Home

Welcome

Subscribe

Store

Donate

Back Issues

Readers Guide

Contact Us

Send Us a
News Story

Write for AR

Interviews with
Jared Taylor

AR in the News

AR Attic

Activists

Links


Amren store on Amazon.com
Buy through this link and help AR


Atom news feed
RSS 1.0 news feed
RSS 2.0 news feed
American Renaissance

Previous Story       Next Story       View Comments       Post a Comment       Send This Page

Court Orders Anti-Affirmative Action Proposal on Ballot

AR Articles on Anti-Discrimination Law
The Law is an Ass (Sep. 1999)
The Nightmare World of Anti-Discrimination Law (May 1992)
Obstreperous Whites (May 1993)
Who Wants to be a Black Millionaire? (Feb. 2001)
Search AmRen.com for Anti-discrimination Law
More news stories on Anti-Discrimination Law
Tim Martin, AP, Dec. 20, 2005

LANSING (AP)—The Michigan Court of Appeals on Tuesday ordered the secretary of state to place a proposal that would ban some affirmative action programs on the November 2006 ballot.

The appeals court issued the order because it said the Board of State Canvassers failed to follow a previous court mandate. The four-member elections panel deadlocked on a motion to comply with the court order last week.

Tuesday’s ruling is a victory for the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative, which backs the proposal to ban race and gender preferences in university admissions and government hiring. Opponents of the measure have said they would appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court if the proposal is ordered on the ballot.

In a strongly worded order, the appeals court said it may address possible contempt charges against the two canvassers who failed to follow its previous order.

{Snip}

Original article

(Posted on December 21, 2005)

     Previous story       Next Story       Post a Comment     Send This Page      Search

Comments


Home      Top      Previous story       Next Story      Send This Page      Search

Post a Comment

Commenting guidelines: We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. Statements of fact and well-considered opinion are welcome, but we will not post comments that include obscenities or insults, whether of groups or individuals. We reserve the right to hold our critics to lower standards.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)