American Renaissance
Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Send This Page       Date Archives       Category Archives

Immigration Law Makes Deportations Easy—But Life Hard

More news stories on Immigration Law Enforcement

Greg Mellen, Contra Costa Times, Dec. 31, 2008

When Veasana Ath got busted for residential burglary in 2004, he had no idea that his future as a U.S. resident was imperiled.

Ath came to this country with his family as a toddler. Although he never became a citizen, he never thought he was anything but American.

After doing three months in jail, Ath was picked up by the Immigration and Naturalization Service, predecessor to the current Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

By the end of the year, he was in Cambodia penniless, with no job, no family or friends and virtually no chance of ever returning home.

The story of Ath and 188 other Cambodian-Americans sent back to their homes has its roots in the 1996 presidential race, the aftermath of the first terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in 1993 and the roiling world of immigration politics.

When the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act was passed by Congress in 1996, among its main goals was expelling and stiffening penalties against aliens who overstay visa allowances and improving security against illegal immigration on the borders and internally.

The law came in the wake of the 1993 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center, when immigration was a hot topic in the run-up to the 1996 presidential election.

While the law achieved some its objectives, it also spawned a population of immigrants, green-card holding “lawful permanent residents,” who could be more easily deported.

One reason for this was a provision in the law that greatly expanded the list of crimes that qualified as “aggravated felonies” that would make aliens deportable.

When the category of “aggravated felonies” was first added to immigration law in 1988, it encompassed only murder and trafficking in drugs or firearms.

Those crimes along with a number of other violent and sex crimes remain as deportable offenses. But the 1996 law also added dozens of lesser offenses. These can include forgery, burglary, tax evasion, domestic abuse and any attempt to commit an aggravated felony.

A number of crimes make aliens deportable if the sentence is a year or more, regardless of time served or whether the sentence was suspended. It even includes crimes that are misdemeanors in some states.

The legislation also reduced leeway for judges to consider providing relief. Issues such as immigration status, time lived in the U.S., existence of family who are citizens, ties to the community, or service to the U.S., including military, are not considered.

Whether this was an intended consequence depends on to whom you talk. But the fallout has been substantial.

Separating families

According to a Human Rights Watch report in July 2007, deportation of legal immigrants convicted of crimes “has separated an estimated 1.6 million children and adults, including U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents from their non-citizen family members.”

It has hit hard in the Cambodian-American community in Long Beach since 2002, when Cambodia began accepting deportees.

{snip}

Original article

(Posted on January 2, 2009)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment     Send This Page      Search

Comments

1 — Peejay in Frisco wrote at 5:55 PM on January 2:

Did you see the episode on “Americas Most Wanted”where a Cambodian who was a wannabe Black Ghet-toe thug shot and killed a white boy who he had stolen from his car a stereo system?This happened in Utah. This incident alone is a good reason to deport permanently any non citizen back to where they came from if they commit a serious crime.

2 — A Reader wrote at 7:10 PM on January 2:

It just isn’t fair to deport green card holders who commit serious crimes.

On the contrary.

One of the main reasons of imposing a lengthy wait on eligibility for citizenship is to test an immigrant as a prospective American. And once he failed the test, he should be kicked out, period.

This nation has absolutely no interest in importing criminally tainted genes and mixing them with already imperfect ours. America does not exist in order to help the immigrants. The immigrants exist in order to help America. So, once they are not helpful, not needed, or otherwise not desirable, they are out of place here.

3 — John PM wrote at 8:45 PM on January 2:

“Those crimes along with a number of other violent and sex crimes remain as deportable offenses. But the 1996 law also added dozens of lesser offenses. These can include forgery, burglary, tax evasion, domestic abuse and any attempt to commit an aggravated felony.”

I had to read that paragraph about four times, then I bellowed laughter boisterously, and finally composed myself enough to write my following comments below.

What on God’s great green earth is wrong in general with this country and in particular, with utterly worthless Red imbeciles like this Comrade Mellen? It is totally absurd that even minimal “humanitarian” considerations should be given to criminals who are aliens, let alone his myopically suggested mollycoddling of them.

‘Oh, what a pity these criminal invaders were deported,’ his kind holds.

Oh, what a pity they were not simply made to abruptly cease to be on the spot once detected, I hold.

End of story!

4 — Memphomaniac wrote at 11:54 PM on January 2:

Residential burglary? as in “home invasion”? Yeah, that is good enough reason to send any green card holder back to his own country, no matter how long the felon has been in this country.

EXCEPT….make sure they do the time FIRST. Being a foreign citizen does not absolve them from their debt to society for their felony act. Do the time….then deport.

5 — Michael C. Scott wrote at 12:45 PM on January 3:

“Not fair”?

Compared to what? Surely this Ath character knew residential burglary was a serious no-no! Residential burglary, unlike burglary of a school or commercial building is considered a violent crime in most US states - whether the residence is occupied or not.

The article says that this deportation law has hit the Long Beach Cambodians particularly hard. Golly; perhaps they should stop breaking into other people’s homes.

6 — ciccio wrote at 2:17 PM on January 3:

I must disagree with Memphomaniac, not when doing time costs the taxpayer $40,000 a year and life in jail is far far better than freedom in the poverty stricken third world.

7 — Anonymous wrote at 7:11 PM on January 3:

“deportation of legal immigrants convicted of crimes has separated an estimated 1.6 million children and adults, including U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents, from their non-citizen family members.”

The family can reunify in their home country. Church groups can raise the money to fly the family to their loved ones side.

8 — Fed Up wrote at 7:13 PM on January 3:

How many MILLION CRIMES BY ILLEGAL ALIENS will it take… to wake our political hacks up in Washington, D.C.? When was ANY border-jumper ever checked for a criminal background? For a history of rape, child molestation, etc.?

We see too many criminals among the illegal aliens in our local Houston area news. Nor is it rational to think Houston is the ONLY part of the country suffering from an epidemic of crime by illegal aliens.

9 — Greg Deane wrote at 1:28 AM on January 4:

I can only add my voice to the sense of outrage already expressed regarding the concern for immigrant criminals who come to Western countries uninvited, break our laws, violate our persons and property and then demand humanitarian consideration be afforded them that their own cultures, normally tribe or clan based, do not provide. If they do provide it, they rarely do so outside their own narrow communities; and when it is provided, it is normally provided with bribes, euphemistically described as gifts.

In Australia, we recently had difficulty with a so-called Muslim medical doctor from India, Mohammed Haneef. He had links to the Muslims who bombed tube stations in London in July, 2006. These bombers were his cousins-I think two of them were.

The Australian Federal Police arrested him, and questioned him over a number of days, in connection with a phone card, the sort of thing that could be used to detonate bombs. Apparently there was some error in procedure.

Now this Haneef is demanding an apology, and he ‘is thinking’ about claiming compensation. He is a sleazy little opportunist, a doctor who had to borrow his plane fare out of Australia, before he was arrested. It is an unusual medical practitioner who doesn’t have the price of an air ticket to India from Australia. His hurry was also suspicious.

Yet the human rights industry is championing his cause, and perhaps he will be set up for life at the expense of the Australian taxpayer. He will then be in a position to import more of his jihadists relatives who set up explosive devices in Australian train stations.

But of course we can’t stereotype or prejudge the likes of Haneef.

10 — Anonymous wrote at 12:05 AM on April 29:

Cambodians are not illegal, they’re legal residents. I don’t see anybody deporting any white people back to Europe, or complaining about Canadians crossing the border. Yes I understand committing a crime is wrong, but it isn’t right for somebody to serve their sentence, and then, get deported. Is that what you call “justice”? That just isn’t right, that is inhumane!


Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Send This Page      Search