Home

Site information

Subscribe

Store

Donate

Back Issues

News Archives
by Date

News Archives
by Category

Contact Us

Send Us a
News Story

Write for AR

Interviews with
Jared Taylor

AR in the News

AR Attic

Activists

Links



Amren store on Amazon.com
Buy through this link and help AR


Atom news feed
RSS 1.0 news feed
RSS 2.0 news feed
American Renaissance

Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Post a Comment       Send This Page

Record Number Escaping UK’s Immigration, High Taxes and Crime

AR Articles on Britain
Whites as Kulaks (Jan. 2002)
Report from Britain (Sep. 2001)
Oldham Erupts (Jul. 2001)
No Representation (May 2001)
The Racial Transformation of Britain (Aug. 2000)
Black Crime in Britain (Apr. 1996)
Search AmRen.com for Britain
More news stories on Britain
Kevin Widdop, News of the World, n.d.

Government figures set to be released later this year will show that an astonishing 250,000 people fled Britain in 2007.

That’s 684 A DAY—or ONE every TWO MINUTES.

And it’s a massive 21 PER CENT increase on the 207,000 who went in 2006—and up nearly 70 PER CENT from the 149,000 who left in 1997.

Now experts expect this year’s total to be even higher as hard-pressed families seek a new life in the sun—with Australia, New Zealand, France and Spain the top destinations.

Meanwhile, huge numbers of foreigners are pouring INTO the UK, with 591,000 settling here in 2006.

And there has been a 90 PER CENT increase in immigration over the past ten years—from 327,000 in 1997 to an estimated 620,000 last year. Emigration expert Paul Arthur believes the numbers leaving will continue to rise.

He said: “We have had record enquiries about emigration over this winter, with people not just wanting to escape the bleak weather, but seeking a whole change of lifestyle.

“Many are unhappy with the levels of crime, high taxes and the general way of life. Overseas there are more career opportunities, particularly in Australia and New Zealand which have huge shortfalls in skilled labour.”

Unfair

Typical of those leaving are plasterer Damian Barrett and wife Alison.

The couiple, both 37, who are emigrating from Bolton-le-Sands, Lancs, with kids Holly, eight, and Joseph, six, to Auckland, New Zealand.

Alison said: “We’re tired of Britain, with its unfair tax system, crime, and live-to-work ethic. There are also too many foreigners coming in and using up all our resources. We want a better life.”

634

Original article

(Posted on February 1, 2008)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment     Send This Page      Search

Comments

How could so many foolish whites continue to flee “cultural enrichment” and “diversity”?

Doesn’t anybody want to be around these third world non-whites?

I cringe to think about this world in about 10 more years.

Posted by RJS at 6:05 PM on February 1


A truly sad commentary on the cowardice of Whites the world over. Leaving their country they built and formed to the hordes of the 3rd world. Just like America. From what I have read New Zealand is getting alot of the 3rd world immigrants also. ALL White nations are doomed if they do not take a stand and PRONTO!

Posted by at 6:12 PM on February 1


*“We’re tired of Britain, with its unfair tax system, crime, and live-to-work ethic. There are also too many foreigners coming in and using up all our resources. We want a better life.”*

I’m just curious as to why so many are fleeing that for New Zealand? We’re slowly tearing ourselves apart, yet are completely blinded to it.

And I don’t blame them - the sun has finally set on “Britannia”.

Posted by Obscuratus at 6:48 PM on February 1


There is (or there may be), an interesting «sidebar» to this matter. There is an «ex - pats» page on line, which treats matters concerning the lease, rental or purchase of real estate, in the Mediterreanean; including North Africa.

Linked to the page there is an interesting page, put up by an entreprising Englishwomen and her Tunisian husband, describing how they «fled» Ramsgate (an typically «English» seaside town at the southern tip of the Thames Estuary), for an «better life» in Hammamet; an similarly sized seaside town, on the south - east Tunisian coast. Fronting the Gulf of Sydra.

Notwithstanding the one party politics of Tunisia, the human rights abuses, the media censorship, and the proto - police state mentality of the «the usual» «public officials,» the family appear, in general, rather happy with their «change of scene.» The educational system, proceeding upon the mercilessly logistical premises of the Cartesian French system, is highly regarded. And the degree of general public safety, especially as it concerns women and children, is better, apparently, than contemporary England. Of course, single women can not attend at the domicile of an single male, even in officially secular Tunisia, this is simply «not done.»

It reminds one of the story (possibly apocryphal, possibly not), of an Latin or Greek writer of the «meridional» centuries between Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages, who, upon visiting an semi - permanent barbarian encampment, found «one of his own» who had elected to live with the Barbarians. I think the writer may have been Eusebius, I cannot recall.

Upon being quizzed with regard to having made this remarkable «transition» from civilization to barbarism, the man replied that he preferred life with the barbarians because of their «superior morals» (shades of Tacitus and his own portrayals of «noble» Germanic Barbarians), as well as the fact that he paid less taxes to his Barbarian overlords, who, reciprocally, exhibited an greater tendency to leave him alone, instead of constantly inhibiting his freedom with an ever more intricately constructed network of «regulations.»

This page to which I refer, also emphasizes the more «equitable» tax regime in Tunisia («more of your money and more for your money» according to their page). An interesting parallel, perhaps. Note, I am note endorsing or recommending the page to which I have referred in any way; nor have I included the «URL.»

Posted by at 6:48 PM on February 1


Perhaps Cecil Rhodes’s foundation funds could be extended to these folks as transportation relocation costs to South Africa..Mandela would honor the relocation of his bronze statue back to his Roots if these folks get the money and an OK from WINNIE and KEN…

Posted by sharing the love at 7:08 PM on February 1


Why are the British choosing NZ? New Zealand’s south island is stunningly beautiful and not over populated and some of the towns like Christchurch are built along English lines. The people are not quite as boisterous as their northern neighbours in Australia, nor do they carry the unfortunate anti-English chip that many Australians seem unable to shift.
Unfortunately the North Island is filling up with Pacific Islanders, and the Maori population around the major cities like Aukland cause a lot of trouble with fights and drunkeness.
I understand that the Prime Minister has openly stated her ambition to make New Zealand more brown; so English people may find they’re not so welcome in the near future. Unless they are non-white citizens of the UK of course.
Arc..

Posted by Arcadian at 7:14 PM on February 1


I think this is known as “voting with your feet.” If you think the comments on this site are bracing, go and check the comments at the website where that story originates. Breathtaking.

Posted by Xenophon at 7:44 PM on February 1


What these people are REALLY fleeing is whites who have completely sick ideas about race, community and nation. By sick, I mean they are suicidal and self-destructive. And they rule the institutions of the country and make it impossible for normal people to impose sanity on these issues.

They leave because they have no other choice. They are powerless in face of the majority which has lost its marbles. Those creating the problem in Britain will meet a grim fate. But that doesn’t mean the significant minority of whites who want normalcy, have to share that fate. There is no cowardice in this. Only a sad realization that they cannot fight because most of their neighbors not only won’t stand with them, they are traitors to their own.

This is the inevitable result…..white nationalism. Liberals will be left behind in the situation they created. Quite frankly, they are being left to die. Normal people will form segregated communities elsewhere.

The important point of this, for every white person in the world, is where they will choose to live. Choosing poorly (example…South Africa) will have….consequences. In the US, this is mostly an issue of choosing the correct state to live in, followed by a decent community. It’s pretty easy to see where by using this tool:

http://www.censusscope.org/us/map_nhblack.html

http://www.censusscope.org/us/map_hispanicpop.html

Don’t live where blacks and hispanics are concentrated. In a short period of time (no telling when), whites will not be tolerated there. In certain areas of California, in particular, whites and asians need to worry about ethnic cleansing, if our immigration policy isn’t fixed and soon.

Posted by at 8:15 PM on February 1


Will prince Charles , as the last white person in England, please turn out the lights when you are ” forced ” to leave by non-appreciative non-whites and non-Christians.

Posted by Michigan patriot at 8:21 PM on February 1


“A truly sad commentary on the cowardice of Whites the world over.”

I take exception to this. Most whites would love to keep the non-whites out, not rent to them or hire them or provide for them. However if we do we’ll be sued and our own governments will toss us in jail. The cowardice is on the handful of politicians, not the general public.

Posted by Not Surprised at 8:47 PM on February 1


A heavier dose of thought control, and enough money earmarked for things like Billboards should cure this.

Posted by at 9:12 PM on February 1


In a way I think the British are hedging their bets that if enough third worlders arrive they will not be nuked or attacked. I think this is a rather bad gamble either way.

Posted by Lars at 9:29 PM on February 1


IF THEY ARE SO SICK OF THE ALIEN INVASION, WHY DID THEY VOTE FOR BLAIR?

I am sorry to be so blunt, but the Whites worldwide have been digging their own graves—by voting for alienist politicians like Kennedy and Clinton and McCain in the US, and Blair in the UK, etc.

Whites know that immigrants are invading their country, stealing their jobs, stealing welfare dollars, their women, their land and killing them in crime sprees, but they continue, for some bizarre reason, to vote for politicians who dig their nations’ graves by supporting immigration.

Brits could have voted for the BNP (and French for La Pen, etc) and ended immigration to their nations with the stroke of a pen.

Why did they no do that?

This is a million dollar question and I think we need to go and talk to these (at least white) Brits and French and US voters and try to find out the mental block or brainwashing that has put them into such a dazed state that they continue to vote for those alienist politicians who are cutting their throat.

The answer to this question is the key to the survival of white nations and the West.

Posted by Thomas at 10:46 PM on February 1


It truly is a shame to see the Britains being ethnically cleansed of its indigident population just the same as the Tibetans are being cleansed from Tibet. Both are due to massive immigration. And that while the Tibetans are allowed to say such things those poor Brits are persecuted if they dare to speak the truth.

Posted by John in America at 1:45 AM on February 2


Although they never ever mentioned it in their manifesto, the ‘New Labour’ government elected in 1997 had a covert, stealthy immigrationist agenda which they hid from the British electorate.
You see, they thought they were being ‘clever’ in a neocon mould by pursuing this policy, which the deadheads in charge erroneously thought would lead to ‘economic growth’.
David Blunkett, Home Secretary a number of years back, once let slip that Labour’s policy was ‘There is no upward limit to immigration’.
Only that it has exploded in their stupid faces.
Houses are unaffordable.Taxation is at a record high.Public borrowing is at a record.And in a true Salterian* fashion native Britons are voting with their feet and getting out.The Britons leaving are generally those most valuable to society, the young and skilled, who (rightly) see no future for their kids in Britain.

*See the works of Frank Salter on ‘Ethnic self interest’ in the AMren archives.

Posted by Kenelm Digby at 9:11 AM on February 2


Brits could have voted for the BNP (and French for La Pen, etc) and ended immigration to their nations with the stroke of a pen.

Why did they not do that?
Even though many people agree with the BNP, their is still a stigma in voting for them because of their vilification by the left and right wing media. But this has just started to change because people are now seeing the results of mass immigration.

Posted by at 9:25 AM on February 2


I wish someone from Britain can respond to this question: Why don’t you guys just vote for the BNP? I realize that the BNP was a very negative public image and voters may be concerned about how they will handle issues other than immigration, but how do you think things will change if you keep voting the same traitors back into office?

Posted by at 9:56 AM on February 2


In response to Thomas at 10:46 on February 1:

I have wondered too why native White voters continue to sit back and elect politicians who allow their countries to be overrun by foreigners. Here are some possible reasons:

(1) Whites want the other races in the world to think that we are “nice” people who harbor no ill will towards any other race or creed.

(2) Many Whites who are intellectually inclined no longer have the primal instincts of other races; that is, to guard their territory from invaders; to ensure survival of their genes and culture by encouraging their children to marry their own kind; etc.

(3) We have been so brainwashed by the government and the media that it would be selfish to care about our own kind and that we should instead help “the Other.” So, charities and welfare and affirmative hiring and scholarships and set-asides, etc. are primarily for the benefit of non-Whites, who then outbreed us and displace us.

(4) Many Whites believe that, once cultural differences are brushed aside, all people and races are exactly the same. They argue we all have the same IQs, the same levels of aggression, the same powers of reason, the same sex drives, the same inventiveness, etc. It is just too painful to contemplate that people could actually differ from one another in quantifiable ways that can never be changed.

(5) Many whites are just living for themselves, for today or for their future retirements, rather than thinking what their countries will be like for their grandchildren and great grandchildren.

(6) Many whites have been raised to be independent loners (except for socializing with their families and a a few friends), and do not tend to band together for a common cause.

(7) Many whites view other Whites as competition for the social status they themselves wish to achieve, and therefore do not care if other Whites have a hard time in this life. In fact, by showing how much they care for non-Whites, Whites often raise their own social status with politicians, the government, big business, the media, and the movers and shakers.

(8) Many whites are frightened of being called “RACIST.” It is a word that has ruined careers, friendships, marriages, family relationships, and so on.

(9) Many liberal Whites feel our race has had its “time in the sun,” and we should now help other races to achieve their greatness.

(10) Many Whites and non-Whites feel losing our lofty position in the world is a just punishment for the sins of our ancestors. (As though all the other races are faultless?)

(11) Many Whites are afraid that if they stand up for their own people, that some of us may go too far and believe we are actually SUPERIOR to other groups.

(12) It is in the best interests of some powerful movers and shakers that Whites remain passively compliant as our world crashes around us. There is a HUGE brainwashing campaign currently in operation by the media, the schools and universities, big business, the government, and social services. Many Whites are brainwashed and prefer to live in a dreamland where everything is just fine, everyone is so nice, and surely no groups would actively try to hurt us.

Posted by ILoveMyRace at 10:22 AM on February 2


“Why are the British choosing NZ? New Zealand’s south island is stunningly beautiful and not over-populated and some of the towns like Christchurch are built along English lines.”

Having visited New Zealand a few times over the past several years, I agree the ‘south island’ portion is the place to be. There are only about 1 million NZers’ in the south compared to about 3 million on the North Island.

Uncrowded highways make for a pleasant drive (left-side) combined with beautiful scenery certainly does draw attention for those wishing a desirable place to live, especially Britons living on a crowded island of similar size with 60,000,000 people.

Christchurch once had few Chinese people until very recently,
but they’re now becoming more noticeable due to increased immigration. I could gauge this increase by comparing a walk through the Riccarton Mall twenty yrs. ago where patrons were 100% white for all intents and purposes… to my last visit in 2003.

The Chinese owner of a ‘fish & chip’ shop near the university that I’d patronized back in ‘87 (yes, he was still there) even voiced his displeasure at all these new Chinese immigrants moving to Christchurch.

Wellington, the capital city, for all appearances still had the most homogeneous grouping of Euro-whites apart from Dunedin.

Auckland, unlike 20 years ago, can now be considered to be “invaded” by the third world.

Posted by at 10:46 AM on February 2


The real shame is that so many white have died in the past to make sure the whites of today have it better than they did. I wonder how many would take the same path if they knew their descendants would turn and run so quickly?

The problem is not the blacks, browns, and yellows but the lack of spine in white men (hey, white women are beating them up, too!)!!!

Most white men are cowards, plain and simple. How do they get to feel like men? By rooting and drooling over black athletes! Pathetic, really pathetic.

Posted by GetBackJack at 1:35 PM on February 2


Australia would be a much better choice than New Zealand given the differing attitudes towards non-whites.

Posted by at 1:38 PM on February 2


Is there any white country that is racially aware and is not committing suicide by demography?

Posted by William Hendershot at 8:20 PM on February 2


This regrettable development is part of the EU masterplan for the devolution of Europe into a Communistic non-national agglomeration which is prostrate, exploitable and mute. Hear Vladimir Bukovsky speak on a download from Fjordman sometime. This trashing of Europe is done by and for petrodollars.

Posted by mark at 9:50 PM on February 2


This literally sounds like white Flight from Michigan. The only reason the population isn’t decreasing is because of immigration. First the Blacks came North looking for work, then came the Muslims.

Is Detroit the future of the White Race? I hope not!

Posted by Ronduck at 11:24 PM on February 2


“Is there any white country that is racially aware and is not committing suicide by demography?”

Places like Russia and Belarus are the best bet, I think.

Posted by at 11:40 PM on February 2


“Will prince Charles , as the last white person in England, please turn out the lights when you are ” forced ” to leave by non-appreciative non-whites and non-Christians.”

I’m sure the Royal Family is making plans to marry off one of the princes to a muslim or other nonwhite to ensure their survival into the next century.

Posted by at 1:09 AM on February 3


Posted by Arcadian at 7:14 PM on February 1
Posted by at 10:46 AM on February 2

I have just returned from my first visit to New Zealand. I didn’t get as far as the South Island, but what I saw was, as you say, stunningly beautiful. My impression was that the culture is a lot like England, but not so decadent and emasculated. There are a lot of Chinese, but on my worst day I saw only two Africans. I’m told the country is 70% white, 15% Maori (none of them pure-blooded any more), 7 or 8% each Pacific islanders and Asians, with the rest, including Africans, lumped together as “0.5% - Other”. Coming fron South Africa, that is a demographic that I can learn to live with.

Many of the people I met were immigrants, from Britain, Europe, and South Africa. I understand that the government quietly opened the doors for Zimbabweans, mostly white, for a few months last year.

The government is widely expected to be defeated in the next general election. Hopefully, the large number of immigrants fleeing from their various multicultural utopias will have some effect on future government policies.

The country is an economic backwater, with the lowest salaries in the first world. Being so far from world markets, with few mineral resources, it has not developed many manufacturing industries. Many skilled young people go to Australia or the UK to earn money. This makes it easy for skilled people to immigrate. Well worth considering. I will be back.

Posted by AnalogMan at 3:10 AM on February 3


“Is there any white country that is racially aware and is not committing suicide by demography?”

Places like Russia and Belarus are the best bet, I think.

Posted by at 11:40 PM on February 2

—————————


Slavs are mongrels and quite different to white western Europeans! Like most Aryan-Mongol inbreeds they lack in intelligence, virtues, self-control, the like, and make good obedient proletarian slaves! Not like those evil Germanic, and Celtic to a lesser degree, people who are intelligent and rebelious!

Posted by Skeptikos at 3:40 AM on February 3


I, like many, have quit the UK after years of political correctness and brainwashing. The tipping point is fast approaching and perhaps civil unrest is on its way (I’d return for that!)

I spent 7 yesrs living in London prior to my escape and the transformation was quite dramatic. I was often the only white on the underground carriage to work. Gypsies walked the carriages begging with drugged up babies, muslims jostled, blacks robbed or knifed people. What a vile caricature of a once great country.

The levels of crime explicitly against iindiginous whites was incredible, esp. that committed by Muslims and Afro-Caribeans.

It was all around us but the police keep a low profile for fear of getting hurt or accussed of racism. The explosion of violence after 9/11 with attacks on lone women, church burnings and no-go areas being set up by muslims was appalling.

And yet the authorities just wish it away and the media just wouldn’t report what we saw on the streets every day. Thank God for local networks and websites to spread the truth - many of which the authorities tried to close down.

Its interesting that when questioned about the benefits of “diversity” they can only come up with chicken tikka massala or kebabs as the benefits we gain from mass immigration.

They overlook gun crime, third world disease, sex slavery and people smuggling, Islamic terrorism, organised crime and drugs, forced marriage and honour killings………the list goes on.

How did it come to this?

Posted by Geoff Miller at 4:38 AM on February 3


Why don’t they vote for the BNP? — a lot of people suggest or ask

The BNP has virtually no support because its platform of Britain for whites is unpopular—very unpopular. Almost all people are essentially multiculturalist in their outlook. It doesn’t mean they want to see ethnic enclaves but it means almost all people are perfectly comfortable with the assimilation of many peoples into the national fabric.


You might think this exodus shows how unpopular immigration is but I suspect differently. “70 PER CENT [up] from the 149,000 who left in 1997.” Lots of people have always emigrated from Britain. It’s up now because of greater European integration and a more globalized professional world.


Posted by O the road to Mandalay at 5:19 AM on February 3


It doesn’t mean they want to see ethnic enclaves but it means almost all people are perfectly comfortable with the assimilation of many peoples into the national fabric.

And yet…and yet…we visited last year our colleagues in Yorkshire. They also talked about not having any problems with immigration, as a good educated citizens should.

But the last day the lady accompanied us to a big shopping mall and there we met a group of Islamic women completely covered in black except for eyes, in a Saudi style, each with two or three kids in tow. And then our host just spontaneously exclaimed “Oh my God! We didn’t have THESE here last year!”

Posted by at 12:52 PM on February 3


Alison said: “We’re tired of Britain, with its unfair tax system, crime, and live-to-work ethic. There are also too many foreigners coming in and using up all our resources. We want a better life.”

*You certainly can’t blame them. But it’s tragic that they have to leave their ancestrial homeland so non white immigrants can take over. And once all the true Brits finally do leave, the UK is completely teaming with Black and Asians, and other assorted non Europeans, who’s tax dollars will support them then? And what will become of the Monarchy? The UK was once a great nation, and it is being destroyed by a swarm of foreigners. White Flight used to just mean leaving the city for the suburbs, today it is starting to mean leaving the country, even when it’s your indigenous homeland. And where is there left to go anymore? Predominately white countries are always the most desirable, but there will be few desirable nations left since non white foreigners are intent on taking them over.*

Posted by at 4:21 PM on February 3


Skeptikos,
How can anyone simultaneously ‘lack self-control’ and make ‘an obedient slave’?

Posted by at 6:27 AM on February 4


its not only the immigrants that are a problem. Remember the London attack? British born muslim terrorists. Thats a problem!

Posted by ben at 7:47 AM on February 4


As a non-British person, I will not shed a tear for the nation that empowered the colored races of the Earth, that continues to denigrate the cultural contributions of non-British Whites, and is the least circumspect of all nations in regards to its historical crimes while sanctimoniously harping on the crimes of other nations. You’re getting what you deserve.

Posted by at 11:54 AM on February 4



I am originally from England but now live here in the states thankfully.

I along with the majority of English are sick to death of the way the govt and the left wing in England ignore the problem done by muslims.

The media led by the BBC and the guardian choose not to tell people what is going on and many a story never gets to air. For instance a girl disappeard in Blackpool which is in the north of England, they find that she had been abducted and chopped up and then served in a take wawy restaurant.

The story onmly carries in the local paper just one paper and that was in small print in the middle of the papers

I then call th epolice and ask them have they told the press and why haven’t they given more info on this.
The response was that they have nothing to say

basically they don’t want to upset those poor loving peaceful people who are muslims

It is high time the govt, the police the media stop ignoring the threat by muslims in the country and every western country .

The police are too scared to go into places like oldham, manningham braford, burnley, bolton, leeds etc etc

I know of a friend whjo said to someone that the country will be muslim in a hundred years because of their big families, their immigration, the emmigration

a lefty looney ugly woman turns round and calls him racist, in the end she had half the train telling her to go and get lost and go over there if she loves them that much

Do you know that one of the police forces have to ask the local imam for permission to go into the area and arrest someone, then they have to take their shoes off, they are not allowed to go in the house with a dog and if a woman is ion the bathroom or bedroom they are not allowed to enter plus if the person is praying then theyb have to wait till theyb have finished

it’s not just the looney left fanatics what stick up and ignore th eislamic threat, just two weeks ago the head of the church ion an area said that it would be good if they the muslims did a call to prayer over the loud speaker so non muslims could look into the religion too

so what is it with siome of the far right christians when they ignore the threat to their own religion and actually encourage islam to take over or think that forgiveness is for everyone

There is a party called the BNP in England, people have voted for this party who stand for no more immigration from thrid world countries and immigrants have to adopt an English way of life

The gove , the media and the loons tried to close them down , they call them racist and call anyone who votes for them racist meanwhile the muslims are laughing their heads of that they are taking over and it’;s not exactly if they are trying to do it slyly as they have openly said that they will not stop in public until the islamic flag flies over the houses of parliament

I could go on and on about how spineless the govt is and just how PC has ruined the country

Just look at the muslims who in America said he will not give his oath when drafted into power on the bible but instead he said he will do it on the koran , the very same koran what has over 100 verses calling for death to non muslims or kaffirs/ infidels as they like to say

Why doesn’t the media and those elected ask barack hussein obama more on his past like they did on Bush, ios it because thye deem it racist when it isn’t because you ask question to a black man brought up muslim

Time for the govt to get a backbone before it’s too late

Posted by Forced out of England by immigrants at 1:26 PM on February 4


Times of India




Britain gives formal recognition to polygamy
4 Feb 2008,

LONDON: The Gordon Brown government has reportedly cleared a proposal that will allow husbands with multiple wives to claim extra welfare benefits.

According to the Sunday Telegraph , bigamy is regarded as a crime in Britain and is punishable by up to seven years in prison, but this decision allows for recognition of polygamous marriages so long as such weddings take place in countries where it is legal. Ministers estimate that up to a thousand polygamous partnerships exist in Britain, although they admit there is no exact record.

Britain’s Conservative Party has condemned the proposal, accusing the government of offering preferential treatment to a particular group, and of setting a precedent that would lead to demands for further changes in British law.

New guidelines on income support from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) state: “Where there is a valid polygamous marriage the claimant and one spouse will be paid the couple rate. The amount payable for each additional spouse is presently £33.65.”

Income support for all the wives may be paid directly into the husband’s bank account, if the family so chooses. Under the deal, a husband with multiple wives may also be eligible for additional housing benefit and council tax benefit to reflect the larger property needed for his family. The ruling could cost taxpayers millions of pounds.

Such a deal, the terrorists husband gets 7,000 pds a month in benefit while the wife and kids starve. I’m sure the British feminazis approve of this wonderful contribution to diversity.

Posted by margaret at 1:31 PM on February 4


I sadly agree. The White race and white culture is doomed. We’ve bought into the propaganda that to be white and proud somehow makes you ignorant and despicably racist.
I’ve heard these liberals gleefully claim, “in 50 years, everybody will be brown.” They seemed truley happy that this would be the case. When my children where growing up, they went to schools that were 98% white, and I remember telling my wife during a christmas pagent one year… “look at all those beautiful white faces. Just because I love my own race, doesn’t mean I hate others. You wouldn’t condemn a black for having black pride.

Posted by Sad for our future at 8:04 PM on February 4


Why don’t English politicians recognize that they lose in the end just like everyone else? What is there to gain by this mad policy of Third World First, England last? Even Morrissey (solo singer and the Smiths’ lead singer back in the Eighties) is living in L.A. What’s going on here?

Posted by Seeker at 5:18 PM on February 5



Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Send This Page      Search

Post a Comment

Commenting guidelines: We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. Statements of fact and well-considered opinion are welcome, but we will not post comments that include obscenities or insults, whether of groups or individuals. We reserve the right to hold our critics to lower standards.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)