Home

Site information

Subscribe

Store

Donate

Back Issues

News Archives
by Date

News Archives
by Category

Contact Us

Send Us a
News Story

Write for AR

Interviews with
Jared Taylor

AR in the News

AR Attic

Activists

Links


Amren store on Amazon.com
Buy through this link and help AR


Atom news feed
RSS 1.0 news feed
RSS 2.0 news feed
American Renaissance

Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Post a Comment       Send This Page

Law School Verdict’s Still Out: Race vs. Ranking

AR Articles on Racial Preferences in Education
The Hollow Debate on Race Preferences (Jun. 2003)
The Cost of Affirmative Action (Dec. 1996)
More Blows to Affirmative Action (Jun. 1997)
Search AmRen.com for Racial Preferences
More news stories on Racial Preferences in Education
G. Jeffrey MacDonald, USA TODAY, April 26, 2006

Law schools eager to raise their national rankings are demanding higher scores on the Law School Admission Test, but they’re paying a price in terms of racial diversity as fewer and fewer black applicants make the cutoff.

That’s the controversial argument of John Nussbaumer, an associate dean at Michigan’s Thomas M. Cooley Law School and author of a widely debated paper in this month’s edition of the St. John’s University Law Review. His thesis says schools increasingly ignore their mandate not to overemphasize the LSAT. It is striking chords far beyond academic circles as the legal profession ponders how to reverse a steady, 10-year decline.

Since 1994, when first-year black enrollment peaked at 3,432, that number has dropped 13% to 2,975, according to data from the Law School Admission Council, which administers the LSAT. By contrast, Asian and Hispanic enrollments have climbed: Asians by 44% to 3,759, and Hispanics by 26% to 2,610.

Blacks are getting denied at the gate, Nussbaumer says, because schools are increasingly concerned with LSAT scores: The average law student’s score has jumped from 154.3 in 2001 to 157.3 in 2005. And because blacks as a group consistently score about 9 points below the national average, a heightened focus on that one benchmark means blacks are getting a disproportionate share of rejection letters.

“Students with low scores can succeed and can be good lawyers,” Nussbaumer says, adding that factors such as life experience and work habits don’t get tested on the LSAT. “But if you over-rely on the LSAT, some of these folks get cut out of the chance to try.”

Whether or not they accept Nussbaumer’s analysis, lawyers agree the trend is troubling both for their profession and for society: Blacks make up 13% of the U.S. population, but they’re just 6.8% of 135,000 law students.

This past weekend, members of an American Bar Association panel on diversity met with law school representatives in Dallas to draft an action plan. Among other key steps, members agreed to develop programs nationwide that get kids as early as kindergarten to think about law as the guarantor of countless personal freedoms—and an exciting career option.

The USA “is becoming more diverse, but the profession that broke down barriers (through landmark cases) is the least diverse” among major fields, says Leonard Baynes, a St. John’s University law professor and editor of the Law Review. When blacks are largely absent from the ranks of legal counsel and judicial authority, he says, “it looks like a very unfair system.”

{snip}

Original article

(Posted on April 27, 2006)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment     Send This Page      Search

Comments


Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Send This Page      Search

Post a Comment

Commenting guidelines: We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. Statements of fact and well-considered opinion are welcome, but we will not post comments that include obscenities or insults, whether of groups or individuals. We reserve the right to hold our critics to lower standards.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)