Comments
It’s good to know these bigots are whining, but I doubt that they have much clout with anybody.
This is just another indication that non-whites’ only desire in coming to this country is to take over and push whites out of their native land. They don’t want equality. They want power and domination.
Just another radical anti-white org that needs to be added to the list.
Posted by Robert Kelly at 6:09 PM on May 9
“La Raza” (The Race) denounces racial hate. Insert laugh tracks here.
Posted by Question Diversity at 6:19 PM on May 9
“I am continually puzzled and outraged by the idea that anyone can say anything about Latinos without fearing any consequence.”
I wonder what consequence this writer has in mind. And, as far as I have ever heard, nothing illegal is mentioned on right-wing radio. What depressing times, I hope our day comes soon!
Posted by at 6:36 PM on May 9
What a stupid man I am!!! This article says: Latinos want Latino majority in the USA and this is okay. I want White majority in the USA and I am wrong. I cannot understand this intricated ‘logic’. You see, how stupid I am?!
Posted by at 6:53 PM on May 9
Are we not allowed to express our own opinions on the invasion of our country?
Have we not the right to favor our own people over the swarms of foreigners that come here and demand equality, and even preference?
So where does TB come from if not the tsunami of unwanted third worlders?
Posted by Schoolteacher at 7:12 PM on May 9
Why it should have taken SIX people to write (or perhaps copy/paste) this boilerplate antiwhite nonsense about “hispanics” baffles me, but just for the record, here are their names:
Faiz Shakir, Amanda Terkel, Satyam Khanna, Matt Corley, Ali Frick, and Benjamin Armbruster
Please note this team of mestizo defenders sounds 50% middle-eastern (and/or black), 50% anglo (and/or black), and ZERO PERCENT hispanic.
Draw your own conclusions.
Also, their claims that “right-wing radio claims 91 percent of radio airwaves” is preposterous on its face. It doesn’t claim anything close to 91% of the AM band, and virtually NONE of the FM band. So these authors are either liars or morons or both.
Posted by Right-Wing Rocker at 7:18 PM on May 9
Like all leftists, La Raza, CAIR, and other anti-American groups seek to silence those Americans who dare to expose them for what they are.
Posted by RED at 7:28 PM on May 9
“These hatemongers have made clear their primary concern: maintaining a white majority. Just this year, Fox News’s John Gibson gave ‘a big round of applause’ on his radio show to the ‘non-Hispanic white women’ who were having babies, which he said vindicated his call on ‘the dominant, or largest population sector, which is Caucasians,’ to ‘make more babies.’”
But I would ask these hopelessly hate filled Marxist “authors” of this ludicrous report, what do you feel is so wrong about maintaining a white majority? Just what is it in your “progressive” agenda Comrades: Faiz Shakir, Amanda Terkel, Satyam Khanna, Matt Corley, Ali Frick, and Benjamin Armbruster, that requires the white majority be reduced to simply a large but still shrinking minority by 2025? These are particularly burning questions, considering that so much of your insanely radical agenda (from population control to verdant ecomania) is tabled, so as to achieve it. Is “diversity’ so much more important, that even Mother Earth must be sacrificed for it Comrades?
After all, America and Americans are said to be the world’s most avaricious consumers of declining resources. We currently only have a replacement population level of 2.5 children on average; white Americans being among the lowest in the pack, at about 1.8 children on average. Thus, by adding “new” Americans, be they the “holy undocumented” or otherwise, does seem to be defeating that purpose. Certainly, had there never been a single “migration” of them to this country, we would only be at a population of 245 to 250 million today and not 305 million, or better.
But of course, an America of 245 or 250 million would still be 81% to 79% white, and not the current 65% or less. Hence, we must conclude that “diversity” is so important, it is worth destroying the white majority in the USA, even if it means the planet is destroyed also.
Moreover, you are so frenzied in the pursuit of “diversity,” that you forget it is a “strength” and “enrichment,” that perhaps you are greedily forgetting your higher social and global responsibilities for. This is doubly troubling, since could not these “talented and hardworking” nonwhites be better serving their “developing” homelands? Is not their eagerness to become “Americans,” an admission of equally deplorable monetary and consumer gluttony on their part, that reflects your own misguided lusts in importing limitless “diversity?”
Perhaps, this dichotomy in thought, which is clearly clouding your collective judgments, is why you ever so eerily include the erratic drug fiend Rush Limbaugh and the equally racially nebulous Sean Hannity in your list of patriotic “hatemongers?”
As always, God help us all!
Posted by John PM at 7:38 PM on May 9
It’s a legitimate concern on the part of the non-hispanic peoples who are voicing their anger and opposition to the hispanicization of the U.S. I imagine if Whites were pouring into Mexico illegally, transforming the very fabric of their society, demanding English be spoken, sapping up resources, costing taxpayers money, and the like, we’d hear the same rhetoric.
Posted by at 8:06 PM on May 9
Progressive radio host Mario Solis-Marich wrote Tuesday, “As a member of the largest minority ethnic group and a member of the media, I am continually puzzled and outraged by the idea that anyone can say anything about Latinos without fearing any consequence.”
Gee, that’s funny. People can say any wicked things they like about whites without fearing any consequences. In fact its a proven way to get tenure in our college liberal arts departments.
It sure is interesting how Hispanics are now our largest minority group. Maybe that’s because they’ve been invading our country in huge numbers for the past few decades, and having too many kids once they get here. It is usually the case that the native people of a country have a low opinion of invaders. That this is an invasion is not the figment of our imagination. Mexicans openly boast about creating Atzlan via La Reconquista. There are increasingly many municipalities in this country where you can’t get a government job without speaking Spanish. Why shouldn’t we object to that?
Right-wing radio hosts have also—wrongly—claimed that illegal immigrants should be kept out of the United States because they bring strange diseases in.
“Wrongly?” They are quite correct. Illegals have brought into our country Chaga’s disease, leprosy, tuberculosis, and no doubt many other diseases.
Posted by WR the elder at 8:55 PM on May 9
“As a member of the largest minority ethnic group and a member of the media, I am continually puzzled and outraged by the idea that anyone can say anything about Latinos without fearing any consequence.”
Apparently someone needs to translate the First Amendment into Spanish for this “member of the media”. ?Ironico, no?
Posted by Jill at 9:23 PM on May 9
“Are we not allowed to express our own opinions on the invasion of our country? Have we not the right to favor our own people over the swarms of foreigners that come here and demand equality, and even preference?
So where does TB come from if not the tsunami of unwanted third worlders?
Posted by Schoolteacher at 7:12 PM on May 9”
Power will never be given to us; we must TAKE it.
So, if I may take the liberty of re-writing your post (which, if stated in an outraged, booming, DEMANDING voice fits my criteria), it would look like this:
“Are we not allowed to express our own opinions on the invasion of our country? YES, WE ARE!
“Have we not the right to favor our own people over the swarms of foreigners that come here and demand equality, and even preference? YES WE DO!
“Will we prevail? YES, WE WILL!”
Yes, we will.
Posted by Wild Eyed Charlie at 9:34 PM on May 9
We all know of course, that corperate greed is behind all of this.
Posted by benny at 9:36 PM on May 9
“It’s good to know these bigots are whining, but I doubt that they have much clout with anybody.”
Operation Chaos, according to the Obama campaign, accounted for 7% of Clinton’s vote in the Indiana primary. This means that Rush Limbaugh has materially affected the Democratic Primary.
Posted by at 9:51 PM on May 9
Are the blockheads at La Raza aware of the anti-white racial epithets routinely used by radical Latinos who protest on behalf of illegal immigration? Of course they are, but they condone the racism of their own people.
Criticism of illegals by Limbaugh, O’Reilly and other neo-conservative media types is milquetoast at best. They oppose illegal immigration on legal, and not racial grounds and all are 100% in favor of our anti-white and anti-American legal immigration policies. Occasionally, O’Reilly lightly touches on the dangers this all poses for white people, but usually gets off the subject in a hurry. Rush worships economic prosperity and the theory of trickle down economics and thinks all non-whites who live a middle class existence are closet conservative Republicans.
The minions at La Raza are free to return to Mexico anytime, but life is too cozy to leave. Besides, this country can never have too many minority race baiters.
Posted by at 10:16 PM on May 9
The truth is “hate” to those who hate the truth! And YES! I would like to maintain a white majority in white-created America!
Posted by Jackers at 10:16 PM on May 9
I’ll keep it simple. All nations including ours have the right to borders, culture and language. Nobody wants to assimulate today, they just bring their invading cultures with them. There is no room for a multi-cultural society in America. Either assimilate or get out.It’s also interesting that all these folks run out of their countries as quickly as they can and then get hear and expect us to adopt to their ways.You want to fly a mexican flag, speak spanish & celebrate toco de mayo day then head south and don’t let the door hit you in the backside.
Posted by ampatriot at 10:35 PM on May 9
“It’s good to know these bigots are whining, but I doubt that they have much clout with anybody.” (Posted by Robert Kelly at 6:09 PM on May 9)
On the other hand, Robert, check out the article, “Radical Chicano Group Gets Millions In Earmarks.”
http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/radical-chicano-group-gets-millions-earmarks
Either they or someone who likes them must have clout, to get this kind of money from the Congress.
Posted by H. Dumpty at 10:37 PM on May 9
right-wing radio, which claims 91 percent of radio airwaves.
As opposed to left wing TV, which claims 100% of TV airwaves.
Posted by qwerty at 10:46 PM on May 9
To the above ^^^
Does Mexico even have taxpayers? What I mean is, I know they tax all imports entering and all US subsidiaries operating within Mexico, but are there actual Mexicans that pay individual income taxes down there, cause they sure as hell don’t pay much income taxes up here.
Posted by David T at 11:13 PM on May 9
Right-Wing Rocker said “. . . these authors are either liars or morons or both.”
That pretty much sums up the extreme left, in my experience. Dishonesty, combined with arrogant ignorance.
Posted by Reader-1 at 11:14 PM on May 9
What is wrong with the current majority wanting to remain a majority? It is the right of the majority to set general directions for the nation. We have heretofore been imperfect, but self critical enough to strive to attain the ideals expressed in our founding documents. If we chose to maintain a majority position in the body politic, it is our right. We still strive to give more and correct more wrongs than any nation ever.
Posted by Johann von Braun at 11:53 PM on May 9
Well, Mario—we can say anything we want about anybody, Latino or not. It’s called freedom of speech, something not prevalent in Latin societies. No wonder you are puzzled and outraged.
Posted by kitty at 12:45 AM on May 10
It’s really sad that virtually 100% of the liberal-Left in the US is totally behind this mad illegal alien invasion of our land. I’m a Leftist and a member of the Communist Party USA, and I want all 20 million of these illegals the heck out of my country. Not now, yesterday. At the very least, illegal immigration is implacably hostile to US workers, especially the working class.
I don’t have anything against Hispanics, and properly and judiciously chosen, they should be no problem than any other non-refugee legal immigrants. The whole problem is that they are completely non-screened. Australia and many other nations have rigorous criteria for immigrants - they make them prove in a grueling process that they will benefit and not harm the land they are coming to. We would do well to mimic this wise policy. Your nation is your home. My front door is well-screened, and I choose very carefully who gets in. Ought to be the same way with immigration. Mass illegal immigration is like leaving your front door open and inviting scores of strangers into your home to do whatever they feel like doing while you don’t wave a finger to stop them.
It’s absolute madness.
I also think that Whites have a right to be proud, like any other race. For this harmless POV, I am continuously vilified as some kind of Nazi and a couple of stores have threatened to ban me for making comments like that. Why must we Whites hate ourselves? We are not bad people! I look in the mirror and like what I see. I like my people and our history and culture. This makes me a Nazi?!
What a lunatic world we live in!
Posted by Robert Lindsay at 3:23 AM on May 10
David T, Mexico, a failed state, fails to collect about 85% of the taxes it is due. For all intents and purposes, the largely White ruling class pays just about zero in taxes. You guys may think that these White Mexicans are your brethren, but they really are the enemy. They refuse to share even one penny of their fortunes with the whole rest of the country and deal with it by exporting the 90% non-elite of the nation to the US. Great people!
Posted by Robert Lindsay at 3:28 AM on May 10
Even if they primary concern of “hate radio” (which is the furthest thing from what it is)is keeping a white majority, how is this any different from the explicit comments made by Mexican celebrities, politicians, and LA RAZA groups when they brag about how Mexico and Mexicans will determine the course of the United States. At least whites have the excuse that the nations founding, progress, and greatness was due to the European values they built the nation up with. What is wrong with wanting to preserver this? How is this hate? Should Mexico change from being distinctly Mexican?
Posted by Bobby at 3:30 AM on May 10
“Racial slurs, particularly fueled against Hispanics, has found a home on right-wing radio, which claims 91 percent of radio airwaves.”
91% of what? The waves themselves, the photons, the wavelengths? If it’s wavelengths, then certainly that’s unfair to AM radio, since it is measured in kilohertz, and FM is measured in megahertz.
Of course, it could actually be 91% of all stations, but how would that work? Would a radio station with a radius of 10 miles count the same as a radio station with a reach of 30 miles?
Posted by Aaron at 4:54 AM on May 10
“This article says: Latinos want Latino majority in the USA and this is okay. I want White majority in the USA and I am wrong. I cannot understand this intricate ‘logic’. You see, how stupid I am?!”
Blacks use the same logic. If a school is majority white, the school must be made black; which includes hiring black teachers and administrators. If the school is majority black, it must remain a black majority and that includes hiring more black teachers and administrators. Once it goes black, there’s no going back.
That’s non-white logic.
Posted by sbuffalonative at 7:45 AM on May 10
Here are the top five ranking media “anti-immigrant spokespeople” with ties to nationally recognized hate groups, nativist-extremist groups, or vigilantes. They are listed by number of television network news appearances.
* Jim Gilchrist
* Dan Stein
* Chris Simcox
* Roy Beck
* Glenn Spencer
To read the rest of this trash talk hosted by La Raza, the website is http://www.wecanstopthehate.org
We need to stop the invasion of our Country someway,somehow,even though the United States Government is doing its best to change our Country to the United States of Mexico.
Posted by at 8:16 AM on May 10
Talk radio and the internet are only the media the American people have that counter the lies of the far left. All three leading candidates for president have stated they would reimpose the “fairness doctrine” This would kill off talk radio. None of the candidates are friends of the consitution This is the kind of action that these race baiting “progressives” would like to have take place. Along with the imposition of “hate speech” laws.
Posted by Burr Hamilton at 9:11 AM on May 10
“As a member of the largest minority ethnic group and a member of the media, I am continually puzzled and outraged by the idea that anyone can say anything about Latinos without fearing any consequence.”
“Largetst” minority ethnic group. So, you should pay attention to them because of their numbers, because soon they will be the largest group period. But they are angry because we are now. So, when its good for them they are a minority, then, the largest minority, then, the largest group period.
I have extensive experience with Latin America, and the two principle features of their peoeple are…
1 - Immaturity
2- Corruption
Psychologists say that dysfunctional families are…
Chaotic, Confused, and Corrupt.
They are either one or all of the above. See John Bradshaws “Creating Love” for a detailed study (and simply apply it to these clowns). Forgive him some of the corny parts and some of the shameless PC pandering (this was the late 80’ early 90’s) which I’m sure he HAD to do in order to be published at all.
It is but a step from dysfunctional families to dysfunctional cultures. And, in an age when “Culture” is bathed in this mystical, magical aura, we should begin to examine them all, East, West, North, South, Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hispanic, Black, White, Gay, Straight, from THIS perspective.
And we should be a Power of Example and begin with ourselves. If the USA is dysfunctional, and it obviously is, then one reason lies in its willingness to become the worlds whipping boy. That is NOT a healthy way to live, and it will solve no ones problems. We have simply GOT to get this Corrupt, Chaotic, and Confused Hispanics and their Cheering Section in the Press OFF OUR BACKS!
Posted by La Dolce Vita at 9:18 AM on May 10
“As a member of the largest minority ethnic group and a member of the media, I am continually puzzled and outraged by the idea that anyone can say anything about Latinos without fearing any consequence.”
I am continually puzzled as to why it is that Latinos and other minority groups have such a hard time understanding the concept of free speech.
Posted by Boudreaux at 10:44 AM on May 10
“As a member of the largest minority ethnic group and a member of the media, I am continually puzzled and outraged by the idea that anyone can say anything about Latinos without fearing any consequence.”
Can we extrapolate and hypothesise what will happen when this ‘largest minority ethnic group’ grows even larger and insists on even greater control of how the populous thinks and what they are permitted under the law to say?
We won’t be talking about hate-speech. We’ll be talking about hate-thoughts.
Posted by sbuffalonative at 10:56 AM on May 10
So it’s ok for Hispanics to be joyful about the fact they’ll be the majority, yet when whites do it we’re somehow “white supremacists”?
Posted by at 12:35 PM on May 10
This is as absurd as it gets.
The “Latinos” openly promise outbreeding whites in the U.S. in order to take over the entire country, and this clear act of demgoraphic war is not labeled “racist” or “hateful”, but as soon as the white Americans say they don’t like the idea, they are being labeled hateful racists.
Also, what is wrong with hating the invaders? If ACLU and company were in Europe during the WWII they would derail the entire resistance movement attacking it as a bunch of “hate groups” against the NAZIs. We need to reject this Leftist nonsense that hate is always wrong. Hating those who want to eliminate your race is a natural, if not healthy, reaction and not a sympthom of evil.
Posted by A Reader at 1:11 PM on May 10
You guys may think that these White Mexicans are your brethren, but they really are the enemy. They refuse to share even one penny of their fortunes with the whole rest of the country and deal with it by exporting the 90% non-elite of the nation to the US. Great people!
Posted by Robert Lindsay at 3:28 AM on May 10
They are actually more rational, in this respect, than we are. They refuse to pay Malthusian population (those who then to outbreed their means of sunsistance) for having more kids.
I wish the U.S. taxpayers stopped paying poor people having kids that they otherwise could no afford, because it leads to economic collapse.
Posted by A Reader at 1:19 PM on May 10
Jay Leno did a joke on his show awhile back.
The joke was something like, “Hillary Clinton says there’s a right wing consipiracy. She’s afraid the liberal message isn’t getting out. ~Other than television, newspapers, music and movies, it’s not getting out!”
Posted by Mr. Pibb at 2:06 PM on May 10
“I’m a Leftist and a member of the Communist Party USA, and I want all 20 million of these illegals the heck out of my country…I also think that Whites have a right to be proud.” (Posted by Robert Lindsay at 3:23 AM on May 10)
Robert, what is the official CP line on immigration today? And do you feel the CP still exerts any sizable influence on what happens in this country? I’m especially curious what beliefs you have in common with the CP that makes you remain a member—from your excellent posts above, you seem like you might be more comfortable in some group that is, uh, just a wee bit more to the right (?)
If you care to answer, if you are able to address especially the issue of this article, immigration, we readers may have a more likely opportunity to read all of the (bound to be interesting) points in your response. Thanks.
Posted by H. Dumpty at 2:29 PM on May 10
I guess there is no “freedom of speech” in this country if your views are to the right. Those of us that object to drug dealers, murderers, rapists, thieves, terrorists, child molesters, scam artists and other criminals that cross our borders every day while loading up our jails, sucking the budgets dry of once thriving cities with all the freebies that American citizens don’t get while refusing to speak our language and draining the health care system while the American tax-payer pays for all their illegal babies, somehow we have no right to object to all that. Oh! I forgot to mention the millions of tons of trash that illegals leave at the borders of property owners and in our state forests. Oh! gee I forgot to mention how the illegal alien drug dealers set fires to our once beautiful National Forests simply to divert border agents to another area so they can smuggle their drugs. Not to mention the diseases the illegals bring and on and on.
Posted by Gerry at 2:36 PM on May 10
Talk Radio is one of the few places less regulated by the PC liberals (the other being the internet), and it needs to stay that way. Considering how much hatred towards white men, lies, and political poison they put out in tv, movies, schoolbooks, newspapers, etc- there needs to be somewhere where people are still allowed to have their constitutional freedom to question what is being said and done.
Posted by at 2:40 PM on May 10
Mr. Bush’s reign is coming to an end and his legacy will be the President who gave away our country to a third world nation. He wasn’t the first to close his eyes to the invasion, but after 9/ll, our borders should have been sealed shut! Instead, he has encouraged illegal immigration, no matter what he says.
Posted by June at 2:51 PM on May 10
Faiz Shakir is the Research Director for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at American Progress. Faiz holds a B.A. in government from Harvard University and a J.D. from the Georgetown Law Center. Faiz has previously worked as a Research Associate for the Democratic National Committee, a Legislative Aide to Sen. Bob Graham (D-FL) on the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, and a Communications Aide in the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy. His writings have appeared in The Jerusalem Post, Florida Today, and Salon. Faiz has appeared on BBC Television and ABC News Now, among other places, and has been a guest on many radio stations, including NPR and BBC Radio.
Amanda Terkel is Deputy Research Director at American Progress and serves as Managing Editor for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org.
Amanda also served as the Center’s Special Assistant for Strategic Planning. Her past positions have been with the Office of Senator Charles E. Schumer (D-NY), the Office of the New York State Attorney General, the 2004 presidential campaign of Senator Joseph Lieberman (I-CT), and the Office of the Inspector General in the Office of Personnel Management. She graduated from Colgate University. Her writing has been in The New York Times, Politico, the Guardian, American Prospect Online, and InTheseTimes.com. She has appeared as a guest on various television and radio shows, including MSNBC, BBC, and Al Jazeera, among others.
Satyam Khanna is an Assistant Editor for the Progress Report and Think Progress at American Progress. Satyam holds a bachelor’s degress in biology and political science from Washington University in St. Louis. Prior to joining the Center, he worked as a field organizer for Jeff Smith’s Missouri Senate campaign and a researcher for Claire McCaskill’s U.S. Senate race, both in St. Louis. He is also an alumnus of the Washington Leadership Program of the Indian-American Center for Political Awareness. Satyam hails from Edmond, Oklahoma.
Matt Corley is an Assistant Editor for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at American Progress. Matt holds a bachelor’s degree in politics from Ithaca College. Prior to joining the center, he was a research intern for TPM Media and a blogger for Wiretap Magazine. While at Ithaca College, he edited the News and Views section of Buzzsaw Haircut, Campus Progress’ 2006 “Publication of the Year.” Matt hails from Newton, Massachusetts.
Alison Frick
Research Associate
Ali Frick is a Research Associate for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at American Progress. She grew up in Denver, Colorado, and holds a B.A. in History from Yale. Before joining ThinkProgress, Ali interned with the D.C. Prisoners’ Project at the Washington Lawyers’ Committee. At Yale, she worked as a writer and editor at The Yale Herald, a weekly campus newspaper.
Benjamin Armbruster, Assistant Editor
Benjamin J. Armbruster is an Assistant Editor for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org. Ben grew up in Cleveland, Ohio and holds a bachelor’s degree in history from Ohio University and a master’s degree in international relations from King’s College London. Ben previously served as a national security research assistant at American Progress. He has also held research positions at Media Matters for America; the Henry L. Stimson Center; and the Verification Research, Training, and Information Centre in London. His work has been published in online and print outlets, as well as various international security journals.
Posted by at 3:04 PM on May 10
I get it. If we white people want to enforce the immigration laws and keep illegals out, we are racists. But, if illegals waant to come here by breaking the laws, that is o.k. Simple, really, isn’t it?
Posted by Frank at 3:16 PM on May 10
The anonymous poster above posted Satyam Khanna’s credentials and all the others who signed this article.
That he worked to elect now-State Sen. Jeff Smith is not surprising. Smith is an uber-liberal, however, what’s strange is that he hinted that he might vote for anti-immigration bills in the Missouri State House. Smith is white, and his district is heavily black.
What’s more surprising is that Khanna worked on Claire McCaskill’s Senate Campaign. If Khanna is signing an article denouncing “anti-Hispanic bigotry,” then he should note that Claire McCaskill actually wielded influence to stop “Comprehensive Immigration Reform” last year, and tried to stop the big business shill Julie Myers from becoming the head of ICE. CMcC is certainly more vociferous and strident on the anti-amnesty issue than the Republican incumbent she defeated in 2006, Jim Talent.
Posted by Question Diversity at 3:53 PM on May 10
Hello HD. I vote Democrat. I’m also a member of the Green Party. I was thrown out of the local CPUSA chapter for supporting social democracy, but that’s just capitalism. They also said I’m not a real Communist. I’m a modern neo-Commie like the Vietnamese, Raul Castro, the Chinese CP, the Lao CP, Hugo Chavez, the Maoists in Nepal, the Sandinistas. We’re all allowing a lot of capitalism these days and a lot of us are even supporting various amounts of democracy.
CPUSA, I think, like the entire Left, is open borders pro-immigration. You can’t be a leftwing or even liberal party or movement in the US anymore and oppose immigration or even want to regulate it in any way.
My main concern is economics. I’m a socialist. Obviously, I would not be happy in any party on the Right. But it really annoys me that there are no socialist parties out there talking a sane stance on immigration. There is a movement out there called National Bolsheviks that is pretty interesting, but it frightens me with fascist leanings.
Since my main project is economic, obviously I want to see the US move in a Left-liberal direction. The downside to this is the the entire US Left-liberal movement is Open Borders, which to me means the end of this great nation.
I am starting to wonder if it is internationalism that needs to be chucked. All Left parties are internationalist. What that means in practice is that you can’t really oppose any workers anywhere on Earth “migrating” to this or that country looking for work or better pay. You can’t favor your own workers over those of Mexico, because all the workers of the world are one nation. This is classic doctrine right out of Marx, but maybe we need to chuck it.
OTOH, I don’t really like nationalism either. I prefer something like patriotism or citizenism.
There really isn’t any party for me out there and it’s lonely in that sense.
CPUSA was the fastest growing party on the Left from 1980-1990. I think it went from 10,000-50,000. It’s still a very small party and has little to no influence or much of anything. They recruit very heavily among Blacks and Hispanics, like all US CP’s. Their economic project is pretty reasonable and they have always supported “Bill of Rights Socialism” as Gus Hall called it. What that means is that due to the long tradition of civil liberties in the US, the CPUSA has to respect that and all full civil liberties as part of their project. They do have close ties with the Chinese CP though. I’ve spoken to some of the top members of the party.
You have to understand that CPUSA is much more Old Left than New Left. They were very close to the CCCP in the USSR, and that was a socially conservative party.
Posted by Robert Lindsay at 6:40 PM on May 10
Does Mexico even have taxpayers? What I mean is, I know they tax all imports entering and all US subsidiaries operating within Mexico, but are there actual Mexicans that pay individual income taxes down there, cause they sure as hell don’t pay much income taxes up here.
Only rich people are required to pay income tax in Mexico. The government owns all subsoil resources, and that’s where most of its revenue comes from. Pemex is a huge cash cow that’s just about been milked dry, as the Cantarell Field recently peaked a few years ago.
I predict that things are going to get real interesting down there soon.
Posted by qwerty at 7:23 PM on May 10
“I am starting to wonder if it is internationalism that needs to be chucked. All Left parties are internationalist.”
It would be nice if we little people had the power to do so, but the fact is, we don’t. Not even close. Too, it’s not only the Left that are internationalists, so are the economic free-marketers in the Republican party. They’re all for unfettered free trade with almost anyone on the planet. We in the middle are being squeezed from the “right-wing international capitalists” and the left-wing international socialists/communists.”
Posted by at 7:51 PM on May 10
I have never and will never hire a non-white immigrant to work on my farm! I have five full time employees that are paid very well and I have no problem finding extra white workers when the need arises. If I contract an out side business to do work for me I will put it in the contract and make it very clear that if they show up with a Mexican crew that the contract is null and void. If I can do this and still operate at a profit, why can’t everyone else that operates a business?
The biggest problem I see with others crying that they can’t find white workers is a simple thing called greed. I have invested over $2.5 million in equipment and technology in the last ten years to keep from having to hire puddle-jumpers and it has paid me back tenfold and the combines, the planters and the automated milking machines don’t sue me when I do something they don’t like and they don’t get drunk every night and call me to bail them out of jail……greed and illegal criminal aliens will be the death of America!
Posted by to the right of Attila at 8:21 PM on May 10
“The government owns all subsoil resources”
In Atlas (Shrugged), the government of mexico was known as Senor Gonsalez…
Posted by senora gonsalez at 8:23 PM on May 10
I’ve recently created an activist group called ‘La Raza Blanco.’ Does this make me a racist?
Posted by Sensitivity Trainer at 8:28 PM on May 10
Nothing new here as American Progress Action once more changes the subject from illegal immigration to non-illegal immigration. The article also shows what little respect for freedom of speech “The Race” actually has. Let’s not call it by its Spanish name and let them help us show the significance of race?
Posted by Factualist at 9:21 PM on May 10
The Center For American Progress is just another George Soros funded, anti-(everything) think tank. Would you expect anything different?
Posted by Mike B. at 10:24 PM on May 10
Thank you President Bush. Your grandchildren will be bewildered by your immigration policy.
Posted by Pedro at 11:02 PM on May 10
From a labor point of view, all illegals are scabs. They
inevitable bring down wages. That’s why they’re brought in. How
can you negotiate with companies if you have no leverage-the abi-
lity to strike? Illegal immigration takes away that leverage.
That many of the big unions support these people just shows how
ridiculously corrupt they are. They have no reason to exist any-
more now that they’ve betrayed their workers. You can’t help ev-
eryone all at once. You need a closed system in order to create
force. This is the principle behind the combustion engine- a con-
troled explosion. Illegal immigrants release the pressure and
thus no protest “work” can be accomplished. That explains why Che
Gueverra used to alert authorities to any illegals he knew about.
Posted by Freyr at 11:58 PM on May 10
”Hello HD. I vote Democrat. I’m also a member of the Green Party. I was thrown out of the local CPUSA chapter for supporting social democracy, but that’s just capitalism”. Robert Lindsay.
Marxists are the same the world over. Always infiltrating other parties. One party aint enough for these socialist brothers, they gotta hog three or four. Don’t you worry yourself, Comrade Lindsay, do what all radical socialists do, form your own socialist party. The perks are great & you get to wear a snazzy outfit just like Fidel.
”CPUSA, I think, like the entire Left, is open borders pro-immigration. You can’t be a leftwing or even liberal party or movement in the US anymore and oppose immigration or even want to regulate it in any way” Robert Lindsay
Here’s a radical idea. Do you think that possibly the people that are doing the above restricting are maybe of the Left … Communists even. After all the Left are the people working throughout the world for one-world government & have been working towards it since the advent of Communism.
Why would anyone in their right mind listen to a party that was funded by a foreign power [USSR] for 60 years & continued to deny this right up to the collapse of the same USSR?
Posted by at 2:31 AM on May 11
Comedian George Carlin once noticed that a radio has two knobs on it. One changes the station, and the other turns the radio off. Don’t like what you hear on the radio? Use one of the knobs. It’s called freedom of choice.
Posted by Michael C. Scott at 4:38 AM on May 11
“greed and illegal criminal aliens will be the death of America!”
Posted by to the right of Attila at 8:21 PM on May 10
Just one point. I think that you are too narrow in your indictment of just immigrants for the death of America. You cannot omit the out of control, murdering, raping, robbing, looting and generally sociopathic Black males who constitute a sizeable segment of the Black male population as a whole.
Posted by at 9:42 AM on May 11
To Robert Lindsay, regarding:
“I’m a Leftist and a member of the Communist Party USA, and I want all 20 million of these illegals the heck out of my country. Not now, yesterday. At the very least, illegal immigration is implacably hostile to US workers, especially the working class.”
Just wondering, are you not the Red who once made the absurd claim that the USA did not have a white majority until the late 1800s?
How ironic if this is the case, since you did seem to at least be making the case for untrammeled Third World “immigration” of all kinds in that piece of anti-white hate screed. You seemed to be indicating the usual rubbish about how we are the world’s “country” and not our own. Also, your admission that you are a member of the CP—USA is equally curious as well.
Have you not grasped that Marxism as you know it is dead, outside of the history and philosophy departments in most Western universities? Multiculturalism is the new dialectical shimmy of the day, if you have not noticed. That, and if you accept the new Chinese model of Communism, slave labor by the many for the benefit of the few in toy and textile sweatshops.
Just wondering where you are coming from, Comrade Lindsay?
Posted by John PM at 9:54 AM on May 11
Insert Robert Whitaker’s Mantra here. If it were non-white countries we would hear cries of genocide and “racism.”
Posted by Simmons at 11:13 AM on May 11
White Amrican racists DEMONIZING hard-working immigrants? The JOKE OF THE WEEK. . . to day the least.
If Mexicans have a bad image, they have only themselves to blame. Here’s a good example:
My wife has used the same dry cleaners for about two years now. The business is owned by a Chinese American woman. She hires Mexcans [spelled CHEAP LABOR] to work at the counter and to do the cleaning.
The young Mexican female was commenting on the nice red pants my wife had in her bundle of drycleaning. She took it as a compliment and left. She picked up the nicely wrapped bagged drycleaning and when she got home — guess what was missing?
The THIEVING Mexican female had stolen the red pants! Nolwl think about this one. HOW MANY buisinesses in our country hire cheap Mexican labor? How much thievery and theft of merchandise can be attributed to this “cheap labor?”
But we Whites are DEMONIZING Hispanics? That they don’t deserve to be seen as 30 million unhung thieves?
Posted by Fed Up at 1:00 PM on May 11
‘Right-Wing Rocker:
Please note this team of mestizo defenders sounds 50% middle-eastern (and/or black), 50% anglo (and/or black), and ZERO PERCENT hispanic. Draw your own conclusions.’
….Ditto that, Brother!
Let all these wierd-o special interest groups team up against the majority of this country, and they will still be shorter in numbers.
“I have never and will never hire a non-white immigrant to work on my farm! I have five full time employees that are paid very well and I have no problem finding extra white workers when the need arises. If I contract an out side business to do work for me I will put it in the contract and make it very clear that if they show up with a Mexican crew that the contract is null and void. If I can do this and still operate at a profit, why can’t everyone else that operates a business?
“The biggest problem I see with others crying that they can’t find white workers is a simple thing called greed. I have invested over $2.5 million in equipment and technology in the last ten years to keep from having to hire puddle-jumpers and it has paid me back tenfold and the combines, the planters and the automated milking machines don’t sue me when I do something they don’t like and they don’t get drunk every night and call me to bail them out of jail……greed and illegal criminal aliens will be the death of America!
-Posted by to the right of Attila at 8:21 PM on May 10”
…First, bless you all and all that you do for doing it the American way! I live in California, and the answer to immigration is automation (of course, with automation comes an INFERRED reduction in overall population and thus immigration as labor is less of a requirement or demand!). In fact, it was said in the 1990s that when the perfected strawberry picking robot was invented, the agg labor from Mexico would begin drying up permanently. Only now, it is not agg jobs to be had by the invaders….I see sixty year old mezzos with their 40 year old sons mowing lawns like an American fifteen year old would have done as a career inducting practice so common in America prior to the 1980-90s. This holds triple true for any fast-food jobs as well, where Americas next workforce was once expected to cut their future workforce teeth!
Posted by ilovemyfirstamendment at 1:24 PM on May 11
Is Hispanics or “people of color working to achieve majority status different from Whites working to keep majority status?
I must be confused.
Posted by at 2:12 PM on May 11
There would be no hate/discrimination involved if Hispanic American citizens identified with Americans instead of Mexican invaders! And since they are entering illegally without screening - yes they are totally responsible for exposing Americans to disease and crime. Corporations want cheap labor both illegal and with visas. This means the supply is great, demand is down, and the American worker has no leverage for wages. They also want free trade so that the job can be done cheaply elsewhere and shipped into the country without tariffs. If Democrats get national health care - it will be a “right” and of course these “rights” can’t be denied to illegals. We’ll be forced to pay into insurance for EVERYONE - companies won’t have to pay for employees. The health “budget” will go broke every year, so forget needing medical attention after summer…
Posted by at 2:34 PM on May 11
I post here nearly every day, and advocate wiring and mining the border. Only about half my posts make it past the editor. Even I do not hate Hispanics. I was in prison for three years, most of that time in Texas, and the Mexicans were about the nicest, most generous guys there. If a white guy was straight with them, and got into trouble, they would all come running to help. One of my friends was doing a dime for running marijuana. He used to share a cigarette with me while wtalked about places we’d been. One of his grandfathers was a white county sheriff.
If one counts Portugese Brazil as “Hispanic” and leaves out Argentina, I find 19 Hispanic nations in the Western Hemisphere’s mainland. As for their partly Amerind ancestry, I am 3/16 Amerind so I suppose with my grey eyes, fair skin and brown hair, I’m a “Mestizo” too, but with different European and different Indian ancestry.
If middle-class Mexicans with values similar to mine wanted to legally immigrate to my country, I would have no problem. I do not believe that my country should be a dumping ground for the world’s poor. I don’t hate Hispanics; I just don’t want their poor and criminals here.
Posted by Michael C. Scott at 3:43 PM on May 11
“I’ve recently created an activist group called ‘La Raza Blanco.’” (Posted by Sensitivity Trainer at 8:28 PM on May 10)
I kind of like just, “The Race.”
Well, not really, it’s a little too much like the typically overdone science fiction interpretation of Third Reich Germany in Norman Spinrad’s, “The Iron Dream” (a great read, though).
But we should realize, that is exactly what the words “La Raza” say in Spanish!! Not, “The Hispanic Race,” but “THE Race.”
Something to think about. The full strength of the words, “La Raza,” is not felt by a non-native speaker of Spanish.
Posted by H. Dumpty at 4:03 PM on May 11
Will the “real” racists please stand up. The ridiculous claim, that Hannity, or Limbaugh make racist statements is insane. Quite to the contrary, out of pure intimidation, and or cowardice neither of those two would dare make a racist statement, even if they desired.
Posted by The Old Sage at 10:03 PM on May 11
To Michael Scott: Time for some studies. Hispanics are divided into 2 vast groups - group A, an assimilated group that is doing great and acts like you and me, and group B, an Underclass that is an utter screaming nightmare. The latter tend to be the children of immigrants, often illegals. The former tend to have much deeper roots. The latter are often darker and the former lighter, but there are no hard rules.
Let’s make Hispanic immigrants submit to rigorous and grueling processes to run the gauntlet to get into this still-fine land. Make them renounce any claim that Mexico owns the southwest. Order them to learn English. Force them to prove that they will join group A and not group B. Do studies to try to figure out which will join group A and which will join group B.
The notion that even 85% of legal Hispanics are de facto traitors for supporting Open Borders and their illegal invader brethren is painful but correct.
Posted by Robert Lindsay at 11:56 PM on May 11
‘…If it were non-White countries we would hear cries of genocide and ‘racism…’
Posted by Simmons at 11:13 AM on May 11
Yes, just as we have heard about Zimbabwe and SA where killing Whites has become the national sport:
“…Mugabe, with the help of his own de facto Hitler Nazi Youth corps called the ‘Green Bombers,’ would go on to slaughter Zimbabwe’s white farmers, take away their land…”
http://thenewamerican.com/node/5059
From SA:
“…There has been a 25% increase in farm attacks over the past year….To date at least 2,951 farmers have been murdered since 1994 in armed militia-attacks on commercial farms and smallholdings in South Africa, Crime Busters of South Africa’s records indicate…,”
http://southafricanhell.blogspot.com/search?q=Farm+Killings+in+
Yes, there was a TON of outrage and coverage from the international press about the black-on-White murders with outpourings of monetary aid and offers of rescue and refugee status in White nations, wasn’t there?
Didn’t the MSM and White countries, led by the US and the UN scream ‘racism’ and ‘genocide’ at Zim and SA, demand that slaughter of Whites would NOT be tolerated and must be stopped IMMEDIATELY or there would be hell to pay, and didn’t International Catholic and Lutheran charities insist that the beleaguered Whites be given immediate re-settlement in the US? Didn’t Bono climb up on his high horse and scream that the US must ’open its purse’ and pour unlimited monies into Africa to help terrified, endangered Whites? Isn’t that what happened?
As for the discussion on Communism: What hath Communism wrought?
From Professor Rummel’s “Death by Government”:
II 128,168,000 VICTIMS: THE DEKA-MEGAMURDERERS
4. 61,911,000 Murdered: The Soviet Gulag State
5. 35,236,000 Murdered: The Communist Chinese Ant Hill
6. 20,946,000 Murdered: The Nazi Genocide State
7. 10,214,000 Murdered: The Depraved Nationalist Regime
http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE1.HTM
Enough said.
Bon
Posted by BonBon at 12:14 AM on May 12
A few things here:
I really don’t care much about race at all. My positions on Hispanics closely mirror those of Michael Scott. As a native Californian, I grew up with these people. They were our friends, best friends and girlfriends (or mine anyway). I was taking Spanish classes at age six. We have been to Mexico many times. I had 5-6 years of Spanish in school. Our mothers learned to cook great Mexican food and we love Mexican restaurants. This state used to be part of Mexico. The streets, cities and geography have Spanish names.
As far as why a Leftist like me turns against the illegal invasion, you guys don’t know what it’s like. We feel this invasion in our bones in a way that the rest of you cannot understand. Look at the paragraph above for the Spanish/Mexican roots of this place. On the ground here, it feels like a reversion. It’s downright terrifying for any sane White person.
To John PM: I still say that my people are not the majority founding stock of this land, and that Blacks, Mexicans and Amerindians are part of the founding stock. FWIW. Of course that doesn’t follow that we need Open Borders insanity to let 2 billion 3rd worlders flood in and turn the US into Calcutta of the Americas. Australia, Japan and many other decent countries have sane immigration policies. Why not us? If we act like them, we are racist? WTH?
Marxism is not dead at all. All of the wealthy countries of the world have socialism to one degree or another going on. The Chinese model is much misunderstood. Indian capitalism kills 4 million a year by not following the Chinese model in 1949. Also they could have controlled their population. China is going too far, but most enterprises are still owned by the workers ultimately. Secondarily, they are owned by municipalities and labor collectives. Almost all housing is state-owned.
Most govt decisions are undertaken with the interests of the majority in mind. It’s really just a gigantic and confusing mixed economy with vast amounts of socialism in it. Most of the economic growth coming out of Chinese-owned firms is coming out of the non-capitalist sector (worker-, municipality- and labor collective-owned firms). The media never tells you this because that would smash their whole “socialism doesn’t work” lie.
Cultural Marxism is garbage. These ppl have given up on class struggle in the interest of gender, race, sex orientation and other identity politics. The Old Left and its regimes were quite socially conservative. You can make an excellent case that the USSR and E Europe was better for Whites that the Cultural Marxism of W Europe and the US.
Posted by Robert Lindsay at 1:59 AM on May 12
As a member of the Model Majority European American community I want to protest the notion that I am without difficulties in life; similar to the Model Minority Asian community.
I must admit that I am troubled by “self loathing” European Americans who would deny me the right to form an organization to promote the legitimate interests of my own people.
As a member of the Model Majority I am still deserving of a representative of my choosing seated at the government/private tables that make decisions that affect me personally, and my family and friends.
Posted by Louis Calabro at 9:02 AM on May 12
“I still say that my people are not the majority founding stock of this land, and that Blacks, Mexicans and Amerindians are part of the founding stock.”
The question is not “land” but “nation,” namely the United States. Apart from a very few free blacks, not one of these groups had a thing to do with the founding of this nation. There were no Mexicans in the US at all in 1776 (and the nation of Mexico did not exist in 1776), and black slaves and Amerinds were not citizens. I know that the Census of 1825 belies this contention, but I’m willing to run afoul of bogus, manufactured data. Whites are the sole founding stock of the US.
Posted by Cassiodorus at 11:03 AM on May 12
Recall, that to the elites who think it only reasonable to have world government, that the age of the nation state is over, all talk of immigration restrictions is nonsense; after all, do not all human beings have a plethora of international, supranational human rights as expressed in multiple international agreements, most signed by the US? If so, then they have a right to live in whatever “country” they like and those who oppose immigration to the US, be it legal or illegal, are barbarians.
This is the logic of their argument. It is the same argument that was used by Lincoln and the radical Republicans in 1861 when they launched a bloody war of conquest against the South. Why?, because the South did not recognize that we had moved beyond the provincialism of confederated “states” and had finally achieved the level of the nation state. Those who object to the unconstitutional notion of a dominant central government will have their homes and families destroyed, their country invaded and themselves put to death at the point of a bayonet.
There is a great deal of similarity between today’s supra-nationalist elites and the nationalist elites of days gone by—-universalism and centralization as the central principles of the state.
Posted by at 4:00 PM on May 12
“I am starting to wonder if it is internationalism that needs to be chucked. All Left parties are internationalist. What that means in practice is that you can’t really oppose any workers anywhere on Earth “migrating” to this or that country looking for work or better pay. You can’t favor your own workers over those of Mexico, because all the workers of the world are one nation. This is classic doctrine right out of Marx, but maybe we need to chuck it.” (Posted by Robert Lindsay at 6:40 PM on May 10)
This is extremely important. One question is what kind of economic system a people will have, and a separate question is whether or not that people will maintain themselves as a people, whatever economic system they have.
That the second question, “will a people maintain themselves as a people,” is an important one is borne out by the feeling you said you have in your bones. No fancy intellectual argument is needed to support the proposition that a people should strive to maintain their identity as a people—this is something that humans just naturally do, when not impeded, as much as eating and loving.
But for reasons historical or ideological, “All Left parties are internationalist,” as you say, and the persons who have been most instrumental in pressing collectivist economic theory upon the world have also succeeded in overriding, in the white countries, this natural impulse of a people to maintain its identity.
So of course internationalism should be chucked—it’s an unnatural thwarting of the natural human impulse to cluster with one’s group, and has been imposed by people who profit from it financially and regard any human instinct that doesn’t put money in their pockets as an unprofitable diversion of human energy.
(Ah, that last part felt good—I’ve missed my old lefty days!)
It should also be said that the urge of peoples to maintain their own identity should be catered to not simply because that urge is a universal human desire, but also because, it still existing as a universal human desire, it must certainly have had evolutionary survival value. That that is indeed the case is strongly indicated by just looking at what is happening in (formerly) white countries everywhere, now that that group survival urge has been overridden.
A chief impediment to whites recapturing their expression of this fundamental urge (which all other ethnic groups in the world still retain) is that they are blocked by the word, “racism.” Whites are now called “racist” at any sign of their having the same group feeling that all other groups feel and express freely. (In our own country, just listen to other groups’ talk, and look at the names of their organizations).
And whites have been trained (and this didn’t “just happen,” but that’s another topic) to feel that there is nothing more shameful than to be racist. That is, there is nothing more shameful than to feel and express the same attachment to one’s ethnic group that all other ethnic groups in the world now and in the past feel and have felt without shame.
A very, very bizarre mental hammerlock has been placed upon us.
Robert, I’ve followed many of your posts here with interest for sometime, and I suspect you’re still in that hammerlock, that you can’t quite bring yourself to give up the feeling of being “virtuous,” and deal with the shaming, that will be directed your way if you give up the struggle to be “good,” and just go with that natural human feeling of group survival you feel in your bones.
I hope you’ll forgive me for addressing you in that manner—it is done in a spirit of friendliness, and with full realization that I might be completely mistaken in my impressions of you.
You also write, “There really isn’t any party for me out there and it’s lonely in that sense.”
Believe me, there’s plenty of us (as you no doubt notice) that feel we fit nowhere, and are lonely. That’s to be expected in a society that’s disintegrating.
Fifty years ago, when I was living in Alabama, I fit in and I didn’t feel lonely. I was living in a functioning society then.
Posted by H. Dumpty at 4:01 AM on May 13
I’ll keep it simple. All nations including ours have the right to borders, culture and language. Nobody wants to assimulate today, they just bring their invading cultures with them. There is no room for a multi-cultural society in America. Either assimilate or get out.It’s also interesting that all these folks run out of their countries as quickly as they can and then get hear and expect us to adopt to their ways.You want to fly a mexican flag, speak spanish & celebrate toco de mayo day then head south and don’t let the door hit you in the backside.
Posted by ampatriot at 10:35 PM on May 9
That’s the thing. They can’t assimilate, as they are a different people. They’ll only blend in when America becomes that of nothingness: no identity other than a racial mix with no dominant majority.
Different races can’t assimilate, for assimilation is related to feelings of sameness and togetherness. These “Hispanics” don’t see nor feel like they are the same, nor do white Americans see them as such, so they’re not going to assimilate. It’s impossible for different races to assimilate. Only people of the majority race can, over-time, assimilate. Hence, this is why all the Europeans were able to assimilate, and still are.
Posted by Ryan at 6:17 AM on May 13
To Comrade Lindsay:
Your capacity for doublethink and doublespeak is certainly in keeping with your Red ideology. To begin with had it not been for the British establishing the 13 Colonies, there never would have been a United States of America; they (the English colonists) were the unifying cultural, political, and socioeconomic force that is primarily responsible for establishing this country. The “Native Americans” would not even be calling themselves this had it not been for white development of this country, because they would remain most likely to this day disunited warring tribes such as the: Cherokees, Creeks, Choctaw, Apaches, etc. As for blacks they contributed next to nothing and Mexicans played absolutely no role whatsoever, in founding this country. To say otherwise, demonstrates a tenable hold on history and reality, that is at best pitiable.
We agree on immigration to a point, but I would hold that all Western colonial nations such as the USA and Australia, should stick to very racially oriented immigration policies as the Japanese do. In short, this view is summed up as whites only; we owe utterly nothing to: Asians, Latinos, Africans, Arabs, or any other Third World rabble you can think of. The strict controls of the early 1900s would not begin to illustrate, just how firm and reactive our laws should be toward the flood of so-called refugees and migrants, that are allowed to enter this country. They are of no value to this nation, and contribute nothing but resource depletion, overpopulation, and social chaos to the USA. Much what they contribute in their home countries, but here I digress.
As for your absurd and obtuse positions on Communism, what else is to be expected from an admitted Red? You can make your arguments about the glorious land of Mao, but you have yet to emigrate there. Why might that be? Perhaps, it is the knowledge that 100s of millions have died there since 1949? And if I am not mistaken, you are in your 50s and easily could have moved to the Soviet Block in the 70s or 80s; why didn’t you? Maybe it is the knowledge that 10s of millions were murdered under those Bolshevik butchers?
As for the “socialism” and mixed economies of the West, how much of that foolishness would be needed, if “diversity” was progressively removed from these countries? Certainly there would be some “social programming,” but it would be nothing like this abhorrent “redistributive” model where whites provide their opportunities and resources, as appeasement to the nonwhite “entitlement” automatons.
What this country needs (and all the West for that matter) is a return to economic and social freedoms for whites, with nonwhites being allowed only such freedoms that they can handle or deserve. If they do not like it, they always have the same freedom that you do; that is, move to China or Zimbabwe where Marxism breeds a quality of life unknown in all of human history, and for good reason!
KRONOS
Posted by John PM at 4:17 PM on May 14
“Recall, that to the elites who think it only reasonable to have world government, that the age of the nation state is over, all talk of immigration restrictions is nonsense; after all, do not all human beings have a plethora of international, supranational human rights as expressed in multiple international agreements, most signed by the US? If so, then they have a right to live in whatever “country” they like and those who oppose immigration to the US, be it legal or illegal, are barbarians.”
from UN Declaration of Human Rights:
Article 13.
(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.
(2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.
Article 14.
(1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.
(2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
Article 15.
(1) Everyone has the right to a nationality.
(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.
Posted by eleanor roosevelt at 4:17 PM on May 15
