American Renaissance
Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Send This Page       Date Archives       Category Archives

Asylum Seeker Family Wins £150,000 Compensation

More news stories on Britain

Tom Whitehead, Telegraph (London), February 13, 2009

The compensation is believed to be the largest payout for such a case and has been handed to a Congolese family after the Home Office accepted their detention was unlawful.

The damages were agreed at the High Court after the family argued they had been left traumatised after immigration officials raided their home and took them to Yarlswood Detention Centre for 57 days in 2006.

The case centred, in particular, on the couple’s eight-year-old daughter who had psychological problems.

The family’s barrister, Stephanie Harrison, told Mr Justice Mackay that the Home Office now conceded that their detention was “unlawful from the outset”.

The mother arrived in the UK with her eldest daughter in 2002 but had her claim for asylum rejected three years later. The father arrived later but had his claim for asylum also turned down in 2005.

The couple had another daughter while here and put in a third claim as husband and wife which was refused in 2006.

Although the mother was still appealing her individual refusal in June of that year, she, her husband, and daughters, aged just eight and one, were woken in the early hours at their home in Dudley, West Midlands, and taken to Yarlswood Detention Centre, where they were held for 57 days.

After they were released, the Home Secretary again signed a removal order against them and another “dawn raid” followed in September the same year. This time the family was held for three days.

Miss Harrison said the Home Office had failed to abide by “its own stated policy” on asylum seekers, or take account of the impact of the raids on the children.

She said the entire family had been traumatised by the raids and detention.

The Home Office agreed to pay £46,500 damages to the father, £39,000 to his wife, £45,000 to the elder girl and £19,500 to the baby girl, who was born in the UK.

Mr Justice MacKay, who ordered that the family should not be identified, said: “This is a fair and reasonable settlement for the wrongs that were done to them.”

A UK Border Agency spokesman said: “The UKBA is actively working on alternatives to detaining families with children.

“During detention or removal from the UK, we take the welfare of families with children extremely seriously.

“Officers involved in family removals receive thorough training in procedures to minimise the distress caused. All members of the family are treated as sensitively as possible.”

Children’s Commissioner for England Sir Al Aynsley-Green said: “I am particularly pleased that the two children have also been awarded compensation by the court. It goes some way to righting this wrong.

“We are working with the UKBA to secure alternatives to detention and improvements to the asylum and immigration system for children. I will be publishing a report with recommendations and an action plan shortly.”

Original article

(Posted on February 13, 2009)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment     Send This Page      Search

Comments

1 — SKIP wrote at 5:49 PM on February 13:

A UK Border Agency spokesman said: “The UKBA is actively working on alternatives to detaining families with children.

The cure for this is not to let them into the country to begin with, we all see the trouble these miscreants get up to and they know they will win!!

2 — ranger wrote at 7:32 PM on February 13:

Personally I think his entire family should be taken in by Tony Blair. And if it isn’t Blair will have proven himself a liar and a manipulator.

3 — Graham of Wales wrote at 3:34 AM on February 14:

£150,000 - a nice tidy sum to set them up when they go back to their Congolese village in the near future.
(Or am I being naive and that in reality the whole family will remain in the UK and live off benefits for the rest of their lives as unfortunately there are not many jobs in Britain for Congolese asylum seekers without work permits).
And they wonder why Britons are moving to the Right in their thinking.

4 — fred wrote at 4:31 AM on February 14:

does anyone doubt the whole purpose of this settlement was to bully UKBA into shirking its responsibility?

5 — Anonymous wrote at 11:58 AM on February 14:

I guess the UK will just deduct the 150,000 pounds compensation from the tab the family has run up thus far in housing,food,education etc.

6 — SKIP wrote at 1:16 PM on February 15:

The British version of “Ghetto Lottery” Hahahahahha I love this stuff! With @ 300,000 U.S. dollars, imagine how many Congolese illegals these “people” can get into the country. And here I thought all of the Congolese were working at the CDG customs dept!

7 — Joanne wrote at 4:09 PM on February 15:

It absolutely disgusts me what is happening in my country.What these people get is beyond belief.

Do you know there have been a few cases in Glasgow,Scotland,where I live,of African asylum seeker females trying to get on buses with prams (strollers) and being told the bus is full by the driver,resulting in the African women taking the child out of the pram,leaving the pram and saying the Government will buy them a new one.

8 — KC wrote at 5:44 AM on February 19:

“£150,000 - a nice tidy sum to set them up when they go back to their Congolese village in the near future.
(Or am I being naive and that in reality the whole family will remain in the UK and live off benefits for the rest of their lives”

Sadly you’re being naive, trust me, they’ll live off of benefits the rest of their lives.

9 — Grahamof Wales wrote at 4:20 PM on February 19:

Stehanie Harrison, the family’s barrister, has made a nice little earner out of this type of case.
Well done, Steph.
Notable Cases
Stephanie has appeared in numerous reported cases. The following is a summary of her most important recent work.
Asylum:

Shah and Islam v SHHD, HL (see above)

Lul Omar Adan and others, HL (see above)

R v Uxbridge Magistrates Court ex parte Adimi and others, DC (Article 31)

Thomas Danian v IAT, CA (bad faith)

SSHD v Danaie, CA (Adjudicator’s finding binding on SSHD)

Salem v SSHD CA, HL (benefits)

Muktiar Singh v SSHD, SIAC (Article 3) ECHR/National Security Deportation
Immigration:

R v SSHD ex parte Arman Ali (recourse to public funds and Article 8)

R v SSHD ex parte Obi (illegal entry and British citizenship)

Baumbast and R v SSHD, ECJ (free movement rights)

Britons’ epiphany is overdue, methinks.
Breaking news: Osama Bin Liner’s right hand man in Europe has today received £2.5K compensation from the NuLabor government.
Also, a murderer of 13 plus attacks on 7 more is being considered for release. Who’s Britain next PM….Homer Simpson??



Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Send This Page      Search