of course. But the overall effect was slight, I believe, and will be so again.
We have to remember, too, that the BNP’s position now is vastly different from how it was five years ago - then, we were very much the persecuted outsiders, wildly out of step with the politically correct “zeitgeist”. Now we are the ones they all fear, and so far has opinion shifted in so short a time that we are now said to be “practically surfing the zeitgeist”.That is a change which, if you have not yet felt it on your side of the pond, you soon will. So, while it was safe to maltreat us five years ago, it is no longer so and our country’s enemies are growing cautious.
These Trade Union bosses are a bunch of Red Totalitarian creeps. Already the UK’s National Union of Journalists (NUJ) have their NUJ guidelines on Race Reporting(it’s on the Internet). The NUJ state that the BNP must be ignored or if that’s not possible then only shown in an unfavourable light. These NUJ guidelines are a Red Fascist excuse for the neo-Marxist Lib/Lab/Con parties to thwart any opposition to their EU Federal Superstate/One-World government program. The NUJ’s Code of Conduct is also on the Internet and the one totally contradicts the other to any ordinary human being, but of course not to a brainwashed neo-Marxist. But the British people are at last awakening to the neo-Marxist liars and their days of lies and deceit fooling the British people are numbered.
“Does that mean that Postal workers can refuse to deliver election material from the Labour and Tory parties also?”
That would be AWESOME!
Mmmmmm,
Might be a good thing in a roundabout way - the ‘general public’ of England, most of whom are probably mystified by left-wing propaganda (and should not be underestimated either, by the way), might become suspicious of this BNP witch-hunt.
Once people start to smell ‘rotten fish’ they might take note and think, ‘Yes, why do I have to vote for the major parties? They don’t care about my family or even England!’
Interesting times ahead…
These people are dishonest even on their own terms.
The phrase that justifies non-delivery is: “offensive due to personal circumstances or beliefs that delivery of a particular item may incur personal risk.”
Clearly this does not apply to delivery of leaflets by a political party.
What’s that? Thought control, commmunications control and censure not by the government, nor by Big Brother, but by everybody’s mailman?
There are now far too many BNP supporters, some of whom may just follow some of these postal workers and film them discarding BNP election material, especially if the worker in not White. This can be construed as a racist act, especially if the mailman is clearly not being attacked in the street. Anyway, getting british postal workers (many of whom are immigrants) NOT to do any work, such as delivering letters, is not such a hard task. Just getting them to work in the first place is pretty difficult. They are, after all, labour party supporters and half way to being out-and-out communists. What the European laws are regarding interfering with European election material being legally mailed out I don’t know, but perhaps some legal eagle out there in AMREN-land will advise me (pro-bono of course!)
Not that I needed any other reasons but this is just one more example of why I hate the extortion regimes other wise known as unions.
The phrase that justifies non-delivery is: “offensive due to personal circumstances or beliefs that delivery of a particular item may incur personal risk.”
And muslim mail personel are offended or ‘outraged’ by such a wide variety of things, who can tell if mail will be delivered at all.
I woncer if Christians (and others) have the same right to be outraged? Or is this a priviledge reserved only to Moslems?