Comments
Marriage, monogamy etc is a “white” thing - the number of black sites exhorting the wonderful “polygamy” of “Mother Africa” is beyond count.
As a humourous aside, I recall reading “Roots” for an English literature report, and (yes, I am aware it is heavily-plagiarised from another story called “The African”), and the “role” of the father in the African village was as follows:
1. “Marry” a girl at least 20+ years younger than oneself.
2. Avoid all possible contact with the girl outside sex.
3. Ignore the resulting offspring as much as possible, leaving the mother to raise it while you look for another young wife.
Posted by Obscuratus at 5:56 PM on February 15
Many jokes could be made about black wedding planners. Like the Maytag repairman, the lonelies guy in town. Or “is there such a thing as a black wedding planner? There can’t be much work.”
Or getting a bank loan “I project at least 2 weddings per year.”
Posted by at 6:19 PM on February 15
Just more meaningless nonsense from these people. Blacks are not serious about anything they do. Nothing! “Marry Your Baby Daddy Day.” Give me a break.
Tom Iron…
Posted by Tom Iron... at 6:53 PM on February 15
I smell a new biznezz opportunity here. Get a minority SBA loan to open up a one stop turn key ghetto fab wedding chapel/reception hall. Tuxedos, dresses, florals, ghetto fab themated reception hall decorations, Tyrone and Da’ Thugalonics House Band, food catering, double stretch Humvee limo service, ya’ll know what I be sayin’! For those reluctant couples contemplating marriage, throw in DNA testing service too.
There’s got to a tax angle in dis thang here too, like mo’ bigga’ EIC or something along those lines.
Posted by Flaxen-headed Strumpet at 7:08 PM on February 15
“….70 percent of children are born out of wedlock.”
I had no idea that 30% of blacks were born to married parents. Surely a figure that high can’t hold.
Posted by w.r. at 7:28 PM on February 15
Yeah like sure they will all get married…if they did…all those plush welfare checks will be cut…who are they trying to kid???
Posted by lydia at 7:39 PM on February 15
This reminds me of a missive in Jared Taylor’s 1992 book, “Paved With Good Intentions.” After a crime spree in a public housing project in Chicago, the housing authority kicked out non-leaseholders, meaning that many of these “baby’s daddies” were out on the streets. In order to keep them off the streets, local vendors sponsored quickie weddings. In reaction, many people in those projects said that they didn’t even know any married people.
Posted by St. Louis CofCC Blogmeister at 7:51 PM on February 15
Why do we have to bribe people to do the right thing?
Posted by pat at 10:12 PM on February 15
IF blacks had any sense, they would be appalled and insulted at the fact that someone sees a need for a “Marry Your Baby Daddy Day” (I can’t even type that on the keyboard without laughing out loud) and, in that realization, DO something about it. Obviously, they have no shame.
Oh well, progress marches on…..
Posted by Tidey-Whitey at 10:20 PM on February 15
The late Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan predicted the phenomenon regarding black illegitimacy and the destruction of the black family way back in the sixties. This has to be the biggest “I told you so” ever to hit the modern age.
Of course, Moynihan was called everything but a white man by the elected liberal mobs in congress as well as in the senate. Then again, maybe they did. They verbally hammered the man mercilessly.
Here’s how to end the insanity: Stop paying welfare benefits to unmarried women who bear children. I know, that’s pretty deep for some, but have someone explain it to you if you’re confused by the concept.
The unmarried girl’s (not, “woman’s”) extended family will have to take care of her kids. Problem solved. What’s so difficult about that? I mean, black “scholars” said that blacks built the pyramids, discovered America first, and invented the alphabet and mathematics so this can’t be at all difficult for the black race.
Of course, the above solution won’t work because today’s young voter, black and white, is thoroughly entrenched in the idea that the government is supposed to make life better for everyone, and guarantee a life without consequences. No matter how irresponsible someone is, young voters believe the government must clean up the mess that one has gotten themselves into. Today’s young voter can’t grasp the glaring fact that the more government is involved in their lives, the more problems they will have trying to establish a career as a free man or woman. Government never created wealth — ever.
The “have a baby, get a check” mentality is firmly entrenched among blacks. It’s now a cultural trait for them, and the hispanics are following suit.
The way to end a problem is to, well, end it. Too bad we don’t have politicians gutsy enough to do just that. Then again, it’s “for the children”, right?
Posted by Proactive at 11:53 PM on February 15
“An act of grass-roots social engineering, her effort to wed unmarried black couples who have children echoes efforts—by GOVERNMENT…to strengthen the institution of marriage.”
No, if the government was encouraging marriage it wouldn’t be paying welfare.
Also, Steve Sailer wrote an article showing how Blacks were assimilating towards White norms up until the Great Society came along. When the welfare rates were radically upped in the 1960’s they reverted back to African norms:
http://www.vdare.com/sailer/randall_kennedy.htm
Posted by Ronduck at 12:24 AM on February 16
Shouldn’t it be “Marry Your Baby’S Daddy Day?” Or what about “Marry Your BabIES Daddy Day?” Oh wait, based on most black single mother’s I’ve seen, it should be “Marry Your Babies DADDY Day?”
Posted by at 2:16 AM on February 16
This little ploy cannot work. Most of these women have no idea who donated the sperm for their offspring.
Posted by Flamethrower at 2:24 AM on February 16
My thoughts when I read this was: How do they know? Who is the daddy? Did they do a test? I also thought of that joke, the definition of mass confusion is: Fathers day in E. St. louis.
Posted by abc at 5:37 AM on February 16
Does anyone share my suspicion that the 1960’s counter culture promotion of living together and illegitimacy as positive cultural developments, combined with the disparaging of marriage and family values amongst the WHITE population was a laying of the groundwork for the acceptance of Blacks to live and breed with and amongst us? (Sorry about the long sentence). After all, if in 2008 we were still practicing and promoting the comparatively moral lifestyle of the pre-60’s period, then White folks, the media, politicians, academics social workers would surely have to condemn Black’s lack of sexual morality and perhaps even insist that we remain segregated.
I guess my question is this: Is the now total acceptance of living together, illegitimacy, “free love” etc of Whites not an immitation of Black lifestyle?
Arc.
Posted by Arcadian at 8:28 AM on February 16
“Tuxedos, dresses, florals, ghetto fab themated reception hall decorations, Tyrone and Da’ Thugalonics House Band, food catering, double stretch Humvee limo service, ya’ll know what I be sayin’!”
Flaxen Headed>>>>>,
Tyrone? How quaint. I haven’t heard that name in ages. Now it’s mostly Rontey, K Shawn, Kamal and a host of other absurdities.
Posted by at 8:53 AM on February 16
I knew AmReners would rise to the occasion about the fallacy of this concept, but I have something to add to bolster your point.
I had a black neighbor about a year ago (who moved out recently), whose daughter had twins last year. In their quest to find the father, they found out something. They were asking the wrong question all along: It’s not who is the “father,” it’s who is the “fathers.” Two words for you: heteropaternal superfecundation.
My web research indicates to me that this is a supposedly rare phenomenon in humans, but as J. Phillipe Rushton has demonstrated, black women are way more likely to ovulate two eggs in a given menstrual cycle than white women. Combine that with their world-famous promiscuity, and it makes me think that h/p s/f is more common among blacks than our “better” minds would like to admit.
Nevertheless, which man should this woman’s daughter marry?
Posted by St. Louis CofCC Blogmeister at 10:25 AM on February 16
To Mr. w.r.:
“….70 percent of children are born out of wedlock.”
The figure is actually closer to 78%. Thus your surprise that 30% ARE married has to be modified. Let’s hope we can still be astonished and joyous that 22% are hitched!
Posted by Annoyed In Illinois at 10:49 AM on February 16
……”Shouldn’t it be “Marry Your Baby’S Daddy Day?” Or what about “Marry Your BabIES Daddy Day?” Oh wait, based on most black single mother’s I’ve seen, it should be “Marry Your Babies DADDY Day?”….”
Posted by at 2:16 AM on February 16
You’re absolutely right regarding the correct mechanics in the sentence as well as being strong in your point, but you forgot one major thing; proper punctuation, ownership and tense is not proper in the ghetto. The majority of blacks have contempt of all things “white”, and that goes for proper English.
Now show more “respek” for diversity, “awight?”.
Posted by Proactive at 11:46 AM on February 16
I released an inmate the other day who is 17 years old…HE has 3 girlfriends that are PREGNANT…one is expecting TWINS!…17 with 4 babies on the way!…this is NO tall tale he was spinning as I spoke to ANOTHER inmate I was releasing who KNOWS this kid and CONFIRMED it…so WHICH woman marries her “baby’s daddy”?…by the way…he’s PROUD AS PUNCH!
Posted by Suzan Donoghue at 12:32 PM on February 16
I used to be in the “events” business (managing a catering facility) and the very rare black wedding would happen.
A couple of points: caterers hate these events, because there are always more people who show up (no one’s ever heard of RSVP), so more tables, chairs, dishware, food, table cloths, etc., had better be handy.
Most “hoity-toity” black weddings I’ve seen have a wedding coordinator—but you get what you pay for. A lot of times, it is the bride’s “aunt” or “cousin” or someone like that…I’ve seen coordinators drunk, and seating several dozen people at a 60” round table (designed to seat 10). Hilarity does ensue.
Posted by at 1:50 PM on February 16
“Flaxen Headed>>>>>,
Tyrone? How quaint. I haven’t heard that name in ages. Now it’s mostly Rontey, K Shawn, Kamal and a host of other absurdities.
Posted by at 8:53 AM on February 16”
And let’s not forget those all time favorites “Lemonjello” and Orangello.” My personal favorite is one from the book “Unintended Consequences,” by John Ross: “‘Nosmo King’ (from a sign in the waiting room).”
Posted by Tweety Snake at 2:30 PM on February 16
My web research indicates to me that this is a supposedly rare phenomenon in humans..
All fraternal twins are the product of double ovulation. But you are right, black women probably have a MUCH higher rate of ending up with two different fathers.
Posted by Sonya at 5:26 PM on February 16
Suzan Donoghue:
You said “you” released a young man of 17 (I’m presuming he’s a gentleman of the colorly persuasion) from prison. Can I take this is a clue to your profession? Also, would you care to share what state you live in? Missouri does consider 17-year olds legal adults for the sake of criminal responsibility, and 17 is the minimum age for entry into the state’s adult prisons.
Posted by St. Louis CofCC Blogmeister at 9:20 PM on February 16
“All fraternal twins are the product of double ovulation.”
The point here is that the two eggs are fertilized by two different males. That’s the norm for cats: five kittens in one litter can have five different fathers. In order for a human to accomplish that, she’s either gang-raped or pulling a train at just the right time.
Or, just very very popular.
Posted by ObscureInformation at 10:34 PM on February 16
The very term “Baby Daddy,” as opposed to “father,” is an embarrassment at best and a calamity at worst — and it speaks to the heart of what is worst about black culture in the USA.
Posted by kgb at 11:55 PM on February 16
>>
I think you meant to say: “Marry Your BabIES’ DaddIES Day”.
Outside of the Middle East and, if the Archbishop of Canterbury has his way, some British cities, this wouldn’t be legal.
Posted by Mencken the Baltimore Sage at 2:36 AM on February 17
Agood example of our government at work, these people are rewarded by gov. for having illegitimate children.
Posted by tall one at 5:17 AM on February 17
Over and over I see black females who claim they are 150% (whatever that means) certain Tyreese is their baby daddy, when it turns up he isn’t then they are 190% certain it’s Darvonne who is their baby daddy. when it turns up he isn’t they run off the T.V. talk show stage to lay on the floor and weep ans Tryrone jumps and jiggles and dances and rhymes his glee in being found innocent of the impregnation. Then the female admits she got a little drunk at a party and when she woke up naked on the bed there were MENS ALL OVA ME, DOIN THE NASTY TO MY UNCONCIOUS BODY. Winning the lottery would be easier than finding Sharika’s baby daddy.
Posted by popeye at 8:51 AM on February 17
A couple of anecdotes re baby-mamas, baby-daddies, and baby-naming:
* I once met a Jewish osbstetrician from PA who had the misfortune of working in Da Get-Toe of (I believe) Pittsburgh. He had recently delivered twins to some dizzy teenage Welfare Recipient Of Color. The doctor had tried to talk the silly girl out of naming her newborn pair “Onesie” and “Twosie.”
* Ever noticed there are black people whose given-name is “Cinque” (pr. “Sin-kay”)? It is a mispronunciation of the French word for “five” — and is sometimes (not always) an indication that Cinque was the fifth child to emerge from this particular womb.
* I believe it was an old American Renaissance issue about the criminality of Haitian immigrants in Quebec, where I learned that there are now people in Canada whose LEGAL first-name is “Pas Besoin” (pr. “Pa Bes-wan”). Pas Besoin translates as “No need” or “Unnecessary” or “Of no use.” You see, after having pumped out seven or eight babies (usually by seven or eight different sperm donors), a Haitian mother tires of having to come up with new names every time — so the spud gets OFFICIALLY REGISTERED on his birth certificate with a “Christian name” meaning “Unwanted.” When it comes to encouraging a child’s self-esteem, this must be almost as helpful as naming him “Bastardo.”
(If I am correct about this anecdote deriving from AR, perhaps an editor or reader can post a link to the original article.)
Posted by The Incredible Shrinking White Man at 9:49 AM on February 17
In order for a human to accomplish that, she’s either gang-raped or pulling a train at just the right time.
There was a famous case in Germany where a woman gave birth to fraternal twins of different races: one was black and the other white. This woman was a prostitute who’d had sex with a black man and a white man in the same day.
Posted by qwerty at 11:18 AM on February 17
Tweety, I just happened to to see the name “Tyrone” in the news a couple of days ago.
“Tyrone Luther Hadnott”, actually. I guess whoever named that guy wanted to be sure the package was clearly labeled.
The link: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080214/pl_afp/japanusmilitarycrime
This Tyrone-Luther, aged 38, a staff sergeant in the Marine Corps & stationed in Okinawa, was recently accused of raping a 14 year old local girl. Good luck getting these guys to marry adult black women who already have children. They will probably be more interested in those children…
(I wonder what the hell she was doing anywhere near the guy in the first place? I wonder if she was enthralled by the massive, multi-billion dollar campaign by the entertainment industry to convince as many youthful & weak minds as possible that black men are the source of all that is hip, cool & sexy. “Gee, look at me! I have the distinguished achievement of being the first in my 8th grade class to attract the amorous attention of a real, live black man! Practiced my “Hip-hop mating-ritual dance at home, and invested lots of money in very little clothing, & it actually worked! I’m sooo happy now! Doesn’t that win me the “cool & sexy” prize for the whole Jr. High?” Too bad she had to find out the hard way that you can’t just wear one on your sleeve, then send him on his way at your convenience. )
The report I read stated that the “incident rekindled memories of the gang-rape in 1995 of a 12-year-old girl by three U.S. soldiers” … Yeah, I remember that none of those guys were white, either. And that their folks (mothers, anyway) got on the news to complain their boys were just being victimized by racists.
Yep, “Tyrone”- a blast from the past, and yet another wonderful example of the family values of black men. How many black women really even want them? Either as a husband, or to be around their kids- especially if they are not the fathers of those kids…
I’m with “Proactive” on this one- productive & responsible people have to stop footing the bill for these people’s irresponsible behavior- both for having children they don’t raise, and for carrying them along via government directed & enforced redistribution of wealth programs, right up to (& past ) the day they start literally sticking knives into the backs of those carrying them along.
It’s got to end.
Posted by W.D. at 11:22 AM on February 17
Two things are needed to increase the number of marriages and decrease bastardy. Tin snips and shot guns. Point the shot gun at the man`s head. If he reuses to marry shoot him in the rear end and use the tin snips to geld him. Worked like a charm for me and my son in law.
Charles B. Tiffany
Kissimmee, Florida
Posted by Charles B. Tiffany at 1:13 PM on February 17
“The point here is that the two eggs are fertilized by two different males. That’s the norm for cats: five kittens in one litter can have five different fathers. In order for a human to accomplish that, she’s either gang-raped or pulling a train at just the right time.
Or, just very very popular.”
Or with two guys during the same period of time, sort of like Kobe Bryant’s “rape” accuser (although I think she was with 4 within 24 hours).
Posted by at 1:52 PM on February 17
“I guess my question is this: Is the now total acceptance of living together, illegitimacy, “free love” etc of Whites not an immitation of Black lifestyle?” Arcadian
Yes, and no Arcadian. The Bolshevik’s encoraged “revolutionary marriage”, which was a simple declaration of living together. The communists looked upon the family as a bulwark against socialism. Children were to be raised collectively as good communists, not bourgeoise individualists. Stalin made divorce more difficult to stop the decline of the birthrate. He wanted more workers and soldiers. However, I would still say that the destruction of the bourgeoisie family is an unconscious goal of even contemporary diversity Marxists.
Posted by Sardonicus at 2:06 PM on February 17
no animal knows the concept of marriage or responsible pairing, why should the non whites ?
Posted by A.Wallacher at 6:51 PM on February 17
I wonder who made the donations.
I think I enjoyed more the burial of the n word. That was more interesting.
Posted by Ben D. at 11:31 PM on February 17
I released an inmate the other day who is 17 years old…HE has 3 girlfriends that are PREGNANT…one is expecting TWINS!…17 with 4 babies on the way!…this is NO tall tale he was spinning as I spoke to ANOTHER inmate I was releasing who KNOWS this kid and CONFIRMED it…so WHICH woman marries her “baby’s daddy”?…by the way…he’s PROUD AS PUNCH!
Posted by Suzan Donoghue at 12:32 PM on February 16
I have read articles about groups or clubs of young black men in Baltimore, Boston and New York that call themselves “the 20/20 club”. The requirement for joining is to have 20 children by 20 women by the age of 20.
Posted by at 6:59 AM on February 18
“The doctor had tried to talk the silly girl out of naming her newborn pair “Onesie” and “Twosie.””
If he wasn’t a MD but just a regular guy, perhaps someone who works with the public in the service industry, there’s a good chance a guy like that would be fired for offering such advice.
Posted by at 8:51 AM on February 18
If this action is going to succeed? Of course. Do you want a proof? Here it comes.
Hey, look carefully at this line ‘Marry Your Baby Daddy Day’. Have you concentrated? Now tell me, which word the the main? Which? No, my friend, you are mistaken. The main word is DAY. If you are a black Gentleman or Lady and someone pays for it, why not to have a one DAY fun! Then is going to be tomorrow, and you can marry again. Why not!?!?
Posted by alex at 9:28 AM on February 18
It’s not that it won’t work—it’s that you’re afraid it will work, and you’ll have one fewer excuse for racial discrimination.
Posted by at 9:39 AM on February 18
“(I wonder what the hell she was doing anywhere near the guy in the first place?”
I believe the 14 year old Japanese girl was walking home from school when brave American soldier Tyrone dragged her into his van.
Posted by at 2:35 PM on February 18
2:35 PM POSTER:
Does anyone have a picture of this guy? I have been following this story and assume he is black because of his name (which is actually kind of sad because Tyrone is originally an Irish name). Ever wonder why almost all of the U.S. military is in Okinawa about as far away from the home islands as the Japanese could keep them? The U.S wants to station troops now in new spots in mainland Japan and the local Japanese are fiercely resisting. They know what to expect from a certain kind of U.S. servicemen.
Posted by at 3:41 PM on February 18
Rather than award Ms. Reid cash and valuable prizes for her absence of morality, less than a century ago, Ms. Reid and her like would have been declared “Moral Imbeciles” and institutionalized under strict supervision for the protection of others.
Posted by LastWMinNYC at 4:35 PM on February 18
I think the laws should be changed in order to receive any welfare…if any woman has one child and on welfare in order to keep receiving those checks she should either be….fixed…or if she does have another child…she is immediatatly taken off welfare and have to get a job and fend for herself and her kid….bet that would also send the illegals packing and heading back over that border….
Posted by lydia at 9:03 PM on February 18
The Incredible Shrinking White Man wrote: I believe it was an old American Renaissance issue about the criminality of Haitian immigrants in Quebec, where I learned that there are now people in Canada whose LEGAL first-name is “Pas Besoin”. Pas Besoin translates as “No need” or “Unnecessary” or “Of no use.”
Interesting. Perhaps some white entrepreneurs could market T-shirts to blacks with “Pas Besoin” on the front (after all, how many blacks understand any French?). Tell them it means “cool” or “hip” or some such in Swahili. Then watch with amusement when people who do speak French point at them and laugh. Or sell them shirts reading “бесполезно” (pr. “bespolezno”) or “Inútil”, which is Russian and Spanish respectively for “useless”.
Posted by Strider at 9:08 PM on February 18
To think that getting married would make these men responsible. Ha!
Posted by at 1:33 AM on February 19
South Africa is desperately short of black engineers and professional people. Black, because the law there says that 85% of employees in a company or government department must be black to represent the racial ratios in the country. As they have chased out now nearly 1, 3 million whites, those who have the ability to earn a living and were holding the economy together:they are trying to attract them back to get the electrical power stations working again. Needless to say the whites and Asians who have made the move have good jobs in their new countries, including the USA, and have no wish to return to the “crime pit” that SA has become.
May I suggest that African Americans be advised of this fantastic opportunity to get work with little competition from other qualified people.
Posted by Brian Deller at 6:02 AM on February 19
Stalin made divorce more difficult to stop the decline of the birthrate. He wanted more workers and soldiers.
That was not the reason. Previous marriage law stated, that the couple should get registered at the “office for registering civic unions” (ZAGS). So far, so good, but if one partner got bored, he just went to the registering office, registered him/herself out of the union (regardless of parental status) and disappeared, whereas the other spouse was informed by a letter from the ZAGS office, that they are “free” again.
Due to the rather bad economical situation of USSR, it was very difficult for the lone parent to support children. Therefore they ended often on the street - sometimes even the despairing lone parents threw them out at the mercy of the state who enabled such situation. There was not enough orphanages or youth penitentiaries for the street children, so the marital law was reformed again to the more restrictive conventional form.
Posted by EW at 6:40 AM on February 19
Better yet, don’t have any parasitic, criminal and special needs offspring. Do Western society a big favor. My wallet, lack of being a inter-racial crime victim, I thank you .
Posted by Michigan patriot at 11:35 AM on February 19
Even if every charge of white racism leveled by black people was true that does not give them an excuse to abandon their children.
Posted by Dennis at 12:36 PM on February 19
“no animal knows the concept of marriage or responsible pairing, why should the non whites ?
Posted by A.Wallacher at 6:51 PM on February 17”
Actually, some species are known to mate in monogamous (or at least nearly monogamous) relationships for extended periods of time, even entire lifetimes (e.g., penguins, elephants). Which says a lot about those of the human species who are totally incapable of anything close to such commitment.
Posted by at 1:27 PM on February 19
Black males simply do not marry or settle down with the opposite sex. It’s not in their DNA.
By nature, they’re used to running around, having sex with as many of the females they can and then taking off, only to fend for themselves and leaving the female to care for the offspring on her own.
I suspect this behavior is/was promoted by living in the wilds of Africa, where that strategy and practice was necessary to try to promote the survival of their species. Most offspring would die off due to the harsh conditions, so blacks had to try to create as many offspring as possible. Unfortunately, in our modern age, they continue to follow these primitive instincts.
George Manuelian
San Jose, CA
Posted by George Manuelian at 2:37 PM on February 19
“Due to the rather bad economical situation of USSR, it was very difficult for the lone parent to support children. Therefore they ended often on the street - sometimes even the despairing lone parents threw them out at the mercy of the state who enabled such situation. There was not enough orphanages or youth penitentiaries for the street children, so the marital law was reformed again to the more restrictive conventional form.” EW
Thanks, I stand corrected on that point. A study of communism and particularly Stalinism is invaluable for understanding the present Zeitgiest in America and Europe.
Posted by Sardonicus at 7:48 AM on February 20
South Africa is desperately short of black engineers and professional people. Black, because the law there says that 85% of employees in a company or government department must be black to represent the racial ratios in the country. As they have chased out now nearly 1, 3 million whites, those who have the ability to earn a living and were holding the economy together:they are trying to attract them back to get the electrical power stations working again. Needless to say the whites and Asians who have made the move have good jobs in their new countries, including the USA, and have no wish to return to the “crime pit” that SA has become.
May I suggest that African Americans be advised of this fantastic opportunity to get work with little competition from other qualified people.
Posted by Brian Deller at 6:02 AM on February 19
Better yet, they should get the Plavix guy down there. Have you seen this ad? This magic black man directs legions of white workers as they labor under his orders to restore power to a darkened city. The ad concludes with the MBG standing over the city as the lights come on. The most over the top white hating ad I have seen yet. Where are all these ads coming from? Who are the people who are ordering these?
Posted by William Hendershot at 9:38 PM on February 20
Liberal policies have created this. Liberal policies are destroying marriage, on purpose. Liberal policies have encouraged people to have babies that are paid for by the government.
Posted by at 10:54 AM on February 23
