Navajo Nation Likely to Lose Internet Service
| AR Articles on Indians |
|---|
| How the South was Won (Dec. 2001) |
| “The Merciless Indian Savages” (Mar. 1998) |
| Noble Savagery (Dec. 1991) |
| The Noble Red Man (Dec. 1991) |
| Search AmRen.com for Indians |
| More news stories on Indians |
The thousands of Navajo Nation residents who rely on the Internet to work, study and communicate across their 27,000-square-mile reservation will be out of luck Monday, if their service provider shuts access as planned.
{snip}
A tribal audit last year revealed that Utah-based provider OnSat Network Communications Inc. may have double-billed the tribe, and it raised questions about how the tribe requested bids for the Internet contract.
Those discoveries led the Universal Service Administration Co., which administers the service under the Federal Communications Commission’s E-rate program, to tell the tribe March 28 that it would withhold $2.1 million from OnSat.
Jim Fitting, an attorney for OnSat, said the delay in payment means it can’t pay subcontractor SES Americom for satellite time.
“With USAC taking this particular position, it doesn’t look like we’re going to get paid in the foreseeable future,” Fitting said. “We’re already $4 million in the hole, so why should we continue doing it?”
Most evenings, when residents get off work, the reservation’s chapter houses are closed, but their wireless signals remain live. So it’s common to see residents with laptops sitting outside the chapter houses in cars, working away, a local official said.
Through the Washington, D.C.-based USAC, the FCC reimburses 85 percent to 90 percent of the costs for Internet service to 70 of the tribe’s 110 chapter houses, which operate like city governments. The Navajo Nation covers the other 10 percent to 15 percent of the cost and offers service inside the chapter house and nearby through Wi-Fi.
The USAC told Navajo President Joe Shirley Jr. in a March 28 letter that it is withholding money for OnSat for 2006-07 because of the possible overbilling and because the tribe didn’t comply with federal rules that require it to select the most cost-effective service or equipment through a fair, open and competitive bidding process.
The USAC asked the tribe to prove OnSat provided the service it is billing for and has not overbilled.
{snip}
(Posted on April 4, 2008)
Comments
The Internet was not part of American Indian culture. That is white man’s culture. Like electricity, automobiles, vaccines, antibiotics and such.
Since the purpose of the reservations where places where American Indians can preserve their pure culture, such things have no place there.
Posted by at 11:25 PM on April 4
We paid for this. The special status given to reservations must stop. No more “sovereign nation” within a nation.
Posted by at 7:02 AM on April 5
Wait a minute….I thought Native Americans wanted nothing to do with white culture. So….then what are they wanting internet service for?
Posted by at 9:38 PM on April 5
Anyone that can buy a $300+ computer can surely pay $9.00 a month for cheap dial up service. Why should the Government be buying anyone Internet service at all? I will never understand why people who do not work, get everything handed to them on a silver platter, but the people who do work lose half their paycheck to Federal,State,Local,Medicare,SS and tons of taxes we do not even know about.
Now that I think about it, they might get the computers free too.
Posted by at 2:54 PM on April 7
“Wait a minute….I thought Native Americans wanted nothing to do with white culture. So….then what are they wanting internet service for?”
Several reasons. First - to complain (perhaps legitimately, our track record with them sucks eggs). As the saying goes, “The ‘net gives everyone a bullhorn!”
Second - to look for jobs or a white mate and get out of their reservation. Most reservations are variations of trailer parks with slightly different people and scenery.
Third - because they know something the PC crowd won’t admit…that the white man has a culture that is far superior to their superstitious, primitive, totem-spirit worshiping, and brutal culture. (the Sioux and Aztecs best known for the last bit) It’s quite natural to be curious about people who are richer and more enlightened than your own.
Finally I find a recurring theme in all this: a well-intentioned white person propping up another culture. Wouldn’t the money have been better spent on food and clothing and job training?
Posted by Dark-Star at 5:53 PM on April 7