Comments
We are crucially divided as nation. The marxists are upset becasuse Hillary addressed “white people”. She recognized us as “white people”. This isn’t about splitting the party ..or having one last dig at Obama. This is about HIllary acknowledging the collective ethnic interests of “white people”.
It might lead to white people thinking “hey, I am part of a people that have our own interests.” and that is what scares our opposition.
Posted by quinn at 7:10 PM on May 9
Would these be the same hardworking white voters who were absolutely appalled by her “Hillarycare” health plan in 1993?
The fact that she was mathematically eliminated from the nomination by a white-hating, America-hating mulatto speaks volumes about both the state of the Democratic party and what hard-working whites really think of Hillary.
Posted by Michael C. Scott at 7:13 PM on May 9
Too bad she this wasn’t her tune 15 years ago. It’s time for liberals to get used to hearing the word ‘white’ because that is how things are going to break down in the near future.
Posted by Civilized Neighbor at 7:17 PM on May 9
To play the race card as Mrs. Clinton has, to highlight and encourage a sense that we are crudely divided as a nation, to make your argument a brute and cynical “the black guy can’t win but the white girl can” is—well, so vulgar, so cynical, so cold, that once again a Clinton is making us turn off the television in case the children walk by.
I am VERY surprised to hear that coming from Clinton. Perhaps I should not be considering just how badly she has been stabbed in the back by both the far left and the black community.
What the article fails to understand or rather what the writer of the article desperately wants to deny is that she can win with that strategy. There is a REASON voter turnout has been so low in elections for generations now. That reason is no candidate has chosen to do what they should should be doing…..represent WHITE interests. Were that to change. It would change…..everything.
The time is ripe for it, I think. Liberalism is, increasingly, being revealed as not only a lie….but evil. And multiculturalism is one of their most potent tools for harming people….mostly whites. There is a limit. A limit to how many can be raped, robbed, murdered and assaulted by racist blacks and hispanics before whites realize that, as a group, they are evil and a threat to us. And that their claims of racism are foul lies. People are waking up to this. Waking up to the fact that they’ve been tricked.
When I was a kid, only a few people understood this and they were pariahs. Today, everyone I know knows this (and I live in ultraliberal New Jersey…I can just imagine what it’s like where the rednecks live). People talk OPENLY about this. And those conversations often include the n-word, not in unreasoning hatred but in well deserved anger.
Clinton SHOULD come out openly in support of white issues. If she does and gets away with it, she could take the nomination from Obama and she could win against McCain. Liberalism and multiculturalism and support for blacks, hispanics and open borders would be dead in this country.
Hell, I despise her almost as much as I despise Obama. But, I’d vote for her over McCain.
Posted by at 7:57 PM on May 9
I can’t stand the Clintons, and believe they’re among our greatest political hypocrites, but I do give it to her that she had the courage to say it.
Posted by at 8:08 PM on May 9
“White Americans? Hard-working white Americans? “Even Richard Nixon didn’t say white,” an Obama supporter said, “even with the Southern strategy.”
If John McCain said, “I got the white vote, baby!” his candidacy would be over. And rising in highest indignation against him would be the old Democratic Party.
To play the race card as Mrs. Clinton has, to highlight and encourage a sense that we are crudely divided as a nation, to make your argument a brute and cynical “the black guy can’t win but the white girl can” is—well, so vulgar, so cynical, so cold, that once again a Clinton is making us turn off the television in case the children walk by.
“She has unleashed the gates of hell,” a longtime party leader told me. “She’s saying, ‘He’s not one of us.’”
She is trying to take Obama down in a new way, but also within a new context. In the past he was just the competitor. She could say, “All’s fair.” But now he’s the competitor who is going to be the nominee of his party. And she is still trying to do him in. And the party is watching.”
The Democratic party has tried and tried to sweep the race issue under the rug but here it comes out with a vengence and the mere mention of it threatens to destroy party unity. This is the result of promoting non-Whites in almost every sector of society at the expense of Whites. Working class Whites will not be able forget the race issue as long as it is pushed in their faces everywhere they look.
The Democrats are proving to be very fun to watch this season. Hillary’s words have shown the world an uncomfortable truth about her party. Look for more division as the Democratic National Convention draws closer unless Hillary can be persuaded to drop out of the race.
Posted by True Resistance at 9:10 PM on May 9
“Clinton SHOULD come out openly in support of white issues. If she does and gets away with it, she could take the nomination from Obama and she could win against McCain. Liberalism and multiculturalism and support for blacks, hispanics and open borders would be dead in this country.
Hell, I despise her almost as much as I despise Obama. But, I’d vote for her over McCain.
Posted by at 7:57 PM on May 9”
And…
I can’t stand the Clintons, and believe they’re among our greatest political hypocrites, but I do give it to her that she had the courage to say it.
Posted by at 8:08 PM on May 9”
Wouldn’t it be the cruelest irony that Hillary Clinton might just get elected, if she keeps on talking like this. Of all the groups she has pandered to, she finally found the one that nobody has pandered to in a long time, and one that is starving for it and willing to believe it.
Let’s not forget that talking is not acting. She will say anything and do anything to get elected. What she would do to us once she got into office wouldn’t be allowed on TV unless it were pay-per-view.
Posted by Wild Eyed Charlie at 9:20 PM on May 9
remember, when you look at your children tonight, don’t worry about who will answer the red phone when it rings. remember that a black man as president will have his finger on the nuclear button that can kill billions of people. at least think of your children and grandchildren and not allow a black man to become president. signed, a very concerned american
Posted by at 9:44 PM on May 9
Once again, a “hard-line” conservative comes to the aid of the multi-cultural uberlibs.
Interesting.
And isn’t it also interesting that there ALWAYS seems to be an open mic for the Peggy Noonan’s of the world to express the “true meaning of Americanism” in the pages of the WSJ and other cosmopolitan globalist rags the second we appear to be losing faith?
Hmmm.
Posted by James at 10:42 PM on May 9
#“White Americans? Hard-working white Americans? ‘Even Richard Nixon didn’t say “white,” an Obama supporter said, ‘even with the Southern strategy.’”
Well, maybe he should have!
Maybe that heir of : “McCarthyism,” “racism,” and patriotism, should have smelled the coffee brewing for the 80s and 90s?
Maybe he should have heard, in his unmitigated historic “foresight,” the sirens’ call of multicultural madness for what it was, Marxism repackaged and called “progress,” and rejected it? Instead of continuing his détente with the Reds in less uncomfortable “retirements” than his own?
He rehabilitated himself, he did indeed?
Yet?
“If John McCain said, ‘I got the white vote, baby!’ his candidacy would be over. And rising in highest indignation against him would be the old Democratic Party.”
But he does, in so many ways, he does.
He doesn’t say it, he condescendingly asks: ‘where else could you go? And if you could, you would never pick lettuce for $ 15.00 an hour, once you got there…’
Thus, is the state of the party of Nixon, and dare I say, Reagan and Goldwater too?
Sorry MS. Comrade Noonan,
That is just the way it is!
What more to say?
Well, of course, God help us all!!!
Posted by John PM at 10:52 PM on May 9
I don’t think she played the race card. I think she was tippytoeing around it, and thought she was safe refering to white people, but the truth is that whites can’t even use the word “white” anymore. We are told to simply pretend we are colorblind.
Posted by at 10:54 PM on May 9
Imagine saying the word ‘White’! It is atrocious! Of course it was a woman that said it. That’s not so bad. Women are victims. Imagine a White heterosexual male referring to his OWN race. Imagine. Obama and Clinton. Don’t be surprised if Hillary winds up on the ticket as Obama’s running mate. The controlled media loves displaying a Black man next to a White woman — in any context whatsoever. The ultimate triumph for the media and the liberals and the multiculturalists is for a Black man to have a White woman (with blond hair) as a running mate. It is the media’s dream soon to become a reality. Embrace it folks! It’s going to wake up a lot of us palefaces.
Posted by Awakened at 10:54 PM on May 9
Why is it that we can talk openly about “the black vote”, but using the word “white” causes a scandal?
Posted by at 11:05 PM on May 9
To play the race card as Mrs. Clinton has, to highlight and encourage a sense that we are crudely divided as a nation, to make your argument a brute and cynical “the black guy can’t win but the white girl can” is—well, so vulgar, so cynical, so cold, that once again a Clinton is making us turn off the television in case the children walk by.
Hilarious. I actually thought her comments were rather mild. Of course, this is an era in which we can’t utter even the mildest truths about race. Except, pundits CAN point out that 90% of the black vote is going to Obama, as long as they do so in purely statistical terms. That’s all right. But as soon as we say that a certain percentage of whites might actually want to vote for another white, and that such a thing is perfectly understandable, then its outrageous. Hillary just lost her beloved title as the country’s “first black first lady.”
Posted by Tim in Indiana at 11:06 PM on May 9
I’m none too fond of Peggy Noonan. Without going into too much detail, I will say that she should never be allowed to get into a position of power.
Posted by Question Diversity at 11:12 PM on May 9
THEY NOW NEED THE WHITE MAN’S VOTES
Democrats screw WHITES for 40 years and now need our votes. Go to your Hispanic voters Clinton.
Posted by the Soviet Republic of New Jersey at 11:21 PM on May 9
A few weeks ago Hillary was asked point-blank in a debate if she thought Obama could win, and she answered “yes . . . yes …”
But with these more recent comments, she is essentially saying that she doesn’t think Obama can win. In the fall when Obama leads the Democrats to defeat, she’ll be able to say “I told you so.” Then, she might be seen as the more competent leader in the party.
Posted by Reader-1 at 11:29 PM on May 9
He came within 2 in Indiana and won by 14 in N.C.. I hate to keep making this repetitous {unposted} post— but. I told you so. No matter what dirt is dug up on the witch doctor, his zombie liberal followers have drank the potion. Attention: All white subjects, be prepared, I fear we are doomed to the coronation of the avenging king Hussein, & his wife the bitter Queen Mee- shell.
Posted by The Old Sage at 11:59 PM on May 9
How can these racial traitors and hypocrites; now praise white-Americans who they have had parties ” celebrating ” the projected end of original Americans caused by the demo-rat-ic 1965 Immigration and Reform Act ,teasonous, non-representative pogrom ? The former first lady of America’s first ” black ” president, ” Slick Willie ” declare for separation ?
Posted by at 1:02 AM on May 10
By uttering the seldom heard “white” word, Hillary has officially announced that such people actually exist. However, when the chips are down as in her case, she had no alternative but to play her ace card for a desperate last play at winning the hand.
It doesn’t really matter who wins the contest because this public display is for entertainment purposes only. In reality, “presidents are selected, not elected.” We just don’t know who has been given the tap on the shoulder yet.
Posted by at 1:18 AM on May 10
John PM, correction, McCain said Americans wouldn’t pick lettuce for fifty dollars an hour. I double checked the sources. Yes,he is that vile.
Posted by Bobby at 3:35 AM on May 10
“Scorched Earth” politics. Hillary has been routed by Obama so she may as well scorch the political landscape on her way out?Anything that contributes to White racial consciousness is a good thing anyway, this may be the only “silver lining” to be found in this entire lurid spectacle.
Posted by Mike at 4:10 AM on May 10
None of these people are remotely qualified for the job of President. Come on people! I nominate Clint ” Make my day punk ” Eastwood for President and Joe ” Baseball bat ” Pesci for VP. Make America proud!
Posted by at 5:34 AM on May 10
“Hilarious. I actually thought her comments were rather mild. Of course, this is an era in which we can’t utter even the mildest truths about race.”
tim in Indiana
So did I. I really don’t see what all the fuss is about. She didn’t say anything terrible or shocking —only the word white. Is that considered an offensive word now?
Posted by at 7:58 AM on May 10
I never thought Hillary would be so bold as use a policially incorrect phrase like “white people” but good for her.
Posted by at 10:54 AM on May 10
This election year — as ghastly as it’s been to watch unfold, and as mind-blowingly, race-riotously HORRIFIC as it might yet get before the year is out — has nevertheless forced racial issues to the forefront. It’s impossible to hold a high-profile mass-media slug-fest between a white woman and a black (or black-ish) man and NOT mention racial issues.
This is a good thing for folks who think the way we do.
If there’s but one thing I’m sure EVERY AmRen regular would agree on, it’s that white issues — and indeed ANY sort of racial-consciousness among “People of Non-Color” — are routinely sidelined by the MSM. Sidelined, that is, when they’re not being demonized.
As other posters have noted, this “outburst” of Hillary’s is nothing more than the shocking nature of a white person talking about white people in public. That this harmless, factual, demonstrable — and indeed, OBVIOUS — remark of hers about her white support should become the subject of analysis and speculation, proves my point.
The Obamalamadingdong camp — which of course includes 99% of the MSM — goes into shocked-and-offended “How DARE you?” mode every time anybody utters the word “white.”
Well, when it’s said by anybody WHITE, I mean.
A white person saying the W-word is now considered ALMOST as bad as a white person saying the N-word — and we all know there’s NOTHING worse than a white person saying the N-word. (According to TV bounty hunter “Dog” Chapman, saying the N-word was “the worst thing he’d ever done in his life” — worse, even, than any violence he’d ever been involved with.)
The charismatic young Senator from Indonesia — oops, sorry, Illinois — has said he wants “a national conversation on race.” Yet as soon as one begins, he and his operatives try to shut it down — or at least dictate the terms of what may or may not be said. Mr. Jared Taylor has also been trying to promote such a conversation on race since he launched his American Renaissance magazine some 18 years ago. Mr. Taylor has never tried to silence anybody — and has fastidiously stuck to verifiable facts over smears and namecalling — yet has been, by turns, ignored and vilified for his noble efforts at truth-telling.
In a classic case of “Be careful what you wish for,” it now appears that Comrade Barry may be getting his “race conversation” after all. Unfortunately for him, it’s not going to be the one-sided, didactic, and prescriptive “dialog” that The Great Non-White Hope had in mind. In the white race’s present politically-correct predicament, ANYTHING that gets white people thinking and talking about the forbidden subject of Breathing While Caucasian will only help to keep us Caucasians breathing.
Posted by The Incredible Shrinking White Man at 11:01 AM on May 10
White People have unique interests of their own.
Once a simple bumper sticker statement has made it’s way into the general public consciousness everything will change. It has to be simple, something people can get their minds around and reinforce with matrix emotions. Propaganda, yes. The intelligent analysis, detail and explanation come afterward. It’s just the way people are!
A statement like “White people have unique interests of their own” shouldn’t be controversial. It shouldn’t offend any reasonable person. It’s a simple leap; a beachhead once entrenched, everything comes easy; like a password on your computer, once known and used everything opens before you.
Hillary’s obvious attempt to find the intellectual formulation, the password, that would be simple, emotionally strong, and at the same time politically correct, is good news indeed! It has to come from a respectable source like her. It seems so difficult to us, so far, but it’s really just an ‘Aha’ insight that could grab White People almost overnight in seemingly mass mystical experience. “Yes, it’s alright to believe Whites have unique interests all of their own.” Once they could say that, everything would be different, and much would follow.
Hillary’s attempt is fumbling and may fail, but it’s a start; the next person may find the right phrase, password, under better circumstances and succeed.
White salvation may come from a different direction than we expect, maybe from someone like Hillary as a leader. The character in Orwell’s ‘1984’ speculated that any hope of over turning his nightmare world would have to come from the ‘proletariat’. Don’t forget that Communism was defeated by the working class unions in Poland. The key is separating the White working class from the non-whites thrown together in a unnatural, incongruous way. Their interests don’t correspond.
Upton Sinclair’ novel “The Jungle”, describes how Blacks were brought in to break the Chicago labor strikes. The White working class has unique interests, but they’re made impotent by parasite non-white ethnocentric groups that care only about their own group interests. Ever since then, Labor (and the left) has lost it’s way.
But aren’t I giving opportunistic Hillary too much credit? Yes and no. People are complex. They express contradictory opinions when they’re with their church friends and when they’re with their barroom buddies. They’re not necessessily being hypocritical; The ambiance makes them sincere on each occasion. An idea can ‘dry up’ because it can go nowhere, or it can come to life when it will get a hearing. All of humanity is in each person. A hundred years ago almost everyone believed in White survival. What’s different today? The opportunity to fight for that. But it’s still there in the minds of virtually all White People, only in a dormant but live potential.
Posted by Patrick at 2:49 PM on May 10
Perhaps I should run for President.
As President, I would order all foreign aid money and UN contributions impounded (a President can do this, and the money can not be spent until he relents). I would issue blanket pardons to everyone convicted of having violated state or city handgun or “assault” weapons bans (on those charges alone). I would issue blanket pardons for anyone convicted of violating the 1932, 1968 and 1986 National Firearms Acts (on those charges alone). I would order the Mexican border sealed, wired and mined, except for a few easily-policed roads. I would request Congress to overhaul the tax system as the total tax burden on the average American family, as a proportion of their income, doubled between 1963 and 1988. I would press for cutbacks in the US army, by reducing forces deployed in Europe. The surplus US Army personnel would be transferred to ICE for mass-roundups and expulsions of some 40 million illegal aliens here. I would ask the Iraqis to hold plebiscite elections so they can partition a country that can not be fixed, and retain US forces there only until that was done, and no longer than that. I would press for charges of crimes against humanity being filed at The Hague for “deliberate importation of alien peoples with the intention of displacing native peoples” for pro-fourth-world-immigration government officials and clergy in every developed state, even ours (yes, this is recognized as a crime against humanity, as it is related to genocide). I would make khaki pants, polo shirts and loafers my daily dress, because as President, I would be in office to work, not to look like a Gentleman’s Quarterly model.
I do not think the USSA is ready for either a convicted felon in the White House or a Japanese First Lady.
One Australian friend suggests that I should just be Dictator of the World instead. I doubt that is an elected office.
Posted by Michael C. Scott at 6:00 PM on May 10
She’s a very ambitious woman and she’ll do or say anything to get elected. She would call Obama the N word if it would throw the election in her favor. I would like to see her win the nomination by courting White votes. That would make McCain squirm, what with all his pandering to the NAACP and La Raza. I would love to see what his strategy would be.
Posted by at 6:35 PM on May 10
I’m offended. Hillary says “hard working white Americans” support her. Well, I’m white, I work, and I don’t support Hillary. So is she saying I’m lazy? I want an apology. And reparations.
Posted by at 6:53 PM on May 10
“The controlled media loves displaying a Black man next to a White woman — in any context whatsoever. The ultimate triumph for the media and the liberals and the multiculturalists is for a Black man to have a White woman (with blond hair) as a running mate. It is the media’s dream soon to become a reality. Embrace it folks! It’s going to wake up a lot of us palefaces.”
-You hit the nail right on the head here! Yet having them both on the same ticket is not even neccessary. All they need is to place a Black male in the White House and this symbolism will already be driven home. America ITSELF is symbolic of the White female, so by “picking” Obama, the symbolism of the White female choosing the Black male will already be made.Even more strongly so, since Obama himself is the product of the White female choosing the Black male. Twisted stuff, but this is all part of the pathology of these death throes that White America is going through.
Posted by Mick at 7:40 PM on May 10
She’s a very ambitious woman and she’ll do or say anything to get elected. She would call Obama the N word if it would throw the election in her favor.
But isn’t that the point of her saying what she did? She is testing the waters to see if calling black people what they are, especially their leaders, like Obama, would in fact win her the election.
I think the answer to that question is yes. Alot has changed since the days of David Duke. It’s not obvious because our media is so tightly controlled. Whites (all whites) are right on the cusp of racial consciousness. It won’t take much to crystallize this for the vast majority. Obama doesn’t realize it, but he is the catalyst.
Posted by at 8:03 PM on May 10
Michael C. Scott, I like your well-considered ideas. IF ONLY you, or someone with similar views, would consider the “top job.” I keep hoping that we haven’t passed the point of no return, but just this evening in Church, we were asked to pray for our nation “in these very difficult, dangerous, uncertain times.” We all understood.
Posted by at 9:13 PM on May 10
Why is it that we can talk openly about “the black vote”, but using the word “white” causes a scandal?
Posted by at 11:05 PM on May 9
EXACTLY! White people are not supposed to have any needs as a separate people. We are supposed to be quiet and invisible, pay our taxes and politely hand over our forefather’s country to non-whites. You see, the People Who Run The World Behind The Scenes have decided whites are rather difficult to dominate, for various reasons. It is easier to dominate lower IQ types who cannot understand abstract concepts nor are inventive.
Once our numbers are down to 5% of the world population, and then down to 2%, do you think the media will be talking about what a tragedy it is to lose the wonderful white race? They would definitely be lamenting this, of course, if it were any other race.
Posted by at 9:59 PM on May 10
Even if she somehow managed to get the nomination, Clinton has clearly ticked off the black electorate to an extent that they will not support her in force at the polls. Her Senate seat might be threatened in 2010 unless blacks have a very short memory.
Posted by at 10:00 PM on May 10
Four years of Barack and Michelle may well mean four years of “pinning the blame on the honkey” for any and every black problem, even more than we currently endure. Talk about depressing!
Posted by at 10:46 PM on May 10
DENIAL Peggy Noonan. You’re living a lie… You obviously haven’t noticed that the age of individualism is over in America and now the group reigns. And the ethnonationalist group forms its basis.
Posted by factualist at 8:15 AM on May 11
Hillary has no chance at getting any of the Black vote, so she’s trying to cozy up with the people she has trashed - Whites. No thanks, Hill.
Posted by at 9:29 AM on May 11
To Bobby, regarding:
“John PM, correction, McCain said Americans wouldn’t pick lettuce for fifty dollars an hour. I double checked the sources. Yes, he is that vile.”
Indeed, he is that vile and I understand this fully!
Please reread my paraphrase of what he said again; it was intended to be sardonic and humorous. Well, darkly humorous at any rate, given the sheer abysmal nature of this election. That fifty dollar crack was so disgusting and arrogant, it is beyond all belief. I went to school for 2 years beyond college and make about 60% of that amount an hour. I am not complaining mind you, only setting up the punch-line so to speak.
This being that this pig-dog McCain, will likely win this election on the backs of whites; yet he hates us so much, that he thinks we wouldn’t pick lettuce for fifty dollars an hour and feels this would warrant his disgusting amnesty positions?
With this in mind, with this snide and hatefully arrogant remark fully recognized as his contempt for all white Americans, we should always hold a blood liable against the sewer that is Vietnam.
We should hold it against them, because they didn’t put him down when they had the chance, and spare us his current graces. That omission can be seen as an act of warfare by stealth, should he become our next El Presidente.
And for that, we should drop 50 nuclear bombs on them once every year, on the anniversary of his return to our soil!
Posted by John PM at 9:59 AM on May 11
The * in my last post refers to Solzhenitsyn’s quote from his Harvard Address. That shallowness and impatience are the two psychic diseases of our age.
And he said that in 1978!
The Power Elite of today, the Liberal/Left/Neocon Leviathan, as I like to refer to them, are capable of building only one culture, Pop Culture. Interesting and entertaining as a diversion, absolutely end of the world dangerous if taking seriously for the real thing.
Geez, I mean, not even their money is real. And it’s all they seem to care about.
Posted by La Dolce Vita at 10:12 AM on May 11
Hell, I despise her almost as much as I despise Obama. But, I’d vote for her over McCain.
Posted by at 7:57 PM on May 9
Everyone should go back and read this excellent post. You might not agree with all of it, but that’s no matter. Well done anonymous, and may I humbly suggest you choose a name to post under, just so we can refer to you as something other than, anonymous. It gives you at least some kind of identity. And this whole thing does seem to be about a quest for identity; as opposed to our enemies trying to eliminate our identity.
But the one great thing you helped me see is that the writer is over doing it, which suggests panicking. As you said, the WSJ writer has a hard time dealing with the fact that Hillary could win on this issue of openly identifying with Whites. Just look at the adjectives and other words she uses to describe Hillary’s mere mention of Whites (Never mind that the MSM can refer to Obama as a “Black Prince” and routinely refer to him with the politically correct “African-American” even though he is half White). “Vulgar” “Crude” “Brute” “Cynical” etc. Wow, Ann Coulter was right, women ARE too vicious. But I would like to use a word or two to describe Noonan, “Self-Righteous” “Hysterical” “Hypocritical” “Deluded” “Kept” “Bought and Paid for” “Organ-grinders dancing monkey” “Journalistic Assassin.”
But, let us not forget…. Whites today are not allowed to identify as White. That is a quote from the late Mr. Rasberry, the Black Journalist who said there was no reason under any circumstance that Whites should be permitted to free assembly, none.
THIS is what it’s about. I was surprised this came from Peggy Noonan, but it did. The Power Elite she works for absolutely do not want us gathering, aside from the harmless AR Conference or two. But if we were to get behind Hillary, and she is the ONLY reasonable choice (sorry folks), then the Power Elite would probably get out the SWAT Team and Police Dogs and Riot Gear, etc. I have no doubt about it. And ARE eventually going to organize, and when we do, this is what will happen.
Posted by Mal Evans at 10:46 AM on May 11
“Hilarious. I actually thought her comments were rather mild. Of course, this is an era in which we can’t utter even the mildest truths about race.”
tim in Indiana
So did I. I really don’t see what all the fuss is about. She didn’t say anything terrible or shocking —only the word white. Is that considered an offensive word now?
Posted by at 7:58 AM on May 10
Yeah, but look at what it’s saying…. ZERO identification as White.
Either these people are beyond deluded with their “I’d Like To Teach The World To Sing” Coca-cola Commercial mentality of life.
Or they are just out and out not even hiding it anymore.
It’s a commentary about Hillary, but a message to us!
They want us to hear them tell Hillary, “back in your dog house, back, BACK… Get in there, Ge….” all said with a very visible back of the hand raised and ready in the event she doesn’t obey. I mean, it’s come to that.
For me, we are at the stage of “Pay NO attention to that man behind the curtain.” The Internet is revealing the PC, Multi-Culti Machine for what it is; but the problem is most Americans can see the man behind the curtain, but are listening to him tell them not to pay attention…to keep their focus on the Image telling them what to do….and lots of them are still doing it. They simply do not know how to respond any other way. For that reason alone I am glad AR is around, for all of its other obvious faults.
Posted by Salty Dog at 11:06 AM on May 11
The finalists will be Obama and McCain. So there is a black and a white canditate. Maybe the racial loyalty will make white democrats not to vote unless there is no white vice-president. So the next vice president is HRC.
There are two after election scenaria. Obama will not denounce his christianity. This will spell him troubles as he has left islam. Leaving islam is a crime punishable by death. Another scenarium is that Obama proclaims he has been all the time a devoted muslim. This might not please white Americans and the Jews who still remember 911.
The most unlikely scenarium is that McCain wins. That would give the present US extension time. But eventually the political division wll go by the race of voters the democratic party being for non-whites and the GOP for whites.
Posted by acc at 12:36 PM on May 11
We are going to have another civil war. I’m as scared now as I was when I was going down the Colorado Springs storm drain system. It will probably be very soon: early 2009 I should think.
I hope I am wrong.
Posted by Michael C. Scott at 6:44 PM on May 11
Sort of off the point, but….I’ve found using the word ‘white’, a PC no go and stringing it together with ‘white race’ people look at you like you’re Hitler himself.
Depending on the environment and company of course.
In the office with gays, fat woman and Indians(how dare you,”get rid of him he’s an antisocial elelment”).
Doing blue-collar back breaking work, sweaty work(no worries).
Good luck with your election, sorry about your lack of choice.
I was thinking hopefully Osama will shame himself if elected.
But with the Bill & Monica, Marion Barry, Ms America 2007(being on Coke and forgiven)scandals.What does it take these days to be shamed, he’d probably get away with being caught red handed selling nukes to Iran.
Posted by Gen X White Man in Oz at 8:50 PM on May 11
It’s a commentary about Hillary, but a message to us! They are just out and out not even hiding it anymore. They want us to hear them tell Hillary, “Back in your dog house, back, BACK… Get back in there!, Get….” all said with a very visible back of the hand raised and ready in the event she doesn’t obey. I mean, it’s come to that.
The Internet is revealing the PC, Multi-Culti Machine for what it is; but the problem is that most Americans can see the man behind the curtain, but are listening to him tell them not to pay attention…
Posted by Salty Dog
————————————————-
First Geraldine, now Hillary. They strayed one step out of the dog house and were slapped back in. What next?
Yes, they are all taking orders from “the man behind the curtain”. (Who feeds them?)
Posted by at 9:47 PM on May 11
This is actually GOOD news! As more and more racially aware/orientated minorites GAIN ‘political power’, all the WHITE candidates will have to strategize that going after the WHITE vote is the ONLY WAY TO GAIN POWER. Blacks will prefer blacks, and Latinos will prefer latinos. So a white DEM or Neo-con running against a Latino candidate will have to use his race card. Latinos will vote less along racial lines than blacks, but it could still be enough to make racial politics interesting.
Chickens comming home to roost. I have never figured out exactly why Clinton was the first ‘black’ president. He cut welfare moms off just like Reagan.
Posted by at 10:07 PM on May 11
“Hell, I despise her almost as much as I despise Obama. But, I’d vote for her over McCain.”
Posted by at 7:57 PM
That is very interesting, because what you’re saying is that you DESPISE them ALL; but that you simply despise her the least.
This confirms what I’ve said before: that our elections have degenerated more and more into a contest between sell-outs and traitors, working against our interests but competing for our votes; and we are given the choice of trying to figure out which one of them will be the LEAST DANGEROUS and the LEAST DAMAGING to our best interests.
Voting is no longer a matter of deciding which candidate do we WANT, but elminimating which candidates we most strongly do NOT want. It’s choosing not which candidate do we LIKE the most, but which candidate do we HATE the least!
In other words, this is a pathetic commentary on the state of affairs in American politics today. It’s obvious that this media-run illusion of democracy is NOT government by, of, and for the people.
Posted by browser at 10:12 PM on May 11
We won’t have a civil war. We are a demoralized nation. We will simply be taxed and legislated into obscurity and be replaced through demographics.
Posted by at 5:18 AM on May 12
If you can’t say something bad about white people, don’t say anything at all.
Posted by Godzilla Pimp at 7:40 AM on May 12
It saddens me to see the lack of choice my American friends have to vote for. If it’s any consolation, we, your neighbours to the north, have the same conundrum when we vote.
Now, my two cents; Hillary does not deserve the vote of the hard working, Whites, she claims are voting for her. She and her husband, “the first Black president,” have done nothing to deserve your loyalty. Vote for one of the lesser known candidates or don’t vote at all.
Posted by Louis from Montreal at 12:51 PM on May 12
