Comments
Barack Obama not that different from Jackson and Sharpton.
With the latest information coming out on this guy, it seems so. Just another Big Government, in the “minority grievance business” type politician. Can’t say I’m surprised.
Posted by Bobby at 5:38 PM on March 20
Brillant. Mr. Steele has put into words something Walter Williams has been saying for years. Both are right. Too bad these black men will never have a chance to lead the nation. They are not black enough for the liberals.
Posted by Frank at 6:00 PM on March 20
So many whites continue to support Obama, even after write’s anti-American anti-White racist comments and Obama’s only mild reprove of write.
Case in point: Geraldine Ferraro. She objected to Obama’s comparing her to Write, but she also said she thought Obama’s speech was excellent and a very good speech on race relations. Are you kidding me? It was a terrible speech. And Ferraro should be furious. He even injected his little old grandmother—who has shown him nothing but kindness and love—as being a problem because she confessed to him she is afraid of black men as she walks the streets. He should have defended his grandmother and told her it is all right to be concerned about her safty. She need not feel guilty about that. Instead, he seemed to amplify his disapproval of her to the world. But he can’t bring himself to denounce Write.
Then in the same speech he refers to Geraldine Ferraro, again, even though Ferraro did nothing but point out a fact—in today’s political climate, Obama has an advantage in that he can get 90% of the black vote whithout losing the white vote.
In short, it was a terrible speech and Obama didn’t address the issue of his close association with Write. But he needn’t worry. Whites will continue to fawn over him and the press will continue to be in awe.
Posted by at 6:18 PM on March 20
“For whites, here is the opportunity to document their deliverance from the shames of their forbearers. And for blacks, here is the chance to document the end of inferiority.”
“Shames of their forebearers?” Well, old guy, you missed the mark there entirely. Slavery a couple hundred years ago concerns no white other than self-appointed elitists and radical liberal types who are out of touch with the real world.
It isn’t even a feeling of shame that drives these mentally challenged minions of political correctness to give up the ship, so to speak. Their attitudes are formed from a base that desires to placate for the sake of profit and getting along, with many of them additionally desiring some kind of confused conception that has to do with a peace-loving utopia where everybody hugs all the time.
But all of them are blind to the fact that blacks share no such view and not only behave criminally towards whites, but preach against them and hate them, and that has been their position all along in spite of everything they have been given by whites, and that will not change, no matter what, even if Barack Hussein is elected president. So the bottom line is that Obama supporters are comprised of the mentally disturbed, the misinformed, and the greedy, who have no real grounding in reality. Guilt has very little to do with the matter.
And an Obama presidency allows blacks the chance to “document the end of inferiority?”
How so? He’s half black, far the exception to 99.9 % of any other black, and he was raised in the white world by a white mother that dragged him out of bed every morning to study, yet, still, compared to educated whites he’s only what could be considered mediocre.
That’s supposed to end black inferiority? Preposterous. But probably not to the average dimwitted black who is known to place himself on a pedestal of arrogant supremacy if he knows his ABC’s by heart and can do a little bit of basic math, totally blind to his own stupidity.
There’s hardly any bargaineering going on here as Steele would guess. More than anything what this entire affair should reveal to the entire white population is that there are white people here who are ready, willing and able to sell out their heritage, their traditions, and their culture to satisfy some sick, misguided desire. And this entire contentious debacle is unequivocal proof that multiracial societies cannot work, and on a personal basis it reveals that one of the cruelest things in the world a woman can do is bear a multiracial child that has no grounding in anything and really belongs to no one.
Like the man without a country, Obama is the man without a racial family, and he miserably straddles the racial fence in confusion. Even today when he claims to have the problem solved.
Posted by Robert Kelly at 6:20 PM on March 20
Overall a good article, and it highlights the reason why a “black” can never be president. There is always an anti-white strain hidden somewhere deep in the psyche of every black person. For one thing, they can’t reach the highest levels of society on a totally even playing field. They have benefited from affirmative action and other programs which, at their core, have as their philosophy that blacks are historically the victims of white people, and so deserve perpetual restitution. For this reason a black candidate is always going to be “anti-white” in some respect. If this “blacks as victims of evil whitey” philosophy were ever to disappear from American society, a black still could not get elected because then whites would have no feelings of guilt that would motivate them to vote black.
Posted by Tim in Indiana at 6:22 PM on March 20
With his “blame whitey” speech, Obama broke the bargain, starting with the line “right the wrongs of history” (read reparations)
“And for blacks, here is the chance to document the end of inferiority.”
and what happens at the end of 4 (or eight) years of an Obama presidency when the “end of inferiority” is not realized?
An Obama presidency may not be very good for Blacks.
Posted by at 6:37 PM on March 20
An excellent analysis of Obama’s dilemma by Shelby Steele. It’s a dilemma I believe many, many biracial people face, although his is magnified many times because of his candidacy for president. The dilemma is: What am I? WHO am I? Obama has chosen to say “I am African American” and to hitch his wagon to the star of a vicious, hate-filled demagogue and his Afrocentric church to try to prove it, most of all to himself. Note also how, in a society where successful black men so often marry White women, Obama appears to have deliberately chosen a black as his mate. Possibly he was afraid that unless he reinforced the black, his children would be TOO light.
On the other hand, Obama has preached the bogus argument to White audiences that as president he could take us “beyond race,” that he could “transcend race.” Since the revelation of the rantin’ and ravin’ preacher’s hate spewing, Obama’s chances of that coming true are melting like snow in July. I believe White America, enthralled as Steele said with the idea of a black president, is finally waking up to say, “My God! What were we thinking?!”
Posted by Wayne Engle at 6:52 PM on March 20
I hope some savvy enterprenuer makes up millions of bumper stickers before the election that state:
“GOD DAMN AMERICA!….VOTE OBAMA”. Yes…that should put an end to Mr. Obama’s bid for president quite nicely. I don’t have the resources to make it happen, so the idea is free to anyone that wants it.
Posted by Cliff Yablonski at 7:09 PM on March 20
Steve Sailer and UK race chief Trevor Phillips have essentially said the same thing — That Obama is the imaginary black friend for whites to hold up to defend against racism charges.
Posted by Question Diversity at 7:17 PM on March 20
“Thus, nothing could be more dangerous to Mr. Obama’s political aspirations than the revelation that he, the son of a white woman, sat Sunday after Sunday—for 20 years—in an Afrocentric, black nationalist church in which his own mother, not to mention other whites, could never feel comfortable.”
I would say pity the poor White grandparents who brought him into their home and nourished him, only to be denigrated and have their kindness turned on them like a knife in the back. But I see in vdare.com that Steve Sailer has discovered the White grandfather was a self-hating White leftist who makes pastor Jeremiah Wright sound like Ghandi when it comes to attacking Whites. So … they sort of got what they deserved. Unfortunately, the rest of the nation is on the verge of being raped by the Obamaists, thanks to Obama’s grandparents’ suckling of the serpent.
Posted by Deporter at 7:18 PM on March 20
Barack Obama only grants whites “racial innocence” upon their voting for him. Like the Medieval Church, our Souls fly out of racial purgatory when our votes clink in the ballot box.
Posted by PBL at 7:26 PM on March 20
I think Mr Steele is on to something. I know that White Obama supporters are irrational in their expectations of him. They seem to think that his election will fix everything, that he can somehow “transform the nation” into something better. Maybe they imagine that all the Blacks will pick up 15 or 20 IQ points and start acting civilized enough that White liberals won’t have to be afraid of them any more. Whatever, there is a powerful fantasy afoot among White wienies, a dream that it will no longer be necessary to judge people by the color of their skin, and B. Hussein Obama has tapped into that.
Posted by Schoolteacher at 7:32 PM on March 20
As realistic white male I am shocked by all the support that stupid whites have for Obama. I know that there are ignorant whites who view Obama as some type of saviour. They tend to be young and dumb 20 something’s. They have not enough life experience. They don’t understand that minorities as a rule hate the white race. And Obama has spoken in platitudes. They view a vote for Obama as the road to Utopia. As the truth about Obama is coming out I hope these whites wake up and get real.
Posted by Burr Hamilton at 8:39 PM on March 20
“And the press, normally happy to dispel every political pretension, has all but quivered before Mr. Obama. They, too, have feared being on the wrong side of destiny.”
Shelby Steele makes for good reading. However, I think he is incorrect about the press’s fear. They fear being branded as racist. Period.
Posted by at 8:55 PM on March 20
“Bargainers make the subliminal promise to whites not to shame them with America’s history of racism, on the condition that they will not hold the bargainer’s race against him. And whites love this bargain—and feel affection for the bargainer—”
Most blacks feel little need to be ‘bargainers’, unless they are the boss, in which case, they have no need at all to be a ‘bargainer’, to get what they want. Affirmative action and being untouchable give them what they want, and one thing they don’t want is to be fair to whites.
Posted by at 9:08 PM on March 20
Barack Obama is symbol of something much larger and much more significant than black hostility towards whites.
Don’t fall for Steele’s vulgar propaganda.
He is a symbol of WHITE ruling class irresponsibility and treachery.
I mean, just look at all of the jumped up, plutocratic, Wall Street Journal reading white who have supported him … knowing damn well what he’s all about.
You can’t tell me that the Kennedy’s weren’t aware of Rev. Wright and the rest of Obama’s racial baggage.
No bloody way!
He is a symbol of class prejudice, of rich whites ruthlessly puting their own class interests ahead of the interests of their fellow whites.
And the same is true of Hillary and John McCain. It’s just not a blatant with them … for obvious reasons.
Posted by KP at 9:21 PM on March 20
This article hit the bullseye.
Let’s remember that the purpose of the presidential election is to elect the most qualified and trustworthy person available to the Oval Office and not to prove that we are not racists, after all.
Mr. Steele (interviewd today by Lou Dobbs) could have been declared a “race traitor” by some. Which makes me think that, perhaps, it’s not the race that counts, but the closeness of person’s dominant genome. Mr. Steele, although partially of black ancestry (I suppose), seems to be genetically closer to many of us, Caucasians, than some of 100% white people like, for instance, Bill Clinton. (You probably saw a paper re-posted at AR that claimed that “liberalism” is genetically predicated.)
If he is our genetic kin, indeed, then, perhaps, we should change our emphasis and stop talking about races and begin to talk about genetic kinship and genetically kin groups, instead. This should shut up the “politically correct” propaganda and its militant thugs of kind of SPLC (just to name one of many) for a while.
I am sure that the above idea is based on gross oversiplification, but please remember that so were many other inventions in their early stages. The bottom line is not what someone’s race is but whom he will side with in time of test and turmoil. (No, I don’t think Obama will side with us.)
Steele told Dobbs that he gives whites the benefit of doubt. I am tempted to give him the benefit of doubt, too.
Posted by A Reader at 9:33 PM on March 20
“And yet, in the end, Barack Obama’s candidacy is not qualitatively different from Al Sharpton’s or Jesse Jackson’s. Like these more irascible of his forbearers, Mr. Obama’s run at the presidency is based more on the manipulation of white guilt than on substance. Messrs. Sharpton and Jackson were “challengers,” not bargainers. They intimidated whites and demanded, in the name of historical justice, that they be brought forward. Mr. Obama flatters whites, grants them racial innocence, and hopes to ascend on the back of their gratitude. Two sides of the same coin.”
He is right in that Obama is essentially the same as Jackson and Sharpton. The sameness is that they are all marxists. Steele believes in the existance of White guilt. I think he is wrong. White fear and marxist ideology are the forces at work. The leftest crowd does not feel guilty, they feel superior. They, quite unfortunately, hold enough power to cow those who disagree.
Where were those black loving leftists when Alan Keyes was running for president? Why didn’t they draft Herman Cain? Why didn’t Thomas Sowell have to join a fascist church for “street cred”? Clarence Thomas is a supreme court justice, and Dr. Walter Williams was chairman of one of the best economics departments at any university (boasting several Nobel prize winners), but will you ever see any of them honored during black history month? I don’t think so.
Whites are not looking for expiation from blacks. Marxists are just looking for a stooge.
Posted by Flamethrower at 9:55 PM on March 20
Mr Steele is right on the money. He gets right to the
heart of the issue: politcal correctness is perverted Christ-
ianity with Whitenss being equivalent to Original Sin. And from
there, a sophisticated Black Man like Obama can easily become a
Christ figure absolving the Evil Whites of guilt. That Obama is
half White only adds to the symbolism. Did not Christ become man
and still remain God? And the next step would be for all of us
to become like Obama-hand in hand Black and White go forward but
only their coffee colored children can enter the Promised Land.
Yes, miscegenation is a sacrament of this evil cult. Now that he
is completely exposed, he is to be rejected by all decent Whites
everywhere. Vote for yourself and your Children, not Death per-
sonified.
Posted by Freyr at 12:23 AM on March 21
Remarkably, none of the posters above made any predictions about how the Wright affair will affect the outcome of the Democratic nomination race or the presidential race. (As of the time I am writing.)
My view is that Obama still gets the nomination, but that the country as a whole will now be very wary of him and he won’t win the election.
We have just seen a turning point in the presidential election of 2008.
Posted by Reader-1 at 12:24 AM on March 21
I don’t care what anyone says. Politics and the Press. Two occupations simply oozing with Degenerates.
I’m no genuis, and only did fair in High School, never went to college. But I work hard and got my own small business, Landscaping. I do ok, not great, but ok.
But I started to do something I never did before, and even though I don’t consider myself a White Nationalist, at all, I know I was driven to it by all this anti-White stuff.
I started reading books. You know, Dead White Males. I just thought, if these guys in the MSM and the whole PC thing don’t like them, they must be good. I’ll tell ya, I recommend it. After reading a good book it makes TV look SO stupid, and movies too. Like another world. And it makes it easier to read the Internet stuff I like.
It’s like exercising. I don’t do it to be in the Olympics. And I don’t read to be some big Intellectual. Its just good for me. Maybe if TV and Movies weren’t so bad I would use them instead of books. But above all its making me feel more White. I like it. It doesn’t make me hate other races, it just makes me like being White. These books are great and aren’t in any other culture and maybe I don’t get them like some professor but I get something out of it.
It also cheers me up, especially after reading all this garbage about Obama.
Posted by Scott Landers at 3:28 AM on March 21
Shelby Steele himself claims to be the product of an African American man and a white woman. He’s a race relations expert at Stanford and a rare African American conservative. He says affirmative action has had a negative impact on African Americans.
That “bargainer” concept in the WSJ piece is not new. He’s written a book A Bound Man: Why We Are Excited About Obama and Why He Can’t Win. A commentary similar to the one in WSJ was published in Time a few months ago.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1689619,00.html
This quote from Time commentary is memorable in summing up Obamamania.
“Obama—like Oprah—is an opportunity for whites to think well of themselves, to give themselves one of the most self-flattering feelings a modern white can have: that they are not racist.”
Posted by at 4:08 AM on March 21
Obama is of course, a fraud, and a friend to radicals like Wright. His own people eat this up, obviously. The question is, are normal Americans too dim and/or self-destructive to buy it also? Perhaps this election will serve as the ‘canary in the coalmine’ as a predictor for the future of American civilization.
Posted by Jack at 9:18 AM on March 21
Obama has promoted himself very well on the Internet, especially on YouTube. I think American Renaissance needs to start a YouTube channel called ‘American Renaissance’ where all the speeches from the conferences and other related footage, as well as Mr. Taylor’s debates and TV/radio appearances can be viewed.
The Internet is the best way to reach people with our message and YouTube is one of the best methods of doing so.
Posted by Economist at 9:39 AM on March 21
“Obama has promoted himself very well on the Internet, especially on YouTube. I think American Renaissance needs to start a YouTube channel called ‘American Renaissance’ where all the speeches from the conferences and other related footage, as well as Mr. Taylor’s debates and TV/radio appearances can be viewed.
“The Internet is the best way to reach people with our message and YouTube is one of the best methods of doing so.”
Posted by Economist at 9:39 AM on March 21
I think that is an absolutely excellent idea. It’s a great way to reach the youth in this country before they get to one of the university propaganda centers, besides getting the message out generally. At least it will give them a base of knowledge to draw from other than the Pavlovian indoctrination of political correctness.
If there’s any cost, I’d be more than happy to contribute.
I hope that Jared Taylor gives this option some serious consideration.
Posted by Robert Kelly at 10:37 AM on March 21
I know I’m going to get flamed for this, but here goes, I’m a white guy and I think an Obama presidency could be a good thing in the long run. All three choices right now are pro-amnesty marxists, the biggest difference in them being their willingness to extend the Iraq war. “100 Years” McCain and “I Voted for the War Then I Voted Against It” Clinton cannot be trusted to end it, but Obama seems serious about wanting to get out of Iraq. As far as race goes, one of two things will happen: Obama’s election (which would not happen without the white vote) would placate SOME of the race hustlers OR Obama’s anti-white side would come out and he would start demanding reparations for slavery or something like that. If that didn’t get him impeached, he would never be elected the next term and it would be decades before a black could even try to run for president. Whites, and I’m talking about whites in general, not just AmRen posters, are outraged at Wright’s speeches. Obama’s slips in the polls reflects that. I take that as a sign that the liberal brainwashing is wearing off and whites are finally waking up. A militant black in the white house for four years would be all the nails that coffin needs.
Posted by at 11:45 AM on March 21
“I think he is incorrect about the press’s fear. They fear being branded as racist. Period.”
I wonder why people in America fear being branded a racist?
Posted by at 12:14 PM on March 21
Lots - LOTS - of great posts.
Posted by KP at 9:21 PM on March 20, point about Classism certainly has some truth to it.
“(You probably saw a paper re-posted at AR that claimed that “liberalism” is genetically predicated.)”
Posted by A Reader at 9:33 PM on March 20
This touches on something that I’ve been thinking about for a while now, ie; that the REAL reason the Liberal/Left/Neocons react with such hysteria every time someone says something about Genetics is NOT because they care about Blacks (their policies have driven a stake through the heart of the Black “Community”. Even with all the evidence, after nearly 50 years and Trillions of dollars later, they STILL can’t admit they are wrong. How honest or loving is that? It sounds pretty twisted and unhealthy to me).
That’s a pretext, and to me, a not very convincing one, not anymore at least. Especially after the Watson affair. That was the straw the broke the camel’s back for me.
All they can do is offer yet MORE ego-defenses.
No, what they fear more than anything else is being exposed. I can only present my conclusions here, but I am convinced that the essence of their thinking, and very being, is schizophrenic. Conservatives do not get a pass from me, but they are not the issue here. Plus they are doing more to protect free speech than anyone at this moment. And their more honest. Particularly the Paleoconservatives. But I don’t think they are bad, I just think they are in error in terms of their general outlook. They simply don’t know enough about Cultural History and Human Behavior and so remain Polarized, which I think is a form of Codependency.
Anyway, the point is that if more conclusive data is revealed and applied to the Liberal/Left/Neocon Leviathan, then their entire belief system will crumble to the ground and they will cling to it at OUR peril. I believe this is the situation we’re in today anyway.
But the source is NOT merely genetics. It has also to do with our Intellectual and Cultural History. In the same way the Catholic church has yet to make “the great leap out of the Middle Ages”, the majority of Americans and Europeans have yet to make the great leap out of the 18th Century.
I have traversed the www as thoroughly as possible, and it is amazing to find how almost no one knows anything of any real substance concerning the 19th Century. Specifically the overlapping periods between 1790-1915, when Modernism had officially arrived. Everything that happened then is happening now in magnified form. It seems to me that this is where we should focus our attention, if we want to fully comprehend what is happening now, so we can determine, with more clarity, what we should do.
Posted by Dedalus at 1:10 PM on March 21
Obama will most certainly not be good for race relations. As president, his constituency will be looking to him to lift them out of the ghetto. When he can’t do that…whom do you think they’ll blame? NOT Obama or themselves.
Or…imagine this - some Neo-Nazi skinhead clown tries to hurt him. Even if Obama doesn’t receive a scratch, we’ll still have anti-racism focus groups popping up at every university, church, community center, and Starbucks from San Diego to Portland (Maine, not Oregon).
Posted by Paradigm at 2:29 PM on March 21
The solution to white quilt is not to feel guilty! What have most white individuals today to feel guilty about? No living person was a slave holder and very few are descendants of slave holders. In addition, most whites have not taken any direct actions to hurt blacks or other minorities.
One needn’t feel oneself to be a “Rascist” but rather a “Racial Realist”. Guilt is a useless emotion and certainly not one to live with even if one has directly taken an action worthy of guilt. Guilt should only serve as a short term lesson that psychologicaly healthy people should learn from and then move on.
Posted by at 3:57 PM on March 21
I wonder how these people are going to feel when they live with the reality of a president that can’t be questioned, criticized, or lampooned, ever. At least, they dare not do it.
This is an important aspect of the presidency, and of democracy in general. Those in power MUST suffer the constant critique of the public- this is how the system is set up.
What a boring four yers, when we can’t endlessly make fun of the president. That’s an American tradition!
The NWO has certainly played their cards wisely with this one. This sure will end all that pesky scrutiny!
Posted by Boudreaux at 4:04 PM on March 21
Obama just made his race speech, in order to get elected. But I think he his sincere in wanting inter-racial “love.” He also implies “vote for me, Whites, if you want ‘White Innocence.’” He actually, probably wants all Blacks and Whites to mix into a mulatto race, akin to the mixed Hispanics, but generally more Black.
Posted by at 4:38 PM on March 21
I enjoy both the subjects and the comments posted on this site. I read things here that I never see anywhere else.
I do have a request for the Webmaster -
Please program the page so that the most recent comments appear at the top of the page instead of the bottom.
That way you don’t have to scroll down to the bottom of the page to read the most recent comments if you visit the page several times a day.
This is particularly helpful when a page has an unusually large number of comments on it.
Thanks.
Linky Drake
Posted by Linky Drake at 5:12 PM on March 21
Note to Linky Drake,
Your request, while well-intentioned, would make the comments harder to read for most people. The current format puts the comments into a sequence of ideas and often comments refer to those which preceded. Reversing the order would make this unintelligible (as I have experienced with many other web sites).
Your reverse order only works for people who return to the site repeatedly in one day, which is the minority of viewers.
Posted by Reader-1 at 10:48 PM on March 21
I am sorry to disagree with another poster, Linky Drake; however,
Dear American Renaissance Webmaster(s): I like it the way comments are currently posted. This way, one can see the chronological context of comments. Our eyes naturally read from top to bottom, not vice-versa. And it’s easier to find and read replies (comments responding to previous comments), this way.
The previously suggested way of posting is more appropriate for showing or presenting purely news stories, where people mostly just (though not exclusively) discuss personal opinions about most talked about news stories. It also works for blog listings and relevant news listings, that uesely don’t directly correlate. However, this is more of an intellectual-oriented forum. Scientific comments and replies thereof, can be quite frequent. There is also the possiblity that one may have to read replies to original comments, before finding the latter.
Sometimes, comments tend to specialize (over time), and relate less to the original theme. Here is an example: there is an article on a study that Blacks tend to be social than Whites and Asians. Then, posters will start talking about that difference, then personal stories pertaining to this difference. Then other differences may be discussed.
And the comments are a sort of ‘reply’ to the respective article.
There are advantages to both methods, but I suggest the current one, for this sort of forum.
Thank you for your concern.
Sincerely,
EA (European American) Steve
Posted by EA (European American) Steve at 11:01 PM on March 21
“Please program the page so that the most recent comments appear at the top of the page instead of the bottom.
That way you don’t have to scroll down to the bottom of the page to read the most recent comments if you visit the page several times a day.
This is particularly helpful when a page has an unusually large number of comments on it.”
I just hit the END key (next to page down). This will drop you right down to the last comment.
Posted by uncle sham at 11:55 PM on March 21
If ” Obama ” is my imaginary ” friend ” ; i would hate to meet my real black enemy.
Posted by Michigan patriot at 12:03 AM on March 22
“The Internet is the best way to reach people with our message and YouTube is one of the best methods of doing so.”
I would LOVE to see an AMREN youtube channel. This is the medium of ideas for today’s young people.
Jared Taylor on Youtube could be revolutionary.
-Phil
Posted by Phil at 4:46 AM on March 22
Here is the YouTube video putting together Obama’s comments with the Reverend’s. I knew someone would do it.
http://election.newsmax.com/mccain_aide/
Enjoy!
Posted by at 2:52 PM on March 22
The YouTube idea is a very good one, but for the most effectiveness, it might be a better idea to start with light weight ideas and walk the brainwashed youths into the water. You want to soften up their defenses first for the message to take hold. Then when you have their attention and they trust Amren, then start posting the heavy stuff. Also, you don’t want to trigger YouTube’s censors into action. That would shut down the whole enterprise. Like being introduced to an interesting and beautiful girl, you want to put your best foot forward.
Posted by The Quadfather at 11:40 AM on March 23
I get so angry with my own race for this mess whites have created by letting blacks run rampant and with no accountability for their actions. Years before the civil rights era, our people were taught what was based on common sense with regard to co-existing with blacks. Segregation was correct and no tolerance for black misbehavior was the norm.
Fast forward to today, and see what has resulted from us throwing all our safety nets away. I do not advocate mistreating blacks, as sometimes was the case in the Old South, but keeping blacks separate from whites was a very sensible way for them to live peaceably in this country.
As much as many white people don’t want to believe this, blacks are not our equals and never will be. If the slave traders had not gone to Africa 400 years ago and bought blacks from their own people, and whites had not gone there and colonized it in the 19th century, what would Africa be today? It would be the same as it was 400 years ago. Hello, white people!
Today, we have a mulatto would be presidential candidate who can mimic profound deep thinking by mouthing 50 cent words. He contradicts himself all throughout his speeches, but the words sound really nice, warm, and fuzzy. The message in his speeches makes no sense when you listen closely because he’s blaming whites over and over for black plight. Yet he’s mesmerizing whites all across America! Wake up people - it’s like having a pit bull running loose on the streets. The odds are we’re going to get bit if we don’t come to our senses and fast!
Posted by UnPC at 11:44 AM on March 23
Great post UnPC!
One day humanity will look back (if there is a humanity) at this PC garbage and say “how did this ever catch on, whoever thought of it was a retard.”
Posted by at 10:26 PM on March 23
“One day humanity will look back (if there is a humanity) at this PC garbage and say “how did this ever catch on, whoever thought of it was a retard.”
Posted by at 10:26 PM on March 23”
Nope. The people who thought of this knew exactly what they were doing and it is serving their purpose beyond their wildest dreams.
Read Kevin McDonald’s work
Posted by EB at 1:33 PM on March 24
If the “Obamination” were to actually WIN the presidency, this country would go down the drain at warp speed!
Presidential Order #1 would probably be: Anti-White racist venom is allowed; any anti-Black slur, joke, comment or complaint an imprisonable offense.
With Order #2 undoubtedly guaranteeing every Black or person claiming to be partially Black — a large, and certainly undeserved monetary “reparation”.
The immigration mess would be streamlined — to allow another 100 million Africans coming here. With American taxpayers probably being required to fund first-class airfare tickets for them in the bargain.
If that kind of thinking represents the “change” Obama constantly harps on — maybe we could instead elect Vladmir Putin. At least we KNOW Putin to be anything but against America’s best interests. Lying Phony Obama… hopefully his presidential aspirations are lying dead in the dust at this point.
Posted by Fed Up at 1:41 PM on March 24
B.A.R.A.C.K. O.B.A.M.A.! = “Blinded Americans Relishing A Candidate Keep On Believing A Masked Afrocentrist!”
Yes, not only is Barack wearing an expedient mask to hide his true loyalties (Africa), But those foolish Whites are also simultaneously wearing a mask that is transmogrifying into a blindfold over each weak their hopes and desires are imputed on a con artist….. And the masquerade will continue…..
Posted by White is Beautiful Robert at 6:57 PM on March 24
