American Renaissance
Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Send This Page       Date Archives       Category Archives

Akaka Bill Impact Revealed

More news stories on Indians

The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, January 7, 2009

The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii (GRIH) has released a new study from the Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University. “The Economic Impact of the Akaka Bill: Unintended Consequences for Hawaii” estimates that the Akaka bill could cost the state up to $690 million per year in lost revenue. The Native Hawaiian Government Reorganization Act of 2007 (S.310 and H.R.505) in the 110th Congress, also known as the Akaka Bill after sponsor Senator Daniel Akaka, proposes to create a sovereign Native Hawaiian Governing Entity (NHGE) within the state of Hawaii. While the terms of the bill are vague, the most likely effect would be to vest this new Native Hawaiian government with the rights to land now owned by the state, to the detriment of non-Native Hawaiian taxpayers and, correspondingly, the state economy. This is the first study on the economic impacts of the proposed bill, which is expected to be re-introduced in the new session of Congress.

{snip}

Among the study’s findings are:

* The bill could exempt Native Hawaiians living or shopping on land ceded from the state from paying state income and sales taxes.

* There may be a transfer of state-owned lands to persons designated as Native Hawaiians to the detriment of non-Native Hawaiian taxpayers and, correspondingly, to the state economy.

* The resulting tax increases would have large, negative impacts on the state’s economy leading to a possible reduction of 20,793 private sector jobs, a loss of $417.2 million in investment and a loss of $1,461 in real per-capita disposable personal income annually.

“We’ve looked at the bill, as introduced in the last session of Congress, from many different angles and have provided an objective in-depth analysis of what the economic impacts might be on Hawaii and its citizens,” said Dr. David Tuerck, Executive Director of the Beacon Hill Institute and co-author of the study. “In ‘The Economic Impact of the Akaka Bill: Unintended Consequences for Hawaii’ we’ve identified the most likely effects of the Akaka Bill on the Hawaiian economy. By almost any plausible interpretation of the bill, those effects are uniformly negative,” adds Paul Bachman, Director of Research at Beacon Hill.

[Editor’s Note: “The Economic Impact of the Akaka Bill: Unintended Consequences for Hawaii” can be read or downloaded as a PDF file here.]

Original article

(Posted on January 12, 2009)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment     Send This Page      Search

Comments

1 — John PM wrote at 7:28 PM on January 12:

‘“In ‘The Economic Impact of the Akaka Bill: Unintended Consequences for Hawaii’ we’ve identified the most likely effects of the Akaka Bill on the Hawaiian economy. By almost any plausible interpretation of the bill, those effects are uniformly negative,” adds Paul Bachman, Director of Research at Beacon Hill.’

Big surprise there!

What will Hawaii be in 20 years, if it no longer suckles at the teat of Aunt Sam; my guess is either a Chinese slave colony, or the Pacific’s reflection of Zimbabwe? After all, what else has so-called “independence” from the West, brought to “indigenous” peoples such as these “Hawaiians”?

Nothing, but a false sense of “pride” and opened hands and mouths, clutching back to the West for its crusts; and that is all it will ever give them.

As always, God help us all!

2 — Tusky wrote at 9:50 PM on January 12:

Give it back to the Hawaiians! It produces nothing, it is tax negative, and it basically is a platform for the Senators from Japan.

Yeah, it’s pretty. So is mainland America and that is our chief interest.

Tusky

3 — Whiteplight wrote at 10:16 PM on January 12:

They are simply hoping to hog the tourist trade, that is all. If it wasn’t so pathetic, it would be funny because they will fail at all their plans due to the problem they have of “living on Hawaiian time.”

4 — Anonymous wrote at 12:04 AM on January 13:

They should just give Hawaii its independence. It was a mistake to make it a state in the first place.

5 — flyingtiger wrote at 12:40 AM on January 13:

This is just like Quebec. They wanted independance until they learned they would have to increase taxes to pay for services that the Canadian government provides.

6 — Michael C. Scott wrote at 1:56 PM on January 15:

I think full independence for Hawaii would be the best approach. Close all the bases there, prohibit travel from Hawaii to the mainland, and raise the wrecks of USS Arizona and USS Utah and scuttle them in deep water.

7 — Anonymous wrote at 2:27 PM on January 16:

If Whites don’t rule Hawaii, Chinese or Japanese will. I care nothing about tourism or the rights of indigenous people to soil their nest. We need to get our military out of Korea and Japan, but keep the bases in Hawaii. We stay out of Asia’s way, and they stay out of ours. I don’t want the Chinese navy operating out of Pearl Harbor.


Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Send This Page      Search