Facebook, Myspace, Youtube Are ‘Recruiting Tools for Hate Groups’

Most of the people in this article are expressing opinions. They may be repugnant IMHO, but they’re still opinions. Except for this Brian Marcus character, who is giving official Federal government imprimatur to slandering those who express un-PC race opinions as terrorists. He personally and HLS are opening themselves for lawsuits.

“There are sites on Facebook and MySpace that promote civil rights but there are many, many more that demonize Jews and Muslims and Gays and other minorities,” he said.

Wow, is there nothing in between the two extremes? You’re either promoting “civil rights” or you’re promoting “hate?” I thought there was a whole range of views on these sites, from far left extremism to far right. The people obviously live in a bipolar universe.

Thank God there is now a way for race realists to get out the truth about black on white crime and violence. 1.5 million black on white crimes per year are totally covered up by the media.

As for the ADL, it is an anti white hate group. It helps fund and sponsor Tim Wise’s “whites must be eliminated” seminars and speeches.

“THE popular websites MySpace, Facebook and YouTube are being used as recruiting tools by extremist groups, experts have warned.”

“Extremist groups?” Do they mean like the leftist nutcases who attack speakers who have a different point of view or the ones who run through the streets with no clothes on, throwing molotov cocktails at the police, in protest of globalism, global warming, or the lost habitat of the green back snail, and capitalist profits?

The only danger from extremist groups I’ve seen are the leftist, violent radicals who are engaged in violence.

Everything else are complete fabrications from people who are brainwashed to the point of insanity.

Martin Luther King Jr and Barry Goldwater both implied they were proud of being an ‘extremist’. MLK even said “maybe what the world needs right now is an extremist”. I guess we’re not living in MLK times…

I read one today online I thought was pretty interesting… it read “kill diversity”.

“Extremist groups,” “hatemongers,” blah, blah, blah. Round up the usual straw men, which of course go carefully undefined except as supposedly preaching “hate.” Why when such articles are written by the media does it never occur to the reporter to wonder if these liberal “watchdogs” are merely trying to silence those with whom they have ideological disagreements?

And by the way: What precisely is this “hate” that these people keep warning us about? Why don’t they ever give us a specific definition of it? While they’re at it, they could do the same for the word “racism.” Or is it like the famous explanation a supreme court justice once gave about “pornography”: “I can’t define it, but I know it when I see it.”

We’ll be seeing more of these kind of stories under an Obama regime. And please enjoy your free internet access while you can—it’s days are numbered. You’ll be telling your grandkids about the old days when there we’re open forums, like Amren, and they will just look at you as if you’re crazy.

‘recruiting tools by extremist groups’
I don’t think this statement is fair, sure this is a social networking site so yes you can find like minded people (at varying levels of maturity and sophistication).
But the decision is always your own in terms of who you communicate with. And I have never been approached by any such group, though I am attracted to conservative thought.
And there is alot of anti-white and anti-conservative sentiment also within (not mentioned in this article of course).
Look at most conservative video’s and these days you’ll find alot of pro-Obama gloating.
See example: http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=e1aCXMgephw
It is free expression at it’s best.
Which of course this is dangerous to ‘the powers that be’, people thinking for themselves and discussing their ideas freely.
Plus there is not alot of money being made by anyone off the content.
I Know find it alot more entertaining and educational than my $120 per month cable television subscription (whose days are numbered).

Just to add, here are a couple of examples of videos they probably want to censor (contain no sex, graphic violence, swearing etc).

Quirky montage of banned WB and Disney cartoons
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmCd0QXTS7I

Obama gives support to his Kenyan cousin in elections, which leads to bloodshed because he didn’t win (sound familar)?
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=a0zwvyPDQgw

Black preacher James David Manning, PhD warns white people about Obama.
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=e_aIvfFq3BA

We have to keep the internet free!

The only hate I see is for those who didn’t want to vote for Obama. I’m sure these hate-investigators are moving to get right on top of that. On top of these haters who didn’t vote for Obama, that is.

Blacks are something like 20 times more likely to commit violence against whites, while 2 to 3 times more likely to commit officially designated hate crimes (which is itself worthy of ‘equal justice’ investigation).

It’s a good thing they are right on top of that with this article about ‘hate’ here…

The Internet: Where the men are men, the women are men and children are the FBI… and I might add… and the ‘hate groups’ are the SPLC undercover.

Mr. Wolf, a lawyer and expert in internet laws says, “There are sites on Facebook and MySpace that promote civil rights but there are many, many more that demonize Jews and Muslims and Gays and other minorities.”

What about the thousands of Hollywood movies, big movies not little mom & pop production web sites, that demonize white people. “To Kill a Mockingbird”, “In the Heat of the Night” are just two blockbusters still sending out the message for over fifty years that white people are demons.

When Stefan Glaser, Deborah Lauter, and Christopher Wolf use some of the million of dollars they collect to watch dog the MSM for their hate the white race messages, then we can take them seriously.

And if there is anything really dangerous afoot in America it is Brian Marcus and his Homeland Secret Police who are itching to kill the internet on the pretext that it is spewing hate too often.

We could lose the internet at any time, particularly in
the next few years if Obama get one of his on Supreme Court.
Australia is about to lose internet freedom. So, what happens to
our movement then? It’s just one more reason to get us all to-
gether in given areas. After all, the battle will be fought on
the physical plain not in cyber space. Northwest Migration, an
idea whose time has come.

Their idea of extremeist groups also includes any individual who criticizes Obama. I have a myspace account and already at least thre people that I know of had their accounts deleted because some Obama supporter who complained.

For these liberal idiots, not being afraid to tell the truth about racial issues equals hate.

You’d have to be a naive fool to believe these diveristy worshippers are trying to promote love.

This is very concerning to me. They say protecting minorities but I live in South Africa, bet you $100 Million, I will not receive that protection because I am part of a white minority. They could in fact silence any form of communication we have with the outside world and any anti white hate speech will not be included in this virus, they will only target white groups and white groups only. Free speech must be insured.

Some here are saying that we need to keep the internet free, and indeed, ensuring that the internet remains uncontrolled needs to be a priority of everyone here.

Here is a PBS program that touches on everything involved in this ensurance, termed “net neutrality”, as well as many topics related to it. I think even people who are aware of the issues should watch it have they not already:

Bill Moyers on America: “The Net at Risk”:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmlpfXzSfhg

Anyone interested may also want to know about Community Internet:

http://www.freepress.net/communityinternet

…and the means of achieving it I find the most fascinating — Wireless Mesh Networking:

http://communication.howstuffworks.com/how-wireless-mesh-networks-work.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_mesh_network
http://www.freepress.net/communityinternet/mesh

Hate against Whites and Christians is OK. That won’t be called hate.

“Free Speech, can only be free speech; when free speech can be offensive.” Robert Griswold

We can offend Christians, conservatives, and such. The Tyrants that once demanded their free speech to attack our American way of life are now the ones demanding that ours be taken away.

What are they afraid of? Bad ideas fall into the garbage can of history. Where are the Flat Earth People?

They know all to well that “Ideas have consequences” Francis Schaeffer

Ho hum. The usual anti-white bigots are trying to keep white folks from meeting up as white folks. Any identity is fine with these haters and bigots, so long as it isn’t the genuine identity that all white people have: our unique genotype and unique phenotype on this dark planet.

The paradox of “freedom”: it enables people to do whatever they want, including things that threaten “freedom.”

This is why no serious political leader uses it except as a selling point. In reality-land (far away from USA), governments think in terms of privileges and the assessment of actions as whether they get us closer to or farther away from a goal. Only in wartime do democracies approach this clarity.

If we have “freedom,” it should be legitimate for people to wage warfare against geranium owners if they please. But that offends those who think “freedom” means “freedom to keep the peace, and everyone else gets excluded.”

“The virus of hate certainly has infected those technologies”

Hate is not a virus. It is an opinion.

If you don’t like the “changes” being forced on society by liberals and immigrants, and you like the relatively sane,polite, civil, non0barbaric society we once had, this makes you an “extremist”?
Welcome to Orwells’ fiction turned to fact.

Use whatever freedom of speech you have now. Talk to everyone you know, everyone you meet. Everyone within reason.
I’ve found many whites are receptive to what I have to say. almost universally they simlpy don’t know what’s going on. I always tell them to research what I say to verify it.

But it’s A-OK to “recruit” anything else under the sun the LEFT doesn’t deem “hateful” no matter how legitimately “hateful” they really are!

I am against any movement that promotes any sort of violence or what I consider REAL hate. But most of these groups expressing themselves on these mediums are more than likely harmless; they are just trying to act as a voice for white people and rightfully so. As for the author claiming that these groups suddenly seem to be growing; well what does he expect? When you push whites against the wall, they WILL react. I am surprised it has taken this long.

So any time a group of white people meet together it’s “evil” and “hate”? I guess the only time whites are allowed to come together for racial stuff is when we are anti-white and promoting white guilt. Whites like that make me sick. God hope they don’t breed!

Once more we see haters who hate what they call hate groups. Is it against the law to have enemies whom by definition one hates?

Notice if they represent white culture, pride or causes, it is hate. If they represent blacks or illegal aliens it is good!

Well, I hate bees. I hate scammers. I hate users. Should I be charged with a “hate crime”?

The idea that certain so called authority’s believe they have the right to banish certain emotions in those they disagree with, is hateful against the full spectrum of human nature.Is hateful against freedom. The banning of certain thoughts is not something the creator did, so how is it the province of these self proclaimed censor’s? The true haters are those that would banish free thought and free speech, these are the enemy’s of America.

This kind of Marxist thinking will lead to claims that “The virus of hate has infected the thoughts of whites” and mass forced lobotomies will become the order of the day. The average defeatist poster to this site will whine and moan about it but do nothing whatsoever to stop it. Apparently they would rather die on their knees complaining than die on their feet fighting.

Gentlemen, we all must die one day and dying in battle against evil forces is vastly preferable to dying one day at a time in a hospital hooked up to a machine…

The worst thing is that many rationalists and others are getting banned for merely beeing critical of or poking fun at religions or religion in general. This is falsely beeing called racism and hate speech, and we are beeing banned and silenced in the name of P.C. ‘religious tolerance”. Tolerance is good, but that also extends to those with intolerant opinions. This is not even about tolerance to them, it’s about silencing anyone with an umpopular opinion about religion! It’s not toelrance they are themselves endorsing but their own brand of intolerance.

But, even with racist or prejudiced speech. People have a right to it. I despise racism and racists mkyself, but I still think they have the right to speak/express their vile opinions.
This political correction is a threat and danger to freedom, democracy, justice, and humanity!

“Toleration is not the opposite of intolerance but the counterfeit of it. Both are despotisms: the one assumes to itself the right of withholding liberty of conscience, the other of granting it.”
— Thomas Paine, The Rights of Man

“I have always strenuously supported the right of every man to his own opinion, however different that opinion might be to mine. He who denies another this right makes a slave of himself to his present opinion, because he precludes himself the right of changing it.”
— Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason

“He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.”
— Thomas Paine, Dissertations on First Principles of Government (July 7, 1795),