Home

Welcome

Subscribe

Store

Donate

Back Issues

Readers Guide

Contact Us

Send Us a
News Story

Write for AR

Interviews with
Jared Taylor

AR in the News

AR Attic

Activists

Links


Amren store on Amazon.com
Buy through this link and help AR


Atom news feed
RSS 1.0 news feed
RSS 2.0 news feed
American Renaissance

Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Post a Comment       Send This Page

Bias, Acrimony And The State Bar

AR Articles on Racial Sensitivity
The Ways of Our People (Part II) (Oct. 1996)
A Certain Trumpet (May 1997)
Search AmRen.com for Racial Sensitivity
More news stories on Racial Sensitivity
Steve Duin, The Oregonian, June 13, 2006

For Gary Georgeff of Brookings, the tipping point was the mandatory continuing legal education class in which a former Oregon Supreme Court justice used a John Grisham film clip to lecture on jury nullification. “You wouldn’t find a trial judge in Oregon who would let you make that argument,” he said.

For Diane Gruber of West Linn, the last straw was either the three hours she spent at the Mexican counsulate, “being told by nonlawyers, for the most part, how to help illegal aliens stay in Oregon,” or the presentation in which, Gruber said, lawyers were told to place “the radical homosexual agenda ahead of our legal interests.”

And for the remaining 12,442 active members of the Oregon State Bar? The subject of mandatory diversity training generated inspired name-calling—and sustained yawns—before the membership voted overwhelmingly in April to end sanctions against lawyers who’ve decided they’ve had enough lectures on white guilt and “the elimination of bias.”

{snip}

Original article

(Posted on June 14, 2006)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment     Send This Page      Search

Comments


Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Send This Page      Search

Post a Comment

Commenting guidelines: We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. Statements of fact and well-considered opinion are welcome, but we will not post comments that include obscenities or insults, whether of groups or individuals. We reserve the right to hold our critics to lower standards.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)