Rich Flanders Seeks More Autonomy
| More news stories on Europe |
|---|
Henri Astier, BBC News, Sept. 30, 2008
Speed cameras—hardly popular anywhere—are a source of particular irritation in Flanders.
More than 1,000 have been installed across the Dutch-speaking northern part of Belgium, while Wallonia, the French-speaking southern half, has only a handful.
Yet revenue from fines is collected centrally and redistributed. Many Flemish motorists not only resent being caught speeding, but feel they are subsidising freewheeling Walloons in the process.
The speed cameras provide a neat snapshot of Flemish grievances.
“The hard-working north is supporting the south, just like in Italy,” says Pascal Francois, 42, an architect from the town of Aalst.
Flanders indeed has wealth, a hard-working population, and beautiful, world-famous cities—like Bruges, Ghent and Antwerp.
Many there are asking why their taxes should prop up what they regard as a lagging, mismanaged region.
“Walloons should be responsible for what they do,” says Roger Vandervoorde, 65, a retired sales director, sipping a drink in front of Ghent’s picture-perfect cathedral.
“The best would be a confederation, with each part responsible for itself and only a few small matters handled federally.”
Deadlock
Such reform is precisely what the Belgian government, dominated by a Flemish conservatives, has in mind.
But the Walloons are digging in their heels. They regard confederation as secession in all but name, and insist on keeping tax and welfare policies at federal level.
As a result Belgium has not had an effective government since the June 2007 elections.
Pressure in Flanders for more devolution is coming from both ordinary voters and business leaders.
Luc De Bruyckere, chairman of the Ghent-based food group Ter Beke and vice-president of FEB, Belgium’s main employers’ federation, says a more regional approach to economic policy is urgently needed.
He points out that Flanders has a very tight labour market, while Wallonia is suffering from 17% unemployment.
“We have to organise ourselves in such a way that the different problems can be answered,” Mr De Bruykere says.
“One size fits all is not a solution.”
Remi Vermeiren, a former chairman of the banking giant KBC, contends that Flemish people “believe more in a market economy” than Walloons, and argues for outright independence for Flanders.
But resurgent Flemish pride is based on much deeper forces than just material wealth.
The cultural divide between Europe’s Germanic north and Latin south has run through the middle of Belgium since the Roman Empire.
“We are a very dual country with two areas that differ in many, many ways,” Mr Vermeiren says.
Language problem
The sense of Flemish identity is all the more acute as it was suppressed by the French-speaking elites that ran Belgium after the 1830 revolution.
The constitution was written in French. A Dutch version, written a century later, was not given equal legal force until 1967.
As the Dutch-speaking majority demanded recognition, it was mainly pressing claims against the Belgian state.
From the 1960s—with the south’s old mining and steel industries in terminal decline and the north powering ahead—a series of constitutional reforms gradually devolved more powers to the regions.
But for all its economic dominance and political assertiveness, the Flemish still feels culturally on the back foot—and this contributes to their prickliness.
Wallonia may be poorer, but it is part of the 200m-strong francophone community.
The Flemish are not standing on the shoulders of a friendly giant next door—and can be irked by Walloon cultural self-assurance.
Language is a particular sore point. Like their Dutch brethren, the Flemish are taught from an early age the need to learn foreign languages. Walloons are not.
“If we take part in a meeting with, say, eight Dutch-speakers and two French-speakers—we often all end up speaking French so everyone can understand,” says Naima Charkaoui of Minderhedenforum, a Brussels-based umbrella group for immigrant associations.
Suburban fears
Flemish defensiveness is at its sharpest near Brussels. The capital, which used to have a Dutch-speaking majority until the early 20th Century, is now overwhelmingly francophone.
Its population is spreading outward in search of greenery and cheaper homes—a move that many in the Flemish suburbs find threatening.
Liederkerke, a traditionally working-class town 15 miles (25km) west of Brussels, is one of many suburbs that have seen an influx of both rich expatriates and African immigrants.
“That cocktail is leading to Liederkerke being more French and that is growing fast,” says town councillor Johan Daelman, who worries about the “invasion” faced by the city.
The number of families without a Dutch-speaking parent has doubled in the past four years, to reach almost a quarter of the 13,000-strong population.
The town clearly feels the need to remind newcomers where they are.
One sign, featuring the Flemish lion, proclaims: “Liedekerke, where the Flemish are at home.” Another reads: “Welcome to our Flemish commune.”
From Mr Daelman, the message is: “You can come, but don’t bring big-city problems and respect local people.”
Mr Daelman belongs to the right-wing Vlaams Belang (Flemish Interest) party, which seeks a separate Flemish Republic.
“Belgium will not stay united,” he predicts. “You don’t have a Belgian language or a Belgian nation. You only have Flemish and Walloon people—plus a few Germans.”
Allegiance
Vlaams Belang, widely regarded as xenophobic, is shunned by mainstream parties and in opposition everywhere, including the Liedekerke municipality.
Despite—or perhaps because of—its pariah status, the party has achieved considerable success in recent years by attracting protest votes.
It is the largest single party in the Flemish parliament.
However a wide majority in Flanders reject Flemish separatism. Most people just want more autonomy within the Belgian state.
“The problem with parties like Vlaams Belang is that they make our job a lot more difficult,” says Sam Custers, director of a Flemish cultural centre in Kraainem, another suburb of Brussels.
“They create a negative image of Flanders. Our message is: we’re open to everyone.”
Flemish pride rarely takes a virulent form. French-speakers visiting Flanders are not in hostile territory. The worst risk they might take is not being served until they make a token attempt to speak Dutch.
But even the least nationalist among the Flemish know where their main allegiance lies.
“I am Flemish first, Belgian second,” says Pascal Francois of Aalst.
(Posted on September 30, 2008)
Comments
The British are partly to blame for creating the mess that is Belgium. I welcome the independence of Flanders.
Posted by at 7:26 PM on September 30
Look at the conditions in the U.K. and tell me seiously that anybody could possibly pay heed to anything the BBC reports. After all, the BBC thinks whites in the U.K. are racists. The BBC tows the multiculti line. They are in no position to judge anybody. And sure as Hell not qualified to do so.
Posted by at 9:33 PM on September 30
Main issue is not Flemish neither Wallons. Main issue is 1,5 million french speaking arabs in Brussels. They were brought by french speaking politicians to “raise” french vote.
Posted by RL at 8:35 AM on October 1
The main issue is the welfare dependency of the Walloons, very much as in the states where a certain sector contributes very little to the economy whilst demanding - and getting the largest share of welfare.
Posted by ciccio at 1:50 PM on October 1
“The main issue is the welfare dependency of the Walloons”
cicio
—————
I wonder if you might be confusing those “Walloons” with the hundreds of thousands of FRENCH-SPEAKING Arabs who have been invited in, as RL said, in order to raise the “French-speaking” vote.
Posted by at 10:13 PM on October 1
“The main issue is the welfare dependency of the Walloons”
cicio
—————
I wonder if you might be confusing those “Walloons” with the hundreds of thousands of FRENCH-SPEAKING Arabs who have been invited in, as RL said, in order to raise the “French-speaking” vote.
Posted by at 10:14 PM on October 1
The BBC is an extremely anti-white organisation. All Brits should boycott the TV licence and end the BBC.
Posted by at 7:25 AM on October 4