Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Post a Comment       Send This Page       Date Archives       Category Archives

House Approves Border Fence

More news stories on Immigration Law

Stephen Dinan and Jerry Seper, Washington Times, Dec. 16, 2005

The House voted last night to build nearly 700 miles of fence along the U.S.-Mexico border as it began the first major floor debate in years on enforcing immigration laws.

The vote, 260-159, came on an amendment to a border-security and employer-verification bill that is scheduled for a final vote today.

Republican leaders appeared to have cleared a remaining hurdle last night by promising to remove language that said there should be a legal means for foreign workers to come and go.

Some Republicans had argued that the provision, which was nonbinding, was a place-holder to attach a guest-worker plan in the future and thus was a deal-killer.

On the fence construction vote, 49 Democrats joined 211 Republicans in supporting it while 12 Republicans joined the Democrats and one independent in voting against it.

{snip}

Polls show a fence has overwhelming support among voters.

{snip}

Lawmakers and advocacy groups on both sides of the issue agreed that the bill never will become law as is, and even Republican leaders said it must include a guest-worker plan by the time it gets to President Bush.

“As we move this legislation to the president’s desk, it should include comprehensive reform,” Rep. David Dreier, California Republican and chairman of the Rules Committee, said on the floor.

The Senate is expected to begin debate early next year on enforcement of immigration laws, a guest-worker program and a path to citizenship for illegal aliens.

{snip}

Original article

(Posted on December 16, 2005)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment     Send This Page      Search

Comments


Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Send This Page      Search

Post a Comment

Commenting guidelines: We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. Statements of fact and well-considered opinion are welcome, but we will not post comments that include obscenities or insults, whether of groups or individuals. We reserve the right to hold our critics to lower standards.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)